Folklore: The Green Man

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Ged Fox
Date: 19 May 15 - 06:05 AM

My dad mentioned once that, when he was a lad (circa 1930) living in Walthamstow in the shade of Epping Forest, they used to play a game at grass cutting time wherein one child was buried in cut grass and the rest made a circle dance while chanting "Green man arise-o" until the green man jumped up.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 18 May 15 - 10:31 PM

great thread!

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 12 Aug 08 - 04:03 PM

The village's main pub is called The Green Man!

Ah yes - this was touched on this elsewhere (where? I've no idea!). Certainly there has always been a folkloric interest in the pub name, (which has nothing to do with the ecclesiastical foliate heads!) and given that the writers of TWM certainly did their researches into such things (mostly through The Golden Bough!) then it's hardly surprising. What is surprising however is that, other than the pub, there is no other mention of The Green Man in TWM. In any case, TWM just might represent the earliest instance of a foliate head in the context of a Green Man pub name. The confusion between the Foliate Head and The Green Man as a pub name is c/o Lady Raglan in 1939 and the modern trend for Green Man pub signs to show foliate heads derived from ecclesiastical carvings, no matter how stylised these have become in recent years.

Okay - what I'm really looking for now are publications which mention The Green Man & Foliate Heads in a pagan / folkloric context prior to 1975....

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: GUEST,glueman
Date: 12 Aug 08 - 04:11 AM

Must say I've never bought into the paganisation of the Green Man favoured by fundies. The medieval minster builders, people who weren't averse to the odd Doom painting, never AFAIK elided foliate heads with Old Nick as visual simulacra. Iconoclasts, men you'd assume would have a grudge against this particular idolatry, don't appear to have singled out leaf faces for their ire and big hammers.

The Green Man in pub signage sees him as Robin Hood, Jack in the Green and the Jolly Green Giant of tinned food fame which is also a bit of a presumption IMO. My suspicion is the foliate head in churches had some significance which was fully compatible with a Christian reading to their builders that has been lost. TGM could be a personification of summer (like moons and suns have faces) without implying an extra deity, or the abundant wood the beams are made from, or a visual signifier for all acts of human creation - but we're in the world of guesswork.
Conspiracies are one of the better uses for Occam's razor. There's no need for goblins.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Peg
Date: 11 Aug 08 - 09:56 PM

"It is, for example, supremely significant that the Green Man is altogether absent from The Wicker Man (1973) - surely the cinematographic watershed of much of today's paganism (and 'Dark Folk')."


Not true. The village's main pub is called The Green Man! The sign (with its odd image) is shown very prominently. I would hardly call that "altogether absent."

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Sailor Ron
Date: 11 Aug 08 - 11:29 AM

Going back to songs about 'The Green Man' Alan Bell wrote a rather good one years ago.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Leadfingers
Date: 10 Aug 08 - 05:50 PM

100

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Q (Frank Staplin)
Date: 10 Aug 08 - 05:32 PM

As Edgar Rice Burroughs pointed out (1906), the little green men moved to Mars. They invented the flying saucer.









Sorry-

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Q (Frank Staplin)
Date: 10 Aug 08 - 05:27 PM

refresh

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 11 Feb 08 - 04:31 AM

Just picked up a copy of Cathedrals in Britain and Ireland by William Anderson and Clive Hicks (MacDonald & Jane's, 1978) in which we find but a single reference to a green man (a caption to a photogaph of one of the Chester misericords), with nothing in either the glossary or the index. Given that Anderson & Hicks's later Green Man (The Archeype of Our Oneness with the Earth) (HarperCollins 1990 & COMPASSbooks, 2002) and Hicks's own The Green Man - A Field Guide (COMPASSbooks 2000) are both 'key' works in the popular Paganisation of your common-or-garden EFH (Eccliastical Foliate Head), this strikes me as a particulary significant absence.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 18 Sep 07 - 09:45 AM

Here's an article that's worth a look, despite a few deliciously wayward tangents & conclusions:

The Name of the Green Man

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 15 Sep 07 - 06:57 AM

Relationships between Herne / Cernunnos & the Green Man have been suggested before, but I've never seen an antlered Green Man. Those with horns are clearly depicted as Old Nick himself, who does, I admit, derive from earlier Romano-Celtic imagery, but never associated with foliage.

