Subject: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Wesley S Date: 03 Mar 05 - 05:37 PM I've heard that Hollywood is in the process of making the sequel to "Taxi Driver". And "Basic Instinct" too. Do either of those sound interesting to you ? Curious as to what Travis Bickel has been up to ? What he'll do when he gets out of the lockup ? What should Hollywood be trying to make ? Are you curious as that what Harold has been doing without Maude ? What happened to Mr Smith when he left Washington ? If you owned a movie studio what movie sequel would you bankroll ? Ready ? "Action" |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Little Hawk Date: 03 Mar 05 - 05:45 PM Hmmm. Well, it would be kind of neat to do a sequel of "Gigli", and see if it could be worse than the first one was, I guess... "Pirates of the Caribbean" certainly rates another go, and there is one on the way already. Then there's "Dumb and Dumber", and "Dumb and Dumber-er". What we need now is a 3rd one called: "Dumb Beyond Anything You Thought Possible". Starring: Adam Sandler and Jim Carrey. |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: gnu Date: 03 Mar 05 - 05:50 PM What about starring Shane and Dale? "Bud and Budderer". |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: John O'L Date: 03 Mar 05 - 05:56 PM "Lunch At Tiffany's" "The Day After The Day After Tommorow" (Sub-titled "Next Week") |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: GUEST Date: 03 Mar 05 - 05:57 PM Bambi: The Stir Fry. |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Alba Date: 03 Mar 05 - 06:14 PM An Affair to Forget 8 Euros in the Fountain 7th Sense When Harry dumped Sally Wide awake in Bangor...(Follow up to Sleepless ect) Jude (the person not the Film) |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: gnu Date: 03 Mar 05 - 06:16 PM Hehehehe |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: GUEST Date: 03 Mar 05 - 06:24 PM All the President's Women. An Officer and A Thug. |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Little Hawk Date: 03 Mar 05 - 06:30 PM LOL! Keep 'em comin'! |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Chris Green Date: 03 Mar 05 - 06:34 PM It's A Sane Sane Sane Sane World Fou14een (sequel to Se7en) Take The Head Of Alfredo Garcia Away 'Cos It's Rather Smelly Now |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: GUEST Date: 03 Mar 05 - 06:50 PM A Clockwork Orange : Juiced. The Boys with Brazilians. It's not a Wonderful Life. Aliens : The Proof. Forrest Gump Graduates. The Thin Man Disappears. Full Metal Jacket : Slightly used. |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: John O'L Date: 03 Mar 05 - 07:37 PM Dirty Old Harry The Matrix: Uninstall The Matrix: Fatal Error The Men in the Band |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Alba Date: 03 Mar 05 - 08:32 PM Can't resist this thread:>) Illegal Alien Kane Dial P for Pizza O Sister who art Thou? How to find a Guy in 10 Minutes Captain Corelli's Accordion I Dreamed of Leytonstone How Toxic is my Valley Jude! again the person not the bloody Film! |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: John O'L Date: 03 Mar 05 - 09:56 PM The Rosebud Code |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Little Hawk Date: 03 Mar 05 - 11:41 PM The Day The Earth Speeded Up! It Came From WalMart The Nothing The Attack of the 3 Foot Woman! Invasion of the Body Rejectors The Creature from the White Spittoon Gums! (horror film about a very old shark...) Pollywogs! (Son of Frogs) The Fruit Fly ("heellllppp meeeeee...!") King Kong versus Barney |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: John O'L Date: 04 Mar 05 - 12:06 AM Apocalypse Again The Better, The Worse, And The Sickeningly Grotesque |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: dick greenhaus Date: 04 Mar 05 - 12:17 AM Thelma & Louise--part 2 |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Shanghaiceltic Date: 04 Mar 05 - 12:40 AM Lassie Kills Chickens Frankenstien-Cloned Snow White and the 7 divorces Mutiny on the Bounty-The man management training issue version Ben Hur/Him-PC approved Gaydiator Home Alone IV-The social worker calls Home Alone V-Child in Care |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: LadyJean Date: 04 Mar 05 - 01:09 AM I consulted with my cats, and they offer the following: The Little Purrmaid Of Mice and Birds Catnip Madness Cat Day Afternoon Nap. Spray Misty For Me Paws The 39 Naps The Kitty Vanishes The Sound of Mewing |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: GUEST,Wesley S Date: 04 Mar 05 - 11:41 AM Funny - But actually I was trying to be serious. I think the premise of a Taxi Driver sequel is rather interesting. What kind of person would Travis Bickell be after he's spent many years in prison ? Or was he sent to a mental ward and released early ? I've wondered how three normal guys that experienced the violence that took place in "Deliverence" would have changed as people. Are they still dwelling on what happened ? Or have they managed to bury it ? Do they even speak or do they avoid bumping into each other ? Havn't you ever been so enthralled with a character in a movie that you wondered what happened to them later ? And I'm not talking about "Porkys III". |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Little Hawk Date: 04 Mar 05 - 12:32 PM Thelma and Louise Bounce Back! Actually, the only movie I recall seeing in a long time that I would want to see a sequel of right now is "Pirates of the Caribbean", and that's coming soon. I'm gonna start a thread on movies you would like to see done