BS: Views from Canada

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: Ed T
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 04:10 PM

"Queen's portrait pulled down, Alfred Pellan paintings back up in Foreign Affairs building""

Canadian picture 

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: gnu
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 04:40 PM

Guest... don't mess with my milk or my dairy farms or my apples or my blood pressure. PERIOD. Canada got rid of that shit years ago based on good science.

Ya wanna talk science?

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: GUEST,HiLo
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 04:40 PM

Most people seem not to understand the issue of so called growth hormones. Reading the actual science would be helpful on any case.

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: GUEST
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 05:15 PM

Agreed, science literacy is sadly lacking among the general public and the pseudo science served up on the interweb is not helpful (and there is shitloads of it out there).

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: gnu
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 06:11 PM

Now THIS Canuck military strategy is the best yet!

Any Herring Chokers or nearby folks out there who will understand this?

I am still laughing.

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: GUEST
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 06:34 PM

The scary thing is I understand CCT perfectly well.

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: GUEST
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 06:39 PM

Agreed, there is also a shitload of BS Science, more appropriately called corporate sponsored food science.

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: GUEST,HiLo
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 06:57 PM

Most legitimate "scientists" are very Leary of so called "corporate science". Please read independent scientic reports on this subject.

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: GUEST
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 07:05 PM

"OK, more specifically BST and rBGH."

They're all the same thing. I guess you missed the part in the post of 09 Nov 15 - 01:23 PM where it says that the added BGH is indistinguishable from the native and that measured levels in treated milk fall within the range of variation for untreated milk. That's an important fact right there but one that is conveniently ignored by those espousing a cause but not understanding the science.

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: Ed T
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 07:07 PM

Canadas Arctic ignored 


""All of Moscow's effort and attention, combined with Canada's neglect, has effectively turned the Arctic Ocean into Putin's Lake.""

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: GUEST
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 07:41 PM

there is also a shitload of BS Science, more appropriately called corporate sponsored food science.

Could you provide links to this. I would be very interested in seeing the names of university based or government funded food scientists who are receiving funding from corporations and publishing scientifically unsupported data.

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: GUEST
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 08:17 PM

No need to provide a multitude of links to corporate fubded research that provides the basis of food and drug sector decisions- it is the way government operates today.Unfortunately, government science is mostly underfunded and welcomes the research, regardless of its accuracy.

Corporate interests have a large impact on government and those elected and of course is always given the benefit of the doubt, when economics are figured in.

If government food and drug aporovals, based on science were so good, why do so many approved drugs cause do many problems?

The reason many countries do not permit their dairy industry to use these added, artificially sources hormones is animal health. Dick animals receive more antibiotics, which ends up, in varied amounts, in dairy products.

Labeling could be as elementary as in fruit products, for example, no sugar added -in this case no growth hormones added.


OK, Q?

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: gnu
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 08:30 PM

Q? WTF is that shit? You got a case, prove it. And, BTW... start another thread for it and don't try to screw this one up with unsubstantiated bullshit.

One more BTW, I can't be arsed with bullshit that ignores science by trivializing it in a condescending manner like a bully on a playground. Put or shut up.

I have read the science. I shant spoon feed it to you. Nor will I be back. I am done with this tread.

gnightgnu

Subject: RE: BS: Views from Canada
From: GUEST
Date: 09 Nov 15 - 09:43 PM

And, then there was the pseudo-science that some chatter on about fraking.
LOL