Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2]


BS: War crimes - continuing discussion

CarolC 26 Apr 02 - 12:05 AM
Little Hawk 26 Apr 02 - 12:55 AM
CarolC 26 Apr 02 - 01:37 AM
CarolC 26 Apr 02 - 06:43 AM
sledge 26 Apr 02 - 07:10 AM
Troll 26 Apr 02 - 08:09 AM
CarolC 26 Apr 02 - 08:13 AM
Troll 26 Apr 02 - 08:38 AM
CarolC 26 Apr 02 - 08:43 AM
Troll 26 Apr 02 - 08:56 AM
catspaw49 26 Apr 02 - 08:58 AM
CarolC 26 Apr 02 - 09:11 AM
McGrath of Harlow 26 Apr 02 - 10:16 AM
CarolC 26 Apr 02 - 10:22 AM
GUEST 26 Apr 02 - 10:26 AM
GUEST,paolaitaly 26 Apr 02 - 10:48 AM
Wolfgang 26 Apr 02 - 11:10 AM
GUEST,mg 26 Apr 02 - 11:13 AM
Troll 26 Apr 02 - 11:22 AM
sledge 26 Apr 02 - 12:10 PM
DougR 26 Apr 02 - 12:43 PM
GUEST,paolaitaly 26 Apr 02 - 01:19 PM
DougR 26 Apr 02 - 02:02 PM
McGrath of Harlow 26 Apr 02 - 02:37 PM
GUEST,Feder 26 Apr 02 - 02:52 PM
Troll 26 Apr 02 - 03:16 PM
GUEST 26 Apr 02 - 04:06 PM
McGrath of Harlow 26 Apr 02 - 05:41 PM
CarolC 26 Apr 02 - 05:48 PM
CarolC 26 Apr 02 - 05:55 PM
GUEST 27 Apr 02 - 09:08 AM
McGrath of Harlow 27 Apr 02 - 01:25 PM
CarolC 27 Apr 02 - 05:07 PM
CarolC 27 Apr 02 - 05:11 PM
DougR 27 Apr 02 - 05:26 PM
GUEST,mg 27 Apr 02 - 05:52 PM
Little Hawk 27 Apr 02 - 06:43 PM
DougR 27 Apr 02 - 08:27 PM
CarolC 27 Apr 02 - 09:23 PM
CarolC 27 Apr 02 - 09:26 PM
CarolC 27 Apr 02 - 09:45 PM
Little Hawk 27 Apr 02 - 09:52 PM
artbrooks 27 Apr 02 - 11:13 PM
CarolC 28 Apr 02 - 12:43 AM
Troll 28 Apr 02 - 03:47 AM
CarolC 28 Apr 02 - 04:17 AM
McGrath of Harlow 28 Apr 02 - 08:38 AM
DougR 28 Apr 02 - 02:46 PM
Little Hawk 28 Apr 02 - 02:53 PM
McGrath of Harlow 28 Apr 02 - 03:28 PM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 12:05 AM

At the request of mg who can't load the old thread which can be found here...

Israeli soldiers charged with war crime.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Little Hawk
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 12:55 AM

Sorry. Should've posted my long message to troll on this one, I guess...

- LH


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 01:37 AM

Here you go, LH...

Subject: RE: BS: Israeli soldiers charged with war crime
From: Little Hawk
Date: 26-Apr-02 - 12:52 AM

troll - I understand what you are saying, for sure, although I would partially disagree with much of it. You are viewing it all through a certain prism, and probably have not read some of the articles I have, representing the more progressive forces in the Muslim community (I'm assuming that you haven't read them...I may be wrong).

Yes, the Arab oil states are extremely wealthy...for the few at the top. One of the reasons why the wealth is not shared with the general populace is this: the USA and Britain have traditionally supported autocratic rule by compliant dictators in many Muslim countries (and elsewhere in the 3rd World too), supplying them with weaponry in return for oil and military bases.

Some examples: Saudia Arabia, Egypt (not for oil, but for other strategic reasons), Kuwait, Pakistan, Indonesia, and until fairly recently, Iraq. Iran when the Shah was in power. There have been some genuine initiatives toward democracy in some of those places from time to time...crushed by people on an unofficial USA payroll.

Britain did the same thing when they were ruling the roost in the Middle East. They talked democracy, supported autocracy and feudalism.

Neither the USA nor the dictators they support have any intention of allowing democracy to develop in those countries. Democratic regimes are way too hard to control. (When they do arise of their own accord, as happened in Chile and Nicaragua and began to happen once in Iran, they are ruthlessly destroyed by whatever means possible...a war, a coup, an assassination, an economic blow, whatever it takes.)

The Saudi government spends millions on religious facilities...yes...to distract its people and keep them in line while a few rich people live like emperors...in collusion with their rich western friends who own the multinationals. They get together in places like Monaco and Paris and gamble or play polo. A lovely time is had by all. The building of more religious facilities is a cynical exercise, meant to shore up popular support, and it works...for a while.

It is precisely because collusion between the West and the local sheiks and bully boys have rendered the development of local democracy impossible that fanatical Islamic revolutions have occurred, like that in Iran. The common people see it as the only avenue left to them to institute change and achieve real national sovereignty. This further imperils the chances of liberalizing and modernizing those societies, and is a great tragedy for the Islamic moderates who dream of achieving a peaceful, progressive, modern society. There are many such moderates, but you don't hear much about them on the news, because they aren't killing people.

