Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2]


BS: The Royal Knickers

Related threads:
BS: Bill/Cate's Wedding & ROYAL FAMILY CHAT (103)
BS: The Royal Wedding/baby (203)
BS: Bill and Kate to visit Canada (35)
BS: Royal Wedding Drinking Game (12)
Oh, THAT wedding!!! (43)
BS: Royal Wedding Announcement (165)
BS: Queen invites murderer to wedding (80)
BS: Royal Wedding Film (23)
Folk Session on the royal wedding wkend (9)
BS: Bishop Suspended - critic of royal wedding (152)
music suggestions for the Royal Wedding (10)
queen refuses to attend wedding (69)


The Fooles Troupe 25 Apr 11 - 10:22 PM
Stilly River Sage 26 Apr 11 - 11:34 AM
GUEST,Alan Whittle 26 Apr 11 - 12:11 PM
frogprince 26 Apr 11 - 12:43 PM
MGM·Lion 26 Apr 11 - 01:13 PM
WalkaboutsVerse 26 Apr 11 - 01:14 PM
gnu 26 Apr 11 - 01:40 PM
The Fooles Troupe 27 Apr 11 - 08:52 AM
The Fooles Troupe 27 Apr 11 - 09:03 AM
gnu 27 Apr 11 - 01:35 PM
The Fooles Troupe 28 Apr 11 - 02:25 AM
CupOfTea 28 Apr 11 - 02:40 PM
gnu 28 Apr 11 - 02:50 PM
Lizzie Cornish 1 28 Apr 11 - 03:22 PM
GUEST,Alan Whittle 28 Apr 11 - 07:48 PM
MGM·Lion 29 Apr 11 - 04:33 AM
frogprince 29 Apr 11 - 12:37 PM
gnu 29 Apr 11 - 03:26 PM
gnu 29 Apr 11 - 03:26 PM
Don(Wyziwyg)T 30 Apr 11 - 11:15 AM
Dave MacKenzie 30 Apr 11 - 03:14 PM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 10:22 PM

"Edward VIII abdicated because it would be an abomination if an American divorcee was the wife of the King"

That's the cover story. Now that many alive then are deceased, more facts are coming to the surface. She was highly pro-nazi (as indeed many Rich Americans were at the time - there was a strong US Nazi party till Pearl Harbour and Hitler declared War on the USA a few days after) - great personal friends with many high ranking nazis, and Edward was very amenable to them as well. Many such as Churchill were adamant that if he remained as King, Britain would become officially pro nazi too.

Some of this is covered in, and highly relevant to the recent movie "The Kings Speech". Documented too.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 11:34 AM

There was also reference to it in this week's Upstairs/Downstairs they showed in the U.S. Some were very cosy (and the Windsor family is originally German, is it not?)

SRS


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Alan Whittle
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 12:11 PM

'Maybe they are referring to the abdicating King and his American wife with alleged nazi sympathies....'

who cares what they refer to - they're bonkers.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: frogprince
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 12:43 PM

Why should we settle for this kind of superficial media coverage about the "royal knickers"? Why isn't someone doing some serious in-depth reporting? Shouldn't we know how much fuzz will be in those things? Will it grow free, be trimmed back, or will it be shaved off completely?
Oh, did I just exceed the bounds of good taste? Sorry, but I guess the boundary got a little blurry there.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 01:13 PM

Why did you choose your nickname, Frogprince, if you can't be a bit more respectful towards somebody who might well be the one to give you that essential magic kiss?

~M~


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 01:14 PM

Blue.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 01:40 PM

froggy... you crack me up, yet again. Hahahahahaaa.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 27 Apr 11 - 08:52 AM

This is bizarre...
ABC forced to pull Chaser wedding coverage

Just two days before Prince William and Kate Middleton are due to tie the knot, ABC TV has been forced to cancel The Chaser's one-off live coverage of the event due to what it says are restrictions imposed by the royal family.

The Chaser's Royal Wedding Commentary was due to air on ABC2 from 7:00pm AEST on Friday, offering viewers a satirical take on the royal wedding.

But now the live special - promised to be "uninformed and unconstitutional" - has been reluctantly pulled due to restrictions imposed over the Easter break.

ABC TV was initially advised by the BBC, and subsequently by Associated Press Television News (APTN), there were no coverage restrictions that would prevent The Chaser's wedding commentary.

But new conditions of use issued by APTN over the Easter break state footage cannot be used "in any drama, comedy, satirical or similar entertainment program or content".

ABC TV director Kim Dalton says he is disappointed.

"The national broadcaster has acted in good faith in its negotiations around ABC2's planned coverage with both the BBC and APTN," he said.

"We're surprised and disappointed at this very late stage to be informed that any satirical or comedic treatment of the marriage of Australia's future head of state has been banned."

As late as this morning the BBC issued a new contract imposing additional restrictions on the use of its material.

"ABC TV had always planned to take the BBC's full coverage with commentary on ABC1, however, like other broadcasters, we thought Australians would appreciate an alternative take on this major event," Mr Dalton said.

"The Nine Network has Dame Edna giving her commentary and the Ten Network has the 7PM Project taking a light-hearted approach to the royal wedding.