There is an absolute beauty in the Templar church of Saint Michael, at Garway in Herefordshire (for image click HERE ) - a classic example of the Herefordshire School of Romanesque Sculpture. Here, his satanic identity seems fairly unambiguous, though when we visited Garway earlier in the year, there was a big display detailing his pagan & folkloric associations! I note with interest that the new 'Merrily Watkins' novel by Phil Rickman
("As if an episode of The Vicar of Dibley had morphed into Cracker") is set around the church at Garway... Oo-er - though needs must I wait for the paperback, unless my ever resourceful father-in-law picks up a copy in a charity shop first...

I've never come across the phrase 'Out on the Greenman's' - is that a translation of the German? I like the speculation though, especially regarding the role of the 'outsider in the wilderness' in medieval / pre-industrial times, though it doesn't account for the fact that most Green Men are found actually on the inside of the Churches and Cathedrals. And is Pan ever depicted actually wearing leaves I wonder? Examples welcome!

Whilst it is undoubtedly true that the mission of the early church was to site both churches and festivals with respect to pagan sacred places & sacred dates, there is nothing to suggest the pagan deities themselves were ever taken on board. It is the sheer lack of anything resembling a 'Green Man' in the Romano-Celtic or the Norse-Saxon pantheons that is the problem for those wishing to establish a pagan precedent; hence the spurious links to the various Jacks-in-the-Green of folk custom, none of which are as old as the Green Men themselves.

Living as we do in the urbanised, polluted, sprawling mess that is 21st century England (Britain / Europe), it's quite natural that for many the 'Green Man' should become the mischievous guide that might lead us a fine dance back to a lost utopian wilderness of the green-wood (real or imagined / actual or symbolic) once peopled by such grotesque vagabondian outsiders we see depicted (as Green Men) in many churches. For some choice examples see my wee film of Saint Peter & Saint Paul, Salle, Norfolk - and if you're ever passing, be sure to call in...

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Les in Chorlton
Date: 15 Sep 07 - 06:02 AM

"It was the place the pagans, or more precisely, heathens - retreated to when the Christian churches came in."

"and it was not uncommon for heathens to use leaves and foliage for camoflage"

"Sometimes they were hired by the townies to police the woods and keep out strangers and highwayfolk"

Evidence?

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: GUEST,greenmanwest
Date: 15 Sep 07 - 05:52 AM

I had always thought the name was taken from the phrase "out on the Greenman's" which meant beyond the edge of town, beyond the cultivated fields. It was the place the pagans, or more precisely, heathens - retreated to when the Christian churches came in. If you lived on the Greenman's you were living in the rough, and it was not uncommon for heathens to use leaves and foliage for camoflage. Sometimes they were hired by the townies to police the woods and keep out strangers and highwayfolk. Later on, as cathedrals became more ornate, these heathens would be depicted on the outside amoung the gargoyles to protect the cathedrals as they protected the towns.

If there was a god involved, it may have been Herne the Hunter - who used to camoflage himself.

When I lived in Germany as a teenager, a lot of the farmers near Heidelberg seemed to think that the greenman was a way of hiding images of Pan on the cathedrals in plain sight. The leaves originally were the grape leaves pan wore. Eventually the leaves became more generic and less grape like.
Much of the craft of cathedral decoration was devised to try to bring the heathens around to the new, better way of the church (better in the eyes of the church)

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 06:01 PM

did anyone else come across Clo Chapman's novel in the Nightshades romantic novel series?

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 12:50 PM

Note also 'The Golden Legend' in respect of the story of Adam and the three seeds (see my entry above - 13 Sep 07 - 02:55 AM). As I say Kathleen Basford referenced this in her seminal work on the subject, 'The Green Man' (1978).

As for Fortean Times, we subscribe to it annually as a matter of course, living as we do out in the wilds of Durham. If you've got a copy of FT222 (May 2007) to hand you can see my image of the 'Foliate Osama Bin Laden' from the cloisters of Chester Cathedral; he keeps some choice company in there too, so if ever you're passing Chester be sure to check them out. And look out for the Cheese Rolling too; I made a wee film of this (see Cheese Rolling in Chester ) back in March (complete with the various 'municipal Green Men' from the surrounding buildings) - some choice comments on there too!

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Crowdercref
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 12:14 PM

Dear Liz the Squeak,

The original is (I think) in the Bodleian.

The transcription often used by scholars is:

NORRIS, Edwin, The Ancient Cornish Drama (2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1859; repr. London & New York: Blom, 1968).

