Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: gnu Date: 03 Aug 01 - 04:14 PM smallpiper... good one ! As for porn, some people use it to fulfill a need / desire. I assume it's mostly single people. It is unfortunate that some people can't find that "someone special" to share this part of life. However, some unfortunate souls, for whatever reason, don't connect with a soulmate and use porn as a substitute. Hey man, whatever gets you through the day. Life is hard enough without a mate... life without ANY sex or sexual stimulation would be just going through the motions... so to speak... nudge, nudge, wink, wink. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: bobbi Date: 03 Aug 01 - 05:04 PM English John... LMAO Ask Ted Bundy what's wrong with porn. He's America's "Hillside Strangler." Raised in a prominent family with a good education, he says he became intrigued with the sex-death-power trip he was on by venturing into pornography at an early age. He has since been executed by our penal system. No one should be censored...by anyone (regardless of how well meaning that person is). Censorship is akin to pornography... It leads to oppression, power trips, and bondage.. And it refutes another's right to present an opposing argument. I think this guest (flamer) has been very well dispatched by the Mudcatters he has addressed (you raised us well, Joe)... And..I would much rather read his remarks about "what's wrong with porn" than those I encountered on the thread: "The last thing I wanted to read.." (The fued between two mudcatters, Brendy & Praise) but I read all... My right to know, respond if I choose, and have an opinion. We are all adults here and do not need to be protected from the bad things of the world.. From the responses I have read, I think we are quite capable of protecting ourselves.. (no offense intended to Joe Offer, who is a good dude). As for our "Flaming Guest," who seems to have nothing better to do than look at dirty picture and pet it up, why don't you take up the harp instead? They say it's theraputic! I prefer the kazoo, myself... but can't seem to find one that's pretuned! b |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: catspaw49 Date: 03 Aug 01 - 05:16 PM I dunno' what the big deal is here folks. Porn has been a subject around here for years. A couple of years back, I compiled the list below so we could check out all the porn sites run by Mudcatters. It's definitely time to do an update I guess, but here is the original list......You'll recognize quite a few names I believe!
bbc's Menonnite Nudes--www.stillgottabonnet.whoa I am always updating this list, so be sure to check in at: Spaw's Completely Offensive Utterings-www.dummass.fockit
|
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Joe Offer Date: 03 Aug 01 - 05:31 PM Oh, shit. Wouldn't you know that Catspaw would turn this thread into a classic? -Joe Offer, off to the Mennonite site- |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: GUEST Date: 03 Aug 01 - 06:19 PM What Ian said. There may be a use for pornography. If there is one, find all you want at google.com and don't intrude on the mood. Two Noble Truths: [1] Everyone ought to have the right to say anything anywhere. [2] Everyone ought to refrain from exercising that right. To those who wanted to validate this somehow, "Guest" [=Gutless] didn't ask for a dissertation on ribald music; he asked for pornographic "art." Screw him; that's pornography enough for all concerned. CC |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Gareth Date: 03 Aug 01 - 06:22 PM The originator of this thread obviously likes his "sex" manually. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Richard Bridge Date: 03 Aug 01 - 06:42 PM gnu, you are an optimist. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: mousethief Date: 03 Aug 01 - 06:59 PM I'm hurt, Spaw. Alex (the real one -- always check the spelling!) |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Bill D Date: 03 Aug 01 - 07:06 PM the elves are getting heavy-handed in the deletions, hmmm? *shrug* |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Burke Date: 03 Aug 01 - 09:11 PM I love spaw's list, but Joe's reaction is what really got me laughing! |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull Date: 03 Aug 01 - 09:26 PM bobbi-The point is we are NOT all adults here, as i said to Guest kids visit this website, it is mainly a music site, and I dont think porn is suitable here, if joe deleted the porn I think he did the right thing, however I have no wish to argue with you or anyone else so I wont read this thread again.john in hull |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: bobbi Date: 03 Aug 01 - 11:40 PM I don't think porn was posted.. only a request for some links.. There has been much worse language used in other threads. Lest we lose sight of the original issue.. which was simply a stupid request that I'm assuming no one honored.. I would like to requst that catspaw49 update those links though.. I tried most all of them without success. Thought I really hit pay-dirt there for a while. And I WILL be checking in later! (After I finish reading the thread on "What's Your Pimp/Prostitute Name) Bet the kids got a kick out of that one! tsk! b |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Bernard Date: 04 Aug 01 - 06:34 AM Porn on the cob or sweetporn? I have pornflakes for my brekkie... Pornography can't be all bad - look at the wads of cash people who produce it are making!! ;o> |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Liz the Squeak Date: 04 Aug 01 - 07:39 AM The Kipper's Cricket song might be in their song book, which has stuff from the first two albums and the Cromer Crab wars. If not, PM me and I'll try and find my copy which has a handwritten version in it, if the original isn't printed. LTS |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Linda Kelly Date: 04 Aug 01 - 09:29 AM I liked that smutty James Bond movie with Porn Connery. Spaw -I'm going to frame your list - it's a gem! |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Snuffy Date: 04 Aug 01 - 11:30 AM Try the Lassie films for hard-paw corn |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: IanC Date: 04 Aug 01 - 01:39 PM Noreen
Not as good as the real thing! ;-) |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: GUEST,.gargoyle Date: 05 Aug 01 - 02:25 AM If you are in a LOVING, MONOGOMOUS, RELATIONSHIP..... Pornography is WRONG!!!!
