Subject: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: ToulouseCruise Date: 21 Mar 05 - 01:45 PM This should get some monarchists in a tizzy.... the British Parliament has responded to a question from within, and has stated that Camilla Parker-BowlingBalls will automatically be given the title of Queen when/if Chuckles ascends to the throne.... the only way she would stay as Princess-Consort (Charlie's idea) is for the Brit Parliament and all 17 other countries (including Canada) that recognize the British Monarchy as their head of state to pass legistation... here's daFacts, Union Jack... from Canada's Globe and Mail |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Peace Date: 21 Mar 05 - 02:49 PM |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Peace Date: 21 Mar 05 - 02:51 PM When Elizabeth visits our country, she does so as the Queen of Canada. This new twist would not bother me, because I do not recognize kings and queens. I am not anti-monarchy. I simply see no need for the institution. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: gnu Date: 21 Mar 05 - 03:11 PM What is her present title? And, pardon my ignorance, is Chuck the Duke of Cornwall? |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST Date: 21 Mar 05 - 03:18 PM the heir to the throne, takes the traditional titles of The Duke of Cornwall under a charter of King Edward III in 1337; and, in the Scottish peerage, of Duke of Rothesay, Earl of Carrick, Baron Renfrew, Lord of the Isles, and Prince and Great Steward of Scotland. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST Date: 21 Mar 05 - 03:19 PM He is also Earl of chester |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 21 Mar 05 - 03:32 PM He is also a funny lookin' guy with big ears. But so is George W. Bush. Maybe that's why Bush wants to be King so badly. The job goes with the ears. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST Date: 21 Mar 05 - 03:33 PM So who's the Duke of Earl? |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Peace Date: 21 Mar 05 - 03:34 PM . . . and the Queen of Hearts. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Rapparee Date: 21 Mar 05 - 03:47 PM The ears prevent the crown from slipping down around their neck and being confused with a dog collar. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 21 Mar 05 - 03:47 PM Whether she was called Queen, Princess Consort, Duchess of Cornwall, Mrs Windsor, or "her indoors", would make absolutely no difference to her status, which would be that of the wife of the King. The point which some people seem to find it hard getting their head sround is that the word "Queen" is used in two distinct senses in this context - sometimes it means the reigning monarch, as with the present Elizabeth, sometimes it means wife of the reigning monarch (or widow of a previous one), as with her mother. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST,Mrr Date: 21 Mar 05 - 04:08 PM Actually, my read was that she COULD be, not MUST be, Queen. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Uncle_DaveO Date: 21 Mar 05 - 04:12 PM A couple posts have discussed Charles's titled. But I wonder, whatever happened to "The Prince of Wales"? It wasn't mentioned above. Dave Oesterreich |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: gnu Date: 21 Mar 05 - 05:31 PM What is her present title? Anyone know? |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: robomatic Date: 21 Mar 05 - 05:36 PM I love England, I even like Charles since I saw a clip of him taken years ago doing a very good Bluebottle imitation, but about the doings of the royals, so help me I can't even TRY to care. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: jacqui.c Date: 21 Mar 05 - 06:07 PM gnu - she doesn't have any title at present. Well, not an official title anyway. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: freda underhill Date: 21 Mar 05 - 06:13 PM she's in her 50s, he's loved her since he met her, he was prevented from marrying her when he wanted to. let he wear a funny hat if she wants to - it makes no difference to anything. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST Date: 21 Mar 05 - 07:35 PM Well, it COULD bring on the revolution at last. Queen Camilla? I think not. Off with their heads! |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 21 Mar 05 - 08:18 PM In any proper revolution those heads would be way way down the list. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Rapparee Date: 21 Mar 05 - 10:16 PM She can call herself the Dominatrix of the Universe for all I can, because frankly, I don't give rat's arse. I say that they should skip all them "royals" and make me King of England. I'm only in it for the perks and the retirement benefits. And the groupies, of course. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Boab Date: 22 Mar 05 - 01:24 AM Go easy on Charlie; he's part of a family of pampered, pompous mumbling heads, but from where I stand he's just about the most viable human being among them. His Da is a first-class plonker. Putty is used as make-up foundation for his Ma. I must add that I see his kid sister as something which, while one more useless entity, does have her good points. She has the reputation of greeting all press approaches with "Naff off". Aye----but in truth the first word likely begins with an "F". I'm on her side there. Pity they don't all have jobs and social security numbers like the rest of us...... |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Hrothgar Date: 22 Mar 05 - 05:02 AM Camilla is at least as well qualified to be Queen as Charles is to be King. Roll on the Republic of Australia! |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Paco Rabanne Date: 22 Mar 05 - 05:34 AM I am taking careful note of all your names, so that when Prince Charles has been crowned King, he will know which heads to chop off! Monarchy, the true path! |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST Date: 22 Mar 05 - 05:44 AM If she is queenie they should stuff protocol and use her for the stamps. Charlie's ears would make them too big and they would hang over the edge of the envelopes. