 sj |
||
|
||
BS: Saddam Will Rise Again
|
|
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Donuel Date: 10 Dec 05 - 01:15 PM animation of his resurrection http://www.angelfire.com/md2/customviolins/aas0.gif |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: DougR Date: 10 Dec 05 - 12:28 PM Shucks shoot, Big Mick, I was just about to write a message of support for your post, then you done backed down. DougR |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 10 Dec 05 - 06:05 AM One thing's for sure. When the takeover comes it won't be a Sunni day for minorities. Same old same old. Don T. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Terry K Date: 10 Dec 05 - 06:03 AM The only reason Saddam ever came to power was because Iraq was in parlous condition in the 1970s. Pretty much like now, in fact. Iraq is ready and waiting for its next deliverer to be hailed and applauded as Saddam was when he rescued Iraq all those years ago. So who's next? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: The Fooles Troupe Date: 09 Dec 05 - 10:35 PM Yeah, the normal trolls are bad enough, but the Government paid ones are a real pain. God Help Us! They think the Mudcat is a seething mass of Pinko Terrorist Sympathisers, instead of a bunch of burnt out old Folkies! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Big Mick Date: 09 Dec 05 - 10:29 PM I will buy that, Dick. I just think that the comparisons are ludicrous and a troll. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Bobert Date: 09 Dec 05 - 10:24 PM Hey, don't look at me... I din't write that stuff thou I agree wid it... Heck, I can spell better than glowboy GUEST most days of the week... Welcome, glowboy... Watch out fir T-Shooter... He likes to shoot first and never ask or answer no questions... Nice to have you on board... Bobert |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: The Fooles Troupe Date: 09 Dec 05 - 10:16 PM The alleged 13 year old girl, can't be - can spell correctly! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,glowboy Date: 09 Dec 05 - 10:06 PM Yew jist think yur so smarte withe all the bad spillin so's no one kin harldly make owut whut yer asayin'. Ifn I wuz ez edicateed as yew I wuid drop some perls uv widsom hear too end uew wid be amaized and awesticken by my brillyance. As fer George Warshington...he exterminated a whole lotta Injuns. That \s a fact. He kilt 'em, burnt 'em out, and cut down alla they fruti orchrards too. Drove them 6 Nations outta New York State. He wuz a mass murderer. Better beleeve it. A corse them redskins wuilda dun the same to him too ifn they hed the chancet and et his heart and liver in the bargoon. So I calls it a standoff. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: dick greenhaus Date: 09 Dec 05 - 10:04 PM Y'know, what bothers me is the pretence of legality. If you wnt to say that Sadam is a sonofabitch and should be hanged, I have no real quarrel with that. But don't try to make it look like a legitimate trial. Especially not like the kind we're supposed to have in the United States. We pulled the same shit at Nurnberg. The validity of a legal process really doesn't have anything to do with whether the accused is guilty or not. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: robomatic Date: 09 Dec 05 - 09:50 PM Bobert I'm not really shor whut you iz on adbout. Just don go impyunin' them brave burds the chickenhawkz wud I saw a brave l'il felr un the teevee even do hez alil guy he wuz alluz tryina eat that loudmouf fogherd legwerd. so yoo jez wutchit 'cuz thad lilberd wil go afur you 'ni 'll root fer 'im Iw ill. 'N I think ol' Saddam iz wun ornry cuss but I think ol' Ramsy Yusuf CLark iz a goodun and wull hell;p wile we giv'im a fur trile 'n hangum. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Big Mick Date: 09 Dec 05 - 09:26 PM Using Saddam and Washington shows you for the troll you are. There is a difference. Washington did not seek to exterminate folks, and turned down the chance to be King of this new country. Instead of ridiculous statements why don't you try a little critical thinking. One needs only look at the motives of each man to know there is no parallel. It is true that the victors write the history, but your comparison shows you to be not very bright. I shouldn't post when I am in a bad mood. Mick |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,zefto Date: 09 Dec 05 - 07:35 PM Saddam is in exactly the same spot that George Washington would have been in if the BRITISH had won the war of the American Revolution. Up shit creek. The best he can do is go out like Patrick Henry, with defiance, and secure his place forever in certain people's hearts as a martyred hero. He's a handy propaganda piece for both those who love him and those who hate him. Remember this as you gloat over his present misfortunes. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Puff The Magic Dragon Date: 09 Dec 05 - 05:25 PM now its 101 |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Janie Date: 09 Dec 05 - 05:01 PM its 100! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Janie Date: 09 Dec 05 - 05:01 PM beacause |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Janie Date: 09 Dec 05 - 05:00 PM Just |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: DougR Date: 09 Dec 05 - 01:26 PM Saddam will rise as high as the rope takes him. DougR |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Bobert Date: 08 Dec 05 - 10:29 PM Hmmmmm, MG???? I don't fell like I've cught any of it... Heck, I've delvered some but none in my cather's mit... Yo, 13 year old girl, First of all, sorry for the typo where I called you a 134 year old girl... Actually from reading yer post, I'd swear you weren't a day over 93... But, not to worry, 'cause this ain't got nuthin to do with nuthin... Yeah, I'm sure you are 13... Problem is that you seem to have "liberals" pigeon-holed into these nice cookie cutter people that all think exactly the same... Sorry, 13, but you are very much mistaken. Hope this doesn't ruin yer entire Christmas... First of all, what makes you think that "liberals" are all for every danged Hispanic who has crossed into the United States is like the "Second Coming"??? Where did you get that idea??? The way I see it is that the Boss Hog's of America, 13, are the ones who have been so happy to see all this cheap-ass labor... Yeah they are the ones who have benefited the most by cheap labor... Afterall, it's Boss Hog who loves cheap labor 'cause then he can hold a bat over the head of average American who's just trying to get by... Like I understand that you see the world thru the eyes of a 13 year old girl but coule you, would you elaborate on just why6 liberals, who have been traditionally pro labor, would support a few million "scabs" coming in to bust up what ever our working class had going for them??? Then, when you are done with that little exercise, maybe you could ask yer mommy or daddy on just how much it is going to raise yer mommy and daddies taxes to provide for these "scabs" and their families??? Uncle Bobert |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Once Famous Date: 08 Dec 05 - 09:53 PM It's real nice to see bobert catch the shit he is getting on this thread. Real nice. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,13 year old girl Date: 08 Dec 05 - 12:21 AM No Bobert, this is not the democracy TJ had in mind. The world is quite a bit different now and I don't think he could have envisioned modern comminucations and technology any more than you can envision the state of art in communications and technology 200 years from now. In 200 years what will democracy be like? Personally I think the Constitution needs to be updated without the influnce of lawyers, lobbyists and politicians wanting to be re-elected. Somehow Corporations have become entitled to the same rights as living human beings. Terrorists and illegal emmigrants have become entitled to the same benefits and rights as American taxpaying citizens. Liberals even want to allow them to vote so they will vote for them. Now what would TJ think of that situation? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,Teacher Date: 07 Dec 05 - 11:42 PM Guest, 13 year old girl, It's a week night and you should be doing your homework rather than spending your time on the internet arguing politics with a bunch of hopeless old farts. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Bobert Date: 07 Dec 05 - 11:10 PM Ahhhh, 'cause signin' on with the Kyoto and the World Court was the right thing to do... And, no, Kerry is nuthin' but another corporate shill, just like yer hero, 12 year old girl... I'm gettin' a little sick and tired of corporate shills... Uswed to be that legislation was written by congressfolks and their staffs... No more, its lobbiests... There are some 50,000 lobbiests in the Washington, D.C. area, all living in million dollar McMansions, 13. You do the math here... Is this the democracy that you thought Thomas Jefferson had in mind??? If so, in less than 300 words of yer own, please explain... Bobert |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,13 year old girl Date: 07 Dec 05 - 10:49 PM Bobert what is yer point? All I read is more Bobertisims. Are you a pundit or a knowledegable person? You are on the side of Slobodan Milosevic and Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman if you defend Ramsey Clark. Has the world court been able to convict Slobodan Milosevic? what good is the world court? They are as effective as the UN. I am glad Bush rejected the world court it shows leadership instead of a spineless popularity contest mentality. I am also glad Bush did not sing the Kyoto accord. WHy should America be shackeled when Red China was not required to sign? Why sign an agreement to use only high test when your competitors can buy regular and see how long your cab company lasts. Now beat me up with some facts. Who else wouldn't sign the Kyoto accord and who else rejects the world court? Your hero Kerry? Maybe you should read up on it here and absorb some of the facts you are so lacking: http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0806-05.htm |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: M.Ted Date: 07 Dec 05 - 05:54 PM Well, if Saddam is convicted, his conviction will be slightly more credible because a former US Attorney General defended him--Those who have been listing his former defendents may not have noticed it, but he didn't get many of them off, did he? Be that as it may, most mornings, and on CSPAN, no less, Don Imus shares the view that Saddam is the only one who can run Iraq--and it may be true. Iraq , as a country, never quite worked out, still Saddam showed up. He was the tough, do what you gotta do to whip em' into line kind of leader that folks like Crowbar, and the Bush clan, love-- I never liked Saddam, even when Saddamites like the Bushes and Rumsfeld were supporting him. The thing is, Iraq was a mess when he came along, and he created order. and it is a mess now--so the math is simple, even for Bush-- |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,Martin Gibson Date: 07 Dec 05 - 05:20 PM ramsey clark is going to lose this case and will go down in history as a traitorous american. Saddam is going to be executed and will be in hell forever. bobert, however will find new heroes of this type. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Bobert Date: 07 Dec 05 - 08:40 AM First of all, Ramsey Clark has pointed out that this trial just might not be a legal trial seein' as it is being held by an interim government that was largely picked by an occupying army... WEhy not have Saddam's trial moved to the World Court??? That would at least have some legitimacy... (But, Bobert, Bush pulled out of the World Court for fear that US citizens might be hald accountable for their crimes against other folks...) Good point but still, this trial is nuthin' but a big ol fashioned PR event... Makes the O.J. thing look like small potatoes... But really, IMO, one day historians will lump this trail in right next to "Mission Accomplished" and phony landing... (But, Bobert, Bush was in the plane...) Good point but he didn't pilot it thou no one made much of an attempt to reveal that at the time. Now back to Saddam... Yeah, send him to the World Court. This is embarrassing that an occupying army with a handpicked faux-erment would think it had the right to try this man... And while we're sending dfolks to the World Court I can think of a few folks who the Bush administartion is buddied up with who need to go as well... Yeah, if we're going to talk human rights let's 'round up all the thugs... Bobert p.s. Sorry to call GUEST a "134" year old girl... That was 'spose to come out "13" year old girl... nd, BTW, don't confuse anti-war with pacifist... Yeah, fir the most part I am a very peacefull person but if you attack me or my family, I'm going to defend myself... And you, as well as other cowardly GUEST, as right good on the attackin' part... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Teribus Date: 07 Dec 05 - 05:38 AM Yes Ebbie especially Saddam Hussein. Notice how our Aussie pal freda is not cutting and pasting the witness testimony from the Saddam trial - wonder why? Too harrowing maybe? Or maybe because oh never mind... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Ebbie Date: 07 Dec 05 - 01:03 AM Ramsay Clark is a principled, decent man who believes deeply in the concept of justice and democracy. Would that all did. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,Geoduck Date: 07 Dec 05 - 12:24 AM So you don't like war but your violent side is showing. Maybe you think a fight solves things despite the crap you post here. I'll tell you what, you can beat me up intellectually buy laying out some cold hard facts and none of your "No Child Left UnRecruited" "Did GUEST think it was cool when Saddam gassed Iranians?" "Don't take a weatherman to tell which way the wind blows" Bobertisims Also it don't matter if I am male, female, 12 years old or 134 years old. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Bobert Date: 06 Dec 05 - 11:40 PM Yo GUEST (meanin' any 12 year old girl in America)... Maybe you'd like to Google Sidewalk Bob so you'll know where to come to collect yer butt whup... Hey, I'll meet you at the innerstate to save you on gas... Chicken!!! Cluck, cluck, cluck... Must be nice tyo be 134 year olf girl hiding behing a scarey GUEST mask... You mean nuthin' to me... You ain't even got the courage to come out from behind yer mask... You are a coward of the highest level... Prolly a chickenhawk, too boot.... Prolly another couch potato who gets his jollies hidin' behind a friggin' mask and sayin' "Boo"... Well, "Boo" back at ya, you sissy creep... You gonna attack me, come on out and play... Wuss... Bobert |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,Crowbar Date: 06 Dec 05 - 11:27 PM Thanks to the traitor, Ramsey Clark Saddam, will rise again. Attenton Bobert: This is a cut and past. If you don't lik it, blow it out of your crybaby ass. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002666990_clark06.html BAGHDAD, Iraq — He wore a headset pushed back from one ear and addressed the Iraqi judge in English, in a genial but stern Southwestern drawl. "May it please the court," former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark insisted, his frustration evident even to those who didn't understand what he was saying Monday. "I just need two minutes. If I don't get two minutes, we're going to walk out of the courtroom." And so he did, precipitating an abrupt exodus by Saddam Hussein's defense team in a tumultuous day in the trial of the former Iraqi dictator. To those who've watched his legal evolution over the past half-century, Clark's latest choice of clients — and his brief protest at the outset of Monday's proceedings — came as no surprise. The son of a former U.S. Supreme Court justice who began his practice in the family's establishment law firm in Dallas, Clark has spent much of the past 30 years well past the reaches of mainstream politics and the law. Long before he signed on to Saddam's defense team, the 77-year-old Texan had assembled a client list that included former Yugoslav dictator Slobodan Milosevic, a Rwandan clergyman charged with genocide and Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, who was convicted of conspiracy in the 1993 truck-bomb explosion at