Is there any reason why the USA should not support Israel? Well, sure there is...a host of reasons. The USA should not support either aggressor in this useless conflict, they should show no favoritism at all, but bring all possible influence to end the fighting by negotiation and equivalent concessions from both sides, and by not arming or funding the combatants on either side. This, of course, would be VERY bad for business, so it absolutely ain't gonna happen! It would likely also help lead to the collapse of several compliant Arab regimes in fairly short order...it's US supplied armaments that keep them in power.

Yes, the Arabs have been beaten badly again and again...but they might well have won in 1973, had not the USA massively resupplied Israel with new tanks in a matter of a few days. This is not lost on the Arabs. They had to go it alone. Israel did not.

Israel has precisely the advantage in battle that a thoroughly modernized military has over a half-modernized one every time. I've played very accurate simulations of many Middle Eastern battles with tanks, etc....the Arab armies are so technologically outclassed by both the USA and Israel that all they can do, generally speaking, is show that they know how to die bravely. This is what has happened again and again when colonial European forces, a generation or 2 ahead of their opponents in the techniques of war, slaughtered Africans, Asians, or Arabs with more advanced weaponry. It's not really something to be particularly proud of...it's rather like shooting fish in a barrel. This is why you see suicide bombers these days. They feel it is the only way they can strike back effectively and do real damage. For them to fight openly with tanks, etc. is basically suicidal in any case, just as it was for the Japanese after 1943, which is why they too adopted planned suicide tactics on a large scale.

The Arabs are not going to stop fighting unless they are all killed, and that is not going to happen...or until there is real substantial negotiation and positive change in the status quo...give and take on both sides. Israel is not particularly interested in that, because they figure they have the power to get what they want by force. They may change their minds if the suicide bombings continue indefinitely.

I agree that Israel wants and needs defensible borders, and I understand that concern, particularly as regards the Golan heights. I think that those areas should be demilitarised and strongly occupied for at least a generation (or longer than that, if necessary) by not Israel but a multinational peacekeeping force of well-armed soldiers from neutral countries...but Israel would not hear of it...(nor, perhaps would the Arabs) and the world community is too probably too fractured to agree on how to do it anyway. Too bad. The fighting will go on until something like that is done or until there's a nuclear conflict and everybody in the region gets fried.

If Israel was not expansionist, they would not be putting Israeli settlements into various of the occupied areas. Sounds like "lebensraum" to me....remember that? It's on a much smaller scale of course...but the intention is rather similar, I think. "We took this land, so let's use it. Well, now that we live here, we aren't leaving. Too bad for you!" That's expansionist. The same thing happened in America with the Indian lands. They were also outgunned.

Lastly, Osama Bin Laden was a rich kid...yes. So? So was Fidel Castro. Most of Castro's rich family repudiated him and fled to Florida when he threw out the Mafia and the multinationals and divided the land up among the farmers who had worked it for generations, on a starvation wage. Why did he do that when he was already a rich kid with a guaranteed easy life at the top of the heap?

Well, it happens. Rich people are not necessarily immune to acquiring social ideals, and some of them become fervent revolutionaries despite putting themselves in personal danger and risking losing everything. Washington and Jefferson did. It often happens. What is so surprising that it happened in Bin Laden's case? His religious viewpoint is his form of social conscience. You don't agree with it. I doubt that I do either. But for him, it is a high ideal that is synonymous with having a social conscience. He was an exception to the rule among his peer group. Most of his foot soldiers come from the poor, and I trust that most of his rich relatives have disinherited him. He is a noble who decided to opt out of the club...and that is unforgivable when you're in that club, I believe, but it still happens. Revolutions are often led by the sons of the rich, because rich people have the time and the educational opportunities to read in depth, to think, to philosophize, and to develop theoretical passions and ideals of every kind...if they are so inclined. A few of them always are. Buddha was the son of a king. He chose complete renunciation of all that luxury and privilege, and launched a philosophical revolution that changed the world.

But the real key to all of this is that the West (and Russia as well) have pursued foreign policies which pretty well guaranteed that democracy would have no chance of developing in the oil-producing countries, but that they would remain obedient clients of Big Business, ruled by autocrats, and keep their poor people superstitious, helpless, poor and oppressed.

It is precisely that which has led to the rise of ever more fanatical and dangerous muslim religious extremists. The West sometimes has used those extremists to fight its dirty wars in places like Afghanistan in the 80's...but later discovered that the scorpion they created will not stay quietly in its box.

It's a long, twisted, and sad story. Power has been served. Money has been served. Privilege has been served. Business has been served. Democracy has never been served. There are no good guys among the major players in this Middle Eastern fiasco. Not one. They all have the blood and misery of millions on their hands.

- LH


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 06:43 AM

Little has been said about the three palestinians who were accused of being Informers for the Israeli forces, two days a go they were dragged into the street and murdered by their own people, the bodies then hung from pylons for all to see, and for those of you who didn't had access to uncensored tv /press pictures, it was very ugly, Will those killers be bought to justice.

I think this one is worth answering here. troll asked a similar question on another thread.

I think the Israeli government would probably treat people who are informers for any entity with whom they are at war pretty harshly also. I'd bet they would first torture them, and then the informers would probably be either imprisoned or executed.

I think a lot of people are operating with an incredible double standard here. Things they wouldn't give a second thought to if the side they favor does it ("because my guys have good reasons") and they condemn the very same things when practiced by the side they don't favor.

You might want to think that there is something barbaric about doing it in the streets or something. Remember that the Israeli military destroyed all of the Palestinian infrastructure for handling things like that in a civilized way.

