BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Raggytash
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 12:38 PM

No, not at all, not one jot, not one iota.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 10:54 AM

I agree entirely PFR - I've never suggested anybody should be banned because of extreme opinions - I welcome them, especially when they are rationally put
I draw a line at persistent abuse (we all do it sometimes but there is a limit), but even then the decision is with the moderators
Keith's problem is that there comes a point where he refuses to respond to what is being said and goes into his 'speaking clock' mode, repeating the statement over and over again as if nobody has responded - "stonewalling" in sporting terms
At that point, we need to move on if we are going to continue to share opinions and knowledge
Keith relies on this not happening - then he claims he has "won" something because - he claims - nobody can answer his points - it has always been a regular technique - and he is the only one to make these discussions a matter of win-lose
Then, and oly then will I suggest we stop responding to him - not because I disgree with him but because he then becomes an obstruction
Missing him already - aren't you!!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 10:46 AM

I don't agree. There are times when the whole reputation of the place comes under threat. If you indulge serial bigots and bullies that's precisely what happens.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 09:51 AM

"I have to say, I've come out of this thread knowing far more about our glorious leaders than when it started - even Buck House - who'd have thought it!!
Who says Keith has no uses?"

Jim - that's precisely why i object to bans and exclusions of our worst adversaries...
We need hardcore antagonists like tezza to keep us motivated in staying better informed, better equipped for fighting back...

If keith is all we have left, then mudcat is poorer for it...?????

[there are maybe 2 or 3 tezza understudies, who try hard, who have so far not been banned from BS, but they are just not in his league...]

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 11 Mar 18 - 08:08 PM

" sympathisers"
Is there more than one Dave?
Thought this was a one-mane SPP (Save the Prominent Pervs) campaign
I have to say, I've come out of this thread knowing far more about our glorious leaders than when it started - even Buck House - who'd have thought it!!
Who says Keith has no uses?
Jim Caarroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 Mar 18 - 03:42 PM

The more you draw attention to the deceitful activities of this and previous governments, Jim, the more their sympathisers squeal. From the amount squealing that is going on I think you are hitting the mark.

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 10 Mar 18 - 04:58 AM

YOUR FRIENDS SEEM TO GET EVERYWHERE, DON'T THEY KEITH?
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 10 Mar 18 - 04:21 AM

More and more information you continue to ignore Keith - plenty more to go
You are an idiot without a grain of self-respect - I am happy that you continue to humiliate yourself in this way for as long as you feel the need to protect paedofiles because they are prominent politicians
Nice of you to draw attention to yourself on the Brexit thread - the more the merrier, I say
You really have reached sewer-level on this one
Great start to the day - thanks
"Strange, sad man."
I trust you were addressing yourself when you wrote this
At least the Government attempted to cover up their pervs
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 10 Mar 18 - 04:21 AM

You know, I think he really believes that I take him seriously.

Bloated crap butler

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: DMcG
Date: 10 Mar 18 - 04:18 AM

Ok Keith - chat later.

But Tusk's statement did not contradict what I said in (a). And point (b) was more important as I said at the time (though 'significant' might have been a better word.)

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 10 Mar 18 - 03:58 AM

Jim,
I said have put up May's statement that there was possibly a cover-up over the Dolphin Square Paedofile ring

The police found nothing. Just two deluded or deranged people whose stories were shown to be fabrications.
The police had to apologise to the families of the dead and compensate everyone named still living.

Your whole case was just lies.

Dave,
Tossing wang bogle

Strange, sad man.

I am off line for a while.
A blessed relief if you found odds of only six against one too gruelling.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 08:15 PM

"Jim, you have never quoted May suggesting Heath was a paedo."
Now you are deliberately distorting what I said - is there no end to your lying to protect these monsters?
I said have put up May's statement that there was possibly a cover-up over the Dolphin Square Paedofile ring
I asked you to explain that immediately I put it up so you cannot possibly claim it slipped your notice
When a senior minister, especially one who is now Prime Minister, makes such a serious admission about her own Government you can bet she believes there has been a ******* cover-up
Want another missing file involving high-ups and paedophilia?
THERE YOU GO
One of the "missing" files involved a Government advisor you have already been linked to, PETER RIGHTON - SERIAL SEX OFFENDER
Righton'es name has also been linked to the Dolphin Square orgies - yet this particular scandal has nothing to do with that squalid rapefest - another entirely
THATCHER had already made sure none of this information got to the ears of the general public long before the files disappeared but some of the details escaped into the press
THIS IS THE MAN THATCHER PROTECTED
THIS is his own confession
GEOFFREY DICKENS SAW THE REPORT BEFORE IT "DISAPPEARED" and described it as "Explosive"
These are the obscene squalids you are defending - makes you a pervert, I reckon
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 03:51 PM