properly... |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Blissfully Ignorant Date: 04 Mar 05 - 12:37 PM Care Bears- The revenge!!! |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: heric Date: 04 Mar 05 - 12:59 PM I don't think they should do Moby Dick II. |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: DougR Date: 04 Mar 05 - 01:01 PM Sorry I didn't see your thread before seeing Little Hawk's Wesley. My reply to your query is in his thread. It's very similar to yours. DougR |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Tannywheeler Date: 04 Mar 05 - 01:02 PM The movies we think of as great classics may have been innovative films, technically, which improved the storytelling; or have been based on well-told stories from novelists or fine shortstory writers, combined with well-done adaptations by good screenwriters. The policy of "take a property we own and see if we can milk it for more cash" is denying us the best chances for more great classics. Thanks for listening. I've had that stuck in my craw for a while, now. Feels good to get rid of it. This is a generalization, so is generally wrong in some percentage of cases. Just in case you didn't know. Tw |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: s6k Date: 04 Mar 05 - 01:04 PM halloween 9: no we are not joking james bond 22: again we arent joking endangering private ryan E.T - text home |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: DougR Date: 04 Mar 05 - 01:07 PM Oops, Wesley, I thought you were posing a serious question. Based on most of the replies, I guess not. Just so they don't screw around with "The Quiet Man." DougR |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Grab Date: 04 Mar 05 - 01:33 PM Serious suggestions? OK. The one that's dying to be made is The Hobbit. But that won't happen until Christopher Tolkein removes his underwear from up his crack and relaxes a bit. Another Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon would be good. Apparently that was just one part of a series of classic Chinese stories, so there's plenty more material. Another vote for a Pirates of the Caribbean sequel too, although they need to pace it a bit better - the best bits of the first one were Johnny Depp sailing into the harbour at the beginning and the duel with Orlando Bloom, and the rest was really filler. A sequel to Unbreakable would be worth having too. Apparently that's in the pipeline, but see how it goes. Another Spiderman is inevitable, but the quality of the first two mean I'm looking forward to that. Ditto X-Men. Zorro if they have Antonio Banderas and Catherine Zeta Jones doing it; forget it otherwise. Judge Dredd if they have Stallone doing it; forget it otherwise. And to be honest, anything with Michelle Pfeiffer in it, if she ever gets back to making films again. You can keep all your Kim Basingers and Sharon Stones and other interchangeable starlets. Graham. |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Alba Date: 04 Mar 05 - 01:57 PM Doug...umm how do I tell you....well: Prepare yourself! I know Doug. Actually when I lived in Co. Clare there was a Team of Hollywood Folks including Don Johnston from Miami Vice. They told us they were location scouting for a remake of the Quiet Man. That was about 9 years ago now...guess that one came to nothing. You can imagine the response they got from some of us....lol Sorry Wesley....It seemed to me to be a great oppertunity for a giggle and well there isn't enough of that around lately..... I will now change direction and ponder your question...seriously:>) Blessings Jude |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: GUEST Date: 04 Mar 05 - 02:00 PM Therapy on Elm Street. Dracula : The Transfusion. |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: wysiwyg Date: 04 Mar 05 - 02:50 PM The Day the World Ended ~S~ |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: katlaughing Date: 04 Mar 05 - 03:33 PM Sorry Wesley, the giggles have been good. I will try to think of some serious replies, for now, I can only offer: Close Encounters of the T'urd Kind -wonder if Spaw will be in it? Like, lick me for chocolate Bridges' Trolls of Madison County The Unsinkable Krispy Kreme The Gigantic (subtitle: Fuck-up!) Grapes of Wraith Boney and Clod |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Little Hawk Date: 04 Mar 05 - 03:47 PM "Boney and Clod"? That would be an epic about a Valley Girl and her L.A. guy, I'm assuming? |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Bunnahabhain Date: 04 Mar 05 - 05:22 PM M.U.S.H. The St Valentines day edition. Alexander Nevasky 2- Didn't you get the message first time... |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Jim Dixon Date: 04 Mar 05 - 06:03 PM Let's do it once and for all: "I Screamed When I Saw What You Did on Elm Street Last Halloween: The Final Scary Movie" |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: GUEST Date: 04 Mar 05 - 06:07 PM Return to Neverland : uncut. |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: GUEST Date: 04 Mar 05 - 11:45 PM sIre JohN of hUlls latE WintErs gArdnEn |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Little Hawk Date: 05 Mar 05 - 01:13 AM Bedtime for Chongo (This time the ape gets top billing, and George Bush and Condi Rice play the supporting roles, portraying an unhappily married suburban couple who are rescued from their nothing life by a brilliant primate, who opens them up to the full dimensions of love, compassion, and art appreciation.) |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Georgiansilver Date: 05 Mar 05 - 03:48 AM They