Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]


BS: Roe v. Wade

Donuel 25 Sep 22 - 04:14 PM
MaJoC the Filk 26 Sep 22 - 04:28 AM
Steve Shaw 26 Sep 22 - 06:23 AM
MaJoC the Filk 26 Sep 22 - 10:51 AM
Stilly River Sage 26 Sep 22 - 11:11 AM
Steve Shaw 26 Sep 22 - 11:41 AM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: RE: BS: Roe v. Wade
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Sep 22 - 04:14 PM

If one lived here they would know the outrage.

If one claims that clear concise English makes no sense to them, there are 2 possible explanations, prejudice or dementia.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Roe v. Wade
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 26 Sep 22 - 04:28 AM

Nine seems about right (but pushing the limit) for a committee to have a range of opinions but to be of approximately one mind; any more, and you start getting factions, even in the absence of political leanings. I can back that up with arguments based on Parkinson's research and Dunbar's Numbers if you like, but Herself's waxing sarcastic about helping with the house cleaning.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Roe v. Wade
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 26 Sep 22 - 06:23 AM

"You can't understand American politics or other goings-on unless you live here."

What tommy-rot. We get all the same news as you do. I even read the NYT!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Roe v. Wade
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 26 Sep 22 - 10:51 AM

I can't understand English politics, and I *do* live [t]here.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Roe v. Wade
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 26 Sep 22 - 11:11 AM

Shifting the argument about US news to a new thread? Time to drop it.

There's an interesting interview in the New York Times yesterday with Elizabeth Banks, who made the film Call Jane before Roe was overturned. That event thrusts this film into the spotlight (it's due to be released in late October).

“Call Jane” was obviously finished before the Dobbs decision came down. What does the new context around abortion mean for how the film might now be received? I have no idea how people are going to receive the movie. I will say that the Dobbs decision has solidified our commitment to getting audiences to see the movie in the right light, which is to say that there’s maybe a bigger responsibility on the movie that I didn’t feel when we were making it. I don’t want to give it too much import, but we have a midterm election happening right after the movie comes out and, well, my hope is that it invites Republican women voters to go vote. The Democratic women I know, we’ve done all we can do. I want the movie to inspire people to vote out Republicans who don’t support reproductive justice.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Roe v. Wade
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 26 Sep 22 - 11:41 AM

'Twas your friend who did it Maggie. Have a word...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 2 May 3:24 AM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.