Subject: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Patrish(inactive) Date: 09 Feb 01 - 09:24 AM WOW!!!!!!!!!!!! FEMALE ORGASM BY REMOTE CONTROL A newly patented electronic implant could deliver orgasms at the push of a button, a device that could help women who are otherwise unable to achieve orgasms. Stuart Meloy, a surgeon at Piedmont Anesthesia and Pain Consultants in Winston-Salem, N.C., got the idea for the orgasmic electronics while performing a routine pain-relief operation on a woman's spine. The surgery uses electrical pulses delivered through implanted electrodes in the spine to modify pain signals passing along the nerves. "I was placing the electrodes and suddenly the woman started exclaiming emphatically," Meloy says in the journal New Scientist. The stimulating device would be implanted in one of the buttocks and operated by remote control. Though the implant is almost as large as a pack of cigarettes, "If young women of 15 or so are having painful operations to enlarge their breasts when they don't have to, are you kidding? Of course it'll be used," says Jim Pfaus at Concordia University in Montreal. Meloy expects clinical trials to begin later this year. Though he has yet to test the device on men, Meloy says there's no reason it shouldn't work the same way. Patrish xxxxxx
|
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Date: 09 Feb 01 - 09:28 AM Will they be looking for volunteers for the clinical tests? The Mudcat Female Scientific Research Group (me and any others who wanna join) would be only too glad to help. |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: SINSULL Date: 09 Feb 01 - 09:33 AM aN "oRGASMITRON"! bARBARELLA - NO? |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Patrish(inactive) Date: 09 Feb 01 - 09:40 AM YEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!! |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Lady McMoo Date: 09 Feb 01 - 09:42 AM "Exclaiming emphatically"!! Is this the medical term for it? (:>) mcmoo |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: JedMarum Date: 09 Feb 01 - 09:43 AM It works for men too, by the way - but the electronic version still leaves them sleepy afterwards. |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: CarolC Date: 09 Feb 01 - 09:56 AM Sign me up! |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Steve Parkes Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:00 AM Call me old-fashioned, but I still prefer the manual method! Steve |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Noreen Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:01 AM Thanks Patrish! I'm all in favour of scientific research. Noreen MMFSRG |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Gary T Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:05 AM Implanted in one of the buttocks, eh? Might be interesting if the device developed a glitch to where every time you sat down..... |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:10 AM Mudcat Female Scientific Research Group Mission Statement We, the Members of the Mudcat Female Scientific Research Group (MMFSRG) hereby declare our intentions to push forward the boundaries of knowledge and strive for satisfaction in the interests of science. We aim to provide a stimulating influence in current research, and welcome all new developments with open...arms. (*Please note: The MFSRG is in no way affilated with the NYCFTTS, unless we're talking Screwed in the Biblical Sense) |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST,bflat Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:11 AM Sounds satisfying but, no thanks, too much like a road to a world of Amazon women; no men needed. When intimacy looses it's role in orgasm what will the new love songs become? Honey, I'll love myself as long as my battery pack lasts or You recharge me baby like Energizer. Forgetaboutit! But, if it works for you, then go girl! Ellen |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Llanfair Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:12 AM You have GOT to be kidding!!!! |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: bill\sables Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:13 AM Open Arms ?????????? |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:18 AM I am a scientist. My interest is purely scientific. I am prepared to sacrifice my time and energy in a selfless manner for the benefit of humankind. |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Wolfgang Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:19 AM Thanks for the volunteers, but don't forget that three quarters of you have to be tested in the different control groups and it will be not your choice whether you are in one of the controls or in the experimental group. And then think of the pitfalls of remote control. When you realise you have left the control at home and your child just has detected it and plays the buttons while you are in a conference. Wolfgang |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Metchosin Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:21 AM Steve, there is a third method *BG* |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST,Roger the skiffler Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:24 AM So... if I get an extra button on the tv remote, that's another job I can do without getting out of the chair! Great! Not tonight dear, the batteries have run down! RtS |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Mrrzy Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:28 AM I love the idea of the kids getting the remote... LOL! |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Pseudolus Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:31 AM Kinda makes a new angle of advertising available to the Energizer bunny.......think about it.... :)