The Tale of Seth and Adam is (naturally) in the Origo Mundi (i.e. the first of the three plays).

The variant from Jewish oral tradition has also been printed but I don't have the ref to hand.

Gans gorhemmynado an gwella,

Crowdercref

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Bee
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 08:34 AM

Some long gone to dust mason, I suspect, may be having a last laugh, having carved the very first foliate head completely out of his own imagination, chiseling away at his oak leaves with an admiring nod to the Roman love of acanthus leaves.

I know there may be, as Sedayne suggests, a churchy basis for these Green fellows, and there may even be an echo of earlier worship as others speculate.

But I have always found that scholarly people, and that includes archaeologists and historians, often tend to spin a religious tale out of the smallest evidence when it comes to ancient times. Many times, they may be onto something. Other times, not so much.

I'm reminded of the various arguments about all those fat little prehistoric Venuses, pounced upon as being little fertility figures or even little mother goddesses. Quite a few years back, someone writing for British Archaeology Magazine (sorry, can't find the article) re-examined the little women and made some entirely different speculations, one of which was that they may have been essentially ancient pornography, and another of which was that they may have been tokens representing captive women (some of them have some interesting suggestions of bindings). He or she may be as wrong as the Mother Goddess folk, but the arguments were just as rooted in probability.

One need only look at the history of 'clan tartans' to see how eager people are to clutch at some kind of continuity of ancestry. For years (and still, occasionally) I did work for a fellow who supplied the artistic desires of that segment of the North American population which is fascinated by their Scottish (and 'Celtic') forebears. There's no question that the works we turned out are things of beauty, but we eventually gave up explaining to people the actual short history of clan-specific tartans, and the monkish and Scandinavian origins of knotworks, and even the specific rules around heraldry, because they didn't want to know. They had their own mythology, which included no clever tailors, no official heralds, and a lot of pre-Christian fakelore.

All quite harmless, of course.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Stu
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 07:19 AM

Nice to know you're a Fortean Times reader Sedayne - it's gone a bit downhill in recent years but still pretty good. I'll pick up a copy and have a pike at your letter - nice one for getting published.

There is a certain pleasure to be taken from the irony that a Christian creation (although I personally still reserve judgement on that) is being hijacked by the modern pagan movement and subverted for their own ends*.

About bloody time too.

*I agree - this is a subject worthy of discussion. I wonder if the process of paganisation of the Green Man is analogous to the sort of myth-making we see with urban myths. I feel the motivations might be different, but it would make an interesting subject for study.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: GUEST,LTS pretending to work
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 06:53 AM

The majority of Anglicans seem to forget that our mediaeval cathedrals and churches were built as Catholic places of worship - they didn't spontaneously spring into being with the introduction of Protestantism. Many a village church and cathedral spire have echoed to the Latin Mass, the Credo and Benedictus rang out before any Book of Common Prayer was made. For some people, the thought of Catholics worshiping in "their" church is more abominable than it being used for Satanic rituals and Hollywood movies.

LTS

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 05:51 AM

All such carvings would have originally been painted; in some places the tradition still exists, most famously perhaps in the cloister of Norwich Cathedral where one of most iconic of all 'Green Men' is predominantly leafed in gold.

As for getting 'hung up on the nomenclature', it is the very name 'Green Man' that has lead to 'his' unquestioned paganisation in recent years. Take away the name, and what one is left with an un-named ecclisial foliate grotesque often set quite deliberately within the context of other religious iconography of the time.

There are good arguments to be made for the Roman Catholic church adopting many elements of pre-Christian & 'pagan' belief. After all, it doesn't get any more 'pagan' than naming the most important Christian festival after an Anglo-Saxon hare goddess and celebrating it on the first Sunday after the first full moon after the Spring Equinox! But the 'Green Man', perhaps somewhat ironically, would appear to be an entirely Christian invention.

If certain elements of folklore are indeed evidences of a continuation of an ancient belief system as has been suggested (but never actually established - see above 29 Aug 07 - 09:40 AM), this has nothing whatsoever to do with the 'Green Man', who is not, and has never been, a folkloric image. It is only very recent years it has become so, which is perhaps a subject worthy of discussion in its own right - whereby such an absolute orthodoxy might have arisen as though overnight without any foundation whatsoever.

