BS: Big Breasts?.......

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: 42
Date: 07 May 05 - 07:05 AM

If the shirt fits, unbutton it.
Let it all hang out for all the world to see.
underwire and pad it.
uplift the masses. Divide and conquer!
the elusive mammary

chorus to a charming little ditty I wrote in a fit of pique.
j

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 07 May 05 - 04:39 AM

Just wait to see if it leaves the seat up.....

Thanks for that SRS, good to see the captive breeding programme has its successes. Maybe one day, we won't need it.

LTS

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Peace
Date: 06 May 05 - 06:24 PM

"and the sex has not yet been determined."

i don't think anyone will be finding out until it's OK with mom.

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 06 May 05 - 06:01 PM

I couldn't resist.

If the cutline doesn't come through, it says "Binti Jua, a 17-year-old western lowland gorilla, cradles her new baby at Brookfield Zoo in Brookfield, Ill. The 4- to 5-pound infant, born Monday, has not been named and the sex has not yet been determined. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)
(May 05, 2005)"

SRS

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 20 Apr 05 - 05:13 AM

And doos is what doggies leave on the pavement (sidewalk).

Brings a whole new meaning to the old song 'There she was just a-walking down the street, singing doo wa diddie diddie dum diddie doo'.

LTS

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Michael
Date: 19 Apr 05 - 09:03 AM

But 'lallies' are legs.
Mike

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 18 Apr 05 - 03:27 PM

They don't have diddies, doos , or lallys in that list.
G..

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 18 Apr 05 - 03:23 PM

(o)(o)

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: GUEST
Date: 18 Apr 05 - 03:10 PM

Still no discussion on the phenomenon of "mannaries" or man boobs?

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: GUEST,Skipy
Date: 18 Apr 05 - 02:28 PM

sod the pencil test! go for the house brick test!
Skipy

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: GUEST,OO
Date: 17 Apr 05 - 04:34 PM

Yea

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 17 Apr 05 - 04:31 PM

Every name you could ever think of and then some.........

LTS

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Peace
Date: 17 Apr 05 - 04:04 PM

OK.

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Tam the man
Date: 17 Apr 05 - 09:38 AM

this is a Scottish Joke.

A man goes to the Doctor and tells the doctor that his wife's breasts taste like chocolate, one taste like chocolate and the other taste like Coconut, and the doctor says well there boun' tae (bounty).

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: GUEST,Amos
Date: 16 Apr 05 - 10:34 AM

Curator, et al:

I suggest you read up on our local Religious Innovation, the Temple of the Golden Globes, dedicated to just the propositions which you raise about the contemplation of pulchritude and in particular, mammary pulchritude.

You may feel that you want to pair up with the nearest branch organization; it is clear you are already on the curve and this will help you get in better touch with your feelings.

A

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: GUEST,Leadfingers
Date: 16 Apr 05 - 10:30 AM

Bobert - if I hadnt , El Ted would have ..

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Bobert
Date: 15 Apr 05 - 11:21 PM

What am I gonna do wid you, l-fingers??? Awww, I don't care... 100 posts? And over a ziplock bag full 'o silicon???

Who woulda thunk it???

Bobert

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Leadfingers
Date: 15 Apr 05 - 11:15 PM

The 100 th Post !!

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Leadfingers
Date: 15 Apr 05 - 11:14 PM

This is the post BEFORE

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Leadfingers
Date: 15 Apr 05 - 11:13 PM

The Hell with it - One more post and I can say - - - -

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: GUEST
Date: 15 Apr 05 - 07:07 PM

The three Over The Top women may be candidates for Ringling Bros, Barnum & Bailey but ... to me they are attractive women regardless.

I agree they overdid the 'augmentation' part, but it must've been something they felt deeply about in order to tolerate the concomitant problems evidently inherent in such a topheavy physique, not to mention the social scrutiny they must receive.

A matter of choice, obviously.

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: GUEST
Date: 15 Apr 05 - 02:56 PM

YAWN

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 15 Apr 05 - 10:30 AM

Thanks for that Giok... now I know that what I thought were coal tits are really great tits....

Just hope they hang around long enough to hatch this year.....

LTS

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 15 Apr 05 - 04:56 AM

Great tits Liz
G ¦¬]

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Sttaw Legend
Date: 15 Apr 05 - 03:20 AM

Sorry to see its blue LTS did you trap it in something?

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 15 Apr 05 - 03:03 AM

Here's a picture of one of my tits.

LTS

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: JohnInKansas
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 02:35 PM

Stilly -

I did say which occasionally reports minor items like this correctly. I guess this wasn't an occasion.

Unfortunately, they placed it on about page 12F, just in front of the comics, so I probably scanned past it to get to the good stuff, but I don't believe they mentioned a result for the other company.

A later TV report (almost as reliable?) was discussing some limitations on use of the other one, but I didn't catch the whole thing. It sounded like they may have limited it to reconstructive use only?? Or not.

My "extensive studies" of representations of "feminine beauty" over the period from about 1240 thru 1940 indicates that very little has changed in that time. There are quite evident differences in "total body mass(?)" probably reflecting the availability of food and amount of foraging required in different eras, but the proportions of one body part to another seem to reflect a very consistent "standard gorgeous" concept in art. Natural is best, in any quantity - except when Mother Nature plays a really dirty trick on you.

(I need to get my "study" printed, but my current printing facilities just won't handle the Braille edition properly, and I know that's the one that would be most in demand.)

