|
|||||||
BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred |
Share Thread
|
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Peace Date: 20 Oct 05 - 08:33 PM Best t-shirt I ever had read: "I am trying to see things from your point of view but I can't stick my head that far up my ass." I made use of it once many years back in a meeting. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Bill D Date: 20 Oct 05 - 05:38 PM I'm sorry, but the ARE things which are simply beyond the pale. Tee Shirts of that sort could be worn in 'some' places, at private gatherings, but as liberal as I am, and relatively tolerant, I would not appreciate stuff **designed** to be offensive and crude. Clever things with double-entendré remarks are one thing: stupid, hateful obscenities are another. I simply do NOT feel that anything goes, and that the filtering is the responsibility of everyone else. Anyone who puts on a shirt like that KNOWS whether it crosses the line, and they are doing it because it crosses the line.... |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: JohnInKansas Date: 20 Oct 05 - 04:36 PM They would probably have arrested Cornelis van Haarlem (1562-1638) Dutch painter (Haarlem), for "The Monk and the Nun," 1591, Oil on canvas, Frans Halsmuseum, Haarlem. If you scroll down on the description, you'll find that everything has it's pious explanation. All that's needed is a good lawyer. John |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Richard Bridge Date: 20 Oct 05 - 04:25 PM Hells bells. For I think the first time ever I agree with BOTH the above posters! |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 20 Oct 05 - 04:01 PM I think the young man's T-shirt expresses contempt. That's not necessarily the same thing as expressing hatred. The only way such a shirt could incite hatred would be to incite hatred against the person wearing it. That's not a crime, it's stupidity on the wearer's part. Trust me, nobody felt the least bit compelled to go burn down a church after reading the message on that T-shirt. Furthermore, the shirt didn't say something like "Jesus is a cunt. Mohammed is the true prophet." Its message is nihilistic, not antagonistic. Last time I checked, nihilism was still a legal worldview. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Clinton Hammond Date: 20 Oct 05 - 02:20 PM Fuck it... it's a t-shirt... you dont' like it? Tough... don't buy one... You don't like that I'm wearing one? Tough... Don't buy my CD... Don't like that -I- hate your religion? Tough... That's life for ya... Some people are going to hate you... sometimes for no reason... Try not to lose any sleep over it... You don't like that your poor little baby might have to see what's on my t-shirt? THink of this as an opportunity for you to show the world what a good parent you are by taking the time to talk to them about it... I don't give a shit about your baby.... And I'm not gonna change my driving just because YOU put a stupid "Baby On Board" sign in your car window... the world doesn't change cauae YOU put up a sign... Or because you don't like what I have on my t-shirt... |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: TheBigPinkLad Date: 20 Oct 05 - 02:07 PM Or a sarcastic sod, Don ;o) |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Don Firth Date: 20 Oct 05 - 02:04 PM My respect for TheBigPinkLad has just taken a quantum leap! When someone can recognize that they've been parried, then nailed with a solid riposte, and acknowledge the hit, therein one finds a gentleman and a scholar! Don Firth |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Auggie Date: 20 Oct 05 - 01:52 PM Sorry Just funnin don't you know. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: TheBigPinkLad Date: 20 Oct 05 - 01:50 PM Good one. Ouch. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Auggie Date: 20 Oct 05 - 01:30 PM Quite frankly, there are any number of concepts which come to mind that I am most assuredly "too stupid" to comprehend, not the least of which is the true nature of God. But I hold hope that perhaps some day I shall become as enlightened as you. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: TheBigPinkLad Date: 20 Oct 05 - 01:21 PM Ahh ... so the logic is sound but we're too stupid to interpret it correctly? |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Auggie Date: 20 Oct 05 - 01:08 PM I would suggest it is rather, where our 'understanding' of God in Abramic theology breaks down. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: TheBigPinkLad Date: 20 Oct 05 - 12:57 PM Erm ... yes, that's exactly what all powerful means. Good AND evil at the same time. That's where Abramic theology breaks down. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Don Firth Date: 20 Oct 05 - 12:31 PM If God were "all things," then He/She/It is both Good and Evil. That means that God must also be Satan. That puts a whole new spin on theology. Don Firth |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Jon W. Date: 20 Oct 05 - 12:21 PM How do you go from Omnipotent (All-powerful) to "all things?" That's where your logic breaks down. It would be logically impossible for God to be "All things" since some things are mutually exclusive. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: GUEST, Devil's Advocate Date: 20 Oct 05 - 12:10 PM But, shurely Jesus is a component of the Holy Trinity and, therefore, is God and, therefore, omnipotent and, therefore, all things and, therefore, ... a cunt. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Don Firth Date: 20 Oct 05 - 12:06 PM I think we need to keep in mind who is doing the censoring. If someone wears a tasteless and / obscene T-shirt or such, the government has no business whatsoever in getting involved. If, however, you're running a restaurant and someone comes in wearing a message T-shirt that you find offensive and feel certain that some of your other patrons might also, then you're perfectly within your legal and Constitutional rights to refuse them admission or service. This would hold true for any privately owned business, such as an airline. If I own a public address system and someone wants to use it to broadcast a message that I don't agree with, the Constitution—and the First Amendment—do not require that I allow him to use it, no matter how much he may protest that I am abridging his freedom of speech. One should be clear about this: the Constitution restricts the powers and actions of the government. But not private citizens. Don Firth |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Wesley S Date: 20 Oct 05 - 11:20 AM Recently here in Texas a woman was wearing a T-shirt that was a takeoff on the movie "Meet the Fockers" - but it had a picture of the president and vice president and it said "Meet the Fuckers". She was told she could not board an airplane { Southwest Airlines I believe } until she covered up the shirt or changed it. She felt her free speech was infringed upon. I disagree. While I agree with her assessment of the president and vice president I don't think a t-shirt with that language should be worn if there is the very real chance that kids would be exposed to it. That same t-shirt worn at a Democratic Party fund raiser or an anti-war rally might be just fine. But I don't think the general public needs to have it forced upon them. Aside from I think that an airline - like any other business - has the right to tell people using their services what clothing is suitable. Your opinion may vary. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Bunnahabhain Date: 20 Oct 05 - 09:16 AM Yes, it is entirley justified. Imagine if the T-shirt had had the same woman in Islamic clothing, and "Mohammed is a Cunt" on the back. This man would have convicted in three seconds flat, and almost certainly have recieved a much harsher punishment. This is, of course, assuming he was actually arrested*. If he was wearing a T-shirt as I described, in many areas he'd find himself in hospital, not a police station. Possibly alive, as well. If you're going to have this law it must be applied to all faiths, without Bias. * either for the incitement to hatred, or being criminally stupid,a nd a danger to himself. I don't know if that's possible, but it seems a good idea sometimes... |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Paco Rabanne Date: 20 Oct 05 - 07:39 AM I'd tell his mum! |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: John O'L Date: 19 Oct 05 - 10:47 PM It can't be all black or all white. What people wear on their T-shirts is their business until they wear it where it can be seen by someone else's children. Children should not have to be introduced to the ugliest society has to offer as soon as they learn to read. I regard that as child abuse. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: The Fooles Troupe Date: 19 Oct 05 - 10:05 PM Art (and I don't mean Mr Thieme!) has long often skirted the limits of 'currently accepted offensiveness' in attempts to shock the audience into new ways of thinking. Sometimes it's an advance, sometimes it's a retrograde step - usually only judged in hindsight. |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Deckman Date: 19 Oct 05 - 09:52 PM But it might sell CD's? |
Subject: RE: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: bobad Date: 19 Oct 05 - 09:33 PM Nah, that's just a childish, profane attempt to curry attention. |
Subject: BS: T-Shirt/Censorship/Religious hatred From: Richard Bridge Date: 19 Oct 05 - 09:13 PM Although this is almost about a band, I think it counts as BS. In the UK we have a recent Blairite law that prohibits the promotion of religious hatred. There is a metal band called "Cradle of Filth". They sell merchandising that some find offensive. One of their tracks is called "Cherish the Whore" and they have long sold a T-shirt that bears on the front that track name plus a picture of an improbably voluptuous nun masturbating with a crucifix. Within the last week or so, a young man wearing such a T-shirt with an addditional inscription on the back of "Jesus is a cunt" has been convicted of inciting religious hatred. Is this a justified restriction of freedom of speech or not? |