BS: Pres. Bush's next four years

Subject: RE: BS: Pres. Bush's next four years
From: Donuel
Date: 26 Jan 05 - 05:59 PM

What a sap.

"Why should I give my money to (expletives deleted)"

....

Because a safty net for a society, like the graineries of ancient Egypt, protect us all.

PS While the Constitution protects the rights of our KKK sap, it is good that FDR's social security protects life itself.

Subject: RE: BS: Pres. Bush's next four years
From: Amos
Date: 26 Jan 05 - 06:37 PM

Bobert:

Capital OR labor?   The only wealth that comes from capital alone is from money changers. The only wealth that comes from labor alone is from artisans, artists, or mom and pop operations. To seriously add wealth you have to manufacture which requires management , administration, and capital. All these things add value and help make something happen.

It's doing them badly that causes the problems you are protesting, not the use of capital. It's MISmanagement, not management.


A

Subject: RE: BS: Pres. Bush's next four years
From: Bobert
Date: 26 Jan 05 - 06:52 PM

Well, you know very well my position on *creation of wealth* but...

(pssst, amos... Shhhhh... We got some lives ones and we don't want scare 'um off to soon so I'm just tryin' to reel 'um in until I can get a net unner 'um... But lets jus' keep this between us... Okay, pal?)

Bobert

Subject: RE: BS: Pres. Bush's next four years
From: Peace
Date: 27 Jan 05 - 01:18 AM

Hello Doug,

Regarding your remark:

"brucie: Your remark about Bobert, and his penchant for compassion, compells me to ask:if you are such a champion of compassion, why are you so opposed to compassionate conservatism?"


Before I deal with that question, would you please provide some answers you talked about providing first? See the thread entitled "Good News in Iraq."

I will be pleased to address your question after you attend to that pressing matter.

Subject: RE: BS: Pres. Bush's next four years
From: susu
Date: 27 Jan 05 - 08:30 PM

Donuel, the statement "PS While the Constitution protects the rights of our KKK sap, it is good that FDR's social security protects life itself." Are you insinuating that my husband is a member of the KKK? and if you are, what in the world would make you think such a thing? Actually, he is a wonderful Christian who loves everyone the same, and actually is more tolerant than most people on this website. While he was extreme with the view of people on welfare he did not actually mean that he thought that all of them are on crack or tramps. It is just we have seen alot of people abuse the system. I cannot tell you how infuriating it is to see someone who drives a caddilac, wears designer clothes and carries a $1500 Prada purse using a foodstamp card and saying why should she work when the govt will pay for her to sit at home. Yet when a friend of mine lost her job and they were not making the amount of money to put them above the poverty level, they were denied assistance because they happened to have qualified for a new vehicle that they needed not wanted a new payment, prior to her job loss. The system stated that their car was too new. So there needs to be reform in the system. So before you start calling people members of unsavory organizations, get the facts first, it's called making an informed comment. Susu! (not my hubby)

Subject: RE: BS: Pres. Bush's next four years
From: Peace
Date: 27 Jan 05 - 09:44 PM

Susu, yes some people abuse the system, just as some priests and ministers abuse children.

Subject: RE: BS: Pres. Bush's next four years
From: Once Famous
Date: 27 Jan 05 - 09:56 PM

You never hear of a Rabbi doing this though.