BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?

Subject: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 12:19 PM

Clinton as Secretary General

Good idea? Bad idea?

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: jimmyt
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 12:23 PM

Do they have interns? Mc Donalds? if either answer is yes, then why not! Might be a scream.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Tiger
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 12:29 PM

Gag me with a spoon!

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 12:41 PM

With Clinton to make the 'liberals' happy in America, and the Bushes controlling the White House, the tyrannical agenda will be rammed through in America. Stalin and Hitler did the same things, just under different party labels. Isn't that what's happening here?

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 02:17 PM

Yes, I believe they do have interns at the U.N. Nice exotic ones from all over the world. It'd be like Baskin-Robbins to ole Willie. "And the flavor of the day is...."

Bruce

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,Willie
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 02:46 PM

Cum again?

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 03:06 PM

On a more serious note....

Insofar as the position of Secretary General is not so much that of executive as it is facilitator, I don't have any problem with Clinton having the job. In fact, it's a job that could make better use of his strong points than the Presidency did.

I don't think it would ever happen, though. Too many member nations already feel that the US throws its weight around too much as it is. They're never going to intentionally tip the scales further in that direction by voting in a Yank Secretary General. The SG has always come from a more-or-less neutral country, never from a major power.

Maybe if Clinton were to renounce his US citizenship and become a naturalized Swede or something....

Bruce

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Clinton Hammond
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 03:50 PM

I think it's a bad ideaa seeing as how I'm not an american... and can't give a rats patoot about american politics...

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,Claymore
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 04:21 PM

On the other hand, Colin Powell would be an excellent choice... But I agree that no American would ever be selected, but a Canadian might...

But Bill is out because the American government (read Bush AND the State Department) would never approve. We don't need a Secretary General who is subject to bribes (remember the Lincoln bedroom, Monica and the pardons).

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 04:39 PM

Bush # 1 hand-picked Clinton as his successor because Clinton minded the CIA cocaine airfield in Mena, Arkansas so well. He can be trusted by the Bush Company, so THAT won't be a problem.

And Clinton has proven his willingness to mass-murder on behalf of the U.N. in Bosnia, so this is a done deal, folks.

Clinton will anesthetize the liberals in the U.S. and Bush the conservatives, while American sovereignty is surrendered to a U.N. with an American face on it. The Communists always referred to the U.S. as the final plum, and this is how it'll be picked.

Wash off your daughters, because the first thing U.N. soldiers require when they move into a country is brothels.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Bobert
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 04:41 PM

Nah! There's just something real slimy, like bus station prostitutes about American president's anymore. They can't be trusted.

Now Desmond Tutu? Or, if it is to be an American, someone with a little more real compassion and wisdom, like a Walter Cronkite.

But I wouldn't mind seein' Clinton doing something a little more humbling like my man Jimmy Carter has done. I reckon a few years of swinging a framing hammer would shed a few BigMacs off the boy plus remind him of what real people do for a living.

Bobert

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 05:07 PM

Clinton already has the backing of Russia and China. He's in. This is all scripted. Sure surprised me, though. I thought the plan would be to turn the U.S. over to Hillary in 2008. But now, there WON'T BE any U.S. in 2008. Bush will sign us on to ALL U.N. policies, and America will go along because an American is 'in charge' of the U.N.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 06:35 PM

"Bush # 1 hand-picked Clinton as his successor...."

Dreaded Guest, whatever tenuous whisp of reality you may have been hanging onto has definitely slipped out of your grasp. I've heard some weird shit before but this is the first time that I've ever heard of losing an election to someone referred to as hand-picking him as a successor. I suppose that means that if whoever the Democrats come up with to run against the current Prez Bush in 2004 should happen to win the election he will have been hand-picked by Bush #2. Please put your aluminum-foil-lined cap back on, take some Prozac, and take a nap.

Bruce

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Bill D
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 06:49 PM

*giggle*...and no doubt Clinton will spray the UN General Assembly with Sarin nerve gas as soon as he is in.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Don Firth
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 06:56 PM

My wife and I have a friend who is fairly sane, practical, and down-to-earth in most instances, but she often listens to Art Bell on late night radio. She comes up with some real lulus sometimes. Crystal castles on the moon, for example. I guess the Apollo astronauts were too busy checking their read-outs and missed them. Repeatedly.

