The problem is Joe, the buffoons say that they represent the aims of their club and you say you can pick and choose the rules.

Are they misrepresenting when clearly following the rule book or are you diluting the message?

To the rest of society, Jim seems fairly "on the ball" with this one.

You reckon the cardinal referred to doesn't speak for Catholics. Do you speak for them? If there are myriad messages, why bother with a collective club? You say that "atheists" this that and the other in equal numbers. What are "atheists" being told as to their moral compass? Do you include those who are neither theists or atheists? The vast majority of western people don't deny theism (the a in atheist) but frankly haven't bothered considering it in the first place.

Clerical abuse. Pick out the "atheists" in that one.