 sj |
||
|
||
BS: Most mysoginist language
| Nigel Parsons | 15 Mar 15 - 07:37 PM | |
| Greg F. | 15 Mar 15 - 07:07 PM | |
| Steve Shaw | 15 Mar 15 - 07:01 PM | |
| GUEST | 15 Mar 15 - 06:19 PM | |
| Donuel | 15 Mar 15 - 06:10 PM | |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
BS: Most mysoginist language
|
Share Thread
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Subject: RE: BS: Most mysoginist language From: Nigel Parsons Date: 15 Mar 15 - 07:37 PM Greg F: How do you consider the language of the Bible (you don't state which version) is misogynistic? Is it because it uses the terms "man" & "mankind" as they have been used for centuries to be inclusive of both genders? Do you not understand that it is a product of the times when it was written? I find modern versions drab & lacking in poetry, partially because of the attempt to use "inclusive" language. If we ever totally lose the beauty of the King James Bible, and of the 1662 book of common prayer, I, for one, will mourn their passing. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Most mysoginist language From: Greg F. Date: 15 Mar 15 - 07:07 PM Most misogynist? Well, there's the language of the "Christian"[sic] bible, which could be a contender. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Most mysoginist language From: Steve Shaw Date: 15 Mar 15 - 07:01 PM Dog Latin. Disgusting. It should be Dog 'n' bitch Latin. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Most mysoginist language From: GUEST Date: 15 Mar 15 - 06:19 PM What do they speak on the Isle of Man |
|
Subject: BS: Most mysoginist language From: Donuel Date: 15 Mar 15 - 06:10 PM Does anyone here have the knowledge to form an opinion as to what the most and least misogynist languages are? |