Tossing wang bogle

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 03:45 PM

Jim, you have never quoted May suggesting Heath was a paedo.

From your own quote,
"But the (police) Operation Conifer report will stop far short of alleging Heath was a paedophile and that will fuel critics who say the exercise is a ‘scandalous’ waste of public money that has besmirched Heath’s character."

Your claims about Dolphin Square were all bollocks. It never happened.
The police had to compensate all the suspects they named.

You lied about "Prime Ministers and Government high-ups."

You whole case was lies.
I did not lie.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 03:02 PM

JAy SUS
Whast a lying plonker
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 02:29 PM

Go fuck yourself Keith - you've had it twice - you know this as this is the first time yo have challenged it despite the fact that that I have asked for clarification numerous times
You always do this - ignore challenges then claim you haven't been challenged
"No. I do not defend anyone."
What!!!!!
You have had the records of these perves put up over and over again and you continue to defend them
Do not ever claim you don't tell lies - you no longer know what truth is
You really do need help
Go away - maybe there is a local paedo ring to keep you occupied = you seem to have embraced it big time
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 01:50 PM

Jim, did you mean this?
the present Prime Minister has suggested that his crimes were possibly covered up

I do not remember her suggesting any such thing.
Quote please.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 01:41 PM

Jim,
So you only defend "high ups"

No. I do not defend anyone.
I was just refuting your lie about "proven cases" of "rape and paedophilia" by "Prime Ministers and government high-ups."

You defend your lie by reporting the antics of some local councillor!

No word on Tessie May the fantasist then?

Huh?

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 12:44 PM

Doesn't even know the difference between a Gnome and a Goblin.

Slimy turd captain.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 12:35 PM

... it's also interesting that public boarding school educated tory politicians
adapt so easily to life behind bars in prison........

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 11:31 AM

"Why would I? (He was a councillor. Hardly a "Government high-up"!
Whatea magnificent foot-in-mouth Keith - you really couldn't make it up
So you only defend "high ups"
Didn't doubt it for one minute
"You can not challenge a single word t"
are you joking again
No word on Tessie May the fantasist then?
Didn't doubt that one either
You have hade a one-man stand in defending these perverts and everybody has challanged you
You have not a single supporter here
Mabe it' a fantasists plot
Feckin' eejit
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 11:17 AM

Jim,
how long before Keith begins to defend it?

Why would I?
(He was a councillor. Hardly a "Goverment high-up"!

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 11:11 AM

Dave,
Nothing you say will ever change that. Just do as I do and take the piss

Your weird nonsense just makes you irrelevant.

You can not challenge a single word that I have posted, so you are reduced to posting weird phrases, apparently against yoursel ("Goblin?".)
And it is your thread!

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 11:08 AM

"Just do as I do and take the piss."
Much better to allow him to take the piss out of himself - and much more satisfying
HOW LONG BEFORE THIS IS PROVED THE WORK OF A FANTASIST? and how long before Keith begins to defend it??
Your starter for ten Keith!!!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 11:04 AM

Let's see shall we Keith - what else would the Conservative Telegraph say?

They can not tell lies about the police or legal cases.
I also quoted BBC.

Your quote,
"But the Operation Conifer report will stop far short of alleging Heath was a paedophile and that will fuel critics who say the exercise is a ‘scandalous’ waste of public money that has besmirched Heath’s character."

So, no proven claim of rape or paedophilia against any Prime Minister or government high-ups as you falsely claimed, liar.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 10:57 AM

Jim, you should know by now.

Any dirt about the Tory party = Unproved allegations
Any unproved allegations about the Labour party = The party are rotten

Nothing you say will ever change that. Just do as I do and take the piss.

