Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Crazy Eddie Date: 25 Apr 01 - 04:31 AM Bernard, please!Without the tent, the rain dilutes the beer. Not a happy outcome! |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Bernard Date: 24 Apr 01 - 03:38 PM Or the Refreshments Marquee? Give me a good beer tent any day!! Then again, who needs the tent... |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Date: 24 Apr 01 - 03:23 PM to boldly go where no man has gone before - the ladies' toilet? Btw, I hate marquee. Was that named after the Marquee de Sade? MudGuard |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Patrish(inactive) Date: 24 Apr 01 - 08:32 AM |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Patrish(inactive) Date: 24 Apr 01 - 08:29 AM |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Crazy Eddie Date: 24 Apr 01 - 08:17 AM Hmmm.... Enterprise Klingon Hows that? |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Crazy Eddie Date: 24 Apr 01 - 08:11 AM RichM, Good one. :o) Though I think to boldly go where no man has gone before, had been updated to to boldly go where no-one has gone before, by the time Pickard arrived on the scene. And just to try something else |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: RichM Date: 23 Apr 01 - 11:56 AM Crazy Eddie, Picard should have said Tobaldly go, where no man has gone before |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Bernard Date: 23 Apr 01 - 09:22 AM Just having a laff! They look daft enough in Netscape, so I didn't bother with the blink... They can be quite mesmerising... the different text sizes make them move 'randomly'! I used <table width="75%"> so that it adjusts to your screen width for maximum annoyance!! |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Date: 23 Apr 01 - 06:34 AM the marquee is not HTML, it is Microsoft's invention and will work only in Microsoft browsers. Similarly, blink is a netscape invention and only works in Netscape browsers. both pseudo-tags should not be used on web-pages, not only because they are not HTML, but also because they are annoying! MudGuard |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Bernard Date: 22 Apr 01 - 01:37 PM
|
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Crazy Eddie Date: 22 Apr 01 - 08:21 AM To boldly go, where no man has gone before. |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Crazy Eddie Date: 22 Apr 01 - 08:18 AM Just practicing. To boldly go, where no man has gone before |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Tiger Date: 21 Apr 01 - 01:53 PM :s1 |s1 :m :m |m :r :r |r :-.d :d |d :- |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Date: 21 Apr 01 - 01:36 PM Within pre, tt is usually not necessary as most browsers use a nonproportional font anyway. But it does not hurt to use tt as well. MudGuard |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Tiger Date: 21 Apr 01 - 01:22 PM Testing, testing, testing |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Tiger Date: 21 Apr 01 - 01:19 PM Testing, testing, testing 1 2 3 Testing, testing, testing 1 2 3 |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Jim Dixon Date: 18 Apr 01 - 11:20 PM Here is some text above the table.
Here is some text below the table.
Text line chorus linetext line |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: mousethief Date: 17 Apr 01 - 12:11 PM blicky
|
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: catspaw49 Date: 14 Apr 01 - 12:35 AM Really LR???
Old Mother Hubbard Spaw |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Mark Clark Date: 14 Apr 01 - 12:34 AM Goeff, If you were building your own Web page, the <pre> tag would indeed cause everything to display just as it looked when you entered it. For Mudcat posts, however, any hard return all by itself—separate lines with no intervening blank line—is stripped out causing the lines to flow together when viewed. If there are two or more hard returns in a row—one or more blank lines—they are replaced with a <p> tag. You can observe me discovering this fact just eight posts above this one. - Mark |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Louie Roy Date: 14 Apr 01 - 12:18 AM Old mother Hubbard went to the cubbard To get her poor daughter a dress But when she got there the cubbard was bare And so was her daughter I guess |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Louie Roy Date: 14 Apr 01 - 12:11 AM Joe Offer This is where I get my feet wet I hope that I read your instructions right If this turns out the way it is suppose to I will be sharing a lot of info with others If not I am just practicing the way I anyway Anyway let me know allthe mistakes I've Made |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Geoff the Duck Date: 13 Apr 01 - 08:40 PM If you are still reading this stuff I was led to believe that by using the "pre" tag in "<" brackets would leave text formatted elsewhere with paragraph breaks intact when it appeared on screen. Am I mistaken or is it just something which does not work with Mudcat? Line Breaks <br> added. Mudcat is set to ignore carriage returns in all cases except double-spacing (two carriage returns in a row). The <pre> affects most things, but not line breaks. It's set to ignore carriage returns because there are some problems associated connected with accepting them. I saw the bad advice you must have read, but didn't have time to post an explanation. |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Date: 13 Apr 01 - 12:45 PM problem with pre tag is that the linebreaks do not even reach the server - they are taken out before the browser sends the content of the window to the server as the textarea has the wrap attribute set to "soft" MudGuard |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Geoff the Duck Date: 13 Apr 01 - 06:44 AM Hello there. I am just testing something out for my own information - Checking out a formatting command. Please do not take much notice of this bunch of drivel. |