That Anne Ross helped instigate this orthodoxy by her highly suspect & often downright glib, unsubstantiated observations does, I'm afraid, cast something of shadow over her reputation otherwise.

As I say, even church & cathedral guide books sell their 'Green Men' as being pagan. Recently in Durham Cathedral I caused mortal offence by suggesting that the 'Green Man' one of the (Christian) ushers pointed out to me as being 'pagan' was more likely a graphic depiction of one the most central aspects of Roman Catholic theology. Anglicans, it would seem, are obviously happier with paganism than they are with Roman Catholicism.

I say again, I'm not pushing any sort of religious view here, just taking a look a something that has always intrigued me in the eventual hope of establishing some sort of balance on the subject, which, for the most part, there isn't.

The new edition of Fortean Times (FT228 - October 2007) has just come through my letterbox & I see they've printed my letter (p. 76) on 'Green Men' which might, I hope, stimulate further discussion on the subject!

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Stu
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 04:58 AM

He's as near to us now as the back of a shadow . . .

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Les in Chorlton
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 04:43 AM

I will have a think also and reply in detail later. I once had a summer camp job in Mass. We were in a forest - The Mohawk Trail State Park - I think and I had the distinct feeling of being watched and nearly seeing American Indians. Of course it was all in my mind but none the less powerful for that.

Cheers

Les

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: GUEST,LTS pretending to work
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 04:40 AM

If you want to see the Jack in the Green, find any spot outside and sit down (take a stool or blanket if you want). You don't need to have your feet in poop to see him. As Ian Andersone put it above, I saw some grass growing through the pavements today. There's your Jack in the Green. He's what you want him to be and does as nature intended, he grows, reproduces and dies, to grow again and you'll never stop him.

LTS

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Stu
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 04:05 AM

Snuffy's understanding of what I meant is right - the method of science is not wayward (in most cases - there's always one), but the speculations arising from the study of gathered data certainly can be, and often is.

I don't think this is a bad thing - some of the concepts physicists and mathematicians work with require a fair dollop of imagination and can be difficult to understand. When doing above mentioned degree (much to my lasting regret I never finished it due to work committments - one day though . . .) we looked a facies analysis. This is where you look a sequence of rocks and through interpretaion speculate how they came to be laid down. The books all say one thing - let nobody tell you how any specific sequence was laid down - decide gor yourself. Question, question, question - the basis of good science.

This is why I question Sedayne's interpretation of green men - although having thought about a fair bit since this thread started his theory is beginning to sway me a little more and I might change my point of view, I'll read up on it a bit more. His views on the survival of pre-christian fragments of belief I don't share - in my opinion the evidence for continuity is very strong, and I think he's wrong to dismiss the work of people like Ann Ross who is an academic of excellent reputation.

But then that's the way the process works. Get ten palaentologists in a room discussing the evolution of flight in avian dinosaurs and you'll get ten different opinions on how it happened (chuck in an ornithologist and he might even dispute the fact birds are dinosaurs). Plenty of hard evidence, lots of bones to study, lots of feathered dinosaurs, very little true consensus of opinion except on the broadest of issues.

I see no harm in speculating about the origin of many of our customs and beliefs. It's easy to sit on the sidelines and throw stones at people who are discussing theories, putting forward ideas etc without putting any of your own forward. Belittle away, but I'd rather be searching the woods for Jack-in-the-Green and treading in deer shit than sat at home rummaging through books. I'll never find evidence of his actual existence in the woods near my house, but something tells me he might just be there. If you stop and listen closely, you can hear his laughter amongst the rustle of the autumn leaves . . .

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Les in Chorlton
Date: 14 Sep 07 - 02:53 AM

I am not sure that we disagree. I guess their are three parts to this business:
1. The practice of Science
2. The practice of scholarly study
3. Speculations about the origins of folk lore

I think the first two are the same. The third seems to attract people who promote all sorts of ideas with out much evidence, the origin of morris and those faces in churches are two cases in point.

I have danced morris and I don't doubt for a minute that their is something a bit special and a bit odd about it. I have seen lots of those faces all over Europe and they too are odd. One small problem for the pre-christian / pagan origins is the almost total lack of any evidence and the habit that people have of passing on il-founded ideas as if they were factual.

Whilst searching the woods for Jack-in-the-Green some of these people might tread in some bear poor. I hope it sticks to them and they ponder the difference between evidence and patched up day dreams!

