|
|||||||
|
BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' |
Share Thread
|
||||||
|
Subject: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Skipjack K8 Date: 14 Mar 04 - 08:24 PM Is it an obesity forum? Noone's ever there to ask. Well? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Allan C. Date: 14 Mar 04 - 08:42 PM If memory serves, it was set up to be a weekly gathering place. SINSULL was the main originator. I believe Thursdays evening, Mudcat time, was set for the gathering. Maybe someone else will come along to confirm this. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 14 Mar 04 - 08:49 PM ????? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Allan C. Date: 14 Mar 04 - 09:18 PM McGrath, Weighty Issues is the name of an alternate room in the Mudchat. It is intended to be a resource for support and advice for those of us who could stand to lose a stone or two. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Peace Date: 14 Mar 04 - 09:23 PM Ouch! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 15 Mar 04 - 04:16 AM I just don't think the quick, brief, on-the-fly discourse style of the chat room is a very good mode for talking about weighty issues. If I want to say something about an important issue, I'll usually want to use a few more words than that little box in the chat room provides. I'll also want to edit it, proofread it, and send it through a spellchecker so I don't look like an idjit. Bruce |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: John MacKenzie Date: 15 Mar 04 - 06:33 AM Too heavy man! John |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Dead Horse Date: 15 Mar 04 - 08:18 AM ...............crate of gin! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: SINSULL Date: 15 Mar 04 - 10:31 AM The room is usually used when two weight watchers meet up in the general chat and want to share successes. I have lost and gained the same 8 lbs. three times since the room opened. But one Atkins dieter has lost almost 30lbs. Not bad! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 15 Mar 04 - 10:33 AM The basic trick, surely, is not to have anything edible or drinkable anywhere near your computer, and get so interested in what you're doing on the Internet that you lose all trace of time and miss the odd meal. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Skipjack K8 Date: 15 Mar 04 - 11:20 AM Oh. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Fibula Mattock Date: 15 Mar 04 - 11:50 AM DO NOT be seduced by Skipjack's alledged interest - he has one aim, and one aim only, and that is to increase his lard sales, the greasemongering so-and-so! Resist his evil temptations. Declare oil sanctions!* (*although extra virgin cold-pressed olive oil is good, right?) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: MAG Date: 15 Mar 04 - 01:40 PM We're all at the Y working out. 8>) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: open mike Date: 15 Mar 04 - 02:20 PM Funny, i have asked many times while in the chat why no one was ever in the weighty issues room I figured it was some place to go if you were talking about something so heavy that the regular chat room did not want to deal with it. I am on Paltalk on thursday nights so i guess that explains why i never saw it in use. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Liz the Squeak Date: 15 Mar 04 - 05:19 PM I'm never around at that particular Mudcat time.... But I did lose 2 stones last year - 28lbs! LTS |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Joybell Date: 15 Mar 04 - 05:33 PM I haven't figured out the time properly. I keep meaning to drop in. Friday morning I guess it is for me. I really like the idea. Joy |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Clinton Hammond Date: 15 Mar 04 - 05:43 PM They're there... it's just that they're so big, you can only see 'em from far away! (I'm just kidding obviously!) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: SINSULL Date: 15 Mar 04 - 06:27 PM Come over here Clinton so I can smack you. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Clinton Hammond Date: 15 Mar 04 - 06:28 PM Smack this, Sin... :-) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Liz the Squeak Date: 15 Mar 04 - 06:29 PM Join the queue Sins!!! LTS |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Tinker Date: 15 Mar 04 - 08:03 PM Queue?? Now if we simply join forces and let the boy understand our postion.... I'm sure he'll grasp the gravity of the situation, when he's done gasping... tinker |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Clinton Hammond Date: 15 Mar 04 - 08:18 PM Ya... you folks know all about gravity eh? Hehehehehehe |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: freda underhill Date: 15 Mar 04 - 08:28 PM several of us were in there a couple ofd hours ago, and after the inital smart remaks it was pretty helpful, so i will check it out again |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Noreen Date: 16 Mar 04 - 05:43 AM So will you Clinton when we're sitting on you.... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Clinton Hammond Date: 16 Mar 04 - 12:54 PM I'll bet ya I can out run ya Nor... Heh Cause I can run faster scared than you can angry! :-) |