Mr. Firth, I fail to see what point you are trying to make regarding Songwronger. He posted a link of Mr. Obama assuring the public, that they could keep their existing programmes, which has proven to be untrue. Mr. Obama's remarks were not, reported through the commentary of a reporter or entertainer, but the video clip was taken of him saying those words directly in front of the camera. Now you blast Songwronger for alleging something he said that is untrue.

The only person who has said or defended something untrue is you. The only person to comment anything with disregard for your fellow citizen is you.

Is this from a political standpoint, or is it just you?

I asked you for an 'honest assessment', and you have failed to do so, other than skirt the issue.

It would seem to me and others that if you had a problem with dishonesty that you would take exception to Mr.Obama's misleading comments and not Songwronger for merely posting them.

Do you wish to correct that? If so, please do, because it is impossible to find any truthful credibility in your comments. I find you are fairly articulate but have said nothing to build a premise upon.

Please, if you will, present your rebuttal using facts without resorting to further slanderous remarks of those you disagree with and pretending that your presumptions of a person's character constitutes some sort of proof that your assertions are accurate.

I've reported to you accurately the mood that I have found in a number of your citizenry of whom I have spoken to since my stay in your country and with few exceptions, I find that most of them parallel what has been presented to you, by Songwronger.

Keep in mind that I do not have a political preference one way or another, but rather am looking for the rationale as to the political debate consuming your country. Keep in mind that Washington's policies and statements do affect both your allies and the rest of the Western world and I am curious to discover why those who defend known false statements do so, so willingly.