BS: Twin Towers Controlled Demolition?

Subject: RE: BS: Twin Towers Controlled Demolition?
From: LadyJean
Date: 16 Sep 06 - 12:29 AM

I've seen it. I'm fairly certain it can't be true. The World Trade Center must have been a fairly busy place, and I expect it remained busy 24/7. So people would have seen the charges being set. They might not have known it at the time, but they would have seen someone workmen in odd spaces at odd times, and that's the sort of thing you remember.

Now if 9/11 WAS the work of the Bush administration, why was George W. reading "My Pet Goat" with a bunch of kids?
Why wasn't he at a military base, where he could make a good show as he did when he declared, rather prematurely that the war in Iraq was over?
Or in the oval office at the White House. If the bombers are working for him he's going to be safe. He can make a noble speech about refusing to leave his post when the nation is under attack?
Why, when he finally addressed the American people did George W. make a stupid speech saying nothing in as short a time as possible. Why didn't he have an eloquent address prepared for the American people?
On 9/11, Rudi Giuliani was the man of the hour. If he'd decided to challenge George W. for the Republican nomination in 2008, I think he'd have gotten it. I can't think George W. or Karl Rove or Dick Cheney was happy about that.
So, I'm betting that 9/11 happened pretty much the way they said it did.

Subject: RE: BS: Twin Towers Controlled Demolition?
From: GUEST
Date: 15 Sep 06 - 11:42 PM

This is not news. I think the Towers were blown. Others think not.

Good site HERE.

Subject: BS: Twin Towers Controlled Demolition?
From: Keef
Date: 15 Sep 06 - 11:27 PM

On September 11th I watched events unfold and felt shocked and angered like most people did. I was glad that Bush and America were now going after the bad guys. When people started talking about Bush just going after the oil, and far fetched conspiracy theories, I felt that was just fashionable anti American sentiment.
Only now, 5 years on have I been able to even consider that factions of the US government could be complicit in mass murder.

I have always had some misgivings about the neat way in which both towers collapsed from the top down and fell perfectly vertically into their own footprint. Hard to achieve in a controlled demolition. Even less likely if caused by two non identical aircraft impacts.

This site presents a case that I find unimaginable but plausible

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

From photographs taken during construction it is clear that the central core of the building was a massive steel and concrete structure which could not be significantly damaged by the impact of a relatively fragile light alloy airframe.
By some amazing process this mass of steel and concrete (which was still standing a few seconds after the collapse of one tower) was almost vaporised into a cloud of fine dust.
A google search for 911 controlled demolition or similar will throw up a number of sites of varying credibility. The general scenario is that dark forces conspired to allow the aircraft hijackings to proceed and that the towers had been pre-rigged with explosives to produce a spectacular demolition and bring about a new "Pearl Harbor".
Please set my mind at ease, tell me it's all bullshit.
If not then I might have to start building a bunker cos things don't look good!