Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: MartinRyan Date: 16 Oct 06 - 10:32 AM There was a letter in yesterday's Irish Times from a puzzled Pole about Dubliners' use of the phrase "dig out", which has nothing to do with potatoes. In the wake of Ireland's soccer defeat (5-2) by Cyprus a few days earlier, a taxi-driver remarked to the Pole that "The lads in the Irish dugout would need a digout before the fans were dug out of them!" Regards |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Paul Burke Date: 16 Oct 06 - 10:31 AM If Scots is a separate language, it only became so in the last couple of hundred years. Starting from Old English, it lost the gender and concordance structure in the same way that English did. Sentence structure is the same in Scots and English. Differences are almost entirely in pronunciation and vocabulary. One main difference is that, along with many northern English dialects, the vowel shift that happened from late Middle English to Modern English was less drastic. Another is the retention of guttural fricatives (ch as in 'loch', nicht for night etc.) The spelling of English became standardised before modern pronunciation was fully developed, which means that the spelling often represents Scots better than English. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Big Mick Date: 16 Oct 06 - 10:14 AM Pretty good, Sandy. I would add one thing to clear up the third sentence. The lowland Scots language derives from Saxons. The Highland Scots spoke the Gaedhlige language which derived from Ulster Irish. That language has now pretty well retreated to the outer islands, as I understand it. I would happily stand correction on this. The languages (Ulster Irish and Scots Gaelic) are still very similar in terms of pronounciation and usage but are very different in terms of spelling. All the best, Mick |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Sandy Mc Lean Date: 16 Oct 06 - 10:08 AM Nothing is ever simple: The Scots were Gaels who spoke Gaelic, not Scots, and they came from Ireland. It was the Romans who called them Scottie. The Scots language derives from the Saxons who came from Germany and Holland. The Saxons cousins the Angles, also from Germany spoke the same language and gave their name to England. Their language came to be known as Anglo-Saxon and from it derived both English and Scots. Therefore they are sibling languages, neither being a dialect derived from the other. It could be argued that both are German dialects. Clear as mud?? :-} Sandy |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Uncle_DaveO Date: 16 Oct 06 - 09:32 AM Then there are pidgins. (There are also pigeons, but I don't know what they speak. There was also Walter Pidgeon, the actor, but he seemed to speak all right.) Dave Oesterreich |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Rapparee Date: 16 Oct 06 - 09:16 AM It could be a lingua faca. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: GUEST,DIAVROS Date: 16 Oct 06 - 08:25 AM THE DIALECTS WILL EXTERRRRMINATE YOU!!!! EXTERRRRRRRMINATE!!!!! EXTERRRRMINATE!!!! |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: The Shambles Date: 16 Oct 06 - 08:10 AM Or is it a patois? No - that's what you spread on toast. Subject: RE: BS: Jolly good jokes From: eric the red - PM Date: 16 Oct 06 - 05:11 AM Hey Jock, is that a doughnut or a meringue ? yer nay wrang laddie, it's a doughnut. eric |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Mr Red Date: 16 Oct 06 - 05:10 AM Or is it a patois? |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Rapparee Date: 15 Oct 06 - 03:36 PM Every language and every dialect evolves or dies. Even Latin. Here are a few examples from the Vatican (where else?): alpenstock montanus báculus apartheid segregátio nigritarum basket-ball follis canistrīque ludus bidet ovāta pelvis computer instrumentum computatórium cow boy armentárius edelweis leontopódium alpinum flirt amor levis frittata ovorum intrīta gin pótio iunípera golf thorax láneus manicatus hot pants brevíssimae bracae femíneae jazz iazensis música jeep autocinētum locis iniquis aptum jet aërināvis celérrima jumbo capacíssima aërināvis lady Ánglica múlier conspícua motel deversórium autocinéticum nylon matéria plástica nailonensis picnic cénula subdivālis punk punkianae catervae ássecla rugby ludus follis ovāti week-end éxiens hebdómada Gotta evolve.