BS: Conspiracy theories

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Musket
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 12:00 PM

Isn't Uncle Dave perceptive today?

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 10:39 AM

Personally I have little time for so-called conspiracy theories, least of all for those surrounding lifestyle-deaths such as Monroe and Diana. Boring. However, there is, just occasionally, a rather too-easy willingness to cry "conspiracy theory" when one suspects the attempted covering-up of a miscarriage of justice. I've always believed this to be the case with the Lockerbie bombing. One of the first things that happened after the crash was that the scene, containing vital evidence, was violated, not just by well-meaning locals but, far more significantly, by swarms of unidentified Americans who were spiriting away that evidence. Read about it here:

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n18/gareth-peirce/the-framing-of-al-megrahi

And don't get me started on the testimony of the demented shopkeeper in Malta which was such a vital part of the prosecution case. At least he was well paid by the yanks.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 10:12 AM

Yes, I am listening Uncle Dave. I have taken note of your stylistic preferences, but feel no particular necessity to modify my chosen modes of expression.

Thank you nevertheless for your interest.

≈M≈

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Rapparee
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 09:57 AM

I have a Theory about Conspiracies.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Wesley S
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 09:49 AM

While most of us think of conspiracy theories - there are "true believers" that have "insider information". In my experience people rarely change sides in the matter. Most often than not the simplest answer is the correct one.

Except when the Trilateral Commission is involved. And we all know that the commission was started by Dr Moriarty.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Uncle_DaveO
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 09:41 AM

Whenever I see/hear (MGM, are you listening?) a statement
that Nothing will convince me on a given subject,
I conclude from that very statement that it's from a mind not
only closed against rational discussion on that subject but
likely to adopt other, similar adamant positions. Thus
the credibility of other strong pronouncements from that
speaker/writer is made questionable.

A statement like "to convince me of such-and-such would
take extremely strong proof" would leave room for rational
discussion and allow for honesty or dignity of those who
hold contrary opinions.

Dave Oesterreich

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Ed T
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 07:21 AM

The Bilderberg list

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: GUEST,#
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 07:18 AM

Foolish conspiracy theories, like the Catholic Church hushing up mass graves of murdered children. Couldn't happen in Ireland or Canada. Just uneasy rumours for sure.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Musket
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 07:04 AM

It must have stung like sheep lightning.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: GUEST,#
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 07:03 AM

Conspiracy theories, some of which could better be called crimes.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: GUEST,Sheep in wolf's clothing Steve Shaw
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 06:31 AM

I can baaa-ly believe you said that!


Oops....

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Ed T
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 06:21 AM

And, there was a poore misguided celtic lad who put forward the catty conspiracy theory- that our very own Steve Shaw was actually a sheep in a wood thicket's clothing , and I suspect, as a youth, he would be a lamb? A Shaw being a lamb, preposterous!

:)

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Richard Bridge
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 06:06 AM

PLEASE close this thread before Fugitive From Sanity gets started.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: GUEST,.gargoyle
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 06:00 AM

Julius Caeser
Abraham Lincoln
Sir Thomas More
Salem Witchcraft
Joseph Smith and his brother, Hyrum
Bounty Mutineers
Molly Maguires
Earp Brothers and Doc Holiday - OK Corral
Oklahoma Courthouse Bombing
Twin Towers 911
Hay Market Eight
Chicago Seven
Bartolomeo Vanzetti and Nicola Sacco
Scottsboro Boys
Lindbergh baby kidnapping
Alger Hiss-Whittaker Chambers
Manson Family
Symbionese Liberation Army
McMartin Preschool
Shoot Out at Ruby Ridge
Clinton impeachment and Whitewater
Nixon resignation and Whitewater
Nuremberg
The gunpowder plot
Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette
Socrates
Paul McCartney' s death
Pearl Harbor
Munich beer hall
Shakespeare
chem trails
monkey virus
global warming
AIDS
Holocaust
L. Ron Hubbard
vaccines cause autism
water floridation
Moscow Purge 1936
Hollywood Ten
Tiananmen Square
Mary Queen of Scotts
Crucifiction of Jesus Christ

Sincerely,
Gargoyle

That should keep you twiddling for awhile When you are through we can move on to " who pushed Humpty Dumpty " Jack's involvement with candle sticks" bestiality and the piper' s son" and a hundred more".

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Musket
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 05:24 AM

I dare say you never know the truth when it stares at you...

Finding the truth is a wee bit different to offering alternatives.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: GUEST,Ed
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 05:08 AM

And who might 'they' be?

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: GUEST
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 05:02 AM

In some cases it seems almost as if they go out of their way to provoke conspiracy theory, viz;

- the death and burial of Bin Laden
- everything to do with Locherbie
- everything to do with UTA flight 772
- the removal of Gough Whitlam
- the temporary removal of Berlusconi when he tried to impede the ruin of Libya

Unfortunately we'll never know the truth as there is too much at stake for those involved.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Musket
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 04:40 AM

Either way, it keeps an airport bookstall industry going I suppose.