And furthermore, I think torture is pretty barbaric, not to mention illegal. But my understanding is that the Israeli government practices it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: sledge
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 07:10 AM

Carol, compared to your previous posts there is a lot of "I think" but very little reference. Thats not enough for me. We could all do that and some have but it means little in the real world.

As for lack of infrstructure, the palestinians courts, the other day sent four of their own to prison for up to 13 years with hard labour for their part in the murder of the Israeli tourism minister, so the ability is still there. The Israelis thought the sentences light and want them handed over for trial in their courts, I can't see that happening as these men have now been dealt with. It show a certain reasonableness on the part of the Palestinians that they went through with it and produced a guilty verdict.

Sledge


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Troll
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 08:09 AM

LH, you said:Yes, the Arabs have been beaten badly again and again...but they might well have won in 1973, had not the USA massively resupplied Israel with new tanks in a matter of a few days. This is not lost on the Arabs. They had to go it alone. Israel did not." You help your allies. Thats what the word means.
I don't know of any country who has ever given back land which they had conquered in war without a quid pro quo. Why shouldn't Israel build settlements on its own land? They didn't start the war that gave them the land, so why should they give it back?
When the British Mandate of Palestine was divided in 1948, creating the independent State of Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, it was intended that Jordan be the palestinian homeland. If I am wrong on this I am sure that someone will correct me.
Part of the division was -including Jerusalem- was to remain in British hands but when the fighting ended, Jordan held Jerusalem along with Samaria and Judea. They owned the land by right of conquest and held it until the 1967 war.
Why should Israel not do the same?
Otherwise, a well thought-out post. Wrong, pig-headed, knee-jerk, and starry-eyed perhaps, but well thought-out.
Why can't you see it MY way?

troll***BG***


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 08:13 AM

I'll see what documentation I can find.

The court that you refer to happened in the office where Arafat is under seige. They had to slap the court together with the people they had on hand, and it was far from adequate. However, I heard some of the peope who used to have positions high up in the former government in the Palestinian authority saying that there is nothing they can do. They have no means to carry out their jobs, and they said they were afraid that the streets would revert to mob rule, as any place with a lot of people crowded together with no civil systems in place would do. They don't like it either, but that's what happens when all systems upon which civil society depends are destroyed.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Troll
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 08:38 AM

I think Israel may be out of luck on this one. The PA , or what's left of it, appear to have abided by the interim agreement. The following is off the AP Wire.
"As a condition to lifting the siege, Israel is demanding that Arafat turn over the assassins of Israeli Cabinet Minister Rehavam Zeevi, gunned down in Jerusalem on Oct. 17.

Instead, the four suspects were put on trial in Arafat's office, with police serving as lawyers and judges. After a one-day makeshift session, they were sentenced to terms ranging from one to 18 years, Palestinian officials said.

Israel rejected the procedure. Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer called it "the best show in town," and Sharon said, '"They will anyway be brought to trial in Israel."

According to interim peace accords, Palestinians must extradite suspects to Israel unless they are put on trial by the Palestinian Authority. The Palestinians have never turned over a suspected militant to Israel."
WE'll see what happens next.

troll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 08:43 AM

Has Israel ever turned over any of their people who have assasinated Palestinian officials to the Palestinians for prosecution?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Troll
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 08:56 AM

I don't believe so. Is that a part of the interim peace agreement?

troll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: catspaw49
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 08:58 AM

While much of this thread has made for excellent reading, it is difficult for anyone of you....and indeed anyone at all....to voice an opinion, no matter how well documented, without being labeled in some way. It is the basic problem in all Middle-East affairs. Middle ground doesn't seem to exist even when thoughtfully and logically laid out. Perhaps it can't. We are currently at the lowest point that I can remember.   No one can promote one position or another on either "side" of this without stumbling across the well known atrocities of the past.....from both sides, across the spectrum. There are Arab/Israeli communities living in peace in Israel and in them and the people who make them up are the only solutions.

If I were Hawk, I would not post another word because his last paragraph is a gem. A complete explanation in a nutshell. Until all are willing to draw a different "line in the sand" and one that relegates history and blame to a back seat position, I doubt that anything will be achieved. And that line will be virtually impossible to draw for the reason that Hawk's post so beautifully sums up:

It's a long, twisted, and sad story. Power has been served. Money has been served. Privilege has been served. Business has been served. Democracy has never been served. There are no good guys among the major players in this Middle Eastern fiasco. Not one. They all have the blood and misery of millions on their hands.

.........and not a one will admit it.

Spaw




Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 09:11 AM

I don't know troll. But why should only one side be expected to turn over their assasins?

I think I'll answer this one on this thread instead of the other one...

The well-meaning people who give my wife tracts are stunned too. They just can't conceive that anyone could not believe as they do. Especially when they have shown them proof. My wife is not wicked because she doesn't believe as they do and you are not foolish because you don't agree with me. There are several sides to almost every question and one mans Mesiah may be another mans Prophet.

I think you misapprehend the emotions that motivated both my statement that I didn't think you had read the links as well as the statement that I found it stunning that you could have read the links and still hold the views that you do. It has nothing to do with whether or not we agree with each other. It's more that I have been so deeply and profoundly effected, emotionally, by the things I have read in those links, I just wasn't prepared for the possibility that someone else might not be similarly effected. It just took me by surprise, is all.

I don't expect you to believe as I do, or to agree with me. I just was unprepared for a different emotional response by others, from the one I experienced myself. This doesn't happen very often for me. I usually don't have any expectations about what other people should or shouldn't feel. Maybe that's why I was so unprepared for my reaction to your response to the links. What I experienced was just a very strong, visceral, gutwrenching sort of inability to comprehend.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 10:16 AM

"I don't know of any country who has ever given back land which they had conquered in war without a quid pro quo." The quid pro quo in this kind of situation is peace.

