BS: One for sir john of hul

Subject: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: muppett
Date: 04 Nov 04 - 04:41 AM

I cdnuol't blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The pheonmneal pweor of the human mnid aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde uinervtisy. It deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the first and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amasanig huh? And I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt!

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: Dave Hanson
Date: 04 Nov 04 - 06:43 AM

Rsbibuh.

eirc

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 04 Nov 04 - 08:35 AM

This has been posted here before many times.

Many, many times.

Many, many, many times.

Many, many, many, many times.

Many, many, many, many, many times.

Many, many, many, many, many, many times.

Many, many, many, many, many, many, many times.

A bloody lot of times, actually....

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: Dead Horse
Date: 04 Nov 04 - 08:59 AM

I'm sure you've been told a thousand times not to exagerate, Fooles.

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: muppett
Date: 04 Nov 04 - 09:05 AM

And your point is ................ Foolestroupe?

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: Paco Rabanne
Date: 04 Nov 04 - 09:07 AM

You should have typed - And Yuor Pnoit is .......... Fsifhbsadcnjsde

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 04 Nov 04 - 09:25 AM

splleng not imoprant, tihs is music shight, not spllening sghit.

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: muppett
Date: 04 Nov 04 - 09:26 AM

WLEL SIAD JHON

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: Mr Red
Date: 04 Nov 04 - 09:28 AM

We can all serge on from Hull................. I did it in 1998.

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: Hand-Pulled Boy
Date: 04 Nov 04 - 10:39 AM

Just give us time.

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: s6k
Date: 09 Nov 04 - 12:39 PM

this is music shite, not spelling shite

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: Nerd
Date: 09 Nov 04 - 12:47 PM

Wolfgang and I have both debunked this elsewhere. The original post was made deliberately easy to read by only switching a few letters around.

In one thread on this, I took a random passage from a book on my desk and it took another 'catter twenty minutes from getting halfway there to finishing the decipherment!

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: Hand-Pulled Boy
Date: 09 Nov 04 - 07:48 PM

Correct spelling is important otherwise we'll all end up like americans. What would the Queen say?

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: GUEST,heric
Date: 09 Nov 04 - 08:03 PM

Nerd is right about denchmeieprt.

Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul
From: Peace
Date: 09 Nov 04 - 10:09 PM

. . . and furthermore, it is with regret that I inform you I am on the wrong thread. But while I'm here, hlelo, Ojhn.