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Emma B Date: 22 Mar 05 - 06:07 AM I used to be a rabid republican until Maggie Thatcher was elected and I realized how truly awful a "minority" presidency could be! I mean - it's not really possible to be anti the British monarchy is it? - it's like being anti-parrots! OK - they may cost a bit to feed, seem to require careful breeding and possibly it could be said they live far too long but the bright plumage brings in the tourists and they can be trusted (by and large) to repeat the right words at the opening of Parliament (although you may want to put a cloth over Anne's head when the vicar comes round) BTW Camilla will be the Countess of Chester which also, coincidently, is the name of the local psychiatric unit! |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 22 Mar 05 - 06:31 AM And the appropriate anthem could be "Chester song at twilight..." |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST,Peek-a-Mooh Date: 22 Mar 05 - 06:58 AM But will she know who Clapton is? Beck? May? Page? Look how uncultured the cultured can be! Peace, Mooh. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Richard Bridge Date: 22 Mar 05 - 12:25 PM No, it doesn't say she MUST be, it says that as the law stands she WILL be. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: nager Date: 23 Mar 05 - 12:23 AM At least the monarchy is something the Americans can't buy. But that's about the only good reason I can think of for keeping it! |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST,Dominie Date: 23 Mar 05 - 12:59 AM Tell me it's not true |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 23 Mar 05 - 02:07 PM Kindly leave orf poking fun at our Charlie. He may not be much, but he is OUR "Wingnut". Camilla?...............Go for it! We've no liking for her at all. Don T. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST Date: 23 Mar 05 - 02:14 PM Apparently the wedding march is the 'Adams Family' theme tune. Old queenie poo is now having reservations about letting camilla on the balcony at the trooping of the colour do. Couldn't make up this lot if ya tried. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: MuddleC Date: 23 Mar 05 - 07:54 PM -Tune in for next weeks episode of 'SOAP'..... Bob for King |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST,Betsy Bonobo Date: 23 Mar 05 - 08:41 PM Sorry, I misread the title of this thread as "OOK! Gov't sez Gorilla MUST be Queen!" Thought it was another thread about monkeys. Well... That Chuck boy do look a little on the Simian side... |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: MAG Date: 24 Mar 05 - 05:19 PM It is really hard to imagine whomping up serious interest in this. That said, surely if Charles is going to marry her, it is to give his Mum a reason to skip a generation with the crown? Can you really imagine his popular self in his Mum's place?? |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST,m'lady Date: 24 Mar 05 - 05:55 PM I'll have you know that Phil and I have been waiting for the jug eared little oik to get hitched again. We have plans you know. Ourselves and the corgis intend to take in as many SAGA holidays as possible. I have always had a yen to travel like you peasants. The fun, the fun we'll have. And cross stitch has been calling to me of late. I have a nice thatched cottage in mind. Will look just the ticket above the downstairs lavvy. Phil says he will be quite happy watching QVC. He does like to laugh at the cheap tack. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Richard Bridge Date: 24 Mar 05 - 06:33 PM Well, Don, although I am not actually acquainted with either, I considerably prefer the fairly sensible horsey, doggy Camilla image to the manipulative, moronic, vapid, clotheshorse martyr Diana. She got well over ten million quid to look the other way while the heir to the throne took a mistress (surprise!). That's hard done by? The one who got the shitty end of the stick was surely old Parker-Bowles himself. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: GUEST,m'lady Date: 24 Mar 05 - 07:04 PM Don't call camilla the shitty end of the stick please, that's our pet name for her. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Gov't sez Camilla MUST be Queen! From: Big Al Whittle Date: 24 Mar 05 - 07:50 PM look we've got to have her, cos she's getting married to him. That means we're paying for her. So I reckon, give her a job as a queen, then we can send her out on the road and wave to people. Semi skilled stuff, she should be able to manage that. drop the christmas message....its a pain in the bum anyway. the other possibility is....... we take advantage in the current lack of public enthusiasm for the monarchy and have a republic. but that would take more organising. |