Golly, folks, I'm disillusioned! I just learned that The X-Files is not a documentary!

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Bill D
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 07:17 PM

here is one Art Bell may need to interview M.C. Shampoo, great Canadian inventor

I suggested "Dreaded Guest" avail himself of this guys help, but he seems not to know a good thing when he sees it)

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Gareth
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 07:17 PM

Clinton for Sec Gen ???

Could do worse, and I fear they will !!

Gareth

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Forum Lurker
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 07:33 PM

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Forum Lurker
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 07:35 PM

Sorry about that, my cursor slipped. I meant to say

"Wow, now the Russians and the French are part of your conspiracy of plutocrats? Oh no! I bet the Yemeni are next!"

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 07:39 PM

One more time, for the slow learners...

George H.W. Bush took Bill Clinton to the 1990 meeting of the Bilderberger Group. The group of the couple hundred people who own the world and have yearly planning sessions...'round-table' events. G.H.W. Bush, as President, was invited to attend in 1990, and he took Bill Clinton. Clinton was the Gov of Arkansas at the time. He had no national name-recognition and was the Governor of tiny Arkansas. Yet Bush # 1 took him to meet the most powerful people on the planet...the ones who shape the course of world events.

Then Bush took him to the meeting again in 1991.

The only tie between these two men (public rivals) was the airstrip in Mena, Arkansas. Mena is home to the airstrip where Bush's CIA flew in cocaine for distribution around the U.S. Lots of deaths occurred around Mena while the cocaine was coming in and Clinton was Governor. He couldn't NOT have known what was going on there, and FBI agents have gone on-record on all this.

So, Bush # 1 knew he could trust Clinton as a business partner. Clinton would kill to keep the Bush Cocaine Cartel's flow of drugs coming in.

Clinton's reward was the nomination for the Presidency in 1992. And since Bush # 1 had been Pres and / or Vice-Pres for TWELVE YEARS, his shelf life was coming into question. It was time for him to move out of the public eye, so he did two things. First, he made a statement about taxes even YOU guys could understand...'Read my lips'. Second, he raised taxes. He lost the election. Intentionally. And he was replaced by one of his closest business parnters.

That's the harsh reality, children.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Troll
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 07:53 PM

Different thread, different name, same old crap. Go somewhere else you loser. We're all on to you here.
You are a CIA plant, sent out to stir things up so they can find out what people are really thinking and again I issue this challenge to you, Dreaded Guest; PROVE IT ISN'T TRUE.

troll

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 08:05 PM

Geez. You folks are saying I'M the paranoid here?

The CIA KNOWS what you're thinking, Troll. NOTHING! You're not thinking about ANYTHING, and that's the way they WANT it. OK? If you think I'm an agent, then rest assured my report will be negative on Troll's mental activity. He/she has been completely duped by the govt brainwashing campaign and is no threat to anything but a cheeseburger.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Don Firth
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 08:23 PM

A couple of times in my life I've encountered people who turned out to be paranoid schizophrenics. One of their characteristics is that if you don't immediately heed their warning about their hobbyhorse conspiracy theory, then you become one of the enemy. Also, they're a bit hard to keep track of, because they often come up with a new conspiracy every day.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Troll
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 08:31 PM

That won't cut it, Dready old boy. The fact that I don't buy your bilge says a lot more in favor of my mentality than your slavish belief in it does for yours. You get all your crap from a couple of conspiracy theorist sites that are so bound up in in their own rhetoric that they wouldn't recognize a fact if it walked up and gave them a bloody nose. Your so-called "sources" are circular in nature (they use each other as documentation) and you are too duped to see it.
I'll go farther than that, you don't want to see the stupidities and inconsistencies. You are the one who has been brainwashed and you don't even know it. The truly sad part is, you've done it to yourself.
It's on the SITE and they quoted two other sources so it must be true.
Bill Clinton was Governor of Arkansas and George Bush drove through there so they must be co-conspirators, right?
You are a truly pathetic little person and you really need to get a life.
As far as my CIA file, I've seen it. And my FBI file. And the one from the National Security Council. Your pathetic little effort wouldn't make a ripple.

troll

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 08:36 PM

Don, you're just angry because you didn't know squat about the Sand Point Naval Brig being used in your Seattle WTO 'riot'. I don't hold your ignorance against you, and only YOU can forgive yourself. I believe you started with this obsessive 'conspiracy theory' stuff once you found out the brig down the street from you really WAS used in the unlawful kidnapping of American citizens, but I really don't think they'll do it again. I think you're safe there.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 08:38 PM

You saw your file? Did I spell your name right?