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 10:37 AM

Let's see shall we Keith - what else would the Conservative Telegraph say?
It still does not make one single difference to the fact that, outside of Dolphin Square, each and every one of the people named are serial paedofiles - you have clung onto the Dolphin Square cover-up and ignored their records
I ask again - are THeresa May and the police who have admitted the possibility of a cover up conspiracy theorists - please answer ?
Now will do
You carefully did not ling your quote - you missed a bit
Reports have claimed that police are treating seriously seven of the 40 or so complainants who came forward and that those would have warranted interviewing Heath under caution - had he still been alive. Heath died in 2005 and cannot defend his reputation.
Chief Constable Mike Veale
Chief Constable Mike Veale
But the Operation Conifer report will stop far short of alleging Heath was a paedophile and that will fuel critics who say the exercise is a ‘scandalous’ waste of public money that has besmirched Heath’s character.
Wiltshire Police said: “The Operation Conifer summary closure report will be published on Thursday 5 October 2017. As per our position throughout this investigation, we will not be commenting on any operational detail until such time we publish our report.

“The operational security of the investigation and the anonymity of the people who have come forward remains of paramount importance to Wiltshire Police. It is for that reason that we strongly discourage any speculation concerning any investigation detail and/or outcome.”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/24/fantasist-facing-charges-false-ted-heath-paedophile-claims/
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 09:38 AM

Telegraph,

September 2017 • 10:00pm
The only prosecution expected to arise from the £1.5 million investigation into Sir Edward Heath is of a fantasist accused of wasting police time.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 09:34 AM

Jim, it was all made up.
The police paid compensation to all those accused.
You have made a twat of yourself again.


BBC,
A man who alleged he was the victim of a VIP child abuse ring faces multiple charges relating to the possession of indecent images of children.
The man, known as Nick, claimed a paedophile ring was responsible for murdering three children.
He also said he was systematically abused and tortured by senior politicians and members of the armed forces during the 1970s and 80s.
The claims triggered the abandoned Met Police investigation Operation Midland.
Those he accused included former Conservative politicians Lord Brittan and Harvey Proctor, and Field Marshal Lord Bramall.
After the Met launched Operation Midland in 2014 they held a press conference where a senior detective described Nick's allegations as "credible and true".
In 2015, the Met carried out a series of high-profile dawn raids on the homes of those Nick had accused.
All of them denied his allegations and no evidence whatsoever was found to support Nick's claims.
After the £2.5m investigation was closed, without any charges, the Met apologised for the way they had conducted the inquiry and paid compensation.
A report into Operation Midland, carried out by a retired High Court judge, said the Met had made a series of errors in the investigation and made 25 recommendations on how police should handle similar allegations in the future.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42965637

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 09:19 AM

The Tories have always liked partying as long as nobody sees what they GET UP TO
PARTING AGAIN

Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 08:42 AM

Public schools and boy buggery... seems to be something of a classic traditional combination..

Public schools and the British elite establishment & Tory party...

hmmmmmmmmm.....!!!??????

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 08:34 AM

"Standard,
A man who claimed to be the victim of a VIP paedophile ring "
Your latest ploy seems to have underlined the possibility he was telling the truth in the first place Keith
Nice to see you'e backing down.
It is common and confirmed knowlege that victims of Paedophelia are qyuite likely to become prdators themselves if they feel the climes against them were not tealt with fairly
Some victims of clerical abuse have been found to have become abusers themselves
Paedophilic abuse destroys lives - this is what you are defending
Again your April 17th posting has been made invalid by statements mad over eight months later
Please answer this as honestly as you can - do you believe Theresa mMay to be the conspiracy theorist you have described her to be
Are the senior policeman who now says that Heath would possibly have been charged with juvenile rape had he lived the conspiracy theorists you have claimed they are
This has really blown up in your face
You started disgustingly enough by attempting to make that harassment and rape of women a political issue
Now you are defending the filth of British humanity
You certainly will regret all this in the future - right at the top of your CV - "An apologist for Paedofiles"
Happy days certainlt are here again
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 08:09 AM

Snotty brained turdburlar

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 07:27 AM

Standard,
A man who claimed to be the victim of a VIP paedophile ring has himself been charged with offences related to indecent images of children.
The accuser, known only as Nick, sparked the Met Police’s Operation Midland in 2015 after he told officers he had been abused for nine years.
He claimed the VIP ring raped, abused and even murdered young boys, with some of the abuse taking place in Dolphin Square, Westminster.