John

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 01:06 PM

But getting thinner
b))))))B

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 12:48 PM

The latest thing is butt implants to get that rounded 'J-Lo' look.... so you see, I *A* fashionable and all without surgery!!!

LTS - she of the fat arse!

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: The Curator
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 12:36 PM

I look on breasts as a beautiful part of the female form, if you met a stranger and said she was a lovely face, she smiles, if you say she has a beautiful pair of breasts, your a perv, for looking. Are men not supposed to look ? fortunately for me all the girls I work with know their beauty and accept compliments for their appearance. Things of beauty.

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Peace
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 11:59 AM

Jaysus, Kim, that means he'd have square tits. They would clash with his new line of thongs. Jimmyt is strange enough as it is. He'd look OK with round tits, but square?

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Kim C
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 11:56 AM

JimmyT, if you need to fill out your blouses better, just get you a set of Frederick's of Hollywood Boobs in a Box. :-)

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Blissfully Ignorant
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 11:00 AM

What's wrong with men (or women for that matter) finding boobs attractive, large or otherwise? Jeeez, it's like it's considered to be some sort of perversion...

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 10:47 AM

John, there were two companies presenting claims to reissue their silicone breast implants. In the recommendations forwarded to the FDA, one company was allowed to, the other wasn't. The FDA can say yes or no to the recommendations. The data presented by the successful company didn't run as long as that presented by the unsuccessful one, but it was apparently more convincing. I'm not convinced by this that either one has good data--its routine for companies to present data in their favor. I would want to know who produced it and who paid for it before I accepted any of it as useful.

Guest, the three women in that photo had "augmented" to a point of absurdity. They look like candidates to tour with the circus.

SRS

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: The Curator
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 08:04 AM

And when she slept outside the synagogue, she awake with a heavy jew on her.

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 08:00 AM

ah Nigel the old jokes, how charitable of you to give them an airing!
Giok ¦¬]

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 07:46 AM

The weather was too warm to wear anything other than a pair of shorts to go sightseeing, so that is what Tracey (Blonde, 36-24-36) wore.
She walked into the cathedral,
. . .
. . .
. . .
And the archbishop had a stroke!

Later she tried to visit York Minster, but was stopped by the verger;
"You can't come in here dressed like that," he said
"But," said she, "I've got a divine right"
. . .
. . .
The verger said "The left's not bad either, but you're not coming in."


Nigel

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: JohnInKansas
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 02:20 AM

According to my local newsrag, which occasionally reports minor items like this correctly, the vote was 5 to 4 in favor of continuing the ban on use of the proposed implant materials. Apparently this case is closed pending further tests and resubmittal of the manufacturer's request.

John

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: GUEST
Date: 14 Apr 05 - 12:08 AM

The three women depicted in the Over The Top link are not gross due to their large breasts, or anything else.

If they've had that done cosmetically to draw attention to themselves, they have certainly succeeded (I originally typed "exceeded" instead of succeeded - as some sort of Freudian typo perhaps).

In any case I sympathize with them. It would seem to me that the extra weight above the waist might cause other physical ailments, such as back problems, but I'm not a doctor. They seem not to care a whit for sympathy in the photo, however. They appear happy and content.

And big breasts or no, they are attractive women.

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Peace
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 07:57 PM

gnu,

I was entering report card marks into the school computer system. I am usually on call as a fire/rescue guy from about 4:00 PM until 6:00 AM next morning on school days and from 4:00 PM Friday until 6:00 AM Monday. My job is school teaching. My volunteer work for the fire department only has me on about 80 or so calls a year. That's about one call every 4 1/2 days. I have been doing the volunteer work for about ten years. Almost 2/3 of my 10-1s (ten-ones) completed. They are the courses that full-time firefighters require to join full-time departments. Love the fire/rescue work very much.

Bruce

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: skipy
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 05:37 PM

GYTOFTB
Skipy

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: jacqui.c
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 05:03 PM

I agree about reconstruction following surgery - in those circumstances that would be something I would consider seriously and I suppose that any problems that have been discovered and sorted out as a result of the numbers undergoing purely cosmetic surgery would help those women for whom this is a necessity.

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 03:03 PM

Today on Fresh Air Terry Gross interviewed Musa Meyer about breast cancer. They discussed the pros and cons of reconstruction (listen via the link).

SRS

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: jimmyt
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 02:56 PM

Right KimC In fact I am on the schedule to have one next month and it is just to fill out my blouses better.

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Kim C
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 11:37 AM

Reconstructive Surgery.

Not everyone gets a boob job solely for cosmetic reasons.

(Yes, I read the thread. Yes, I realize it's already been mentioned. I'm mentioning it again because I think it's worth mentioning. So shoot me.)

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: gnu
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 05:28 AM

05:06 dark hundred hours Brucie? Night shift at the old fire hall?

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Peace
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 05:06 AM

Thanks for the mammaries . . . .

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 05:05 AM

So it's gluteus maximus for her, and it's grandius mammary for him, that's that sorted then!
Giok

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Peace
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 04:54 AM

And a left one, also.

Subject: RE: BS: Big Breasts?.......
From: Liz the Squeak
Date: 13 Apr 05 - 03:57 AM

The rest of the mammals of the animal kingdom don't have breasts at any time other than when they are feeding babies. Humans are possibly the only mammal that has breasts all year round.

The rest of the animal kingdom therefore focuses on bottoms (as do quite a lot of female humans.... Damien Barber.... oooohh.....[slap]....) as the 'attractor'.

The theory is that the fixation on human breasts by the male of the species, is because of their resemblance (when correctly displayed) to bottoms.

Don't you feel a right tit now?

LTS