Now, I have to nail a horseshoe to the garage. I understand it brings good luck and even more if you don't believe in it.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Snuffy
Date: 13 Sep 07 - 06:04 PM

Les,I read that bit of Stigweard's completely differently to you.

He is not saying that science is wayward, but that the speculations (hypotheses) of scientists can be every bit as wayward as the speculations of non-scientists: if so they can be disproved by the rigorous application of scientific method.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Les in Chorlton
Date: 13 Sep 07 - 12:11 PM

"Whilst doing a geology degree I started to look at the world in a very different way - the pursuit of empirical evidence to substantiate or discount theories and scientific speculation (which is often as wayward as any other)."

With all the due respect a bucket of cold water can bring "which is often as wayward as any other" it is not as wayward as any other. The stuff we call science is pretty well coherent. Almost all the science in the world is believed by all the people who study it. The only division is at the edges of knowledge and understanding.

Science, like nearly all scholarly study, moves forward in the same way. Information is gathered and hypothese are constructed and tested. They are open to the rest of the scientific community to knock about.

It is clearly much more difficult to study the History of a 1000 years ago than it to study bees and that is why historians are very careful about primary source knowledge.

When people make stuff up and pull together different collections of information I am not sure what it is. Is it fiction? Fiction can be excellent but The Bard and Peeps were doing different things and what they wrote has to be treated in different ways.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Stu
Date: 13 Sep 07 - 08:01 AM

I agree the celtic link is tenuous, but the inscription on the Lapidiare St-Denis seems to have been carved by someone with knowlege of Celtic gods, although you make a good point when say the date of the inscription is of course, entirely unknown - I stand corrected.

In fact, Roberts et al aren't really interested in the green man, I was using their research to demonstrate the survival of fragments of ancient belief systems could exist, and in the case of the green man it's not possible to exclude the possibility it might be the case. The Silvanus inscription aside there is no evidence that would convince me it was a pre-christian survival or a post-christian fabrication.

There is evidence of a continuous belief system - the work of people like George Ewart Evans demonstrates that in rural regions life was largely unchanged from pre-Saxon times up until the first world war (and later in some areas) - and this includes farming techniques and practices as well as folkloric elements of everyday life. In truth it's impossible to tell how old these survivals may be, but it's not "wayward speculation entirely without foundation" to suggest this might have happened in other cultural threads.

But at the end of the day, does it really matter? I went through a long period where I questioned my early life convictions on these subjects, including the green man. Whilst doing a geology degree I started to look at the world in a very different way - the pursuit of empirical evidence to substantiate or discount theories and scientific speculation (which is often as wayward as any other). In the end I realised that for me there was room for both, and engaging for the numinous nature of our lives and our place in the natural world was a part of being human, and it didn't need to happen in the new-age bullshit way.

Sorting it out from the crap? Now that's the real trick.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Stu
Date: 13 Sep 07 - 06:22 AM

"The faces in the churches are green?"

Not sure what your point is here . . I agree that it has been demonstrated that 'Green Man' is a modern name although some foliate faces (if we're going to get hung up on the nomenclature) are painted it may well have beed they all were at some point as statues and carvings in Churches were often painted brightly in the medieval period. Chances are them leaves might have been green.

Sedayne - Thanks for the link to the Sheela-na-gig site - brilliant. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere there is one in the church near to where we play our sessions and that's not on the list. I'll have to dig out the ref and go and have a look.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 13 Sep 07 - 05:50 AM

Actually, it's worth having a look at the named foliate face on the fountain in the Musée Lapidaire St-Denis; compare the beautiful carving of the sculpture itself with the crudely executed graffito scrawl of the name which could have been added at any time, by anyone.

That it has been seized upon without question by Anderson, Grundy et al, shows just how dodgy the pagan hypothesis is. But remember, there was no pagan hypothesis before 1939, just as there was no 'Green Man' - this is a very modern concept!

There is absolutely no Celtic precendent for the Green Man; and given the abundance of Celtic heads of all types in the archaelogical record, one would have thought if the Green Man did have a Celtic provenance, one would have turned up by now.

So, queer notions as I say; wayward speculation entirely without foundation - and the fact that Green Men are to be found throughout the Churches and Cathedrals of Europe is surely a further demonstration of their significance to the culture and theology of pre-Reformation Roman Catholicism rather than the indicator of a Celtic provenance you seem to be suggesting?