But the Met's £2.5 million investigation was abandoned in 2016 without a single arrest, despite police raiding the homes of prominent figures including Lord Bramall and the late ex-home secretary Lord Brittan.
After the operation was closed, the Met Police apologised to those who had been falsely accused and paid out compensation.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 07:21 AM

No - he linked him directly with Dolphin Square

Dolphin Square never happened.
Both accusers, Darren and Nick, were prosecuted.

Telegraph,
Robert Mendick, Chief Reporter
21 April 2017 • 2:27pm
A
‘fantasist’ who accused Lord Brittan of child sex abuse sparking a 12-month police investigation is now being prosecuted over false claims he was kidnapped and shot at.
The man was charged after making a series of hoax emergency phone calls to police alleging he was under attack on at least three different occasions from gun-toting gangs.
The accused, known as ‘Darren’ but whose real name cannot be disclosed for legal reasons, had previously claimed he had witnessed two murders committed by a VIP paedophile ring, prompting a police inquiry.

Lord Brittan, who was falsely accused of child sex abuse Credit: John Stillwell/PA
Darren falsely claimed Lord Brittan, the former Home Secretary, was part of the ring that abused children in a flat at Dolphin Square.
The investigation was closed in September 2015 after detectives could find no evidence to support the lurid claims.
But Darren went on to lodge a complaint with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) that personal and sensitive details surrounding the case had been leaked to the media, including The Telegraph.
The watchdog launched an investigation into Detective Chief Inspector Paul Settle, the former head of the Metropolitan Police’s paedophile unit, which remains ongoing after more than 15 months - and despite the fact Darren has now been charged over the hoax calls.

DCI Paul Settle
A source said Darren had telephoned police on a number of occasions, claiming he had been kidnapped; attacked by gunmen; ambushed by an armed gang; and also shot at.
A friend of DCI Settle, an experienced detective who had warned against the 'baseless witch hunt' of VIPs such as Lord Brittan, told The Telegraph: “It is disgraceful that Paul Settle is under investigation by the IPCC when the police themselves have charged Darren with effectively being a fantasist for making hoax calls. It is utter madness.”

Harvey Proctor, a former Conservative MP whose life was destroyed after being falsely accused of being a member of the VIP paedophile gang, said: “It is utterly preposterous that Paul Settle is investigated over claims made by the man who has now been charged with being a fantasist.”
Darren had told detectives that he had been present at two possible murders – one of a 15-year-old girl at a flat in Dolphin Square used by senior politicians close to the Palace of Westminster and of a man with Down’s syndrome killed on a private estate in Suffolk with links to the Establishment.
He also alleged the man with Down’s syndrome was tortured to death on the estate when he was tied to two cars. “Both vehicles then slowly reversed and I heard a scream. I think he must have passed out because he made no more sound,” Darren told a now discredited news website Exaro in February 2015. His claims led to six people being interviewed by police under caution.

Dolphin Square
A Telegraph investigation in September 2015 showed how Darren was a deeply troubled witness, who had been jailed for two years in the 1990s for making hoax bomb calls and threats to neighbours. A judge accused him of telling “some pretty whopping lies” while Darren also falsely confessed to the murder of a prostitute in the midst of a high profile police manhunt.
Darren had a troubled youth and had been in foster care for about six months when he was abused by his foster carer. He subsequently won a claim for Government compensation as a victim of crime.

The abuse sparked a bout of heavy drinking that led to him calling police and confessing to crimes he did not commit including the murder of a prostitute in what was seen at the time as a possible 'cry for help’.
Darren’s now discredited allegations about the VIP paedophile gang helped to bolster claims by another apparent fantasist, who can be identified only as Nick, who claimed he had witnessed three other murders.
Nick is now under a separate police investigation for perverting the course of justice.
An IPCC spokesman said of the inquiry into DCI Settle as a result of allegations made by Darren: “The investigation is progressing well.”

