BS: Non posting of judgements week.

Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week.
From: John O'L
Date: 22 Mar 06 - 04:19 AM

In a conversation between an unknown number of people who are coming and going constantly (or not), I think something like 'I think that sucks' or 'I agree with that' may be valid comments.

I don't usually make such posts however, and am therefore happy to refrain from doing so for a week. What happens then? Do we assess what we have gained against what we have lost and set guidelines for the following week?

Man, that really s... Oh, that's right.

Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week.
From: number 6
Date: 21 Mar 06 - 11:22 PM

Good point!

sIx

Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week.
From: Peace
Date: 21 Mar 06 - 11:21 PM

OK, Shambles. One week.

Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week.
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 21 Mar 06 - 11:20 PM

How about "That would be a great idea if only it didn't suck so much."?

It doesn't further the discussion, but it gives everyone an opportunity to go "Huh?".

Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week.
From: number 6
Date: 21 Mar 06 - 11:00 PM

Right on Shambles !!

sIx

Subject: BS: Non posting of judgements week.
From: The Shambles
Date: 21 Mar 06 - 10:59 PM

When you publicly posts things like - 'I think that sucks' or 'I think that is wonderful' - does this really add much to a discussion?

As the posting only of personal judgements (good or not so good) of what our fellow posters choose to contribute does not appear to serve any useful purpose and can be counter-productive - perhaps it would be good idea for us to try and resist only posting such things?