Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 23 Mar 06 - 10:17 AM We cannot be kind to each other here for even an hour. We whisper, and hint, and chuckle and grin at our brother's shame; however you take it we men are a little breed. Alfred Lord Tennyson |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Peace Date: 23 Mar 06 - 10:16 AM "you haven't been putting up with this since 1998 or so" To hear some folks tell it, the Mudcat has been a centre of calm and brother/sisterly love since its inception, and the troubles only started in the last year or so. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 23 Mar 06 - 10:05 AM I may disagree with what you say- So does this entitle me to post only call you vulgar and offensive names, question your sanity and motives, to hold public conversations about you, mock your spelling and grammar and to generally gang-up with others to bully you in the hope that another member will get upset with all this personal judgement and leave? |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 23 Mar 06 - 09:55 AM Now that (most of) the usual suspect have had their usual fun - perhaps they will finally accept that any personal judgements made publicly in any form about any other poster on our forum is a totally pointless exercise when the site's owner is making few if any value judgements about what is posted or who may be posting it? Is anyone here really interested in reading posts containing only one poster's personal judgement of another? If anyone is really interested in this - can they please join a site that is set up for such things rather than insist on inflicting such things upon every other poster on our forum? Or asking for our public forum to be turned into a private members club where their freedom to do and say what they wish without censure - which they take for granted and abuse - would be denied to others? |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Big Mick Date: 23 Mar 06 - 09:38 AM self explanatory |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 23 Mar 06 - 09:30 AM glub, glub, glub, glub |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 23 Mar 06 - 09:18 AM Rule 3: Know where you are in cyberspace http://www.albion.com/netiquette/rule3.html |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Bill D Date: 23 Mar 06 - 09:15 AM quack, quack, quack, quack |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 23 Mar 06 - 09:14 AM Thank you Mick for alway being so willing to oblige. But would you think that I or any other poster would be interested in your judgement of another poster? |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Big Mick Date: 23 Mar 06 - 09:08 AM Shambles, my 8 year old neighbor can use Google and come up with quotes that prove about any point and its antithesis in about 1 1/2 minutes. Surely this does nothing to enhance your reputation. As to the poster who thinks I came on in an arrogant way, you haven't been putting up with this since 1998 or so. This man sets himself up to get shot down, then attacks for shooting him down. Mick |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 23 Mar 06 - 08:54 AM Rule 2: Adhere to the same standards of behavior online that you follow in real life http://www.albion.com/netiquette/rule2.html |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Bill D Date: 23 Mar 06 - 08:07 AM "When every man is a prophet, does anyone have anything worth saying?" unknown.. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Wolfgang Date: 23 Mar 06 - 07:30 AM The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess. Luke 18:11-12 Wolfgang |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: GUEST Date: 23 Mar 06 - 07:12 AM Everyone knows that personal attacks are NOT permitted here. If you can't make your case without resorting to attacks, shut up. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 23 Mar 06 - 05:24 AM Each person must live their life as a model for others. Rosa Parks |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 23 Mar 06 - 05:10 AM I would start a "Non-posting of quotations week" thread, but it might upset the copycat thread police. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Purple Foxx Date: 23 Mar 06 - 05:07 AM This is becoming a "Classic" thread. Sub specie aeternitatis. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Paul Burke Date: 23 Mar 06 - 05:01 AM Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι ουδὲν οἶδα (Σωκράτης) |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: John MacKenzie Date: 23 Mar 06 - 04:55 AM I ate Doner Kebab! G. ☻ |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Paul Burke Date: 23 Mar 06 - 04:50 AM Timmy O'Daniels ate Donna Ferranti. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: John MacKenzie Date: 23 Mar 06 - 04:38 AM Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem, Roger. Giok |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 23 Mar 06 - 04:05 AM Let He Who is Without Sin Cast the First Stone John 8:7. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 23 Mar 06 - 03:40 AM Rule 1: Remember the human. http://www.albion.com/netiquette/rule1.html |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 22 Mar 06 - 06:49 PM "From: Paul Burke - PM Date: 22 Mar 06 - 08:01 AM I can't hold out any longer..... You will be taken from this court to the prison whence you came, and thence to a lawful place of execution, where you will be hanged by the neck until you are dead; and may the Lord have mercy upon your soul! (is that a complete sentence?)" I have given this matter considerable thought, and have reached the conclusion that the sentence, complete or not, is a capital sentence. I hope that this conclusion will not be considered too judgemental, but I do have an unfortunate tendency to become mental when I judge. Don T. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Peace Date: 22 Mar 06 - 04:48 PM OK then Bert. We'll take other names for that period of time. Would you prefer to be Ralph or Sam? |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: GUEST,GEUST Date: 22 Mar 06 - 04:45 PM well, well, well.. my last remark has been deleted.. what a surprise !? now no-one will ever know the reason why GUEST 01:01 PM /01:37 PM is ******* up his/her over-inflated sense of self-importance, and being such a contemptous **** ! oh well... [check the ***s for spelling if you like.. I did, with the Oxford Dictionary, and they're correct enough to satisfy the most pedantic of supercilious ********* !] |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Bert Date: 22 Mar 06 - 04:33 PM That sounds good Peace. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: GUEST,going deaf Date: 22 Mar 06 - 03:56 PM eh? what's that? you say Mick's nuts are the size of mustard seeds? |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Joe Offer Date: 22 Mar 06 - 03:29 PM Am I supposed to delete dyslexic personal attacks, too? -Eoj Reffo- |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Peace Date: 22 Mar 06 - 03:27 PM 010100110110100001100 etc... |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Peace Date: 22 Mar 06 - 02:50 PM Hey, Bert. Let's you and I save it for a week and then start a thread wherein we give each other shit for stuff. OK? |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Bert Date: 22 Mar 06 - 02:48 PM I'm going to be like Bill D and save mine up 'till next week, THEN I'll let them assholes know what I think of them;-) |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Bill D Date: 22 Mar 06 - 02:32 PM "...only the one it hits will yelp." but a lot of them will run..... |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: kendall Date: 22 Mar 06 - 02:32 PM Guest 12:02, that was very good! |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: kendall Date: 22 Mar 06 - 02:27 PM It's a favorite of mine but it is not mine. It sounds more like George Carlin. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Jeri Date: 22 Mar 06 - 02:14 PM No, I think that quote's from Kendal Morse. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: GUEST Date: 22 Mar 06 - 02:09 PM "If you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, only the one it hits will yelp." Conficius |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: GUEST,Martin gibson Date: 22 Mar 06 - 02:09 PM yes this thread does suck, but Big Mick was pretty arrogant about it. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Ebbie Date: 22 Mar 06 - 02:08 PM Needing 'permission' from Example frequently stems from cowardice. Bontrager |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 22 Mar 06 - 01:52 PM Example has more followers than reason. We unconsciously imitate what pleases us, and approximate to the characters we most admire. Christian Nestell Bovee |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: GUEST Date: 22 Mar 06 - 01:37 PM "Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself." Guest Geust, my head has spent considerable time in books. That's where I learned to spell, and to use correct grammar. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 22 Mar 06 - 01:24 PM It is easy to ignore responsibility when one is only an intermediate link in a chain of action. Stanley Milgram |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 22 Mar 06 - 01:07 PM Choice of attention - to pay attention to this and ignore that - is to the inner life what choice of action is to the outer. In both cases, a man is responsible for his choice and must accept the consequences, whatever they may be. W. H. Auden |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Ebbie Date: 22 Mar 06 - 01:04 PM Worrying about setting an "example", to my mind, has value mainly when one is teaching youngsters. Surely peers don't need permission? |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: GUEST Date: 22 Mar 06 - 01:01 PM When a person's spelling and or grammar are so bad that the reader has no clue what they are trying to say, I think of the statement , "Language was created so we can converse, and understand each other." Now, if you tend to talk backwards, (Throw Mamma from the train a kiss..." or you leave out connecting words, you should expect some heat from those who are capable of clear thinking. Don't blame them for your own shortcomings. Try to rise to their level of education, instead of expecting them to sink to yours. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 22 Mar 06 - 12:39 PM Here come da Judge! Here come da Judge! Order in da court 'cause here come da Judge! Sammy Davis Jr. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 22 Mar 06 - 12:36 PM http://www.google.co.uk/ |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: Wesley S Date: 22 Mar 06 - 12:21 PM Shambles - would you be so kind as to share the address of the website where all of these quotes are listed ? It looks like an interesting place. Thanks. |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: The Shambles Date: 22 Mar 06 - 12:16 PM The best way to win against the intolerable is to tolerate them, for this they have seldom dealt with. Your indulgence may soften their malice and open their eyes to more honorable ways. Bryant H. McGill |
Subject: RE: BS: Non posting of judgements week. From: GUEST Date: 22 Mar 06 - 12:02 PM For every original thinker there are a thousand lesser fools only too happy to parrot her utterances, lacking the wit themselves to coin a pithy phrase. Me, just now |