should make a sequel to Jungle Book with Jacko as Mowgli!. The bit with the chimp might have to be cut though. Best wishes. |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: The Walrus Date: 05 Mar 05 - 07:31 AM Serious answer: We've had Zulu and Zulu Yawn (sorry Dawn), how anout Zulu Sunset, coveing the Battles of Ulundi and Gingilovo? or pehaps an accurate version of 'Mutiny on the Bounty' showing Fletcher Christian to be the whining little toad he was, rather than versions based on accounts by friends of the Christian family (strange how the pro-Christian books don't mention the mutineers going back to Otahiti and kidnapping native men and women for slaves and mates). How about 'Objective Burma' with the 14th Army (who were there) rather than Eroll Flynn (who was nowhere near). The Italian Job II (the real one, not the re-make) - how did they get out of that coach? I'd like to see Len Deighton's 'Bomber' turned into a film ('though it never would be). There are too many; What about the John Wayne character (I've forgotten his name), in the Cavalry trilogy, what happens when he went into retirement? How did the main characters in M.A.S.H. cope with the peace of the 1950s (or the 'peace movement' of the 1960s). Walrus |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Mr Red Date: 05 Mar 05 - 09:17 AM One for the Prisoner of Zenda I see it as a indecisive tranvestite postman type of story that would be called (ducks and runs for cover first) Return to Zenda ( a dress unkown) |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Bunnahabhain Date: 05 Mar 05 - 11:08 AM Somebody should have a go at HHGH. It would give a lot of people a chance to get really annoyed at something harmlessly.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Bob Hitchcock Date: 05 Mar 05 - 11:24 AM Wierd Al Yankovic in his movie UHF had a trailer for Ghandi II, "no more passive resistance, he's out to kick some butt". I might pay to see that one. Bob |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Liz the Squeak Date: 05 Mar 05 - 12:43 PM I'm glad someone else wants to know how the lads got out of that coach in 'The Italian Job'.... I'd like to see a sequel to 'Pirates' too.... But most of all, a sequel to 'Little Shop of Horrors'... the film (Rick Moranis, Steve Martin version) ends with a little Audrey III growing in the garden of the newly married Seymour and Audrey.... LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Little Hawk Date: 05 Mar 05 - 12:44 PM LOL! How could Hollywood possibly resist that? |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: katlaughing Date: 05 Mar 05 - 01:25 PM A follow-up to Fried Green Tomatoes could be "A Fish Named Tawanda!" |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: s6k Date: 05 Mar 05 - 06:14 PM you dont all need to say pirates of the caribbean sequel, because one is already confirmed. in fact, it is already filming. check it out on google and the IMDB |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Alba Date: 05 Mar 05 - 06:44 PM Found this. I had heard rumours. When it comes to the movie 'Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl', people just love to announce that lead actor Johnny Depp found his inspiration for character Captain Jack Sparrow by looking no further than rock legend Keith Richards. Just in case that piece of knowledge isn't satisfying enough, it's been confirmed that Disney has recruited Richards to appear in the sequels to the film in more than just spirit. The Rolling Stones guitarist and sometimes vocalist has signed up to play Jack Sparrow's father, er, Mr. Sparrow. Richards has reportedly already been for a costume fitting for the upcoming 'Pirates of the Caribbean: Treasures of the Lost Abyss'. Not only will the 60-year-old act in the second instalment of 'Pirates', but he's also set to return for the third movie. One of the last musicians to jump on the acting bandwagon, 'Pirates of the Caribbean: Treasures of the Lost Abyss' will be Keith Richard's acting debut. Filming for the two movies, which is to occur simultaneously, is set to begin in February of next year. In addition to Richards and Depp, the cast of the 'Pirates' sequels will include Keira Knightly, Orlando Bloom, and Geoffrey Rush. For those who somehow missed out on Depp's now infamous quote (taken from a BBC interview), here it is: "I didn't want to do an imitation of Keith, or a character study, just a kind of salute to him, you know, to show him I appreciate him. I was thinking about the pirates of the 18th century, about how they were the rocks stars of their day. So I thought: Who's the greatest rock and roll star who ever lived? And to me, it's Keith Richards hands down. Keith is a bit of a pirate himself!" If it happens it promises to be a Hoot! Jude |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: DougR Date: 05 Mar 05 - 06:54 PM Alba: Arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! Say it isn't so! I cannot, for the life of me, imagine a successful remake of the "Quiet Man". Not without that cast, not without that Director. Cong, though, seems little changed from when it was originally shot in the early '50's. Just some added touristy stuff. DougR |
Subject: RE: BS: Movie sequels: What SHOULD they make ? From: Alba Date: 05 Mar 05 - 07:02 PM Doug I know, I know.....it's SAD! I was shocked enough when they came scouting for locations and relieved when it came to nothing. Perhaps the backers will see sense and back off! ...and just what is there more to say about the Story that requires a Sequel! I'll keep my eyes open and let you know. Blessings Jude |