As for Sheela-na-Gigs - see my entry above for 12 Sep 07 - 08:21 AM

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Les in Chorlton
Date: 13 Sep 07 - 05:23 AM

But I thought it had been faily clearly demonstrated that the faces in the churches were first called "Green Man very recently. The faces in the churches are green?

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Stu
Date: 13 Sep 07 - 04:59 AM

"As for the queer notions of Clarke, Roberts, Ross et al"

I think that's a bit strong - Anne Ross certainly isn't some new-age hippy wafting incense sticks and hugging standing stones - her seminal work Pagan Celtic Britian is still the foremost text on the subject. This is a scholarly work not some airy-fairy new age rubbish.

The discussion seems very centred on the notion the Church was responsible for the creation of the green man, and the Church was responsible for his creation. There is evidence to refute this, and we have to look further afield than Britian to find it. The green man is not confined to the British Isles, he is present throughout Europe, and especially in France and Germany where he is seen in Churches and Cathedrals much as he is in the Isles.

Anderson (1990) states the only green man named in a carving is in Musée Lapidaire St-Denis and appears on a fountain c1200 under the name Silvanus. This god was present in the Celtic pantheon in Britian too where he is called natively as the 'woodland king' (Green, 1986). This god is present both on the continent and here (we know that 'Celtic' culture was distributed across Europe from Hungary to Spain) and he is also named in the French carving. The fact this carving is attributed to the Thirteenth century illustrates the fact a continuity may well have existed between Celitc and mediaeval Europe.

I believe it would be a mistake to overplay the role of the church with regards to it's influence on the core beliefs of the common people. The fact the Christian church used ancient religious sites to build their churches on and adapted the indigenous popluations own festival to their own ends demonstrates their desire to impose their own religion on the population - it's not beyond the bounds of possibility they hijacked the green man and sheela-na-gigs as they have much of our cultural heritage in the past 1500 years. Certainly, when someone carved the name of the god of the greenwood on a stone fountain in France 800 years ago, the churches agressive cultural steamrolling of the deeply-held beliefs of the locals might have have rankled with them too.

Refs:
Anderson, William (1990) The Green Man Harper Collins, London and San Francisco; 111-112.

Green, Miranda (1986) The Gods of The Celts Alan Sutton Publishing Limited; 182-183.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 13 Sep 07 - 02:55 AM

Sounds interesting, Wilfried - is there any way you could send me a picture?

Also, regarding the story of Adam and the Three Seeds, have a look at The Life of Adam which comes from The Golden Legend (Aurea Legenda) by Jacobus de Voragine from 1275, as referenced by Kathleen Basford in her seminal work, The Green Man (1978).

Here's the relevant passage anyway:

And in the end of his life when he should die, it is said, but of none authority, that he sent Seth his son into Paradise for to fetch the oil of mercy, where he received certain grains of the fruit of the tree of mercy by an angel. And when he came again he found his father Adam yet alive and told him what he had done. And then Adam laughed first and then died. And then he laid the grains or kernels under his father's tongue and buried him in the vale of Hebron; and out of his mouth grew three trees of the three grains, of which trees the cross that our Lord suffered his passion on was made, by virtue of which he gat very mercy, and was brought out of darkness into very light of heaven. To the which he bring us that liveth and reigneth God, world without end.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Wilfried Schaum
Date: 13 Sep 07 - 02:01 AM

An interesting variation in my home church (about 1300 A.D.):

the tympanon of a small port is filled with a vine with many branches, growing out of a human head. It is supposed to show St. John 15, 5: I am the vine, ye are the branches.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Cluin
Date: 13 Sep 07 - 01:19 AM

Like antlers, like veins of the brain, the birches
Mark patterns of mind on the red winter sky;
'I am thought of all plants, 'says the Green Man,
'I am thought of all plants,'says he.

The hungry birds harry the last berries of rowan
But white is her bark in the darkness of rain;
'I rise with the sap, 'says the Green Man,
'I rise with the sap,'says he.

The Alders are rattling as though ready for battle
Guarding the grove where she waits for her lover;
'I burn with desire, 'says the Green Man,
'I burn with desire, 'says he.

In and out of the yellowing wands of the willow
The pollen-bright bees are plundering the catkins;
'I am honey of love, 'says the Green Man,
'I am honey of love, 'says he.

