Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST,Seneschal Date: 10 Apr 05 - 05:26 PM Man even Python's theological wrestlers put together a better discussion. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 10 Apr 05 - 05:30 PM So the reason you are still here bothering with us then is....??? |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: Once Famous Date: 10 Apr 05 - 05:40 PM Bill D. Being rude to guys like you is just plain fun because you take it all so seriously and it makes it all so easy to laugh at you for that reason. As long as you brought my name up in this thread, pal. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: wysiwyg Date: 10 Apr 05 - 06:16 PM wizzy you started off your nice set of answers with your trademark 'what you really mean is this', snide put down I sure didn't feel or mean to be snide, but it appears you chose either to take it that way or to characterize it that way to be rude yourself. I would disagree that snideness is a trademark of mine... the last time I was called that, the next poster after the complaint spoke in assurance that I am anything but. I asked a question (Secucrats, wouldn't it be?) and then made the point that you have put two things in opposition that rarely meet either in opposition or agreement. On balance, I think considering the offers that have been made to me to get upset in this thread, I've responded more than civilly. Perhaps you might address the question I raised? ~Susan |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 10 Apr 05 - 06:24 PM wizzy I have no idea what question you raised. I was temporarily blinded by your poorly disguised arrogance, but then I always am, everytime I see your name I think 'Oh shit, there goes the old eyesight for a while.' You have a habit of starting so many replies, correcting what the previous poster had said, to the point that you are telling them what they meant to say? You don't know what they meant to say, and more often than not the original poster tells you that you have misinterpreted them, but does it stop you doing it? Does it buggery. No doubt you'll now condescend to tell me what I think I mean. Please ignore me as I am a guest and not worthy of your comment. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 10 Apr 05 - 06:30 PM I know exactly how you feel 06:24 PM. I haven't recovered yet from this morning's "Secucrats, wouldn't it be?" wizzy question of the day. It's that secucrats thing that's got me buggered. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST,who Date: 10 Apr 05 - 06:31 PM Are you talking of Susan or yourself? |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: wysiwyg Date: 10 Apr 05 - 07:00 PM wizzy I have no idea what question you raised. I can see that. I've asked it twice, now. Your own decision to be upset before even reading my post seems to cloud your thinking unnecessarily; you appear to be unable to define your terms and prefer flinging buzzwords about, and attacking me, instead. You seem to think any effort on my part to engage your thinking is an effort to put you down.... it's an unwarranted assumption. ~Susan |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 10 Apr 05 - 07:02 PM on the other hand, I know that all you regulars at Mudcat really care about your little place in cyberland. I should probably quit being such a prat and decide on a nice name. Anyone want to suggest one for me? |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 10 Apr 05 - 07:05 PM Sorry, I can't help. I'm committed to remaining a thorn in the side of the prats, and besides, milk monitor is already taken. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 10 Apr 05 - 07:06 PM What is this? I hope you don't really mean that. An entire principle is at stake. If you pick a name, they'll expect me to also. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 10 Apr 05 - 07:09 PM The regulars demand I pick a name every damn time I post, so I don't lose much sleep over it. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 10 Apr 05 - 07:13 PM ok, then, I'll keep on with the program. My basic personality won't let me surrender to these daily harassments. There's the principle of unrestrained anonymity to be maintained. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 10 Apr 05 - 07:16 PM why don't we get together and schedule our tirades? we could have them totally apopleptic by the end of the day. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 10 Apr 05 - 07:19 PM Who are you? Are the other one? Or are you me in disguise? I'll be buggered if I can tell who is who. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: Ebbie Date: 11 Apr 05 - 12:36 AM Guest 7:02: How about 'Ex-Prat'? Has a nice ring to it. You guys might keep in mind that your attitude and opinions are not all that important to us. Once in awhile Guest says something meaningful, something that compels thought, and that is very nice. (You may notice that when that happens, the Mudcat still implores you to take a name, even if a temporary one, because they honor the subject you raised or the response you made- and because they want to explore the thought further- surely that is a good feeling?) But when you are just guest one, guest two, guest three, guest ad infinitum, you tend to blur into a Mudpuddle that you are splashing in. Which may be fun for you but is just mud to us. imo |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 04:10 AM I started this thread to gloat. Oh and to bait Susan. Seems to have worked all too well. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 09:21 AM It was obvious you didn't care to actually address the issue or hear anyone else do it! |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: robomatic Date: 11 Apr 05 - 10:10 AM Go monickers! Beat No names! |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 10:30 AM Why the hell should I listen to anyone? |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 10:36 AM Because a different know-it-all may actually know something you don't? |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 10:37 AM And then if you listen you can be a better knowitall yourself... |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: Amos Date: 11 Apr 05 - 10:44 AM A strange burst of honesty, to such unsocial purposes allowing your ownership, that once would cause shame and denial for their evil. A master among baiters, and an old gloat for the f**king. Take what you can in satisfaction from it, puerile Nameless One, as no-one else will give you any. A |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: John Hardly Date: 11 Apr 05 - 10:52 AM Dr. Heathcliffcrat "Cliffcrat" Huxtable was an OBGYN (obstetrician/gynecologist), and his wife Claircrat was a successful attorney. They had five children: Sondracrat, Denisecrat, Theocrat, Vanessacrat and Rudycrat. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: robomatic Date: 11 Apr 05 - 10:52 AM Holy Cats Amos, don't beat around the bush. Tell 'em what you really think! |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 10:57 AM This is a gloat not a conversation. If I had wanted it to be anything else I would have said so. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: Amos Date: 11 Apr 05 - 11:07 AM How Godlike you are in your absolute determinations. I envy you your high psition, your great certainty, your self-assured power of "I"-ness. Must be nice. A |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 01:07 PM Oh, I am indeed Godlike. I can start threads on any subject and be a total ass, and you all will bite every time. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 01:12 PM You know, I may just change my writing style and make you think I'm more than one total ass. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: Amos Date: 11 Apr 05 - 02:10 PM Your ambitions would do great credit to a slime-mold. Aren't you really better than that? A |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST,slime mold Date: 11 Apr 05 - 02:17 PM I object to that. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: PoppaGator Date: 11 Apr 05 - 02:29 PM Back to basics: BEAT THEOCRATS! Let me just note that plenty of believers ~ church members as well as unaffiliated individuals ~ oppose the fundamentalist takeover of public dialog and government every bit as strongly as unbelievers. All it requires is a bit of intelligence. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: John Hardly Date: 11 Apr 05 - 02:35 PM THE O CRATS. THE P CRATS. THE Q CRATS. THE R CRATS. THE S CRATS. THE T CRATS. THE U CRATS. THE V CRATS. THE W CRATS. THE X CRATS. THE Y CRATS. THE Z CRATS. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 02:35 PM guest who are you to talk in my name? I started the damn thread and no wizzy or amos can do a thing. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: Ebbie Date: 11 Apr 05 - 02:37 PM Enjoy |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: Bill D Date: 11 Apr 05 - 06:03 PM well, durn, guest...if the only name you have is 'guest', then anyone can talk in your name! (We had a 'guest' a few years ago that I 'almost' got to use "Rumplestiltskin"...but I think it went away---hard to tell.) |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 06:24 PM who cares. anyway i started this not whoever is claiming it |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 06:25 PM Liar! |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 06:26 PM Hell no this is my thread. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 06:28 PM could we start calling oursels guest #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 06:29 PM what and give in to those mugcaters??? |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST Date: 11 Apr 05 - 06:39 PM I think Susan started it, actually. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: Once Famous Date: 11 Apr 05 - 09:39 PM And I would like to take a dump right here and finish it. |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: Bill D Date: 11 Apr 05 - 10:10 PM why, Martin...that's the first good idea you've had in ages! |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: GUEST,Mrr Date: 12 Apr 05 - 02:46 PM Ah, if only it were so... (referring to the thread title, not the prior post, just in case!) |
Subject: RE: BS: GO SECULARISTS! BEAT THEOCRATS! From: Once Famous Date: 12 Apr 05 - 02:50 PM Yes, it is a good idea, Bill D. Open wide. |