BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 12:06 AM

brucie, you do realize that when we click on your name, we can see your entire posting history? All 4500+ posts?

Now, I haven't threatened you because I don't play those games. You, OTOH, have said things like:

"You have no fuckin' idea what you just bit off."

and

"Enough, you misreable piece of shit."

and

"Hey GUEST, do you diddle sheep?"

"You hereby have my permission to go fuck yourself, GUEST. Ten way from Tuesday."

You log in as brucie, log out, post countless times as guest, guest GROK, and god only knows who and what else, give me "permission" to contact the site manager about your URL (your what? new to the internet world brucie?), whine around that I'm stalking you because we have both posted to several of the same threads today (I can name quite a few others I've been stalking in the threads too, if that is to be the standard we shall use).

You have consistently made a very nasty habit of being rude and obnoxious here for attention, and you think I'm worried about what you are going to say to Max? Or that you might "expose" my identity? Believe me brucie, if I cared whether or not my "true identity" was going to be exposed, I wouldn't be here. You can't trust the people here with your personal information any further than you can throw them. My personal identity has never been safe here, because I've never been willing to kiss management's ass, and I am often critical of the way the forum runs, and the shadow forum runs, and the psychotic people who run the place.

But you need to get a grip, brucie. Honest, you do. I understand that.

So go ahead and expose my URL. Shout my "real" and "true" name from the rooftops. No one on this forum has ever met me, nor will they. I really couldn't give two shits. I post anon on principle, as a couple of other guests do. You seem to need to be flirting with this guest/member thing today. You are doing it all over the place. It isn't the first time you've left yourself exposed and gotten caught at it, and I suppose it won't be your last. But I'm not stalking you, just because I saw your name, and was the first one to mention you forgot to log back in when you were playing your member posting as anon guest games.

Can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen. It's the internet, dude.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 12:18 AM

Guest makes a good point, why does brucie also post as GROK?
do other members post as GUEST wahtever?
if so why?
if you haave something to say, say it!
I have posted consistently for the last 4 years as john from hull, my photo is on this site, there is a high mudcat membership in hull and surrounding areas, and most folkies around here know me as john from hull.

I have posted as GUEST once intentionally since I joined, i started a thread on a personal matter, though for some reason Amos decided to "out" me as been from hull etc, not sure why, I pM'd him to ask, he said he thought it would be a laugh.

see thread "CRB checks".

I can't really see a good reason for adopting multiple identities, ie wahts the point of saying something, if they don't know its you?

weird stuff!

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Amos
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 12:23 AM

John:

That is an unfair description of what I wrote you; I pointed out that, given the way your style and spelling both sag after a few bears, no-one familiar with your posting history could have any question as to who started the CRB Checks thread. Did you honestly think you were being anonymous? You were not, my friend. But it didn't matter -- no-one here would have cared one way or the other if you had just posted under your name.

In my PM I also assured you I had meant no meanness in my remarks, and apologized if they seemed to be hard on you. Do you want a reprint?

A

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 12:29 AM

But to be fair John, brucie is one of the most thin-skinned Mudcatters I've ever run across. And he HATES being exposed the way I exposed him. Hence, his vitriol. He is just behaving like my high school students do when I catch them red handed at something they aren't supposed to be doing. It's a face saving thing for him, so I'm just going to let it drop, and go to bed. It's back to school very early in the a.m. for me.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Lepus Rex
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 12:44 AM

No, seriously, GUEST: Once a l33t hax0r like brucie/GROK gets your, uh, "URL," you're basically fucked. Phear him.

---Lepus Rex

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 12:47 AM

Amos-your either taking the piss, or you ar stupid!
[i'll explain, for the hard of understanding]=
My first post on that said [and this is the salient bit, read it carefully-

"I am a member here, but would prefer to remain anonymouse for this one thread"

in that thread Amos posts "I know that guy, it's john from hull"!

Amos, a bit of advice= don't ever volounteeer for "The Samaritans", or wahtever they are called where you live!

I can just imagine it [Amos in the pub with his mates ="Guess who I took a call from last night!".

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 12:50 AM

Lepus, you ole rattlesnake, how you doin'?