That's why powerful countries pull out of places they have been occupying, not because they have been militarily defeated, but because they realise that they can never win, and that the war is causing unacceptable damage to their own country.

That's why the Americans pulled out of Vietnam. That's why the British pulled out of most of Ireland. That's why, sooner or later, Israel will pull out of the occupied territories.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 10:22 AM

Ok, sledge. These three links (among 163,000 that came up when I did a search with the words "Israel" + "torture"), say that Israel does practice torture, and in the first link, an example is given of someone who is tortured for espionage (that's a bit like collaborating I guess)...

torture link #1

torture link #2

torture link #3


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: GUEST
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 10:26 AM

Thae actions of the jews makes really makes you wonder about all the so called "persecution" they've supposedly faced over the years. Maybe the so called "chosen people" business means they just can't get on peacefully with anyone else. Just think of all the trouble that could have been avoided had they not taken over Palestine.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: GUEST,paolaitaly
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 10:48 AM

I am one who think that (rougly said) in the Middle east situation most of the "rights" are by the side of the Palestinian population, and most of the "wrong" is on the Israely Governement, mostly on Ariel Sharon; but I think that is AWFUL find the eternal anti-semite use this orrible situation for spittin his/her poison like in the last post. Shame on you, whoever you are!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Wolfgang
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 11:10 AM

Just for the balance of it: torture link #4

Wolfgang


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: GUEST,mg
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 11:13 AM

My understanding, and of course it could be wrong, is that the original split was 3 ways..Jordan and then the remaining land into Israel and Palestine. Palestine was never supposed to be Jordan, and Jordan has given citizenship rights to the Palestinians and of course their new queen is Palestinian. mg


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Troll
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 11:22 AM

Carol, I have never claimed that the Israeli Government was kind and gentle and what I am about to say is in no way condoning their use of torture. It is rather an attempt to explain the mind-set that allows such things to happen.
The Nazis marched millions of Jews to their deaths and they went, for the most part, without protest. It was best, their leaders felt, not to cause trouble, but to go to the "work camps" peacefully. They could not concieve of men so evil that they would murder innocent women and children.
They were wrong.
The Israelis decided early on to whatever was necessary to protect their security so that another Holocaust would never happen again. Considering that they have been under threat of attack from their closest neighbors for all of their existance and have, in fact, beaten off several major attacks over the years from an enemy whose avowed intention has been the total eradication of Israel, I am amazed that they have not been even more excessive than they have.MUST have information about what their enemies are doing and planning.They feel -and rightly so- that their survival as a nation and as a people is at stake. Some of them are willing to stain their souls foreven to insure that this does not happen.
I do not agree with the policy. I feel that it dehumanizes both the victim and the perpetrator.
But I can understand why they are doing it and it saddens me deeply that they should feel that torture is necessary to insure the survival of their country.

troll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: sledge
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 12:10 PM

Yep,

the evidence of torture seems to go both ways, another sad indication that both sides are as capable of being as bad as the other.

No search however has given me anything on Israeli mob justice/lynching. Lets hope they can dignify their nation by demonstrating restraint in that respect.

Sledge


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: DougR
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 12:43 PM

Shame on you Wolfgang! What are you trying to do? Level the playing field? :>)

DougR


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: GUEST,paolaitaly
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 01:19 PM

If you search "Israel" on the same place where Wolfgang made a link ( Human rights ) you'll find a lot more stuff on torture.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: DougR
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 02:02 PM

I suspect Carol has already posted that, paolaitaly.

DougR


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 02:37 PM

I suspect that last ostensibly anti-semitic GUEST was probably either someone trying to colour critics of Israel as anti-semitic, or just a shit-stirrer seeing an opening. Either way nothing to reply to. (Commenting on it like this is closer to replying to it than I care to get, but I'm actually responding to paolaitaly's post.)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: GUEST,Feder
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 02:52 PM

McGrath,

You may be correct, maybe not. What disturbs me is that anti-Semites do use the Middle East conflict as a medium to advance their hatred of Jews.

It happens here at Mudcat with too much regularity. Witness the beginning of this discussion when RO1SIN started the initial thread by blaming "the jews" (sic) for the alleged actions of some Israeli soldiers.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Troll
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 03:16 PM

Feder, I think what you mean is that the anti-semites try to use the Middle East conflict as a way to justify their hatred and to convince others of its' rectitude.
Yes?

troll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: GUEST
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 04:06 PM

Troll,

I do mean what I said. Anti-Semites are using the Middle East conflict as a medium to advance their hatred of Jews.

But, you're right too. They are using the conflict to justify their hatred and convince others.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 05:41 PM

True enough. And perversely enough the activities of anti-semites are used as a way of deflecting criticism of the actions of the Israel government.

Here is a link to a recent article by a Jewish writer reminding people who are appalled at Sharon's policies that they need to be particularly active in attacking anti-semitism in all its forms.

"When anti-semitism is no longer treated as Jewish business, to be taken care of by Israel and the rightwing Zionist lobby, Sharon is robbed of his most effective weapon in the indefensible and increasingly brutal occupation. And as an extra bonus, whenever hatred of Jews diminishes, the likes of Jean-Marie Le Pen shrink right down with it."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 05:48 PM

Feder, is it more wrong to be an anti-semite than it is to be racist against Arabs? I don't see you complaining about the regular occurance of racism against Arabs in this forum. And with far greater frequency than anti-semitism, I might add.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 26 Apr 02 - 05:55 PM

Now, for the rest of you who think the playing field needed to be leveled after I posted links to sites about Israel's use of torture...

