BS: 'Rush to post' ?

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 16 Nov 07 - 07:01 AM

Sigh again...

Well that was bloody useful...

try again...

The Old Chat Forum

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 16 Nov 07 - 06:52 AM

Sigh...

thread.cfm?threadid=73190

:-)

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: Peace
Date: 15 Nov 07 - 11:23 AM

"RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?"

Do so or your Christmas presents to family and friends will arrive in 2008.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: Wesley S
Date: 15 Nov 07 - 11:18 AM

I haven't had time to read the whole thread. What's all this about?

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: Severn
Date: 15 Nov 07 - 11:05 AM

"Limbaugh bar lower now....
How LOW can you GO?

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: artbrooks
Date: 15 Nov 07 - 10:50 AM

And, of course, many of the threads are started by the same people, with the same agenda and the same arguments. That tends to make responses simple.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: catspaw49
Date: 15 Nov 07 - 10:49 AM

Rush to posr heellm nno i necdere get in a afdio hurry or any thinn eldper around heerre so I camn

sp\Pwa

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: Amos
Date: 15 Nov 07 - 10:43 AM

IT doesn't take very long to think through the depth of the average thread in these parts; so I submit that is not the reason for more posts faster. More likely, I would guess, is an increasing population of posters in the same time continuum. If we were to expand the time continuum, or expel all posters who have arrived since your earlier data-point, the phenomenon would go away.


A

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: Donuel
Date: 15 Nov 07 - 10:37 AM

The Limbaughland theme park is closed for the season.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: GUEST,Janie
Date: 15 Nov 07 - 10:36 AM

Rush posts to Mudcat? He never mentioned that on his radio show.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: Donuel
Date: 15 Nov 07 - 09:52 AM

Its OK
we all get a bout of egoitis from time to time. Its as common as a common cold.

Few people are ever out to ignore, hurt or slander you.
They are more worried about who may be ignoring, hurting or slandering them

Subject: BS: 'Rush to post' ?
From: Roger the Skiffler
Date: 15 Nov 07 - 09:48 AM

These days I read fewer and fewer threads (lack of patience and over-active bullsh*t detector) but it seems that in the ones I do look at that we are quicker to post these days- it takes only a couple of days for a thread to have 50+ posts. Leadfingers looks out for post #100 on a thread so he might have a view on this. Are we all rushing to post without thinking first? (I know I've always been foot in mouth before checking facts properly,I'm trying to hold back now, honestly.)*

RtS
* (that's probably why my threads either attract zero interest or a raft of clever dicks pointing out the errors in my knowledge and opinions!)