"Our obvious choice for a light-hearted commentary is The Chaser team. Clearly, the BBC and Clarence House have decided The Chaser aren't acceptable."

The Chaser's Julian Morrow says the team accepts the ABC has been put in an "impossible position by people acting on behalf of the royal family".

"For a monarchy to be issuing decrees about how the media should cover them seems quite out of keeping with modern democratic times... but I suppose that's exactly what the monarchy is," he said.

"It's traditional for the condemned to appeal to the monarch for a stay of execution, so that's what we're going to do.

"Unfortunately it's also traditional for people who appeal for clemency to be executed."

Morrow says the move goes against free speech.

"It seems a bit crazy for the royal family to be trying to dictate the way they get represented in the media," he said.

"It seems a bit out of step with a modern democracy, but I suppose royalty is out of step with a modern democracy, so there you go."

The Chaser's Chris Taylor says it is an "honour" to be taken off air by the Queen herself.

The APTN advisory says the restrictions on the coverage of the wedding ceremony from Westminster Abbey have been agreed between Clarence House, the private office of the Prince of Wales, and the BBC.

According to the advisory, restrictions apply to the "period from the arrival of the first member of the royal family for the wedding service until the last member of the royal family leaves the main entrance of Westminster Abbey following the conclusion of the wedding service".

ABC1 will still be taking the BBC coverage of the wedding, including its commentary, and ABC News and ABC News 24's coverage will not be affected by the ban on ABC2 usage.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 27 Apr 11 - 09:03 AM

Chaser fans 'gutted' over axed wedding show

Users of Facebook and Twitter have vented their anger, calling the BBC "wankers" and directing obscenities towards the Queen.

"The royals: such a joke that they can't take any," Jay Dessi wrote on the ABC's Facebook page.

"How do I complain? They need to know they should come to their senses or they will turn me into a republican. I never cared before, but I care now," said Sharnell Shipard.

"They made me care enough that I just joined Prince William's Facebook page to lodge a complaint. I haven't sat through weeks of wedding crap on TV to have the only part I was looking forward to taken from me."

....

"Oh! For Kate's Sake! The Chaser's coverage of the wedding was the part that people were ACTUALLY looking forward to," @Cameron_John said.

Some fans even encouraged The Chaser to "just do it anyway".

"What are they going to do? Set the governor general on you?" @ScottCllns tweeted.
~~~~~~~~~~

Some friends have set up their own facebook page to throw virtual tomatoes .... :-)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 27 Apr 11 - 01:35 PM

Not very sporting of them.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 28 Apr 11 - 02:25 AM

There's apparently quite a rumble building over it. Yet 'Dame Edna' a guy dressed up as a lady pretending to have received a fake award of nobility is ok....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: CupOfTea
Date: 28 Apr 11 - 02:40 PM

They can't quite be the "Royal" kinckers if she's not a royal yet, no? (Being American, i suspect this is so, not quite sure how that works...)

*I* have seen the genuine "We are NOT amused" article: Queen Victoria's used knickers.

Really.

Honest.

The Kent State University Costume Museum had them on display years ago, and me without my camera, dagnabit. I do recall it vividly, though

Joanne in Cleveland


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 28 Apr 11 - 02:50 PM

Actually, not my cup of tea.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 28 Apr 11 - 03:22 PM

Queen Vickie was sooooo teensy. They had a display of her clothes at Killerton House a few years back..including her underwear..

Hope no-one puts my knickers on display when I pop my clogs. Heck, I'd better leave orders for them to be burnt....or....burn them before I go!   I'll be the only 85 year old going commando! ;0)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Alan Whittle
Date: 28 Apr 11 - 07:48 PM

If you'd like to entrust a used pair to me Lizzie, I'll make sure they don't fall into the wrong hands.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 29 Apr 11 - 04:33 AM

And whose hands would they be, then, Al?

~M~


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: frogprince
Date: 29 Apr 11 - 12:37 PM

Actually, Gnu just about said it all on the "not going" thread early this morning"

       "Sniff..."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 29 Apr 11 - 03:26 PM

Well froggy... not quite...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 29 Apr 11 - 03:26 PM

.... COME OFF TONIGHT!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 30 Apr 11 - 11:15 AM

""the next Queen of England."

Do you know something we don't?
""

I think she probably does, assuming that you are unaware that the title "Queen" is not automatic, and is very unlikely to be applied to Horse Face, since she is not his first wife.

Most likely is "Princess Consort", a sort of mirror image of Philip.

The other thing to remember is the extreme longevity of the females of that family. Charles is very likely to pop his clogs well ahead of the present incumbent, and for the sake of the public perception of the royals that might not be such a bad thing.

William and Catherine certainly present a much less stuffy appearance.

Don T.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Dave MacKenzie
Date: 30 Apr 11 - 03:14 PM

I'm old enough to remember (just) when Lizzie was the beautiful young queen with her dashing naval officer husband. Then Charles was the dashing young heir with his beautiful bride. What'll be the public perception of Wills and Kate in 40 years time?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 25 September 11:13 AM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.