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: The Pooka
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 08:40 PM

Gol-lee. / Feller stays away from the 'Cat for a little while, & look what happens. Mymymy. What *else* have I missed? No wait. Nevermind. :)

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Don Firth
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 08:49 PM

Deadhead Guest, you really do hold a grudge. I called you on the Sand Point thing because you brought it up in the first place and you didn't know what you were talking about. I live here and I know what's going on a helluva lot better than you do. The fact that I called you on it really put a burr under your saddle, didn't it? Angry? I'm not the one who's angry. No, I'd be laughing if it weren't so sad.

You are a blithering loony. Why don't you go play on some website where you can talk to kindred souls? There are plenty out there.   The concern your catalog of conspiracies elicits around here can only be measured in micro-give-a-shits.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 08:50 PM

See...this is all tied together. Chemtrail spraying has led to the total neural breakdown of modern American man. No longer able to see the clouds above their heads, they can't even see that the first American Secretary-General of the U.N. is going to be installed for a PURPOSE.

The U.N. had to crush the independence movement in the balkan states, so Bill Clinton launched a war because he 'felt in his gut it was the right thing to do'. The U.N. had to crush independence and could only do it if the U.S. was onboard, and Clinton obliged while he gave us a gastro-intestinal report. And now his re-emergence will polarize America once again behind the phony Dem / Rep paradigm, and a badly-damaged GWBush will actually get another term even though he has done more damage to America than any person in the history of our country.

You guys have to wake yourselves up, apparently. All this stuff is in plain sight. I suspect you just have too much time or money invested in yourselves to change, so you try to trivialize agents of change. So be it. They have a cot with your name on it at the concentration camp. Before long you'll be making plastic Chinese flags to swap for the plastic American flags they're making in THEIR prison camps.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 08:53 PM

I know you've lived there forever. You said so. So you should have known about the Sand Point situation before you shot your mouth off. The brig was used to unlawfully hold American citizens against their will for simply practicing their First Amendment rights. It happened in YOUR city. But I'm willing to accept your complete and total ignorance as an excuse.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Don Firth
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 09:02 PM

Thank you. I'm so grateful.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Forum Lurker
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 09:06 PM

TDG-You think that the genocide party that's been a constant feature of Balkan life for centuries is an "independence movement?" I think that might actually be the craziest thing you've ever said.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Don Firth
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 09:15 PM

Just a casual observation: Our Dreaded Guest has never posted to a music thread. At least, not under that name.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Troll
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 09:21 PM

No Dready, you didn't. I shouldn't have to explain this but seein's it's you, perhaps an explaination is in order.
"troll" is just an internet alias. It isn't my real name.
And yes, I've seen my file(s). Because of my fathers job and the high-level security clearances he held, I and my siblings had to be cleared (or clearable)too.
Now, let us all in on who is behind this gloom and doom you claim is all around us in plain sight. Is it the Tri-lateral Commission? The Bilderbergs? The Gnomes of Zurich? Or maybe its those pesky Illuminati again. Or is it (shudder) THE REPTOIDS.
You've got ALL this information , so surely you know.
C'mon share the wealth. Let us in on the real inside info. (I'd have said "inside dope" but I didn't want to offend.

troll

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 10:28 PM

Good Idea! and make Osama Bin Laden the Chief weapons inspector for Iraq. We should give Saddam the Nobel Peace Prize and nominate Yasser Arafat as Clintons Deputy. Fuck Yes I'm in favour of it...

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Blackcatter
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 11:11 PM

Gee, and I was going to run for Secratary General . . . .

