You may not be on trial, but your politics do seem to be on trial in the court of public opinion. Your answers to questions about your political past do have an effect on how that all plays out. Being only halfway honest (if that) to questions about your political past, and giving the appearance of withholding information about it, informs those who are deciding what to believe and what not to believe coming from you. I don't think you have been completely forthcoming in your answers to my questions.

Because I don't have all of the relevant information available to me to make an informed decision about what to believe and what not to believe, and because you seem disinclined to help me out in this regard, my tendency will be to disbelieve anything you say unless it can be proven otherwise.

You asked me whether or not i was convicted for distributing, and i answered no. You asked me whether or not i was caught distributing, naturally i answered no. Listen Carol, it dont get any clearer than that, so take your rather silly whinings elsewhere, because usually although i respect your posts, as believe it or not, in the past they have challenged me to re-look at my opinions, but here, whatever i say, and no matter how many of your questions i answer, it ain't any good.

So if indeed you don't have all the facts, therefore your tendency is to disbelieve everything i say!!!!!!!!! WHy bother with the questions in the first place!!!!!!!!!!!!! ?????????????????

My opinions are not on trial. Multi-culturalism and its murderous genocide of the rich tapestry of races is on trial.

However, i am happy to be challenged. So...have you taken the google test?