Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Sort Ascending - Printer Friendly - Home


BS: Rwanda and immgrants

Black belt caterpillar wrestler 08 May 24 - 05:33 PM
Nigel Parsons 08 May 24 - 04:16 PM
The Sandman 04 May 24 - 11:34 AM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:





Subject: RE: BS: Rwanda and immgrants
From: Black belt caterpillar wrestler
Date: 08 May 24 - 05:33 PM

It just struck me that it would have been cheaper just to give each migrant a few thousand pounds in view of the costs incurred so far!

Robin


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Rwanda and immgrants
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 08 May 24 - 04:16 PM

The Supreme Court's decision was based on the possibility of 'refoulment' (return to country of origin). Here
As you say, RWANDA has now stated that Those who are not granted refugee status or humanitarian protection, will instead be granted permanent residence so that they are able to stay and integrate into Rwandan society. All individuals relocated to Rwanda will be treated in the same way regardless of the decision of their asylum claim.25 Apr 2024.
As such, the risk of refoulment has gone, so the UK government can go ahead.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: BS: Rwanda and immgrants
From: The Sandman
Date: 04 May 24 - 11:34 AM

Rwanda appears to be an African success story.
The RWANDA prime minster is behaving in a humanitarian manner?
What happens to migrants in Rwanda?
Those who are not granted refugee status or humanitarian protection, will instead be granted permanent residence so that they are able to stay and integrate into Rwandan society. All individuals relocated to Rwanda will be treated in the same way regardless of the decision of their asylum claim.25 Apr 2024.
Is Rwanda a safe place for refugees?
On 15 November 2023, the UK Supreme Court (UKSC) unanimously found the government's intended policy of sending asylum seekers to Rwanda is unlawful. The UKSC did not find the policy of removing asylum-seekers to a third country unlawful, only that Rwanda is not currently a safe country to do so.17 Apr 2024


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 13 June 12:54 PM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.