|
|||||||
|
BS: Failure's no success at all |
Share Thread
|
||||||
|
Subject: RE: BS: Failure's no success at all From: Wolfgang Date: 12 Oct 05 - 02:44 PM One creates many webpages which have the words 'failure' and 'miserable failure' as often as possible and makes links to the target site (Bush's bio; Michael Moore's site). Wolfgang |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Failure's no success at all From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 11 Oct 05 - 07:23 PM How do they do that, since the word "failure", however appropriate here, doesn't appear in the page? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Failure's no success at all From: Little Hawk Date: 11 Oct 05 - 04:46 PM He knows there's no success like failure, and that failure's no success at all. But does Karl Rove know? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Failure's no success at all From: katlaughing Date: 11 Oct 05 - 01:42 PM Thanks for the link, Wolfgang. It led me to a wonderful story about google helping out with info for a preemie twin. Pretty neat story. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Failure's no success at all From: Wolfgang Date: 11 Oct 05 - 12:26 PM Wonder how long it will be before someone suppresses it This happens on Google at least since the 1st of June this year and is well know. So your supposition seems to be wrong. Google's response to calls for suppression If one googles simply for 'failure' (search option) the first two hits are GWBush and Michael Moore BTW. Wolfgang |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Failure's no success at all From: bfdk Date: 11 Oct 05 - 08:05 AM Google always knows best ;-) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Failure's no success at all From: jacqui.c Date: 11 Oct 05 - 07:37 AM Nice one Alan, and how apt. |
|
Subject: BS: Failure's no success at all From: Lanfranc Date: 11 Oct 05 - 07:00 AM This may be old hat to some, but I've just been told about it. Fire up Google, insert "failure" (without quotes) in the search box. Now click on [I'm Feeling Lucky] ROTFLMAO - Wonder how long it will be before someone suppresses it! Alan |