BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: GUEST,the shrink
Date: 25 Mar 05 - 04:57 PM

Martin's obsessions centre around a few main topics. Women, faeces and drugs. What female influence in his life abused drugs and left him lying in a dirty diaper. Discuss.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Once Famous
Date: 25 Mar 05 - 05:13 PM

And what are your favorite topics, Doc?

I love women, always have.

Learn how to spell feces. I have. There is plenty of being dished out by the likes of jerks like you.

I gave up drugs years ago. Obviously, you haven't.

I have plenty of other topics I like to talk about.

Your wife's naked pictures is one of them.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Ebbie
Date: 25 Mar 05 - 05:30 PM

Ha! He doesn't even know where his own wife's pictures are to be found!

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Once Famous
Date: 25 Mar 05 - 05:37 PM

Ha! She doesn't even know that my wife and I are very much in love.

She does know that she is quite a wretched old woman and about as desirable to a man as her old lady underwear.

Ebbie. The wicked witch of Mudcat.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Ebbie
Date: 25 Mar 05 - 05:52 PM

hahahah

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Clinton Hammond
Date: 25 Mar 05 - 05:58 PM

Awwwww... but -I- wanted to be The Wicked Witch Of Mudcat!

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Once Famous
Date: 25 Mar 05 - 06:00 PM

Your the asshole of Mudcat, Clinton

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: EagleWing
Date: 26 Mar 05 - 06:58 AM

Hm! I have seen Joe close down at least 2 threads on this subject because of Gibson and his detractors.

Any moment now . . .

We have allowed this person to goad us into slanging matches on threads about something as serious Terri Schiavo's life and death situation. Perhaps we should take previous advice and ignore Gibson who only exists to foul all threads (and has admitted it).

Frank L.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: GUEST
Date: 26 Mar 05 - 12:06 PM

Would that I were MG... I'd relax, pass you, and send you swirling down the drain to be in the company of your betters....

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Once Famous
Date: 26 Mar 05 - 03:16 PM

Uh, threads weren't really closed down because what I've said.

They've been closed down because of Guests and others who have their undies in a big bunch up their cracks getting so bent out of shape that they show their real colors.

Liberal tolerance is quite phony it seems.

Eagle Wing, I most certainly don't admit to trying to foul all threads. The majority here I don't bother with. Some I do because they are relatively interesting. Others just need a dose of reality that all people just don't have that far left radical drug induced train of thought.

See ya.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Big Mick
Date: 26 Mar 05 - 03:20 PM

Martin, your post seems to adopt a different stance than usual. When you suggest that liberal tolerance is quite phony, does that mean we should tolerate you using filthy language, and making lewd references?

Mick

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Once Famous
Date: 26 Mar 05 - 03:37 PM

[bleep] (for antisocial behavior)If you fucking well want to, Big Mick.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: GUEST,Gringo
Date: 27 Mar 05 - 12:56 AM

Who has been paying for her care for the past few years? G

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: EagleWing
Date: 27 Mar 05 - 06:17 AM

Joe,

Is there no way of just preventing Martin Gibson from coming onto every serious thread and goading people into these slanging matches? If not then I shall stop using Mudcat since I find that every time I want to discuss something of worth Gibson manages to force its degenration into slime and filth.

Frank L.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: robomatic
Date: 27 Mar 05 - 06:57 AM

I think we're faced with a question of common sense against common humanity. Mud gets flung because folks tend to love a mud fight. If people ignored the flinger, the flinger would go elsewhere, because the flinger only really cares about the response.

The question of policing the threads rapidly becomes a two pronged problem. Someone has to spend a lot of time doing the policing, even installing a holding pen so that posts get sequestered for analysis by assigned 'masters'. If you try just revoking memberships, you have to justify what you do and people just change their names and re-up and the problem persists.

The best solution is for folks to learn what to ignore and plow ahead, responding to worthwhile posts.

It's a lot like life.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Once Famous
Date: 27 Mar 05 - 11:28 AM

Eagle Wing apparently doesn't know much about life, Robo.

I am never really looking for responses Robo. I don't need to feed my ego in the way you imagine.

Merely stating my opinion and comments in a public forum is really good enough for me.

I know it gets read, some people nod yes and some people nod no.

Big deal.

The problem stems when someone else's ego is bruised, not mine. I just don't take it all that seriously, please believe me.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: GUEST,ME ME ME
Date: 29 Mar 05 - 08:46 PM

IT IS ALL HERE SAY

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: Peace
Date: 29 Mar 05 - 10:47 PM

You saw it here first, folks!

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: dianavan
Date: 30 Mar 05 - 12:31 AM

I just heard on CBC that Terry's parents received many letters and e-mails from people that also sent money to help pay for their legal fees. Now they are selling the addresses of the donators to a marketing firm. If you are one of those who helped support the parents because you thought they were morally righteous, you might want to think about this twist in the story.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: robomatic
Date: 30 Mar 05 - 08:01 AM

Martin:

Good posts should be about the subject. If egos are involved, then the intelligence and thought put into the thread gets sidelined. And again, I think mud flinging as a message and as a response can be fun, but they can also be ignored when they detract from a subject which might in fact be fun and interesting all its own self.

If we're going to be concerned with "LOOK AT ME!" types of posts, we might as well post photos to go with.

Subject: RE: BS: High Court Rules In Terry Schiavo Case
From: robomatic
Date: 30 Mar 05 - 08:06 AM

Now back to the subject:

Terri's folks won a ruling from Atlanta Court of Appeals (March 29, 2005), that they would hear the case on the facts, not on procedure.

I can only remark that while I think this whole media/legal battle has become a farce, if it were punishment it would be cruel and unusual, as the procedures being used on Terri are COMMONLY used to ease hopeless (in this case brain dead) physical wrecks out of their burden of existence.