Subject: Try Again From: Mark Clark Date: 27 Mar 01 - 10:55 PM C Ab |
Subject: Guitar Tab? From: Mark Clark Date: 27 Mar 01 - 10:49 PM C Ab E
C A |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: campfire Date: 27 Sep 00 - 11:42 PM Try again... Angel from Montgomery |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: campfire Date: 27 Sep 00 - 11:41 PM Try again... Angel from Montgomery |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: campfire Date: 27 Sep 00 - 11:38 PM Try this campfire |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Jon Freeman Date: 15 Sep 00 - 07:21 AM Test |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,Crazy Eddie Date: 03 Sep 00 - 09:47 AM Roses are red, Blickies are blue Can I make a line-break Or 'cos I can't make a rhyme? |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Terry K Date: 03 Sep 00 - 12:34 AM Map of LLanstock |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Terry K Date: 03 Sep 00 - 12:29 AM Here goes nothing - Map of LLanstock |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Joe Offer Date: 31 Aug 00 - 09:26 PM |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: wildlone Date: 31 Aug 00 - 02:56 PM That seemed to work okay lets try a link to the re-enactment group I belong to. Due to the way that the site is made it can take a long time to load. The Royal Welch. |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: wildlone Date: 31 Aug 00 - 02:48 PM as Joe pointed out I should have used a link to a page I found yesterday so I will try and see if this works click . |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Quincy Date: 29 Aug 00 - 08:50 AM Yeeeessssssss!!!! First attempt at a blue clicky thing and it worked!!!!!!!!! |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Quincy Date: 29 Aug 00 - 08:39 AM Click here |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Pene Azul Date: 27 Aug 00 - 12:22 PM Embedding Sound in Web Pages from WebReference.com, a very useful site. Jeff |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Roger in Sheffield Date: 27 Aug 00 - 10:43 AM Thanks Pene it looks complicated but I will look through it A couple more things though if anyone can help How do I put sound into webpages? and do pages load top down? If so can I put a sound file at the bottom of the page so that the text can be read while the sound loads? Roger |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Pene Azul Date: 27 Aug 00 - 08:28 AM Standards, etc. from W3C: HyperText Markup Language Home Page |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,roger in Opera Date: 27 Aug 00 - 08:22 AM Thanks John Those marquees don't show here either Roger |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Jon Freeman Date: 27 Aug 00 - 08:14 AM Roger, I only dabble with HTML. I haven't got time to search right now but there is an HTML standard (in fact more than one as HTML has been "upgraded"). All browsers designed to adhere to that version of the standard should behave in a consistent and defined manner but anything outside such as Netscapes blink, IE's marquee may or may not work in another browser. The same applies to errors in HTML. It is down to the browser to decide how to handle them. With regard to the versions, as an example, older browsers do not support frames and these issues need to be considered when designing a web site. Personally, I would err towards compatibility and I think that is what Max does with Mudcat - IMO it is better to have something relatively simple that is accessible to everybody than to use all the latest all singing and dancing features and find that you are excluding a large number of people who would like to access your site. One final comment, if you ever do attempt to design a web site, test it on whatever browser you have available before putting it on the web. It is easy to make a mistake that will not show up on one browser but will cause problems or not work with another. Jon |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,Roger in Netscape Date: 27 Aug 00 - 07:48 AM Thanks John this HTML stuff gets more and more confusing So how about Opera? does that have its own querks too? roger |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Jon Freeman Date: 27 Aug 00 - 06:44 AM Yes and no Roger, you can put a link in a Marquee but clicking anywhere on the line will activate the link - you don't have to hit the words. The other thing to note about marquees in apart from being irritating, they are an Internet Explorer extension to HTML. They won't work with other browers like Netscape. Netscape have blink instead. Jon |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Roger in Sheffield Date: 27 Aug 00 - 06:13 AM ...one more thing can you put in moving links? like a shooting range? |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Roger in Sheffield Date: 27 Aug 00 - 06:05 AM Don't they work in Netscape? I was just looking at this thread in Netscape and non of that moving multicoloured stuff was happening - WHY??? |
Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: CarolC Date: 27 Aug 00 - 05:37 AM |
Share Thread: |