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 25 Feb 03 - 11:42 PM

Boy are you behind the times, Troll. The Bilderbergs, CFR, Tri-Lateral Commission...for years those groups denied they even existed. Now they're mentioned daily in mainstream news stories. See, they ARE evil organizations planning the world's future wars and such, but their cover has been blown by the internet. They can no longer operate in COMPLETE secrecy, so they're presenting themselves now like it's no big deal that they're planning wars and genocides. Just business as usual. Same with the 'New World Order'. Ten years ago that phrase was always followed by 'black helicopter conspiracy theorists', but now you can turn up a hundred news articles a day which mention the NWO. On CNN, ABC, etc. And those govt media arms say 'Sure there's a New World Order, but it's inevitible, and it'll be good for you'. Bushit. Tyranny is tyranny. Americans were rallied behind a homicidal maniac by an act of terror on Sept 11, and he and his associates haven't eased up on the terrorism since. I sympathize with your obvious mental impairment, but the groups you are still pathetically trying to debunk don't need your efforts anymore. They're out of the closet.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Forum Lurker
Date: 26 Feb 03 - 12:24 AM

So which group is really in charge, TDG? Are the others competitors, or are they all one big conspiracy? What about the Greys? Are they in on it, too?

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Gervase
Date: 26 Feb 03 - 08:29 AM

*sigh*
I really am lost for words at the drivel that this imbecile keeps posting. Is there any way that Max can block his IP address or summat? Give the poor loon something to really stoke his paranoia.
Meanwhile, Dreaded Guest, to stoke up your theories, get hold of a copy of Jon Ronson's book 'Them', or do a google on the topic. Then take your lithium and lie down, there's a poppet.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: harpgirl
Date: 26 Feb 03 - 08:54 AM

...welll, I finally agree with Troll on something!!!

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,Geordie
Date: 26 Feb 03 - 09:05 AM

Bill Clinton.......Jaysus, why not Al Gore, Margaret Thatcher, Bob Dylan...well, Bob might be ok.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: An Pluiméir Ceolmhar
Date: 26 Feb 03 - 10:21 AM

Black helicopter alert.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: Bill D
Date: 26 Feb 03 - 10:39 AM

" Is there any way that Max can block his IP address or summat?"
I 'believe' that blocking IP addys usually involves blocking whole domains...so that it might stop 27 totally innocent folks also...

What I wish for is an 'ignore' button, so that I could make a list of those whose posts I don't want to read. They do this in 'live' chat rooms, but it's probably too much trouble here.

What I REALLY wish for is for Gervase's suggestion to be implemented...*grin*....This guy must spend 16 hours a day 'researching' this stuff and typing his warnings.

Subject: RE: BS: Clinton to become U.N. Sec General?
From: GUEST,The Dreaded Guest
Date: 26 Feb 03 - 01:00 PM

(Well gee, folks, if I'm pitiful for posting this stuff, the only thing more pitiful would be the folks who read it. Below is one of the postings I'm putting on bulletin boards today. I really don't think you should read it. Seriously. Don't read it. Thomas Jefferson said it is my duty to do this, but then if you don't know about that, knowing about this wouldn't do you any good):

A recent CIA analysis concluded Saddam Hussein is highly likely to use a "third party" terrorist group to conduct a proxy attack on the United States in advance of American military operations, according to U.S. officials...

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030225-830684.htm

This is disturbing. It pretty much convinces me there is now a timetable which can't be alterted. Before I read this article, it seemed that Hussein had to be killed BEFORE the CIA released bioweapons on us...they needed Hussein dead so he wouldn't be able to defend himself. But since Bush has been slow in getting the war off the ground, they're now having to change the plan a bit. Why? I believe something has been set into motion which must be explained by Hussein acting 'pre-emptively'.

I just hope the plan doesn't involve Mardi Gras. I know lots of folks who went there, and a couple weeks ago the mayor signed the city over to the Office of Homeland Security. First major city to do that. Ideal vector for the CIA to release a bio-weapon.

Saddam has been told he'd be NUKED if he used weapons of mass destruction, people. After the bio-attack happens, and the Bushes say it is YOUR fault because you marched and protested and didn't let them take out the madman BEFORE he killed your kids, don't forget this article. Saddam has been told he'd be nuked if he released bioweapons. The only people who stand to gain from this are the repressive govts of the world and the arms merchants like the Bushes.

And the part in the article about 'proxy' terrorists....that's talking about YOU. They'll blame some small group first and get us used to Americans being jailed and tortured, then the list of groups will grow until it includes you. Guranteed.