I grok you, dude. I am truly and duly apheared.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 12:55 AM

Guest-agreed, Brucie is a good bloke,
but why post under different identities, theres a thread here [sorry i don't know waht its called, but its current], brucie and GROK are talking to each other, they are the same person, waht is the point?

maybe its funny?, but a jokes only a joke, if we know its intended as such!


i'll shut up about it now, i'm sounding moany! ;-)

but i just don't get it.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 12:59 AM

PS= Amos had nothing useful wahtsoever to add to that thread, he just thought it would be fun to name the anonymouse poster!

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 01:03 AM

Anyway=If someone requests anonymity, that request should be respected.
not have to deal with jokers guessing who they are.

end of story, thats it, all i'll have to say on the matter, subject closed.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 01:05 AM

I agree, John, it was a cheap shot. But Amos isn't above that. I'm sorry to say I can't feel your pain about being outed like that. What can I say? The sick obsession with wanting to out anon posters is the Mudcat social disease. I'm sorry you fell victim to it.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 01:08 AM

Although, if it makes you feel any better, a day rarely goes by that some eejit member doesn't threaten to out/expose me, or challenge me for posting anon. At this point though, I know it comes with the territory, and so am never surprised when someone like brucie comes along all angry because I've gotten the better of him in a verbal duel.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 01:21 AM

Guest-I felt no pain, and didn't feel a victim [ I live in Hull !, I've been mugged 6 times in the last few years, threatened with knives, been called a "Paki Lover", had eggs thrown at me, had dead cats left on my dustbin etc [theres some strange people in hull]!
It just annoyed me that Amos could try to make a joke out of a serious situation, especially as I had specifaically requested anonymity [he could have PM'd me saying Hi John, good luck with it, or whatever],
at the time I just thought "waht a wanker!"

It dod not particulary bother me, until i read Amos moaning about BS, and him saying stuff like [and I quoute] "humour needs intelligence, and an understanding of the subject" etc etc.

It was the sheer his sheer hypocrisy that annoyed me.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST,SueB
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 02:51 AM

I've got to admit, my curiosity is piqued. Will jOhn and Amos ever reconcile? Is brucie really being stalked? Who the hell is Victor Meldrew? It's like Peyton Place around here. Am I the only one who doesn't know what the hell's going on most of the time?

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 02:56 AM

Victor Meldrew is a moany old bloke off UK TV series "One Foot In The Grave".

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST,SueB
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 03:16 AM

Ah. Thank you, jOhn - one mystery solved. I don't think I've seen that one.

I hope you don't stay mad at Amos for too long. He's not so bad. I heard a rumor that he hired someone to put that dead cat in your dustbin, but I don't believe it.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 03:29 AM

oh, the dustmen took it now, or i would have sent it to him.

i will see Amos address and send him some mouldy tomatoes, and bad stinky onions, anyway=i'm going to bury some bricks now, bye.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Alonzo M. Zilch (inactive)
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 08:23 AM

I don't know Max or Joe, so I don't have a clue as to to the real reasons behind their policies. But posting on almost every web or email forum I've ever been to requires a membership or subscription that requires some sort of real or fictional identity. Mudcat is a rare exception.

Hardly a day goes by at Mudcat without an active thread or two complaining about the guest situation. It almost seems like the arguments over guests' status actually outweigh the number of actual postings by guests on other threads. In the time that I've been reading Mudcat, the arguments have remained the same. McGrath of Harlow, for example, has repeated his ad nauseum.

Changing Mudcat posting to members-only would be a pretty simple thing. It would increase membership and it would eliminate the constantcy of these griping-about-guests threads. I'm probably wrong, but it has occured to me, that by sticking with the status quo, Max and Joe may actually be getting some sort of kick out these threads.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 08:27 AM

The recent spats are between members posting either anon or having a jar full of cookies. How is that eliminated. I mean the cookie thing.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 08:53 AM

Well, and lest we forget and leave them out (their egos would be so wounded) we have the shadowy presence of the JCs--Joe Clones. They are an extremely helpful bunch, as brucie can attest to. He has, apparently been inducted into the Mudcat Secret Society of Linguistic Analysis (and this is highly secret knowledge, minions, so don't even THINK of trying this at home), which they use to smoke out the secret identities of the Feared and Loathed Anon. They have been known to check the entrails of Sir John's dead dustbin cats to do this, I believe. The Feared and Loathed Anon are the scourge of Mudcat--nay they be the Al Qaida of Mudcat, and may or may not have a secret society of their own. Only McGrath of Harlow doesn't know for sure.