You guys are so biased against the Palestinians, you didn't even notice that my posting those links was a direct response to accusations made against Palestinians relating to the way they dealt with people they thought were collaborators.

It was I who was leveling the playing field when I posted that since two people, troll and sledge, were using that episode as an example of why we should hate Palestinians.

And troll, if you can justify anything the Israelis do because of extreme circumstances, why can't you understand that Palestinians could be acting out of the same basic human impulses. They've not had the same exact experiences as the Jews, but their experiences have been horrific in their own way.

If there is any racism or bigotry being practiced here it's much more the case against Arabs and Palestinians than it is against Jews.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: GUEST
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 09:08 AM

April 27, 2002 -- NEW YORK TIMES

Anti-Semitism Is Deepening Among Muslims By SUSAN SACHS

Stay in a five-star hotel anywhere from Jordan to Iran, and you can buy the infamous forgery "Protocols of the Elders of Zion." Pick up a newspaper in any part of the Arab world and you regularly see a swastika superimposed on the Israeil flag.

Such anti-Semitic imagery is now embedded in the mainstream discourse concerning Jews in much of the Islamic world, in the popular press and in academic journals.

The depictions are not limited to countries that are at war with Israel but can be found in general-interest publications in Egypt and Jordan, the two countries that have signed peace agreements with Israel, as well as in independent religious schools in Pakistan and Southeast Asia.

Arab leaders, for their part, have long rejected the accusation that their state-controlled press, universities and television stations promulgate anti-Semitic views. Islamic history, they say, contains nothing like the anti-Semitic horrors that occurred in Christian Europe, and Islam as a religion accepts many of the revelations embodied in Judaism.

The use of Nazi imagery, the newspaper caricatures of Jews with fangs and exaggerated hook noses, even the Arab textbooks with their descriptions of Jews as evil world conspirators — all of that, Arab leaders often insist, reflect a dislike for Israelis and Zionism but not for Jews and Judaism.

Yet in many Muslim countries the hatred of Jews as Jews, and not only as citizens of Israel, has been nurtured through popular culture for generations.

Take for instance an official Jordanian government textbook for high school students. It describes Jews as innately deceitful and corrupt. "Up to the present," it states, "they are the masters of usury and leaders of sexual exhibitionism and prostitution."

In the view of many scholars of Islam, such texts are a sign that the Arab-Israeli conflict has been transformed in Muslim culture from a political, nationalist and territorial battle into a cosmic war between religions and, indeed, between good and evil.

The length of the Middle East conflict has contributed to this shift.

"You see a certain level of anti-Semitism that you look at and think, how can smart people really believe this?" said John L. Esposito, a professor of religion and international affairs at Georgetown University. "Part of the explanation is that they grew up with this, but part is also that they grew up in a confrontational situation. You make the world into `us and them,' and therefore you buy into every possible caricature of the other."

Both Jews and Muslims engage in hatemongering based on skewed readings of their holy books, said Professor Esposito, author of the recent book "Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam."

Islamic fundamentalists frequently refer to Jews as either the sons or the grandsons of apes and monkeys. These sorts of descriptions can sometimes be heard in sermons at mosques in the Palestinian territories as well as from some Saudi religious leaders.

The reference is drawn from a verse in the Koran that, taken in context, refers to Jews and Christians who break the Sabbath and who mock the early Muslims for their beliefs. The Koran says that God made those people as despicable as monkeys, pigs and idol worshipers.

"In all faiths, more exclusivist or militant verses are taken out of context by some and amplified in popular culture," Professor Esposito said. The Koran also contains complimentary verses about law-abiding Jews, at one point saying that the "believers and the Jews" who do right will be rewarded by God.

Islamic doctrine concerning Christians has also been reinterpreted in recent decades in an effort to forge a bond between Muslims and Christians against the Jews.

Literal Islam recognizes Jesus as a prophet but does not believe that he was crucified. The Koran says that Jews tried to crucify him, but that God rescued Jesus and that the Jews instead killed only a likeness of Jesus.

Yet a common charge from Muslims these days is that the Jews did indeed kill Jesus. When Pope John Paul II visited Damascus last year, President Bashar al-Assad greeted him with a speech accusing Jews of just that. Mr. Assad's minister of religion affairs, Muhammad Ziyadah, later embellished the remarks, saying, "We must be fully aware of what the enemies of God and malicious Zionism conspire to commit against Christianity and Islam."

The pope did not respond directly but called for reconciliation and peace.

That Jews would be demonized by some Arabs, and Arabs demonized by some Jews may not be surprising after nearly a century of conflict over Palestine. Even in less enduring wars, nations have engaged in vicious and sometimes racist wartime propaganda against the enemy. And since Israel was founded as a Jewish nation, the issue of religion has always been an element in its relations, or lack of relations, with its Arab neighbors.

Still, the breadth and viciousness of the anti-Semitism is striking.

Recent attacks on Jewish centers in France and an ancient synagogue in Tunisia have been attributed to Arabs or Muslim fundamentalists.

Last month the Saudi daily Al Riyadh published an article that accused Jews of consuming the blood of Christian and Muslim children during the holiday of Purim. The author, a lecturer at King Faisal University in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, called this medieval fiction a "well-established fact."