The hedges of quick are thick with May blossom
As the dancers advance on the leaf-covered King:
'It's off with my head, 'says the Green Man'
'It's off with my head, 'Says he.

Green Man becomes grown man in flames of the oak
As it's crown forms his mask and it's leafage his features;
'I speak through the oak, 'says the Green Man
'I speak though the oak, 'say he.

The holly is flowering as hayfields are rolling
Their gleaming long grasses like waves of the sea;
'I shine with the sun, 'says the Green Man,
'I shine with the sun, 'says he.

      ~William Anderson, The Green Man

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Bee
Date: 12 Sep 07 - 10:17 PM

Sedayne, thanks for the well written information there.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 12 Sep 07 - 04:28 PM

well its interesting certainly where it all comes from. you seem to hinting at some sort of conspiracy to make it seem older than it is.

i suppose it matters for historians, but lets face it, the history we learn in school is such a load of bollocks and self advertisement for the politicians and monarchs that its very hard to know what the truth is. probably we'd be better off not knowing any of it.

Take all those Irish threads where Keith and Divis Sweeney used to get steamed up. Ninety per cent of that was all about Keith couldn't get his head round that fact that the English weren't 'decent sort of fellows' in everybody's book!

I'm not sure why you think anyone would be deliberately trying to mislead us all.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Les in Chorlton
Date: 12 Sep 07 - 04:05 PM

We can all say we believe all sorts of things. But to suggest a thread goes back a long way needs to show some evidence of that thread, does it not?

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 12 Sep 07 - 03:25 PM

"The people who want the faces in the churches to be evidence of pre-christian or pagan beliefs and practises behave and seem to think in the same way as those who see morris dancing and black faces in the same way."

I think in truth, they are my feelings - at least ever since hearing The watersons' Frost and fire album sometime in the 1960's. Since then, I have always thought of our folklore as something defined in our nation, by all its inhabitants and all its conquerors. the confused sensiblity about whether we were celebrating winter solstice/or Christmas as a religious festival, fitting in rather well with a culture where even now most of the buggers are pretty illiterate.

I have always suspected that the golden thread of folk culture lies with the proles, and there is a motherlode of atavistic daftness and folk knowledge running straight underground from the Brythons mudhuts to the modern housing estates.

We used to go paste egging when we were kids in the 1950's, and none of our parents (who sent us off paste egging) seemed to know what it was about. I followed the recent revival of the thread about Wren boys in Ireland - it also seems shrouded in mystery.

I'm not sure cerebration is what has kept this stuff going all those years when no one was interested. Is turning up the lens on the microscope going to help. People indulge in these beliefs and practices - because they enjoy it, not because they understand it.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Les in Chorlton
Date: 12 Sep 07 - 01:43 PM

Thanks for an excellent contribution Sedayne! The trouble is, as Jones used to say, they don't like it up 'em!

The people who want the faces in the churches to be evidence of pre-christian or pagan beliefs and practises behave and seem to think in the same way as those who see morris dancing and black faces in the same way.

The best collection of evidence is, I think Ronald Hutton's "The Stations of the Sun" (see my previous thread). He finds almost no evidence for a thread of survival of pre-christian anything and massive evidence for the power and influence of organised religion going back at least as far as the printing press.

It seems odd that dancers and musicians who are keen to make up dances and tunes and play all kinds of music, some of which sounds like Dixieland Jazz, cannot relinquish the black face because they say it is "traditional" and possibly pre - something or other and not to be changed.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 12 Sep 07 - 01:14 PM

Off the top of my nut, I'd say that our feelings are indeed the key to it, as such theology would seem to arise as a concerted reaction to the same basic primal / lustful / instinctive impulse that you speak of; one which in the Abrahamic tradition is defined as the 'sin' with which we are in constant struggle, both actual & metaphorical.

In the Gnostic tradition they went as far as to see it as part and parcel of the material creation of Lucifer, ideas which we see expressed today in terms of the Nature / Nurture dialectic and, perhaps, writ large on the (invariably) tormented faces of the Green Men themselves.