Frank |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Grab Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:57 AM Slightly relevant to this email I got last year. ENERGIZER BUNNY FOUND DEAD!! Today, the world was stunned by the news of the death of the Energizer Bunny. He was six years old. Authorities believe that the death occurred approximately 8:42 last evening. Best known as the irritating pink bunny that kept going, and going, and going. "Pinkie", as he was known to his friends and family, was alone at the time of his death. An emergency autopsy was performed early this morning. Chief Medical Examiner, Dura Cell, concluded that the cause of death was acute cardiac arrest induced by sexual over-stimulation. Apparently, someone had put the bunny's batteries in backwards and he kept coming, and coming, and coming... |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Art Thieme Date: 09 Feb 01 - 10:58 AM What, no need for dental dams any longer ??? What's Hannibal Lector gonna do ?? ;-) Would it work for guys for whom Viagra is a fizzle ???? So many questions. (It does sound great. Go for it.) But be warned: my good friend had a male organ transplant in recent times. His hand rejected it. Art Thieme |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Date: 09 Feb 01 - 11:00 AM He should get a new hand. From the Second Hand shop - ho, ho, ho. |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Grab Date: 09 Feb 01 - 11:03 AM Incidentally, this New Scientist article is the source of the story - more details about it in there. I like the comment about the woman "exclaiming emphatically" saying "You're going to have to teach my husband how to do that." :-) Grab. |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: LR Mole Date: 09 Feb 01 - 11:05 AM I'll have what she's having. |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Metchosin Date: 09 Feb 01 - 11:10 AM Oh gee, does this mean I don't have to sit on the clothes dryer anymore? |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: annamill Date: 09 Feb 01 - 11:13 AM Personally, I don't feel this is a good idea. We fight now over who get to hold the TV remote! Imaging this situation!! Love,annamill |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Morticia Date: 09 Feb 01 - 11:16 AM I already get cranky when I can't find the tv remote....I could see me getting very terse when I lost this one! |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST,BigDaddy Date: 09 Feb 01 - 11:17 AM Could we get back to the oral tradition, please? |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST,petr Date: 09 Feb 01 - 11:38 AM there was a recent story about the guy who had the worlds first hand transplant, the body rejected the hand.. Now its one thing to be rejected by women, but when your own hand rejects you... |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: KingBrilliant Date: 09 Feb 01 - 11:59 AM I already have a remote control, on the soles of my feet. Anyone else have that? - it makes walking across gravel a really weird experience. Kris |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: wysiwyg Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:03 PM Naw, don't need no wires. Use soul-to-soul messaging instead. See me privately for details. ~Happy in PA |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Wolfgang Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:10 PM sole-to-sole massages? |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Patrish(inactive) Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:10 PM I have just deleted what I originally wrote here Patrish PS I read it, and realised everyone else would too!! PPS It was about remote controls!!!!! |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: KingBrilliant Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:14 PM Come on Patrish - I've revealed my foot control. Surely you can tell us whatever it was. Go on we won't tell nobody..... Kris |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: KingBrilliant Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:18 PM Brilliant thread proximity!!!! This thread is immediately followed by the plaintive cry of "do I need a vibrator" Ooops, me sides've split. Kris |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: RichM Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:19 PM Wait, wait: it's obvious that men should be in charge of the remote--due to our fascination -and vast experience- with the TV remote! So girls, hand it over... ;) Rich |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:20 PM Awww, Rich wants to press the magic button! |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: InOBU Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:26 PM Well, the first danger that comes to mind concerns remote control bombs in Ireland. England began to transmit up and down the frequency spectrum to trigger any bombs being placed. Now, should this thing catch on, and say, become common in some war zone where remote bombs were being scaned for... well, I just cant emagine walking down the street in such a place! Srcatching his head in wonder! Larry |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Pseudolus Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:27 PM So ladies, for a real good time, replace the TV remote with this new remote but don't tell the man in your life. Cause you know it'll be HOURS before any of us think to actually stand up and change the channel. we'll just keep pressing this one harder and harder....... Frank |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:36 PM Wow, Tom Swift and his electric dildoe has returned. |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Noreen Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:40 PM ROTFLMAO! Thanks, Wolfgang. Well, to design the experiment: Control groups: . 1. No stimulation |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:46 PM Hmmm, good idea Noreen, we could try: 1. No stimulation 2. Electronic box 3. Manual 4. The insert-flap-A-into-slot-B normal Friday evening shenanigans 5. The Russell-Crowe-in-his-Gladiator-outfit fantasy aspect 6. The aphrodisical affects of a half bottle of Smirnoff 7. Chocolate. |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: RichM Date: 09 Feb 01 - 12:56 PM Fibula mentioned chocolate...yum... ...Even if you dispute that it's an aphrodisiac, any excuse to comsume chocolate is valid!
Damn...I have NO chocolate in the house, there's freezing rain outside, and I have to drive to the dentist soon. Rich Rich |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Noreen Date: 09 Feb 01 - 01:01 PM Fibula- and combinations of the above?? |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Lox Date: 09 Feb 01 - 01:02 PM I've had an organic (orgasmic) version for years now, so I'm not really too impressed I'm afraid - sorry. It's comfy in the palm of the hand too ;) lox |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Lox Date: 09 Feb 01 - 01:03 PM Oh yeah, I forgot, I don't mind letting the woman use it either. I've given up fighting.;) lox |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Mrs.Duck Date: 09 Feb 01 - 01:06 PM Orgasm at the press of a button......am I the only one that already gets that????? |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Lonesome EJ Date: 09 Feb 01 - 01:14 PM Isn't getting there at least half the fun? |
Subject: RE: BS: Female Orgasm by remote control From: Justa Picker Date: 09 Feb 01 - 02:09 PM So much for foreplay. Comes down to just whistle if and when you want me. (In the meantime I'll go and re-string a guitar.) |