BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: DougR
Date: 19 Oct 04 - 01:36 AM

I wasn't going to post to this thread because it's about an embarrasing subject for any male Texan to respond to. You see, male Texans are (looking for the right and proper way to say this)heavenly (got to bring in religion)endowed.

Now Bush had two choices: let it hang out beneith his trousers, or wind it around his body, up the torso and secure it with baling wire at a level just above the nipples. Some guys have to bring it up and wrap it around their neck with only the necktie shielding it from view. Evidently Bush was not blessed with one quite so long. Anyway, it appears that Karl Rove was able in the debates that followed to find a way to conceal the treasure (some would say) he was blessed with (St. Matthew: 7:16-69).

DougR

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: dianavan
Date: 19 Oct 04 - 02:31 AM

DougR - How does that account for the lump on his back? Do you think maybe he needed to bundle it and carry it like a pack? And what about all that hopping around he does - is that just the pee pee dance? You are BRILLIANT!

d

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: Mark Cohen
Date: 19 Oct 04 - 03:49 AM

Hmmm...Doug, you may have a point there. Does that explain why he has trouble speaking, too?

Aloha,
Mark

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: CarolC
Date: 19 Oct 04 - 11:24 AM

So Texas men have square ones? Interesting. Some tapirs have square ones. Prehensile, too. I saw a Texan like that headed my way, I'd be running the other way FAST. Probably screaming, too.

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: GUEST,TheDevilMyself
Date: 22 Oct 04 - 03:57 AM

It was a battery pack. Duracel... Product placement, y'know... not cheap even when you can't see it!

DEVIL

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: Ebbie
Date: 26 Oct 04 - 06:32 PM

(As various ones above have said, I don't know WHAT the lump was but I do know it was SOMETHING. And to repeat: I saw it in the SECOND debate, not the first one. I didn't even know there was any conjecturing going on, until after. As for the third debate, I didn't see that one- I was riding around in an airport shuttle listening to the debate on our way to the blessed Getaway jump off hotel.

Body armor makes the most sense. On the other hand, the man has been campaigning in shirt sleeves, in places where security is not nearly as tight as in the debate halls.)

Here is the latest bushspin:

"I don't know what that is," Bush said. "I mean, it is — I'm embarrassed to say it's a poorly tailored shirt." (Twice? Square?People reported it in both of the first two debates. Eb)

Bush said there was no sound system or electrical signal.

"I guess the assumption was that if I were straying off course they would ... kind of like a hunting dog, they would punch a buzzer and I would jerk back into place," Bush said. "That's just absurd."

"The Bush campaign laughed off the speculation when it first blossomed on the Internet and then cropped up in news stories.

Read All About It

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: GUEST
Date: 31 Oct 04 - 01:43 AM

It was the alien the controlls that evil robot.

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: Metchosin
Date: 31 Oct 04 - 08:07 PM

I got it! I got it! I got it! Its an ice pack! The Republicans didn't want a repeat of the Nixon/Kennedy debate and have their candidate seen to be sweating, so the strapped an ice pack on his back.

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: Ebbie
Date: 31 Oct 04 - 10:17 PM

By George, I think you've got it.

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: Ebbie
Date: 31 Oct 04 - 10:18 PM

On the other hand, I would have been somewhat bemused at seeing his backside drip.

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: Ebbie
Date: 06 Feb 05 - 12:40 PM

Who Cares?

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: dianavan
Date: 06 Feb 05 - 01:22 PM

Just shows you how so many people can be lulled into doubting what they have seen with their very own eyes.

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 06 Feb 05 - 03:13 PM

Roll on the day there'll be really reliable lie-detectors, and one strapped to everyone running for political office...

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: CarolC
Date: 06 Feb 05 - 08:26 PM

How silly of the liberal press to kill that story. No wonder they lost the election.

Subject: RE: BS: What WAS That Lump on Bush Back?
From: Ebbie
Date: 06 Feb 05 - 10:48 PM

How odd that it was the New York Times. I wouldn't have believed it of them.

As for the BuSHITS, I would guess it is a case of their feeling that the end was so important that it justified the means. And to them and to the DougRs and the beardedbruces and the marvin gibbons and the larryks and all the other see-only-what-I-want-to-sees I'm sure that it does justify it.

I will never understand why we, the people, are lying down for this.