So in one sense, yes, absolutely; the Green Man does represent that very same impulse, albeit in terms of dire warning as to the consequences of allowing oneself to become thus beguiled in the green-wood; especially those of the cloistered Holy Orders, to whom the green men were primarily addressed.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 12 Sep 07 - 12:28 PM

well yes, but don't WE have any importance?   This hunger for a bit of racy 'hows your father' in the depths of the greenwood - as a counterbalance to the 'fly on the wall' prosaic reality of everyday life - maybe this is the reason the Green Man is in every garden centre. And maybe that's why he's there in history - our ancestors felt just that same need.

perhaps our feelings are the key to it, rather than some facts in a museum.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Jack Blandiver
Date: 12 Sep 07 - 08:21 AM

As has already been noted, there is a well-established agenda on the part of certain folk-lore researchers to interpret even the most innocuous of folk customs as being vestigial of some ancient prototype, invariably pagan / pre-Christian, and invariably 'stripped of its original meaning'. In this respect I'd have to say that Anne Ross is as guilty as the best of them, especially as she writes with such didactic certainty (as she does in Grotesques and Gargoyles, 1975) that: "One of the most pagan and archaic concepts in the imagery of the Christian Church must be that of the so-called Green Man or Jack o' the Green."

Admittedly 1975 is quite early for this sort of talk - in my experience books on Paganism, Folk-lore & Witchcraft are tellingly void of Green Men until around 1979. It is, for example, supremely significant that the Green Man is altogether absent from The Wicker Man (1973) - surely the cinematographic watershed of much of today's paganism (and 'Dark Folk').

Getting back to Ross, it's interesting to note how absolute such statements have already become even by 1975, leading to the situation we find today where such notions are trotted out in church and cathedral guide books as a matter of fact. Whilst in Sheffield on Monday I noted the comments in the Cathedral guide book concerning the impressive carvings to be found in the Shrewsbury Chapel where a glorious (and disputed!) Sheela-na-Gig is said to be the 'Mother Goddess' and the Green Man her 'consort'. For more on the Sheela-na-Gig, another famously paganised feature of Pre-Reformation church architecture, see the very excellent Sheela Na Gig Project .

I therefore applaud Gloucester Cathedral for producing their splendid pamphlet on the Green Man, which makes quite clear that all links to paganism are quite without foundation. Would that others did likewise, for it must be said that the worst offenders for promoting the 'paganism' of 'Green Men' are very often the Anglicans themselves, keen on turning a quick & cynical buck at the expense of this fascinating facet of the culture and theology of those who built the churches and cathedrals in the first place.

As for the queer notions of Clarke, Roberts, Ross et al - such thinking is, and can only ever be, a matter of pure speculation; and that would be fine were not for the sad fact that such wayward perspectives come seemingly ready-made for a market ravenous for such assuredly authentic cultural / spiritual provenance they find altogether lacking in the real world... Otherwise, a very good place to start would be Bob Pegg's 'Rites and Riots' (copies of which can be had for next to nothing via Amazon); and Bob Trubshaw's worth a look too!

Finally, I picked up a copy of 'Folk Leeds to Song & Custom #6' whilst visiting Hobgoblin in Leeds yesterday, thus seeing the bewildering (and entirely unauthorised) liberties the editors thereof have taken with my Devil in the Details article. But, overall, I'd have to say I was quite impressed with the results & applaud Sam & Ed (and Graham Miles?) for their work. In any case, it's a cracking little magazine - with a fine recipe for Stovies besides. Check out the site at Folk at the Grove.

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 12 Sep 07 - 04:27 AM

freckles, wattles....as the Late Great Eddy Waring used to say, they're all good mates in the showers....

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 11 Sep 07 - 05:19 PM

I don't have freckles.

LTS

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Art Thieme
Date: 11 Sep 07 - 05:00 PM

Just don't fall into it --------------'cause you'll be interred/I>!!!

Art

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Kampervan
Date: 11 Sep 07 - 04:48 PM

Rumncoke is dead right.
Always re-use your daub.
However, if you find yourself in need of a little more then let me know. It's one of the products that I stock.

Can't vouch for the freckle treatment though!!

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Fortunato
Date: 11 Sep 07 - 04:44 PM

Liz,

I understand that a 50/50 mixture of cowshit and buttermilk is an excellent paste for removing freckles,

but I can't find anyone who'll let me try daubing it on them.

by the way, Liz do you have freckles?

Subject: RE: Folklore: The Green Man
From: Rumncoke
Date: 11 Sep 07 - 02:17 PM

And it is reusable - if your wattle gives up, or you need to make a bigger house, you can just knock down the wall and throw the daub into water to soften, maybe mix in a few more cow pats to freshen it up a bit, then slap it on the wall again to get a few more centuries use out of it.