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 07:10 AM

"normal mainstream views"
Muslim implants to rape children
Travellers are slaveholders
Irish children are all brainwashed
All Conservative politicians who rape children are victims of "conspiracy theories"
I knew Britain has swung to the right after Brexit but I didb't realiise it had swung quite so far
You live and learn
Mabe a conspiracy theorist for a Prime Minister and a Police force heirarchy has done more damage than I thought!!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 06:27 AM

"Spare us more conspiracy theories."
We have a conspiracy theorist for a prim minister then - and a whole loasd of them among the top echelons of the British police force
Very worrying
"No he did not. He said he had affairs with adults."
No - he linked him directly with Dolphin Square
Stop telling lies to protect paedophiles
Keep this up much longer and we'll begin to think that....!!!
I'm grateful for your persisting with this - it's enabled me to reopen the criminal activities of your beloved leaders
Will dig around for some more when I have time
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 06:07 AM

Creepy Shit Dragon

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 06:01 AM

Agreed Pfr.
In the real world, I am just expressing normal mainstream views, but here the extremists dominate.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 05:28 AM

"And it has been six against one."

No... as may be indicative of a health condition which is cause for concern...

..it's rational sense and sanity versus one obstinate willfully perverse obsessive old man.....

If you count 6... that's only a minimum number that have even been bothered opening this thread and posting a response...!!!

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 05:25 AM

Thwe cases were so obviously covered up by the Establishment,

Spare us more conspiracy theories.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 05:22 AM

So, no proven cases as you claimed.
Even the son of one of the accused had indicted his father as a sexual criminal

No he did not. He said he had affairs with adults.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 05:14 AM

Thwe cases were so obviously covered up by the Establishment, even to the point that the Prime Minister has admitted the possibility that as far as the rest of the world is concerned the evidence proves these crimes beyond any reasonable doubt
Even the son of one of the accused had indicted his father as a sexual criminal
If any further confirmation were needed, the disappearance of the report puts the lid on it.
You choose to ignore everything that has been put up by claiming they are MY lies
All this has been in order tp protect the reputation of prominent paedofiles
What kind of individual does that
If "proof" were important to you, you would not have politicised this affair in order to denigrate a party against which no proof existss - only unsubstantiated (so far) accusations
Go protect your paedos - it's all you are fit for
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 04:33 AM

Jim, "Latest example" was true as were the others.
There are no "proven cases" as you falsely claimed.

And Keith continues to defend the countries most prominent paedofile

No. All I have done is expose some of your lies.

All I have done on this thread is to repeat what Labour people are saying. As Labour supporters you should be applauding me.
As liberals you should join their condemnation of mysogyny and sexual harassment.

And it has been six against one.

Now the thread instigator is reduced to posting weird insults to himself, while Jim claims some kind of victory! ("game set and match"
and "You've lost this one,"

Strange people.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 08:26 AM

"I have not lied."
Yeas you have - you never stop lying
Latest example -
"Yes, based on and now falsified."
TOu have been given examples of historical abuse, you have shown that "seven reliable witnesses" have accused him
You ave been given accounts of senior policemen saying there is a case to answer
You have been given a statement by the Prime Minister that the affair was hushed up
All this and you claim the accusations are based on "the testimony of a fantasist"
That is an obscene lie to defend a probable paedofile
On top of the Heath affair you have continued to defend every other squalid in this sordid bunch of squalids
"I have not lied."
Another lie - one posting ago
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 07:38 AM

Pompous Rectum Waffle

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 07:03 AM

I have not lied.
You have.

No "Prime Minister," Minister or other "Government High-Up" has a "proven" case of "rape" or "paedophilia" against them, as you falsely claimed, liar.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 06:56 AM

How many "proven cases" of your accusations against the Labour Party, by the way?

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 06:54 AM

Oh dear Keith - you really have blown your concern for sexual criminality wide open, haven'y you?
Don't ring us - we won't ring you
Do we need to continue to encourage this saddo lads?
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 06:26 AM

Idiotic prick goblin

Ha ha ha. At last we know who is being insulted.

Jim,
Not a tabloid claim Keith - a load of police reports

Yes, based on the testimony of a fantasist and now falsified.

Not one single proven case against any prime Minister or Government high-up as you falsely claimed Jim.
It was all bollocks.