JC Jeri and JC katlaughing are the High Priestesses of the MSSLA. Legend has it, that once you have an ally in this secret inner circle, they let you borrow their Mudcat Secret Society of Linguistic Analysis decoder rings, to figure out the identity of an anon you particularly don't like, because they made you look like the eejit you truly are.

Only Max, Pene, and JO know truly the URLs of the Al Qaida Anons, which is why there must be these shadowy organizations, rebel groups (or anon terrorist cells, if you vote Republican in the American elections), and desperate pleas in the night, when desperate jerks who have alienated one too many Mudcatters with their anti-social and obnoxious behavior, go knocking at the PM doors of the JC Secret Society in the dead of night for help, and possibly even use of the Linguistic Analysis secret decoder ring to figure out which member/guest it is that is tormenting them by pointing out their foibles (like logging in and out of the cookie jar, and playing "let's pretend I'm anon guest to terrorize the forum".

Then Her Holy Highness katlaughing becomes concerned, and refreshes her favorite SuperPower Admonishment Thread (this is any thread threatening the minions begun by the Great and Powerful Max), reminding the minions of Just How Lucky We Are to Have this Wonderful Place to Come and Wreak Anti-Social Havoc with at One Anotherment.

And you all have a very nice day.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: The Shambles
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 09:00 AM

Jeri said:

I don't have a problem with anonymity.

Does this mean that you have no problem with posting anonymously and that you do also post anonymously?

Now Jeri also says that volunteers are anonymous and posting anonymously to prevent them from being stalked in threads that have nothing to do with "clonage". As a volunteer who does not feel that you need to keep your identity secret - do you have personal experience of such a problem or none?

If this 'stalking' really is thought to be such a problem - there is a less questionable solution than now supporting and setting the example of encouraging anonymous posting....

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 09:04 AM

SueB, "We're all bozos on this bus!" (Ask CarolC, she can 'splain the quote, but just in case you can't wait, click here)......

Fred, the great thing about GUEST postings is that you can ignore the derogatory ones and bask in the complimentary ones. That is probably all the 'continuity' one needs around here.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 09:26 AM

RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?

Too right it is.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 09:27 AM

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 09:27 AM

See?

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Sam L
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 09:31 AM

Is that still you? No, not at all--as a flame warrior, the derogatory ones are the ones the rouse me from my boredom. Just not right now, I'm a little preoccupied.

Haven't got around to reading the link yet, I may later. But what do you want me to think or do about it--if I don't like it, I'd rather have ignored it, and if I don't mind it, what's the point? You still sound like Treehouse, with this agenda of some sort. Good luck with it.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 10:32 AM

A piece of friendly advice. Instead of following the paranoid line of thinking ethat very anon post comes from a person who has a "secret agenda" (to go with the decoder rings? their secret society?)you might just want think of the Flame Warriors as the cartoon version of Mudcat.

Subject: RE: BS: Is anonymous posting to be encouraged?
From: Joe Offer
Date: 13 Sep 04 - 12:18 PM

Well, I have to say I'm getting very tired of all this animosity. It's great for Mudcat to be a place for free, open discussion, but lately it has seemed to be more like a jungle full of guerrilla warriors. How can discussion be free and open, if everyone has to keep a watch out for sneak attacks? This is a forum for exchange of ideas, not combat.

I get a lot of complaints from people about the conduct of so-and-so, usually an anonymous Guest. The trouble is, the people who complain are just as heavily involved in combat - and then they stick their tails between their legs and want me to protect them. I'm sorry, but if you insist on engaging in combat, I can't protect you. When you join the fight, you open yourself to attack, and what you receive is most often far worse than what you can give out.

So, I would ask everyone to help. If there is combat going on, stay away from it. Act as though the combatants were invisible - that's your best protection from them.

I'm closing this thread because it has become another hotbed of animosity. The topic of anonymous posting has been beaten to death the last few days, and I'm likely to delete or close anything else that gets posted on the subject for a while. Cool it - everybody.

Peace, please.

Thank you.

-Joe Offer-