Because...it HURTS the person you LOVE.
Your beloved spouse is the one that you have pledged fedelity to.
To imagine, to fantisize, to bring pornography into the relationship, lessens and cheapens, and de-values the beloved mate to whom you have pledged your SACRED honor.
Infedelity, immorality, indecency, spans itself within the mind man.... Do NOT allow the seeds to even sprout!!! Weed them out...at the nearest opportunity.
Imagine the hurt, sorrow, tears, of those you cherish most dear....discovering "your most hidden files."
PLEASE>>>> seek spiritual help soon!!! You will be happier...... and your loved ones will be protected from the shame. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: catspaw49 Date: 05 Aug 01 - 04:17 AM Gee Garg........Is fedel any relation to fidel? Or are you talking about package deliveries to Castro? Whatever.....Be sure to read my post to you over on the THOUGHT FOR THE DAY THREAD Now Greg, go off and play with your little dick. Spaw |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Noreen Date: 05 Aug 01 - 06:54 AM Ian: and disappointing at the end... like the real thing? :0) Noreen |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Little Hawk Date: 05 Aug 01 - 10:09 AM While we're at it...what's wrong with: Cannibalism? Sollipsism? Narcissism? Sodomy? Gomorrahcitationism? I think we should discuss those in depth. Whaddya say, Spaw? - LH |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Little Hawk Date: 05 Aug 01 - 10:19 AM Oh, yes, and polygamy...or is that polyandry? - LH |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Bill D Date: 05 Aug 01 - 10:48 AM telephony?...parsimony?...balony?....entropy?...alimony?....oh, sorry, those last two are redundant |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: InOBU Date: 05 Aug 01 - 02:57 PM Spaw!!!! Ya missed one... there is this web site where some nut case gets all strapped to a radiator like thing with leather straps and like, pumps the thing and it makes wailing noises very kinky, you can find more about this at http://sorchadorch.com (yup the ol' plugomatic never misses a beat... ) Anyway, this old SOrchadorcha thingie, is going to have some wierd kinky CD out soon... so keep checking out the sick kinky web page... Anonimously yours, Not InOBU, or Larry, but someone who did not sign his her or its name... Cheers |
Subject: Lyr Add: MOLLY BLOOM (Tom Paxton) From: Charlie Baum Date: 05 Aug 01 - 08:37 PM Molly Bloom
I'm in love with Molly Bloom.
Some people are daring.
I'm in love with Molly Bloom.
