Lizzie, you blow past serious substantive questions about the practicality of the views you support.
Please back up and look at my questions and those of others...and answer them with something besides yet another than "this guy is a firefighter, engineer, military expert, so I don't have to think about what I'm telling you is the real secret truth". I could show you a lot more folks that I trust to take a strongly opposed view.

Do you believe that planes hit the WTC?...or why not?
Do you believe that intense heat of the aviation fuel caused the support girder failure that resulted in the collapse of both towers...or why not.
Do you believe that the failure of WTC7 was caused by impact damage and the heat of a large diesel fuel tank burning at the base of the building?...or why not.
Do you have proof that the WTC towers were "closed for maintainence just before the attacks as you "seemed to recall"? If so, where is that proof?
Do you believe that a plane hit the Pentagon? or why not.
Do you believe that if a 757 actually did hit the Pentagon, that the suit still has merit even if that the denial of that event event is central to the suit?...or why not.
Do you believe that the horribly injured victims who do not support your views are lying?...why would they do that?
Do you believe that a faceless cabal of agents run by Bush/Cheney, and supported by Israel or Jews, faked everything? ...or why not.

How did the conspirators benefit from the attacks?

I strongly suspect that you will avoid substantive answers.


Secret Agent X305A, Provocateur Division
I didn't mean that.
I'm not a real agent...or am I?