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Peace Date: 15 Oct 06 - 03:29 PM I apologize for drifing away fron Scottish English. But having spoken to some English people in person, and some Australians, and Canadians and Americans and ew Zealanders and Indians, and Africans and, and, and, the language changes from place to place even at smmall distances of less than fifty miles (80 km for Canucks). I recall reading a study many years ago that was done in England. In a very small area there were someting like a dozen pronunciations and spelling variations of the word 'icicle'. Thanks, Kevin. I shall add it to the list. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 15 Oct 06 - 03:21 PM You left out hiccough--up |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Peace Date: 15 Oct 06 - 03:08 PM English Through--oo Though--oh Bough--ow Rough--uff Thought--aw Go figger. To make the long 'e' sound we have sea, see, me, receive, believe, ski, and about a half dozen others I can't be arsed to recall. I agree with Dave. No doubt if the Anglo-Frisian speakers had heard 'English' a few hundred years later they would have talked about the decline and fall of the language. No doubt the West Germanic speakers thought the same of the Anglo-Frisians. I agree with Dave O despite not disagreeing with anyone else. Like, what it be? |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Uncle_DaveO Date: 15 Oct 06 - 02:50 PM I'm an admirer of a wonderful book called The Power of Babble (that's right, "Power"), by Alex McWhorter, who is a great writer on language and social-cultural matters. McWhorter maintains that there is no such thing as language: "It's all dialects!" Some of the dialects mutually understandable, to one degree and another, and some are not. Look at the Italian native to Naples and Spanish. They are nominally parts of separate languages, but they are pretty much mutually comprehensible--more so, it might be said, than Naples Italian and northern Italian. The concept of "language", I think, is like "species" in biology, where it can meaningfully be said that "A species is whatever expert biologists decide to call 'a species'." Ditto "language". It's ALL dialects! Dave Oesterreich |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: mack/misophist Date: 15 Oct 06 - 02:39 PM When I offered my 'textbook' definition of dialect, I should have added 'in face to face conversation'. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: ard mhacha Date: 15 Oct 06 - 02:12 PM When you speak to other Europeans about their different dialects you find that there is not a lot of difference, a German I worked with told me that like Ireland accents can differ over a few miles. I pointed out the difference in our own area, between the townspeoples accents and the rural accents, this over a short distance of a few miles. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 15 Oct 06 - 01:44 PM Would a speaker of a Scottish (or any other Englsih) dialect be dubbed or subtitled in British TV Subtitles are generally available in British TV, to help people with hearing loss - and when a strong regional or national dialect is involved it is common for people to switch them on, tomake it easier to makem sense of what is being said. For example when the great Rab C Nesbit was being shown... (The subtitles in that case would have been in Glaswegian Scots, not translated into standard English, but it was a lot easier to follow the man in black and white print.) |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: GUEST,Santa Date: 15 Oct 06 - 01:16 PM I'd suggest that Scots descended from Northumbrian Anglo-Saxon, whereas English mainly descended from Wessex/Mercian Anglo-Saxon. When a dialect crosses over to become a language it's hard to say, but Scots certainly had an Army, so presumably a navy at the same time. Perhaps it's the case that after initial divergence, the course taken by most languages, it has undergone a reversal of its evolution and now is closer to English than it was 200-300 years ago. So it started as a dialect of a dialect, then underwent independent development to become a language, and has now returned to being a dialect. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Wolfgang Date: 15 Oct 06 - 12:50 PM Would a speaker of a Scottish (or any other Englsih) dialect be dubbed or subtitled in British TV? Some German dialects (Swiss German in particular) are now subtitled in our TV (which I resent). Wolfgang |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: GUEST Date: 15 Oct 06 - 12:49 PM I always thought the Scots were an Irish tribe who settled in Hibernia - hence the name Scotland. The language was obviously anglasised and various regional dialects have evolved to the present day. What do you think? |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 15 Oct 06 - 12:48 PM The textbook answer is that it's a dialect if 2 persons of good will and reasonable sense are able to understand each other. That would mean Spanish and Italian were dialects. I think the answerr greg quoted is the best rule of thumb - though I'd put it the other way round, "a dialect is a language that does not have an army or navy", to allow for cases like Welsh, or the various Native American languages. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Bee Date: 15 Oct 06 - 12:29 PM There are certainly dialects of British English that this Canadian has trouble understanding. Watching BBC news coverage of a (miners?)strike with a group of Nederlands students in 1971 or '72, I was asked if I could translate the interviews, as the dialect of the interviewees was thick. Couldn't be done. The Dutch kids were better speakers of even BBC English than I in the first place. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: GUEST,Anthony Date: 15 Oct 06 - 09:39 AM www.electricscotland.com/poetry/purves/Hist_Background.pdf This article is worth reading and should answer the question posted. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: mack/misophist Date: 15 Oct 06 - 09:26 AM The textbook answer is that it's a dialect if 2 persons of good will and reasonable sense are able to understand each other. Mostly. Years ago, PBS ran a series on the English language and it's dialects. They let the Lowland Scot faction call their dialect a language (clearly incorrect because they were understandable. Mostly) and added that Scots Gaelic was the native tongue of one or two outer islands only. The dialect and the Gaelic were plainly unrelated, except perhaps for loan words. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: greg stephens Date: 15 Oct 06 - 08:21 AM A language, as they say, is a dialect with a navy (or army, the saying varies). |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: GUEST,I`m gannin mad Date: 15 Oct 06 - 08:16 AM Tootler correct in every detail. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: Tootler Date: 15 Oct 06 - 06:49 AM Guest, you need to get one thing straight before this discussion can go any further. Gaelic is a separate language. It is a Celtic language once widespread in Scotland but now confined pretty much to the Western Isles. Scots is an Anglo Saxon language. Whether it can be considered a separate language from English or whether Scots and English are dialects of one another is an interesting point. Being of Anglo Scottish parentage, I am not sure what the answer is. Certainly "Broad Scots" is pretty much incomprehensible to people from the rest of Britain. But then so is Broad Geordie or Broad Yorkshire or Broad Devon. Also there are different dialects within Scotland. My mother was from Aberdeen and they certainly spoke differently from Edinburgh or Glasgow for example. This then raises the question when does a dialect become a separate language? I was reading a book about the Border Reivers recently and it had extensive quotes from writings of the time. While there were differences between the English and Scots in both spelling and grammar, with a little effort both were comprehensible to a modern English reader. |
Subject: RE: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: GUEST,I`M GANNING O`ER Date: 15 Oct 06 - 06:41 AM As a Geordie I am also applying for a grant to have Geordie recognised as a language, when working in London I was advised by my Cockney mates to speak English, I also advised them to do the same, Hell blazes were do we stop, the Brummies, the Norfolk-Suffolk swede-bashers,the Cornish pasties, the Devon arrrghs, the Wiltshire moon-rakers, the Hartlepool monkey hangers, please Jock do me a favour and live with it. |
Subject: BS: Is Scots a Language or a Dialect? From: GUEST Date: 15 Oct 06 - 04:41 AM "Gaelic or Scots is not spoken in Scotland" - lumping these two together to imply that each is actually a separate language! Without wishing to court a battle royal, I'm wondering what the general opinion is, at home in Scotland, it's the Scots tongue. Do most folk consider it to be an actual language in it's own right or does half the country feel it is simply a dialect of English? The problem is of course, if Scots is in fact only a dialect itself, then Ulster-Scots becomes a dialect of a dialect! |
Share Thread: |
Subject: | Help |
From: | |
Preview Automatic Linebreaks Make a link ("blue clicky") |