BS: somebody goofed

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: EBarnacle
Date: 21 Nov 03 - 10:28 AM

As pointed out, though, it might be worse to have Cheney. Seems like what his father did with his VP.

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 20 Nov 03 - 03:59 PM

Ah, I've spent too much time in the English department. Wrong canon! There's absolutely no hope that this dope will get any clue, so we'd better hope he faces the music to the tune of cannons!

SRS

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: Hollowfox
Date: 20 Nov 03 - 12:54 PM

SRS, what would the canon do, pray that he'll get a clue? *g*

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: Dave Bryant
Date: 20 Nov 03 - 12:20 PM

At least his armed bodyguard didn't start shooting back - or did they ?

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: SueB
Date: 20 Nov 03 - 03:41 AM

Isn't Cheney already running things, anyway? If he lost his puppet, he'd have to scramble to find a suitable replacement. I can see it now - Rick Santorum for President! Instead of 'a chicken in every pot' his slogan could be "A camera in every bedroom!"   Hmmm, maybe Hrothgar is right. Anyway, Bush has already almost been done in by a pretzel and a scooter, I think you Brits can put away the heavy artillery. Perhaps a banana peel.

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: Hrothgar
Date: 20 Nov 03 - 03:14 AM

If they had hit him, who would be president now?

Lucky!

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 20 Nov 03 - 12:52 AM

Maybe the London Symphony will perform for him. If they do the 1812 Overture or March Slave there's a chance a canon player could do the trick.

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: DougR
Date: 20 Nov 03 - 12:41 AM

Sick. Really sick.

DougR

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: Sorcha
Date: 19 Nov 03 - 11:15 PM

Upshot is, they all missed.....

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: Bill D
Date: 19 Nov 03 - 08:41 PM

OLD radio blooper..."They gave him a 21 son galoot.."

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: John Routledge
Date: 19 Nov 03 - 08:15 PM

2 X 21 = 42 Gun Salute ?

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 19 Nov 03 - 07:56 PM

Yeah, somebody goofed. They were pointing the guns at the sky instead of at Bush.

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 19 Nov 03 - 06:56 PM

Actually the 41 is probably correct - the British go in for more guns than Americans on ceremonial occasions. 41 is the number they fired off when the Queen Mother died. It even goes as high as 124 on some occasions.

This site tells more about all this, and other stuff which might be handy if you are ever playing Royalty Trivial Pursuit.

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: Bobert
Date: 19 Nov 03 - 06:38 PM

Word on the street is that 4 refused to fire their weapons, so the 41 has gone to 21 to 17.

Bobert

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 19 Nov 03 - 06:34 PM

I imagine they counted the echoes. It figures.

Subject: RE: BS: somebody goofed
From: jacqui c
Date: 19 Nov 03 - 06:28 PM

He obviously upset Lizzie overnight. They probably gave up trying to hit him when he managed to dodge forty one blasts! They say God looks after drunks and fools.

Subject: BS: somebody goofed
From: EBarnacle
Date: 19 Nov 03 - 06:08 PM

News reports state that the Brits gave GWB a 41 gun salute today. It sounded wrong, as wrong as using the word "nucular."

Check this site. According to this, the maximum number of guns is 21.

http://www.sizes.com/society/salute.htm