The Supreme Court met her,
When Molly has something to say,
[musical interlude with kazoos]
I'm in love with Molly Bloom. --by Tom Paxton |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Charlie Baum Date: 05 Aug 01 - 08:53 PM P** P* B**** B** D******
Well, I take it that all of us are in favour of freedom of speech, provided it's not calculated to change our western way of thought. I'm all for freedom of speech myself, Swann too has fought a lifetime fighting against censorship. I must say we do feel that perhaps the whole field of literature and the arts has got a little too uninhibited lately, wouldn't you say. I mean, modern plays and films and books and so on; there doesn't seem to be anything you can't say nowadays in public. You can say things in public that you would hesitate to say in private. These four letter words and so on. I am very much opposed to this. There are very few of these four letter words left. If they all come into common use, we shall have nothing left for special occasions. Still, we feel that the time has perhaps come for us to take our stand on the somewhat polluted beaches of the nouvelle varge, to say goodbye to mealy-mouthed hypocracy, which has served us so well for so long, and come right out with something adult, fearless and forthright. And filthy. --Flanders and Swann |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Chicken Charlie Date: 06 Aug 01 - 06:02 PM I try to live by two rules. (1) A person should have the right to say anything he or she wishes. (2) A person should have the sense to refrain from exercising that right. CC |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: bobbi Date: 06 Aug 01 - 06:21 PM InObu must be a gargoyle!!!! Eewwwwwwwwww! So obvious! Now he/she or it, is stalking Sorcha.... The man needs to get laid, obviously! Okay Little Hawk... What's wrong with cannibalism? (Isn't that where you get eaten?) ;-) Chicken Charlie: Never, ever refrain from exercizing your rights, Love! Even a hand grenade held under a lead bucket is ineffective... Use what you have at your disposal to the fullest measure.. That's the only way it will ever be effective! (I can breathe....but I chose not to!) Ha! b |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Bill D Date: 06 Aug 01 - 06:33 PM cannibalism is where you get eaten ONCE.. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: CRANKY YANKEE Date: 06 Aug 01 - 11:46 PM BRAVO FOR JOE O. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: katlaughing Date: 07 Aug 01 - 12:04 AM bobbi, that addy InOBU listed is for his real live band and the radiator type thingie he talks about is the pipes he plays. It just happens that his band has Sorcha in its name, too. I can assure you he isn't the garg-oil.**BG** kat |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Sorcha Date: 07 Aug 01 - 12:13 AM I second that, bobbi. InObu and I were both a little amused about the situation. You see, Sorcha is an Irish name which means "bright"--shining, not smart. Dorcha is the Irish Gaelic for dark........You are not the first to be confused. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: catspaw49 Date: 07 Aug 01 - 12:17 AM And besides, Ol' Larry, The Plug-O-Matic, is generally so busy plugging his band (SorchaDorcha) that he has limited time for matters of a sexual nature. I think his wife might have given him some hand lotion for Christmas, but that's about it................... Now I will tell you that if there is some way Larry could use garg for a plug (no, not a butt plug) for the band, he'd do it. I can see it now................ Even complete and sniveling little pissant gutterspouts LOVE Sorcha Dorcha.......Normal people will find them orgasmic!!! ........which is more than can be said for Larry. Spaw |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: GUEST,Paul Burke Date: 07 Aug 01 - 03:24 AM Little Hawk wrote: While we're at it...what's wrong with: ... Sollipsism? It's speled rong.
|
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: InOBU Date: 07 Aug 01 - 08:25 AM Gee guys... I'm hurt, wounded! To think I would stauk our own dear Sorcha... but more... that there is ONE person in the world who has not heard of the hardest working band in the Celtic World, Sorcha Dorcha!!! AND hurt that you all would think that I would jump on the band wagon of thowing bricks at the old Garg. I've been civil to the old goyle, and he's been civil to me... Why? (TALK ABOUT THREAD CREEP!!!) Well, because it is just right to be civil, because... you never know who may some day want to BUY A CD! SO! Gargoyle! I never sent you a free Sorcha Dorcha CD! Let me remidy that! Gargoyle! Drop me an email at InOBU@aol.com, and I will send you the latest demo, with several live recordings and THREE studio cuts which are to me on our CD, soon to be released on Hearthside Recordings! YES! Here it is in all it's glory! The shamless pornography of the full monty-like band plug!!! Actualy, about the wifie, Spaw, Genie is a lawyer, works 6am to 12 midnight... so that must be why all the Fruedian imagery in our band's music, all that sublimating... What Fruedian imagery??? Well, in a few months, the CD will be out and you can all find out! THIS PLUG HAS BEEN PAID FOR BY CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE PORNOGRAPHIC BROTHERHOOD AND SISTERHOOD OF IRISH CATHOLIC AND PROTESTANT SEX INDUSTRY WORKERS BELFAST DISTRICT LOCAL FIVE... See ya... Larry |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Wincing Devil Date: 07 Aug 01 - 10:59 AM Where else but on Mudcat can a discussion on porn degrade into a posting of Flanders & Swann lyrics and talk of insects. What do crickets have to do with pictures of nekkid wimmen?