After the article was translated from the Arabic and publicized by an Israel-based group called the Middle East Media Research Institute, the editor of the newspaper repudiated the article, saying it was nonsense and should not have been published.

The recycling of such stories has become a fixture of Muslim discourse, said Bernard Lewis, a historian of Islam and the Middle East, who has called this trend the "Islamization of anti-Semitism."

Its literature, he has written, includes classic European anti-Semitic writings like "Protocols," introduced to the Middle East in the late 1800's and now easily available in Arabic throughout the region and in English. In recent decades this material has been supplemented by a home-grown body of work, ascribed to Islamic teachings, that describes what it calls the innate wickedness of the Jewish people throughout the ages.

Yet Jews were minor players in Islamic theological writing for centuries, Professor Lewis wrote in "Semites and Anti-Semites."

They figure in the Koran, which Muslims call the final and perfect revelation of God, as obstinate antagonists to the prophet Muhammad's efforts to bring Islam to the people of the Arabian Peninsula. Of the tribes he encountered, the Jews were the most hostile to his message. But in the end, the Jewish tribes were defeated, and the Koran refers to them as a people whose rebelliousness had always been punished by God.

In more modern Islamic teachings, which can be found in Arab textbooks and mainstream newspaper articles, the Koran's description of the Jews' opposition to Muhammad takes on monumental importance. The Jews corrupted the word of God from the start, the more recent interpretations say, and their scheming against the prophet was an expression of their innate wickedness.

"Some people confuse certain verses of the Koran attacking the Jews of that day, as an attack on Judaism," said Seyyed Hossein Nasr, a professor of Islamic studies at George Washington University. "It's not innocent confusion. It's deliberate confusion, and it happens on both sides."

This is a modern development, less theological than emotional, and leaves as its casualty a long tradition of amity between Islam and Judaism, he added.

"If religious authorities in both religions put the demands of God above nationalistic and ethnic feelings," Professor Nasr said, "then maybe something can be done."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 01:25 PM

Anti-semitism in Europe creates Zionism, and this in turn is used a pretext to generate anti-semitism in the Islamic world. And that in turn helps empower extremist versions of Zionism. It's a vicious circle.

In all places and all times the enemy are those who preach hatred of other peoples, whatever the excuse - and whether the "other peoples" are Jews, Arabs, Palestinians, Israelis...

It's a good idea to focus on the fact that the neo-Nazis like Le Pen hate both Jews and Arabs. Two sorts of anti-semitism rolled into one.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 05:07 PM

The interesting (and sad) thing I've noticed is that when people use hateful language about Jews, they are quite rightly called "anti-semites". But hateful language toward Palestinians or Arabs is completely overlooked, or if it's noticed at all, it's considered the right thing to do. And when someone does speak out against hateful language toward Palestinians or Arabs, the person speaking out often regarded as being anti-semitic.

That shows how completely marginalized and de-humanized Palestinians have become in the US and Israel. And I also think it shows that racism toward Palestinians has become institutionalized in the US and Israel.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 05:11 PM

Here's an interesting example of this...

Last month the Saudi daily Al Riyadh published an article that accused Jews of consuming the blood of Christian and Muslim children during the holiday of Purim. The author, a lecturer at King Faisal University in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, called this medieval fiction a "well-established fact."

And yet when troll states the idea that Palestinians hate Jews more than they love their children, he states it as a well-established fact.

Can't see much of a difference myself.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: DougR
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 05:26 PM

Carol: It appears to me that you are going overboard a bit with your accusations. I don't recall either troll, sledge, or anyone else encouraging people to hate Palestinians. You made the charge, could you back it up by referring us to a post where anyone did that?

DougR


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: GUEST,mg
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 05:52 PM

I think that statement about peace coming when Palestinians (I think it is usually worded Arabs) needing to love their children more than they hate Jews/Israelis/occupation in general should be removed from civilized discourse. It has no purpose other than to insult and inflame. mg


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Little Hawk
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 06:43 PM

troll - Yeah, yeah... :-) Glad to see your sense of humour is still intact, as is mine, despite the passions aroused by this discussion.

You said: "You help your allies. Thats what the word means." (referring to the USA helping Israel)

Okay, fine. But why exactly IS Israel a US ally? What for? That's what I don't get. (It certainly isn't because Israelis are born as sweeter, better, and godlier people than the other Semites who happen to live on that area of land.) The USA might just as well pursue a neutral policy between Israel and the Arabs, after all. Several Arab states have themselves been US allies at one time or another...when it was deemed expedient!

Alliances are nothing but arrangements of convenience, masquerading under the flag of righteousness.

I think the only thing that separates you and me is this: you see Israel as essentially "the good guys", and I don't. I don't think ANY of the combatants in the Middle East are the good guys...they are all out for what they can get. Israel is better equipped, more modern, and has more powerful backers...so they usually get more.

I am cynical about Israel and about the Arabs. I see nothing but naked self-interest on both sides.

In a better organized world, an international justice system would disarm BOTH Israel and the Arabs, put peacekeeping troops in there and FORCE them to stop fighting each other and to share the land peacefully with one another...as they once did (not too long ago, historically).

That's what the Communists did in Yugoslavia, which was FAR better off that way. They insisted that everyone be a YUGOSLAVIAN first, and function as social equals, regardless of ethnic differences. That is social responsibility...just as is practiced, for example, in the city of Toronto or the country of Canada. The moment the Communists were gone, all the old ethnic hatreds arose and shattered the country into Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia, and various other fragments, and we all know the horrific results of that. This was supposedly done to achieve "freedom". Ha! I laugh. It was done to break up a competing power bloc and sieze key strategic and economic advantages for the West. It was done for the most cynical and opportunistic of reasons, and it has caused the utter ruination of that whole area of Europe.

