|
|||||||
BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? |
Share Thread
|
Subject: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: Amergin Date: 30 Jun 10 - 03:39 PM There is a problem in Massachusetts that has been going on for far too long...even longer than the BP oil spill. And yet there is no word from our esteemed president on any ideas or action to resolve this concern. I am getting tired of his passionless demeanour, and incessant goal to do as little as possible during his term. This issue is the last straw. For more information click here. |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: MarkS Date: 30 Jun 10 - 03:44 PM Those British. Sheesh "You can tell a Frenchman "You can tell the Dutch "You can tell an Englishman "But you can't tell him much.> |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: maple_leaf_boy Date: 30 Jun 10 - 05:23 PM I couldn't believe it at first. |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: Bill D Date: 30 Jun 10 - 06:15 PM "That's them, all right—the old 32nd," Carp said. "They fought valiantly at Breed's Hill, ..." The question looms...who has been breeding for 240 years? Are these boys importing Canadian women to support their misguided campaign? |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: GUEST,Wesley S Date: 30 Jun 10 - 06:19 PM No - sheep..... |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: gnu Date: 30 Jun 10 - 06:25 PM Baaaaaad! |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: GUEST,Wesley S Date: 30 Jun 10 - 06:31 PM But it keeps them in pretty red coats. |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: Richard Bridge Date: 30 Jun 10 - 11:19 PM Perhaps if legitimate British rule of the colony were restored some recent international problems might be eased. Not to mention spelling. |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: JohnInKansas Date: 01 Jul 10 - 05:54 PM My impression from posts here is that there is no "legitimate" British rule to be restored. The recent several "British regimes" appear to provoke much dissatisfaction to the people in their own homeland. We'd be unlikely to welcome them here to replace our own honest politicians. John |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: Don Firth Date: 01 Jul 10 - 07:04 PM I'm for disbanding the U. S. government and outsourcing the job to Denmark. The Danes are the most happy and contented people on earth. Research it. Don Firth |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: Richard Bridge Date: 02 Jul 10 - 03:23 AM Hmm, honest politicians, on a scale of 1 to 10, that could be a close run contest. |
Subject: RE: BS: Yet Another Failing of Obama's? From: JohnInKansas Date: 07 Jul 10 - 05:18 AM In a late breaking development, reports have filtered out throughout the former colonies that a person holding a very high place in British government is currently being detained in the US. Published reports indicate the place of detention as being currently in New York City, but only vague rumors indicate whether or not she may be kept there or may be transported to other places within the country. Very large mobs are reported, but little is known of their attitude or current disposition. Accusations are discounted that a "very large ship" previously taken, known locally as "QEII" according to some, is in fact a British warship. Its original intended function appears to have been only espionage via pirating funds of individuals in the US; and it appears to have been unarmed (or very lightly armed) in order to simply infiltrate and spy - or to further other unknown British intentions. Those of the British who continue to foster disreputable intentions with regard to the US should take immediate notice that WE HAVE YOUR QUEEN. As a civilized nation, we sincerely hope that torture will not be necessary in order to learn her purpose in this invasion of our land. Should more extreme methods be needed, we do understand the established "priviledge of rank" whereby persons of certain status within the British heirarchy from time to time in the past have been permitted to name a proxy to bear the torture in their stead, and - should interrogations proceed in that direction - British citizens are welcome to recommend memebers of the current government to serve in that stead as the appropriate proxys, conditional of course on prompt delivery into the hands of US representatives of any such proxy persons. John |