New York's World Trade Center. Clark's far-flung legal forays have earned him dubious nicknames such as "the war criminal's best friend." Jack Valenti, a former colleague from the Johnson administration, says Clark has drifted so far out on the fringe as to become "amusing." Todd Gitlin, a professor at Columbia University who helped organize the first major Vietnam anti-war protest in 1965, said he listened with admiration to Clark's anti-war speeches years ago. "I thought he was admirable, but he's gone haywire politically," Gitlin said. "He seems to have aligned himself with every tyrant and every war criminal he can find." In siding with dubious figures that most other lawyers would shun, Clark asserts, he's fulfilling a "moral obligation" to guarantee that everyone, no matter how heinous the alleged crime, has a chance at equal justice under the law. "You do in life what you believe is right," Clark said Monday in a CNN interview. Clark has known Saddam for nearly 15 years. He met him on a visit to Iraq before the 1991 Persian Gulf War and returned several times to condemn U.N. sanctions, saying they were imposing hardship on Iraqi citizens. Although Clark signed on to Saddam's defense team last January, becoming one of more than 20 lawyers who are representing him, Monday's proceedings were the American lawyer's first substantial performance in the Arab-run courtroom. Family members and longtime associates say Clark's intense — critics would say misguided — sense of fair play is deeply rooted in his own history. One of his two children, Ronda, was born severely handicapped, and Clark and his wife, Georgia, have devoted much of their lives to her well-being. "Ronda is a lesson in love that made him even more compassionate and perhaps an advocate for the underdog," his sister said. Clark's father, Tom C. Clark, served as President Truman's attorney general before he was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1949. After serving in the Marines as a courier during World War II, the younger Clark earned a history degree at the University of Texas and a law degree at the University of Chicago, then returned to work in the family law firm. For a while, he was the youngest assistant attorney general under President Kennedy, assigned to major civil-rights cases. President Johnson appointed Clark attorney general in 1966, prompting his father to step down from the Supreme Court. After leaving government, Clark came out openly against the war by flying to Hanoi in 1971. Three years later, he ran against Republican Sen. Jacob Javits of New York in an unorthodox campaign that included his refusal to take contributions of more than $100. In subsequent years, Clark increasingly distanced himself from the political establishment. His clients have included alleged former Nazi Karl Linnas, controversial political candidate Lyndon LaRouche and Radovan Karadzic, a Bosnia Serb general who was indicted on war-crimes charges. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Peace Date: 12 Nov 05 - 02:43 PM JOE OFFER Regarding the post here Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,Peace: - PM Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:32 PM That was a serious request. Would you be kind enough to message me the address I posted that from? Thank you. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Bobert Date: 12 Nov 05 - 08:00 AM Hmmmmmmm? Howz things this mornin', Bruce??? And fir the record, cronology ain't it's all cracked up to be... IT's gotten alot odf folks hurt or killed over the (years).... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Peace Date: 12 Nov 05 - 12:38 AM Freak-out in Alberta tonight, I'll tell ya. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Peace Date: 12 Nov 05 - 12:33 AM DAMN. There's the answer. It's been between 1966 and 1968 all these years. Didn't think to look there. Since when have the years been in chronological order? Is this a new thing? I thought they was like comets or something, ya know? The first person to see it gets to name or number it. WOW! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Peace Date: 12 Nov 05 - 12:24 AM CIGARETTES. CIGARETTES. Tobacco, man, Virginia tobacco. Player's Light tobacco. Having said that, pass it over here. I'm still searching for the year, 1967. It went missing between 1966 and 1968. Been lookin' for it nigh on 38 years now. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Bobert Date: 12 Nov 05 - 12:17 AM Cough.... Man, this is some dynomite stuff.... Cough.... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Peace Date: 12 Nov 05 - 12:09 AM Uh, Bobert, that ain't what I smoke with. (LOL. Did once or twice as a teenager, but them days is gone.) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Bobert Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:59 PM You smokin, Bruce??? Okay, that's all I need to read!!! Iz on my way to Canadaville and I'm bringin' 2/3's of the cure.... .... The anvil and the ballpeen hammer... Now all we need is the smoker's private parts and the cure will have been delivered.... And, I might add, it's a 100% Guarenteed, Money-back cure... Bobert |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Peace Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:44 PM PS I am particularly interested because I was out having a cigarette--at least that's what I thought. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Peace Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:43 PM Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,Peace: - PM Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:32 PM To Joe Offer: would you be kind enough to tell me the address from which I posted that. I seem to be having a senior moment and I would like to verify exactly which computer I was at. Thank you very much. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Bobert Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:38 PM You ain't picked an issue, T-Lite... All you have picked is a bunch of a stuff that can't be proved one way 'er another becuase right now, there's way too much stuff coverin' it up... Now if you weant the particulars on the 2000 Election Thievery, read Greg Palist's book "Best Democracy Money Can Buy"... I dare you... Hey, 2004 was Diebold's year accross the country... Hmmmmm? Wonder why the exit polls were so different from the3 final results... Firast time since exit polls have been used that there was such a discrepency between on how voters said they voted for and the final results... Do I have proof??? Don't take a weatherman to tell which way the wind blows... Yeah, pick like a real issue... You know, ahhhh, like a policy??? Taht too much to ask????? You get to pick it... No Child Left UnRecruited, Katrina, Tax Policy, Protectin' the Snail Darters in Alaska.... Shoot, bring it on... You see, 100% of legislation that has been written under Bush wasn't wtritten by anyone other than corportist lobbiests and beneath it all is yet another trick to try to steal the workin' man's stuff... Don't think so??? Pick yer friggin' issue!!! Hey, I'm not only given you the choice of weapons but also the element of surprise.... So take yer best shot!!!! Bobert |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,Boab Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:36 PM Bobert---asking the question of iraqis "Would you like Saddam to make a comeback?" after all that has transpired over there is just about the outer limit of vacuous inquiry that anybody could imagine---perhaps except for those "fly-guys" who stand to gain propaganda points from the obvious answer. Few there are who would deny that the man was a ratbag. Those few are only SOME of the "insurgents" who are now involved in the everlasting fight against occupying coalition forces and those whom they see [not always correctly] as collaborators. Ask Teribus what his guess would be at the answer to the question "Would you like us to get rid of Saddam for you, at the expense of the lives of many thousands of Iraqi men, women and children?"--such question being asked BEFORE the beginning of the debacle? I suggest that then the reply would be radically different! It's all "pie in the sky" anyway; the Bush-Tony crew had NO interest in "liberating " the Iraqi people. The real reason lies --as always, and never let constant lie-repetition blind you---in the desperate need for control over oil resource. That was the reason in the beginning, and it hasn't changed. I'd have more respect for those who are pro war if they'd at least admit that simple truth. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,Peace: Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:32 PM |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Peace Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:20 PM It would be considerably better form if you were to give your membership name and THEN be scathing with Bobert. Kinda a bit chickenshit to take shots from the bushes like that. Have the decency to 1) state your name 2) call your opponent the names you want 3) go take a shit in the ocean Thank you. PS Bobert has no 'love' for Saddam Hussein. You jus' don't know how to read him, that's all. Give it a rest, SVP. Thank you again. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST,Crowbar Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:02 PM It's dickheads like Bobert that will enable Saddam to rise again. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST Date: 11 Nov 05 - 11:00 PM Bobert in a nutshell: "All you're good fir is attackin' the messenger" |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: GUEST Date: 11 Nov 05 - 10:09 PM I don't have to explain anything I did not bring up. You do have to explain your sarcastic and churlish satements, the most ridiculous of which is like "Saddam.... We need you now more now than ever..." Maybe you can be more specific about who We includes and what we need him for. Or just continue to spew shit to cover up for your lack of intelligence and sincerity. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Saddam Will Rise Again From: Teribus Date: 11 Nov 05 - 09:46 PM So Bobert I didn't have any points? How about these that you completely and utterly ignored: 1. Having sought the opinion of a representative number of Iraqi citizens, do they unstintingly wish that Saddam Hussein berestored to power -You will find that the answer to that one is a definite NO. 2. Did Al Gore, or did Al Gore not concede the 200 Presidential Election? Hint Bobert, this is a simple YES or NO answer. The answer is a matter of RECORD - AL GORE DID CONCEDE - FACT. 3. By what margin did George W Bush win the 2004 Presidential Election? Again Bobert a recorder matter of FACT Now come on Bobert I'm waiting? No personal attacks now, you've tried all that shit and it's got you nowhere. Above are the points I have put up for discussion - Let's hear you discuss, if you can't, please take my advice and shut the fuck up. |