The real problem in the world is that it is still the Wild West out there...no real international justice system, no international human rights system, no neutral international security forces with the power to prevent regional warfare and massive inequality. All that is out there is the greedy scheming of the powerful, rich and well-armed...and the desperation of the powerless and impoverished.

Human disunity is rampant...and the strong are taking advantage of that in many more places than just the Middle East.

Until all citizens of the world can wake up in the morning feeling safe, having equal political representation, equal economic opportunity, and equal social rights...then these tragedies will just keep on happening.

The reason Canada, for example, is a peaceful place at present (despite long term disputes between French & English or Native people & whites) is that there is one coherent society here, with basically equal rights for all citizens, regardless of their background, and a pretty good standard of living for most of them as well. People feel that they can cope, and live normally. That results in a stable, workable, peaceful situation.

That is not at all what you have in the Middle East. You have prearranged and enormous inequalities, many poor and disenfranchised in refugee camps, and many people whose basic human rights are denied on a daily basis and who are NOT treated as equals. Warfare and terrorism are inevitable under such conditions. The same circumstances are true in most of the African continent and in much of Latin America.

Systemic poverty and denial of human equality creates war.

Does a little child, born to either Jews or Muslims, hate a little child born from the other group? No. Not until his parents, his teachers, and his government tell him to. Those parents, teachers, and governments are the ignorant architects of a terrible future, forever repeating the errors of a tragic past...because they do not have the wisdom to look upon one single Humanity...and see nothing but brothers and sisters.

- LH


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: DougR
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 08:27 PM

mg: That statement, I believe mg, was made by Golda Mier (sp?), as you probably know, and I think that it does have legitimate use in this discussion. After all, how would one describe the thinking of a parent who willingly, or perhaps even encourages, one of their children to strap bombs to their body and go to a public place and blow themselves, and everyone within reach to smithereens? They do that, I believe, because they hate Jews, and want to kill as many as they can. If they loved their children more than they hated Jews, they never would condone that, would they?

DougR


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 09:23 PM

Maybe your're right, DougR. Maybe I have gone overboard. But instead of re-posting all of the things that hit me as being hateful toward Palestinians or inciting hatred of Palestinians, I'm going to put the shoe on the other foot and see how it looks there...

_______________________________________________

I pity the fool who thinks that the Jewish extremists are ever going to permit a Palestinian state in their holy land.

Any truly objective observer must see that nothing, but nothing, will appease the Israeli hardliners except the total desrtuction of the Palestinian state.

I dont know what to say to the sheep who equate Israeli military incursions with retaliation. They, obviously, feel that these incursions are, on some level, justified. I can only pray that their flocks are never labeled anti-semite so that they never have to discover what their reaction would be.

Israel is not going to stop its incursions when a treaty is signed. The sad truth is, they increase the attacks in response to peace talks. If you guys can tell me how to get those Zionists out of the way (without a second holocaust), you will have my full support. Until they are neutralized, however, the status will stay quo.

Because Israel wants nothing less than the elimination of the Palestinians. Their own words have proved it time and again. Take a good look at how they treat them (the displaced palestinians) now. They keep them in refugee camps and give them no opportunities to start a new life.

They do that, I believe, because they hate Palestinians, and want to kill as many as they can.

So why should i or anyone else care how many Jews die?

_____________________________________________

These can't be translated in that way, but I would ask what point there was in posting them except to encourage the perception that Palestinians are bloodthirsty savages. These were not posted as a response to any similar accusations made against Israelis. They were posted independently of anything anyone else said. And yet when I posted the links about Israeli torture in response to these two posts, several people felt that there was a need to "level the playing field" and include something about Palestinian terrorism. Which suggests to me that if someone posts anything incriminating about Israel, it is seen as gratuitous. But posting the same sort of thing about Palestinians is ok.

I noticed in the post on the Canadian group that they spoke of Israeli peace activists demonstrating in front of settlements ,sometimes with Palestinian friends. I was wondering, are those peace activists still alive or have they been killed by the IDF. I ask this because Palestinian Arabs who are suspected of complicity with Israelis have been killed and their battered bodies put on public display in the past.

Little has been said about the three palestinians who were accused of being Informers for the Israeli forces, two days a go they were dragged into the street and murdered by their own people, the bodies then hung from pylons for all to see, and for those of you who didn't had access to uncensored tv /press pictures, it was very ugly, Will those killers be bought to justice.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 09:26 PM

Correction: when I said "and include something about Palestinian terrorism", I meant to say, "and include something about Palestinian torture".


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 09:45 PM

I guess I have to correct myself again. The second to last quote in my 27-Apr-02 - 09:23 PM post was losely connected to a link I posted. But still, I would ask what the point of that post is except to promote a stereotype of Palestinians.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Little Hawk
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 09:52 PM

Justice? Justice is to have the same laws and legal protections for all people, the same opportunity to earn a good living wage for all people, the same voice in electing political representation for all people, the same access to free medical treatment and education for all people, the same right of dignity and respect given to all people, regardless of their race, religion, nationality or other distinguishing characteristics. And...freedom from poverty, freedom from discrimination, freedom from FEAR.

Those things are justice.

Punishment is not justice, and it never will be. Justice is achieved through love put into action, not through the appeasment of someone's fear, rage, and desire for vengeance.

