Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Don Firth Date: 28 Jan 09 - 02:46 PM The geological record shows that the earth's magnetic poles do shift from time to time. Different polarity of iron molecules in different strata. As Little Hawk says, it can be measured with scientific instruments (and it would throw our current compasses off until we adjust navigation to the where, geographically, the new North Pole is, and it may confuse migratory birds and monarch butterflies for awhile), but thee and me will not even notice the shift. What kind of physical forces are there in this neighborhood of our galaxy that would cause a planet which is approximately 8,000 miles in diameter with a mass of 5.9742 × 1024 kilograms to suddenly stop and begin rotating the other way, or cause it to flip over, pole to pole? 'Course, such a catastrophe might be preferable to having Sarah Palin as president. . . . Don Firth |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Stringsinger Date: 28 Jan 09 - 02:39 PM "I can see disaster from here". |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Riginslinger Date: 28 Jan 09 - 02:00 PM Nice feet! |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: bobad Date: 28 Jan 09 - 01:55 PM Hey, my neighbour's got a pair just like that, his name is Maurice. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Ebbie Date: 28 Jan 09 - 01:24 PM Here ya go, Nancy. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Peace Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:44 AM I buy it for the pitcures/pitchers/pitcheures photographs. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Nancy King Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:31 AM The news story described the shoes as "red, Naughty Monkey Double-Dare pumps." Now who wouldn't want THOSE???? Wish they'd included a picture... |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: frogprince Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:14 AM $2,025.00 for a pair of her shoes? Surely she could get a lot more for a pair of her used panties! I might pay a nickle for a pair; I can always use a rag to apply wood stain with. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: EBarnacle Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:08 AM The idea of Palin writing her own autobiography is ludicrous. If it is true, then she will have to come across much more lucidly in print than in vive voce. Of course, she will have plenty of time, as her current job is apparently not very demanding. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Bobert Date: 28 Jan 09 - 09:21 AM Yup... The only copy I ever bought was the one where John Lennon was interviewed... Though I also have the "text only" of the interview of Martin Luther King... But, yeah, I love the folks who say they only buy it for the interviews... What a joke... Half of them can't read... B;~) |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: SINSULL Date: 28 Jan 09 - 08:14 AM and of course, you buy it only for the political stories, right Bobert? |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Bobert Date: 28 Jan 09 - 08:07 AM Well, I'm all for Ms. Sarah runnin' for Prez in '12... I mean, who else could kill off the remnants of the Republican Party better than Ms. Hottie??? Plus, maybe she'd take up Hugh Hefner's offer for a little estra publicity... (There you go, Bobert... Didn't that get you the "blast" from the Mud-womenz last time you brought it up???) Well, yeah... Who cares... I'd buy the mag if she were in it just as a collector's item... B~ |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk Date: 28 Jan 09 - 01:35 AM It depends on which particular 2012 prediction (or prophecy) you are referring to, Alice. There are many different ones. Many have to do with various ancient Amerindian traditional stories from North and South America, as well as other ancient cultural tales. Many have to do with a polar shift of some kind and/or a reversal of the Earth's direction of rotation on its axis. I don't think I have ever heard of the "galaxy alignment" story before. If someone concocted that one with deliberate intention to deceive people, then of course it's a hoax. If not, if they are sincere about it and they believe it for some reason, then it's not a hoax...they are (I would think) simply in error. The word "hoax" means a deliberate attempt to deceive. People are often wrong in their predictions of future events, but they're not trying to deceive anyone if they actually believe what they're saying, in which case...it's not a hoax. It's just wrong, period. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Alice Date: 28 Jan 09 - 01:03 AM Of course it can be stated that it is a hoax - NASA astrobiologist has pointed out that the 2012 "galaxy alignment" is an internet hoax. ask an astrobiologist at NASA "... I can't explain it because it is just an Internet hoax. There is no alignment with the center of the Galaxy in 2012 or any time." |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk Date: 28 Jan 09 - 12:32 AM I'm curious, Maple Leaf Boy...are you talking about a magnetic pole shift or a physical shift of the planet on its axis? The first would be a subtle event, not perceptible to ordinary human senses, but detectable with scientific equipment. The second would be a worldwide catastrophe. And if it's a magnetic shift you are referring to, would that also be accompanied by a reversal of the Earth's direction of rotation on its axis? (in which case the sun would then rise in the west) Just curious which particular theory you are referring to, that's all...not expressing any opinion about it one way or another. No one has any way of knowing if the various predictions and prophecies about 2012 are "a hoax" (or just merely incorrect) or not. I won't be surprised if nothing unusual happens in 2012. I won't be totally astounded if something unusual does happen. Why? Because I have no basis of being 100% sure on either possibility, so why should I pretend (as so many do) that I do have such a basis? I don't know. So I'll wait and see. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Ebbie Date: 28 Jan 09 - 12:30 AM Somebody likes Palin. Look at this: From Shoefly to Flying Shoe (Shoefly is a local shoe store) |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Alice Date: 27 Jan 09 - 10:19 PM 2012 doomsday is a hoax. Palin's ego, unfortunately, is real, as in really big. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: maple_leaf_boy Date: 27 Jan 09 - 10:14 PM It's polar shifts. The "world" that we know is going to end, and a new one is going to begin. But, the world is not going to end-end. The Earth's rotation is going to change, and our North and South Poles will be in different places. This will cause climate changes to occur. The worry is that if the polar shift occurs too quickly. This is based on the beliefs of some South-western U.S. Native peoples, according to a documentary that I once watched. They believe that the world began four times, and has ended three times. Once the polar shifts occur, then metaphorically the world has ended, and a new one has began. A new world with a new North and South Pole. It is expected to happen three years from now, or at least not far from it. The world won't literally end for another 3 billion years, unless the Sun should burn out. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Riginslinger Date: 27 Jan 09 - 09:37 PM Palin, that's where she intended to launch her campaign! |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: artbrooks Date: 27 Jan 09 - 09:32 PM Not the world, Sorcha - only Wyoming. And who'd notice, anyway? |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Sorcha Date: 27 Jan 09 - 09:20 PM Hell, the WORLD is gonna end in 2012...don't you all read the papers? LOL |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: artbrooks Date: 27 Jan 09 - 09:11 PM Well, by 2012 her overall experience won't be much different from that of the last state governor elected president...and we all know what a great job he did. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: kendall Date: 27 Jan 09 - 08:59 PM Talk about delusions of adequacy! |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: SINSULL Date: 27 Jan 09 - 08:38 PM Is she running for president this time or VP or Senator? Will baby bush II be her running mate? They do have lots of guns in Alaska... |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: SINSULL Date: 27 Jan 09 - 08:37 PM Do not underestimate this woman. She is very shrewd and very eager for power. Palin learned a lot over these past few months. Trying to imagine the elegant Mrs. Obama being followed by the Alaskan shrew. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: maple_leaf_boy Date: 27 Jan 09 - 08:16 PM I sure wouldn't vote for her if I could. Willie Nelson for President. Now there's a better choice. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: GUEST,biff Date: 27 Jan 09 - 07:52 PM she's really there for the try it it won't work crowd |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Riginslinger Date: 27 Jan 09 - 07:48 PM I read where she's coming out with a book, too. It won't be long and she'll be just as rich as all the other idiots who run for public office. |
Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: bobad Date: 27 Jan 09 - 07:47 PM She just doesn't get it. |
Subject: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: EBarnacle Date: 27 Jan 09 - 07:44 PM Well, she's done it! Sarah has created a PAC to raise money for a run in 2012. It's so nice that we will have someone to laugh at for the next few grim years. |