Still not nice for their family and friends to have to keep seeing or reading it, all the same. When we build them up and burn them down again, we forget they are humans with human feelings, aspirations and other humans who care for them. They tend to have children for instance. I know my Dad must have had his toes amputated so he could get nearer to the bar, but I don't want to read about it in The Daily Express.

Whilst you are on with conspiracy theories Mike, how's your newsagent? Heard from his nephew lately?

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 03:55 AM

I'll raise my head above the parapet and risk being caught in the crossfire of multiple Musketry 😆, by saying that I'm inclined to agree with Michael regarding the MM and Saint Diana deaths. However, I have to disagree over Myra Hindley - her 'death' was very conveniently-timed indeed, and I've always strongly suspected that she was released very quietly, with a new identity, to spend whatever she had (has?) left of her life in anonymity.

But, in all three cases, I believe it's unlikely we will ever know the truth.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: akenaton
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 03:50 AM

I think that Marilyn was a fragile soul, who may well have been persuaded that suicide was the only way out of her torment....for political reasons. Anything is possible among the political classes, but I rather agree with Ebbie that an arranged traffic accident seems clumsy and unprofessional.

I am led to believe that "life is cheap" amongst our criminal classes.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 03:32 AM

Ebbie -- An experienced professional driver doesn't get drunk while at work conveying distinguished passengers. He must surely have been got at.

≈M≈

Musket -- interpolations on your part, as implied in OP, are not welcome; any further that you trouble yourself to post will remain unread by me & will be resolutely ignored.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Ebbie
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 03:09 AM

I have no knowledge of either Monroe's or Diana's deaths. However, when you say: "Nothing will convince me that they weren't both rather clumsily done away with..." are you postulating that the driver was in on it? Fairly preposterous, wouldn't you say?

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: Musket
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 03:01 AM

Occams razor and and get your medication reviewed.

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 02:55 AM

Good point semantically, Shim. But I think it probably best to run with the generally accepted term, even if it is a bit loosely expressed.

≈M≈

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 02:51 AM

Of course, the phrase "conspiracy theory" is a misuse of the word 'theory'. A theory is not a hunch or a guess but a scientific model, of some aspect of reality, supported by (lots of) evidence. We should really be talking about a "conspiracy hypothesis" ... but that would probably never catch on ... ?

Subject: RE: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: GUEST,CS
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 02:38 AM

One of the problems of the phrase 'Conspiracy Theory' is that it's something of a catchall term that can be used indiscriminately to undermine, what may indeed be perfectly rational and credible arguments about possible conspiracies. Are there conspiracies, of course there are.

Governments hide problematic truths from the people (such as how much they are being spied on for example). The police close ranks to protect themselves when people die under their watch (at a football match for example). Dossiers (about child abuse in high places for example) go 'missing.'

As for your specific examples, I don't have a clue concerning the truth of the circumstances surrounding either Lady Diana or Monroe's deaths, but do I think that those who rule us are frequently hideously shady and capable of eliminating problematic individuals - especially ones that may potentially compromise 'national security', absolutely I do. I think you'd have to be terribly naive not to think so.

Subject: BS: Conspiracy theories
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 03 Nov 14 - 01:46 AM

I am as convinced as it is possible to be that the Moon Landings of July 1969 occurred on the Moon and not in the Utah desert. And that Myra Hindley, the notorious Moors Murderess, died in custody, and the coffin that was buried as a consequence actually contained her body, and not bricks while she had been let out thru a side door of the prison because announcing her release would have provoked too much protest...

In short, I think the vast majority of rumours of such conspiracy theories which catch on are nonsense, not even worth a second of any intelligent person's consideration.

But, as James Thurber pointed out as a moral to one of his 'Fables For Our Time', you might as well fall flat on your face as bend over too far backwards; which is to say, in present context, that because the vast majority of conspiracy theories and rumours which catch on are rubbish, that surely doesn't mean that none of them can ever possibly be true and well founded.

There are two which I do believe in; have stated so on this forum before; and have received a certain amount of scorn & obloquy [particularly on the part of one generally agreed as rather foolish regular forum-stirrer-upper] for dong so. Namely, that the deaths of two prominent women widely regarded as trouble-makers, Marilyn Monroe and Princess Diana of Wales, were both too convenient to too many influential people to have been quite as adventitiously unfortunate as they were made to appear. Nothing will convince me that they weren't both rather clumsily done away with at the behest of some to whom their continued existence constituted a serious threat.

Anyone care to comment on the phenomenology of the Conspiracy Theory; on these particular ones I mention; or on any others which may occur?

≈Michael≈