Subject: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: sapper82 Date: 07 Aug 05 - 04:50 AM Looks like the RN came up trumps with the rescue of the trapped Russian submariners. That's one thing the UK can be proud of! |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Mr Red Date: 07 Aug 05 - 05:33 AM cue for a song? Sort of sub versive? I'll get me sou'wester........ |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: MudGuard Date: 07 Aug 05 - 05:36 AM We all live in a Russian submarine, Russian submarine, Russian submarine ... |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Dave (the ancient mariner) Date: 07 Aug 05 - 05:55 AM Great news, whats "Splice The Mainbrace"in Russian? |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: alanabit Date: 07 Aug 05 - 06:35 AM Bloody brilliant. There was a time when we would have cheerfully sunk the bloody thing, now the skill is being used to save lives. That is something to be proud of. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: alanabit Date: 07 Aug 05 - 06:37 AM I just wonder whether my Dad, also a long time submariner, will be raising a glass with Cyril Tawney to celebrate. I hope so. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: gnu Date: 07 Aug 05 - 07:01 AM Well done!!! |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: R. Padgett Date: 07 Aug 05 - 07:34 AM Missed that, good for them and Anglo Russian relations Peace time losses not good for morale |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Taffy Date: 07 Aug 05 - 07:51 AM Yes, great news and also good for British Russian realtions (I'm assuming it wasn't the English Royal Navy that helped). |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: R. Padgett Date: 07 Aug 05 - 08:08 AM Sorry Taffy, I met British = Anglo rather than Anglo = English see the cricket thread too English and Welsh no offence meant |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Jon Date: 07 Aug 05 - 08:23 AM Royal Navy? It says here it was operated by a civilian team, James Fisher Rumic based in Cumbria. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,G Date: 07 Aug 05 - 08:29 AM Congrats! Have not the British always been up with the best, be it civilian or Navy forces? And thanks for posting it. Had not heard until now. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Taffy Date: 07 Aug 05 - 09:07 AM Anglo = English, full stop. When will people stop using Anglo to mean British? An Anglo Welsh rugby match is between England and Wales. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Metchosin Date: 07 Aug 05 - 11:01 AM Sort of telling that the rescue was basically carried out by the oil industry, but not surprizing, as they usually have bigger budgets for stuff than the armed services of most countries do. It will be pretty scary when the the oil industry starts mustering their own private armies as well.........Oh I forgot.....they already do. Either way, I'm glad that the Russians didn't have another tragedy on their hands again and relieved for the men and their families too. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,G Date: 07 Aug 05 - 11:11 AM We have Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-American, Anglo-Saxon Art, etc. Anglo-American has always been explained as the culture of North America whose language is English and customs are those of Northern Europe. It can also mean a white inhabitant of the US and of non-Hispanic descent. Sort of a catch-all phrase in todays' world - point is 7 lives were saved and, once again, congratulations to the people who did it, be they English, British, Norwegian or Polish and civilian or Navy. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Amos Date: 07 Aug 05 - 04:26 PM BRavo to those who pulled it off! Makes a bye proud, it do! A |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Le Scaramouche Date: 07 Aug 05 - 05:27 PM Heart of Oak are our ships, Heart of Oak are our men, Etc..... Anyway I'm glad Putin has chickened out, politicaly speaking. Another disaster would topple him, luckily for the submariners. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Shanghaiceltic Date: 07 Aug 05 - 05:41 PM Bloody fantastic news. As an ex-submariner (RN)I was following the events and hoping against hope that this would not go the way the Kursk did. It did not and 7 lives have been saved from a very nasty death. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Shanghaiceltic Date: 07 Aug 05 - 07:26 PM I managed to get to see some of the BBC and CNN reporting, they had an interview with Cdr Jonty Powis i/c RN Submarine Rescue Group. I knew him when he was the navigating officer on HMSm Conqueror, nice bloke. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: gnu Date: 07 Aug 05 - 08:16 PM Well... thanks be that the lads were saved. That's what really matters, right? And, wait for it... Britannia Rules the Waves. Good on ya, Brits!!!!!!!!!!! Yer the best!!!!!!!!! As far as the rest of it.... start another thread... this is one of celebration and praise. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Stilly River Sage Date: 07 Aug 05 - 11:34 PM Great outcome to this scary story. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: dianavan Date: 08 Aug 05 - 12:51 AM Hooray for the spirit of co-operation! |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Peter K (Fionn) Date: 08 Aug 05 - 06:05 AM So, you're Welsh Taffy. Stop whining and put up with it. And thanks, Jon, for pointing out the error of the thread title. But that won't stop some jingoistic types glowing with pride that they chanced to be born in the same country as the rescue company. And glowing with even more pride that they were not born in Russia. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Le Scaramouche Date: 08 Aug 05 - 06:15 AM I dedicate this song by The Man to all Russian submariners: On the fifth of November back in fifty-three The big man at Dolphin sure he sent for me: 'I brought you here, boy, 'cause I want you to know We've booked you a berth in the water below, With the diesel and shale, diesel and shale, We've booked you a berth with the diesel and shale.' Well, when I protested: 'I'm no volunteer', He said: 'We ain't had one in many a year, But that's a wee secret between you and me; There's many a pressed man down under the sea, With the diesel and shale, diesel and shale, Down under the sea with the diesel and shale.' 'Oh doctor, dear doctor, I don't think I'm well.' 'Well, never mind, sonny, we'll very soon tell. Try holding your breath while I count up to three. There, that proves that you're fit to go down in (under) the sea,' With the diesel and shale, diesel and shale, To go down in the sea with the diesel and shale.' I went to the storeroom to gather me rig They gave me a sweater ten sizes too big, I crawled down the boat like an old polar bear, And I says to meself: 'There's a smell in the air, And it's diesel and shale, diesel and shale , There's smell in the air and it's diesel and shale.' A push on the klaxon and a ring on the gongs, And then I was down where no mortal belongs, Where the air's going bad and the bread's getting stale, And they mix you a nightcap of diesel and shale, Diesel and shale, diesel and shale, They mix you a nightcap of diesel and shale. Keep walking, keep walking, you foolish young man, You know that I never would give you my hand. Your hair is too thin and your face is too pale, Cause you spend too much time with your diesel and shale, Diesel and shale, diesel and shale, You spend too much time with your diesel and shale. We circled the Med. for a summer or two, Where the sun is so warm and the water so blue. Well, that's what they tell me, but I wouldn't know, 'Cause the view ain't so good when you're stuck down below, With the diesel and shale, diesel and shale, When you're stuck down below with THe diesel and shale. Then the big man at Dolphin he told me at last: 'lt's time you went back to a ship with a mast.' I feel like a Jonah a-leaving the whale Cause l'm saying goodbye to the diesel and shale, The diesel and shale, diesel and shale, I'm saying goodbye to the diesel and shale. Oh Crabby, dear Crabby, I bid you adieu, And Synagogue Dick and The Black Mamba too. l'll do all me travelling by road and by rail, And you know what to do with your diesel and shale, Diesel and shale, diesel and shale, You know what to do with your diesel and shale. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Bunnahabhain Date: 08 Aug 05 - 11:25 AM Reminds me of something that the Navy said during the evacuation of Crete (approximaty): "It takes three years to build a ship, thirty to build a man, and three hundred to build a tradtion. We're going back to get them." |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Shanghaiceltic Date: 08 Aug 05 - 07:28 PM One of the great things about this rescue operation is that even though the Russian Navy is still considered the adversary that assistance was quickly offered and this time accepted with a happy outcome. I have met submariners from other navies and when I left the RN I made some trips to Russia for business where I was able to meet some Russian ex-submariners. One evening over a lot of vodka we spoke very openly about our experiences and even in the acholholic haze that the evening ended up in I clearly remember that there was a mutual respect and shared experiences of life in boats. Apart from being on different sides we thought the same. Not often that happens. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Jon Date: 08 Aug 05 - 07:38 PM I'd take a different view, and say that that I was more pleased to see Russia accepting help. From the offering help side, I can't help think that scoring political brownie points is a big motivation. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Peace Date: 08 Aug 05 - 07:48 PM Good work, lads. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Shanghaiceltic Date: 08 Aug 05 - 08:47 PM The Russians have lost something like 15 submarines over the last 40 years, only a few have been officialy confirmed. Kurk, Komsomolets and this mini submarine. In most of the cases the submarines have been lost with all hands. There is a memorial to those lost boats in the Russian Navy Museum in St Petersburg at Admiraltskaya. There was no brownie point scoring when the Kursk went down only genuine offers of aid which at that time was accepted too late. This time the story was different and seven lives were saved from a very unpleasant death. Whatever the situation most navies, both merchant and miltary, around the world will offer aid to those in distress and then think about the politics afterwards. Unless you have ever served in a navy of any kind then it is hard to understand that even though on opposite sides most mariners have a common view of life and death at sea. One that often trancends politics. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Dave (the ancient mariner) Date: 08 Aug 05 - 09:46 PM I could not have said it better myself Shanghaiceltic mate. Several years ago I had the honour of working with representatives of middle east countries; on a Canadian driven initiative to improve International SAR (search and rescue) programs. One of the most gratifying moments was watching two Israeli and Egyptian military officers discussing how they could conduct joint Air Sea Rescue training missions on a cross border basis. Several months prior to this they were probably trying to kill each other. Yours, Aye. Dave (the ancient optimist) |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Jon Date: 09 Aug 05 - 04:07 AM Yes, sceltic, we seem to agree that the key this time was Russia accepting the help. As for the political brownie points, I'm not suggesting the crews may not always wish to help, in fact I'd be more surpirsed if that sort of comradeship did not exist, particularly in something (which seems to me) as hazardous as submarine work. I am however suggesting it can be the case with governments who after all are the ones that may score political points, not sailors. I can't believe that an exhibition in demonstrating "we have some of the best techonology/ experience in the world for this" is not something a country might not want to have on thier "CV" andymore than I can imagine Russia being to keen (sadly to the cost of lives) to admit "we are not up to this job and haven't got the kit/expertise". This must have been especially true during the Cold War Soviet Union. As for political brownie points on a lower level, one only has to read this thread. I can almost hear "Rule Brittania" and see the Union Jacks flying in some posts. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Liz the Squeak Date: 09 Aug 05 - 04:24 AM To be proud of something your country has done, is patriotism. To insist that your country is better than anyone else, that is jingoism. I see no signs of jingoism in this incident... just a group of Mariners with a long long history of helping others less fortunate and a genuine desire to share knowledge and expertise to the benefit of all. What it all boils down to is this: Regardless of race/colour/creed, when a fellow human is in trouble, there is always someone who will risk all to help. There are also those who will turn away. If you turn away and bitch, don't bitch when someone turns away from you. LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Jon Date: 09 Aug 05 - 04:30 AM Well Liz, I beg to differ. The erroneous thread title here being one reason for my feelings. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Jon Date: 09 Aug 05 - 04:31 AM And Liz, it is not the mariners who decide who goes in. If that had been the case, there probably would have been far fewer Russian sub deaths over the years. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Liz the Squeak Date: 09 Aug 05 - 04:46 AM Well Jon, we'll have to agree to disagree on that one.. there are conflicting reports as to who carried out the rescue, who was in command and who is ultimately responsible. I heard via the BBC that it was a Naval command, another source tells me it was a civilian vessel used. I'm sceptical that the Russian Navy would allow a civilian organisation to assist with any mission, but after the events surrounding the Kursk, I guess they realise that help from any quarter is better than cutting off their noses to spite their faces. LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Jon Date: 09 Aug 05 - 04:54 AM Liz, OK. A couple of comments though. On who carried it out, my best understanding is that technicaly it would come under our MOD. They contract this sepecialist rescue service out to the private company and I presume they would have negiotiated. I guess they [Russia] realise that help from any quarter is better than cutting off their noses to spite their faces. I couldn't agree more! |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Liz the Squeak Date: 09 Aug 05 - 05:04 AM So we're both right... a civilian vessel under command of the RN (via the Ministry of Defence). There ya go! Certainly lead by RN commanders, one is on the radio right now! LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Liz the Squeak Date: 09 Aug 05 - 06:18 AM Anyway, it doesn't matter who actually did the rescuing because we all know that in the film version that will no doubt be out soon, the Americans will be the gallant rescuers..... : ) LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Le Scaramouche Date: 09 Aug 05 - 06:22 AM Jon, they wouldn't score any political brownie points, as Putin deeply resents having to turn to them for help. It's only because if it turned into another Kursk, Putin would not survive politicaly. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Paco Rabanne Date: 09 Aug 05 - 06:23 AM ...and Kate Winslet will be cast as the feisty Russian submarine commander... and Sir Dicky Attenborough will be cast as the crew man permanently on the edge of cracking up. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Jon Date: 09 Aug 05 - 06:32 AM Scaramouch, please re-read my comments. I am saying it is us not the Russians who might have that scoring motive. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Le Scaramouche Date: 09 Aug 05 - 06:38 AM Yes, I know who you ment. please re-read my comments. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Liz the Squeak Date: 09 Aug 05 - 06:49 AM It's the unwritten rule of the sea... if someone asks for help, no matter who they are, you help them. That's all that matters, saving a life. Political point scoring is bollocks. It's life and humanity that matters. LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Jon Date: 09 Aug 05 - 06:56 AM I still don't get them LeScaramouche. Please (and I'm not being rude or akward) explain further. What I'm failing to understand is how Putins position would affect whether the UK government would not score brownie points (world wide and UK specific) for being the rescuers except perhaps in Russia itself. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Le Scaramouche Date: 09 Aug 05 - 07:06 AM Putin deeply resents having to turn to Britain, USA, etc, for help. If you didnt mean among Russians, then never mind. I still think it's nonsense to ascribe an ulterior motive. Anyway, could the UK pretty well refuse to lend a hand? |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST Date: 09 Aug 05 - 07:12 AM No Le Scaramocuce, I was more specifically aiming at our flag waving. I don't think it's nonsense to suggest that the powers do not have mostives beyond saving lives, as you perhaps agree on with "Anyway, could the UK pretty well refuse to lend a hand?" Whatever, the point we all agree on is that it is fantastic that there has been co-operation and lives have been saved. Now if we could just generate the same degree of effort (and I'm guilty too - don't dontate as much as perhaps I could...) to less prestigious crisis like the starving in the world, we may one day have a human race to be proud of. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Jon Date: 09 Aug 05 - 07:13 AM opps, forgot my name. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Big Al Whittle Date: 09 Aug 05 - 07:21 AM glub glub glub seven men in a sub drowning in Davy Jones lucker when an imperialist nation saved their situation dialectically ...a bit of a fucker |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: Shanghaiceltic Date: 09 Aug 05 - 08:14 PM From the 1950's the Russians built up their Navy under Adm Gorshkov to one of the most powerfull fleets in the world. However the submarine fleet in the early years was a disaster. In order to build their nuclear powered capability corners were cut and there were some very bad design flaws in their boats. This resulted in a number of incidents where when a boat was not totally lost the crew suffered from radiation poisoning either due to reactor leaks or poor reactor sheilding. Their boats were noisy too, we could aquire them by passive sonar from a great distance, allowing us to track there movements without giving our position away and often we were where we should not have been. This we know caused a lot of worry and anger to the soviet submarine fleets. The Russians were able to cover the loss of their boats by imposing news blackouts, no help was sought from non Warsaw pact navies. families were instructed not to ask questions but accpet their loved ones had died as patriots. With the end of Communism the funding to the Russian Navy was cut and so too was training. This meant it was easier to track their boats as the crews were not as well trained in submarine operations i.e. keeping quiet. The loss of the Kursk with 118 people was a public distaster for Putin and a tragedy for the families. It is clear Putin resented asking for help, as an ex KGB whatever he appears to be today he is still a man who would willingly go back to the 'good old days'. The 23 men in the aft end of that boat could have been saved. In fact they could well have escaped from the depth they were at had they had the right equipment and training. It was not too deep for a tower or compartment escape. Since I left the RN I have been to both Murmansk and the Kola ports and seen that state of the Russian submarines lying alongside. The crews are often unpaid for months and moral was low. They rob spares from one boat to repair another. Putin knows the state of his Navy and when something like the last incident happens it is more bad publicity for him and his govt. What we dont know is who authorised the call for help, Putin?, his defence mininster? (another ex KGB hand) or the Admiral i/c for the Far East Ports? Whatever, the call was made and lives saved, that is the main thing. Last year the Chinese Navy lost a diesal-electric boat just north of Wei Hai Wei. It was lost with all hands, most likely from CO poisoning due to an internal exhaust leak while running diesals when dived. The enquiry results have never been seen, and probably never will be even though the incident was published (unusually) in the Chinese press. All submariners from what ever navy have very common bonds, it is an unusual and often hazardous job and one which submariners will not often discuss with non submariners in detail. Their true work is often never seen, but the results in the cold war period was a standoff for peace. That is why when something like this does happen sides tend to be forgotten and help offered. I am not being jingoistic when I feel proud that people have been saved by a group of men I once served alongside with. Just pride in a job well done. |
Subject: RE: BS: Well done the Royal Navy! From: GUEST,Jon Date: 09 Aug 05 - 08:45 PM So what are you saying there sc? "All submariners from what ever navy have very common bonds, it is an unusual and often hazardous job and one which submariners will not often discuss with non submariners in detail. Their true work is often never seen, but the results in the cold war period was a standoff for peace." doesn't sound too strange to me. Are you telling me that this comeradeship rises above, in terms of being allowed to do the rescue, politics and government decisions? |