|
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: katlaughing Date: 07 Aug 01 - 11:23 AM Phew, Wincing Devil, I clicked and was really worried when I didn't see your Buck Naked Kitties, but then I figured I'd see what a c/shanteyman thought a nekkid woman looked like, clicked on and was so relieved to see your Minnie, in the pink and lookin' fine!**BG** |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: GUEST,leeneia Date: 21 May 10 - 12:01 AM A couple months ago, my newspaper had an article about the arrest of a couple men for making and distributing child pornography. A local sheriff said, "This is actually the raping of small children." A few days ago, there was an article about the trial of man who forced others into prostitution. He had beaten, raped and burned them. Quite possibly some of them would have wound up making pornography, apparently willingly. Does that answer the original question? |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Richard Bridge Date: 21 May 10 - 03:39 AM That is only true, Leenia, of pictorial pornography, and some of it at that. So, no, it does not answer the question "What is wrong with pornography". It answers the question "What is wrong with some ways of making some pornography"? |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Stringsinger Date: 21 May 10 - 09:32 AM Doesn't belong in the music section. There's plenty wrong with it. and that's the first thing. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Stringsinger Date: 21 May 10 - 09:36 AM Oops. I noticed it was in the BS section. 1. It is an industry that encourages abuse. 2. It objectifies humans particularly women. 3. It is addictive. 4. It is mostly stupid. 5. Erotica is different than pornography. (Sex can be funny). 5. It gives religious nuts on too much with which to concentrate |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Crow Sister (off with the fairies) Date: 21 May 10 - 09:51 AM What's wrong with porn? It's usually totally shite! Maybe because it's virtually exclusively aimed at blokes? But then even my fella doesn't find most porn interesting either, so maybe it's because it's aimed at a particular type of bloke? I think there has been more naturalistic stuff made in modern times - just real people enjoying themselves - but I can't say as I've kept abreast of it (Sorry ..I know, that was pure carry on) |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Crow Sister (off with the fairies) Date: 21 May 10 - 10:01 AM I don't class this as 'porn', I would tag it as 'erotica' for those who might find such imagery sexually attractive (I certainly know couples that like it). And It's definitely an antidote to some of the fakery out there online. I don't find this site 'objectifies' women at all. Real women enjoying showing their ornamented bodies off: http://suicidegirls.com/ There's some semi-nude images on the first page, but nothing to shock. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Richard Bridge Date: 21 May 10 - 12:31 PM The distinction between art and pornography is notoriously elusive. Many of those who condemn "porn" seem also to believe that sex is bad as such, unless redeemed by some approved thing - eg marriage, or love, or something. I have no time for that attitude. Some who defend art that is sexual (or otherwise apt to be attacked by some as "porn" seem to feel that artistic merit is a sufficient defence to an accusation of pornography. I suspect that that may be to go too far. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: John MacKenzie Date: 21 May 10 - 12:53 PM Now there's an interesting thing, I find tattoos obscene. I find people who have their baby's ears pierced, obscene. The old excuse, 'It's my body and I can do what I like with it' doesn't seem to wash with some folks. I daresay, you might get thar response from some people who are involved in pornography. Not everybody involved in activities of which one disapproves, is doing it unwillingly. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Paul Burke Date: 21 May 10 - 02:35 PM What is bad: distorting young (or old) people's images, coercion, violence, rape. What is good: nekkid wimmin (or men if you are of a female or gay persuasion). What is distasteful: 99.99999% of internet porn (of COURSE I've seen 100.00000%), which is about as stimulating as a gynaecology text book. What else is bad: every site is trying to get hold of your credit card details or plant a spambot on your computer. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Crow Sister (off with the fairies) Date: 21 May 10 - 02:40 PM "Many of those who condemn "porn" seem also to believe that sex is bad as such, unless redeemed by some approved thing" Good point. Like you say, there is some kind of formal sanction for 'erotica' that thereby elevates the material 'beyond' the sexual realm, and thus makes it safe to indulge in without worry that you are somehow debasing yourself. There's something Sooo self-deceptively 'Brave New World' about that. One of the most amusing examples would be archeological or anthropological porn, which one may admire at an intellectual distance for it's possible historical/cultural interest but *never* for it's universally applicable immediate sexual reality. |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: John MacKenzie Date: 21 May 10 - 02:53 PM Spamabot Be prepared to laugh uncontrollably! |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: mousethief Date: 21 May 10 - 03:21 PM Maybe because it's virtually exclusively aimed at blokes? But then even my fella doesn't find most porn interesting either, so maybe it's because it's aimed at a particular type of bloke? [i]Road and Track[/i] is aimed at a particular type of bloke. Does that make it wrong? |
Subject: RE: What is wrong with pornography? From: Donuel Date: 21 May 10 - 03:40 PM Nakedshorts/wallstreet.com gnu is either a woman or a man without testesterone. Men can carry around only so much active sperm. Storage space is a premium no matter how big the balls and ducts. The SCOTUS knows porn when they see it so they continue to keep abreast of porn whenever possible. |
Share Thread: |