Five Presidents Instead Of One Better?

Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better?
From: artbrooks
Date: 31 Jul 06 - 01:51 PM

Isn't that what they call a Junta?

Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better?
From: Bill D
Date: 31 Jul 06 - 01:40 PM

"Government by committee" works fine until they all decide at the same time to be "first among equals".

Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better?
From: DougR
Date: 31 Jul 06 - 01:30 PM

In the kitchen, Bobert?

DougR

Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better?
From: Bobert
Date: 31 Jul 06 - 08:31 AM

Yeah, we have Presidents Bush, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rove, Falwell, Limbaugh, Coulter, Wolfowittz, Pearle, Rumsfeld, etc...

No wonder we have so many failing policies...

Too many cooks... 'er crooks...

Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better?
From: Ebbie
Date: 31 Jul 06 - 02:30 AM

Ha. We already have.

Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better?
From: GUEST
Date: 31 Jul 06 - 02:10 AM

No

Subject: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better?
From: GUEST,Wildresident
Date: 31 Jul 06 - 02:09 AM

Would it be more effective to have more than one president in the executive branch to handle domestic and foreign issues more efficiently...... I believe so.