It is customarily the destroyer of human life who most loudly cries for what he terms "justice" in the way the word is commonly used. The guy yelling from the lynch mob. The inquisitor applying the thumbscrews. The officer commanding the death squad. These are the monsters who delight in striking one more blow for what they term.... "justice". They lie. The monster they endlessly pursue is their own reflection looking back at them from the silent mirror of life.

- LH


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: artbrooks
Date: 27 Apr 02 - 11:13 PM

It is clear, after going through the posts, that no one has said anything hateful about Arabs or Moslems. The comments about Palestinians are clearly aimed at the extremists, such as the ones who killed a five year old child at close range in his bed yesterday. On the other hand, Jews and Israelis are considered to be the same thing, which is totally untrue, and all Israelis are blamed for the unproven acts of a few. It is very clear to me where the hate is in this thread, and I will choose to no longer participate in either this one or in the other one that was hijacked.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 28 Apr 02 - 12:43 AM

artbrooks, that is your own interpretation, and it shows your own bias. I haven't seen anyone suggesting that all Israelis are to blame for anything. And in the examples I gave, only two people specified that they were only talking about Palestinian extremests.

And to answer further the posts by Sledge and troll, I can name one Israeli Jew who was publicly executed by an Israeli Jew for being too cozy with the Palestinians... Yitzhak Rabin.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Troll
Date: 28 Apr 02 - 03:47 AM

Rabin was murdered by a right-wing extermist as was Anwar Sadat. In neither case were the bodies beaten and put on public display and THAT'S what I was talking about.
The killing is understandable, the barbaric actions of the crowd is not. Again I say, the Koran speaks against the desicration of bodies -even those of an enemy.
DougR answered my repeat of Golda Meiers statement very well. I never said that it was an established fact. Perhaps I should preface each sentence with an "F" or an "O" for "fact" or "opinion" to prevent confusion.
I have never cliamed to hate the Palestinians or, for that matter, to love Israel. As I have said before, I think that Israel has the right to exist and to have secure, defensible borders and I think the Palestinian Arabs deserve the same.
To close, I try not to post opinions as facts."...if someone posts anything incriminating about Israel, it is seen as gratuitous. But posting the same sort of thing about Palestinians is ok." The stories about Israeli torture remain, as yet, unproven. I say unproven because they are based on hearsay evidence. The story about the murder and desecration of the three suspected collaborators is cold hard fact and was reported as such in Arab media with, although I have not seem them, pictures of the event.

troll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: CarolC
Date: 28 Apr 02 - 04:17 AM

Saying "Palestinians hate jews more than they love their children", even when expressed as an opinion, is still the promotion of a negative stereotype. So Golda Meier was the first one to promote that particular stereotype. That doesn't make it any more correct.

When people promote negative stereotypes of Jews, even if they are stating them as an opinion, they are called anti-semites. Why should it be any different the other way around?

And when you use an expample of the people who killed someone in a mob action because the person was suspected of being a collaborator, in the absence of any particular context, what comes across is that you are saying that they did it because they are Palestinians, and because Palestinians just do that sort of thing. That is also the promotion of a negative stereotype.

If someone did the same sort of thing, like for instance making it a point to tell you that their Jewish neighbor is miserly, in the absence of any particular context, it would probably be taken as anti-semitism.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 28 Apr 02 - 08:38 AM

Lynching and mobbing of people seen as collaborators is likely to happen in the wake of any occupation, in all sorts of countries. France, Italy, Ireland, the USA.

That doesn't make it right, but to see it as something that is peculiar to Palestinians is wrong headed.

In a country where the whole structure of civil administration and communal life has just been devastated, it's hardly realistic to expect too much in the way of law and order.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: DougR
Date: 28 Apr 02 - 02:46 PM

So that type of behaviour should be expected then? Is that your point, McGrath? And those who participate in lawless acts such as hanging alleged collaborators, or shooting them and dragging their bodies through the rubble, should be expected and go unpunished?

DougR


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: Little Hawk
Date: 28 Apr 02 - 02:53 PM

Lynching, mobbing, and abuse of bodies happens in the absence of a well-organized and strong law enforcement system...and it can happen among any population which is experiencing a temporary state of partial or complete anarchy, as McGrath indicated above.

North American Indians did horrific things to prisoners in wartime. Whites did horrific things to the Indians. They both thought of themselves as good, decent people and of the others as vicious barbarians.

Obviously, this is a very subjective type of judgement, based on emotional responses and viewpoints particular to each person's background.

The Israelis have a well-organized society with an intact and higly effective police and armed forces, and that is why you don't see so many mob scenes happening on their side of the line. Remove the cohesiveness of their society and its security forces, and you would see plenty of mob scenes and mob violence. You would also see them violating their holy scriptures, as Christians have been doing regularly for the past 2,000 years. Why then get so worked up when Muslims do it?

As if it was anything unusual....

- LH


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: War crimes - continuing discussion
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 28 Apr 02 - 03:28 PM

Bit of threads drift, but it's worth remembering that Palestinians aren't all Muslims. You've got Christians as well. There are still some Samaritans, and they count as Palestinians as well. Probably a few Buddhists as well.

Yes Doug, my point was that in this kind of situation that kind of behaviour is quite predictable. It'd happen in your part of the world just as readily, given the same circumstances, just as it happened in the most civilised and settled countries in the world within living mmory.

That doesn't make it right, it doesn't mean that it shouldn't be treated as criminal. But when all the police stations have been flattened, and the police shot or interned, enforceing the law gets a bit tricky.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


Next Page

 


This Thread Is Closed.


Mudcat time: 3 May 2:33 AM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.