So when, in order to explain that risky behaviours were common to all sexualities, I pointed to 10% of young women having Chlamydia - which is true - I was 'anti-straight', whatever that means.

Oh, yes, that didn't trouble you when I said, and when other people said it - and more. It only became a live issue for you when I told you I was gay and then suddenly you attack me - and not anyone else that said the same thing - as being 'anti-straight'. And you think that is acceptable? Really? Do you?

When I said that HIV prevalence among gay men appeared to be 4%, I must have been homophobic - given that it appears to be only 1.6% or thereabouts.

So what does that make you, when you said of gay men that their HIV prevalence was:

"Probably 12% to 15% or even 20%
For comparison, the great flu pandemic of 1918 killed 3% of population, and the Great Plague of 1665 killed 15%"

None of which was true - all of which is a lie dreamed up in your twisted little head.

Tell us, Keith. Go on. Carry on.

I haven't had this much sport for ages.