Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]


HI Max: What about Shambles requests?

The Shambles 29 Aug 05 - 03:16 AM
Le Scaramouche 29 Aug 05 - 03:34 AM
Wolfgang 29 Aug 05 - 06:32 AM
The Shambles 29 Aug 05 - 07:11 AM
The Shambles 29 Aug 05 - 07:25 AM
jacqui.c 29 Aug 05 - 08:02 AM
The Shambles 29 Aug 05 - 08:23 PM
SINSULL 29 Aug 05 - 08:45 PM
Bill D 29 Aug 05 - 08:53 PM
jacqui.c 29 Aug 05 - 09:49 PM
George Papavgeris 29 Aug 05 - 10:16 PM
John MacKenzie 30 Aug 05 - 03:40 AM
The Shambles 31 Aug 05 - 02:18 AM
Le Scaramouche 31 Aug 05 - 05:05 AM
jacqui.c 31 Aug 05 - 07:49 AM
The Shambles 31 Aug 05 - 07:54 AM
The Shambles 31 Aug 05 - 08:29 AM
BaldEagle2 31 Aug 05 - 09:39 AM
The Shambles 19 Sep 05 - 05:26 AM
John MacKenzie 19 Sep 05 - 06:02 AM
JennyO 19 Sep 05 - 07:19 AM
wysiwyg 19 Sep 05 - 08:55 AM
GUEST,Yawn 19 Sep 05 - 10:28 AM
Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: The Shambles
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 03:16 AM

The following thread (with a TECH prefix has been relegated to the BS and for some reason - has now been closed.

Closing threads

This was the original question asked in that thread.

Is there some technical advantage given to the general effective running of our forum - by the closing of threads?

Does it make the site less technically effective in any way or make it run slower - if all threads are left open for new contributions?


If you wish to know the answer – you will have to click on the link – but you will not be able to post to it. Unless of course you kindly ask our anonymous volunteer fellow posters to re-open it – to enable you to do this.
    I can't see any reason why it should have been closed. The "close thread" link is in a location where a volunteer could click it accidentally and not notice, so it may have been closed inadvertantly. Whatever the case, I don't think it should have been closed. I reopened the thread.
    -Joe Offer-


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: Le Scaramouche
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 03:34 AM

Of course I'm 'dead'. Who do you think spread the rumour? Pity Shambles is on to us though.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: Wolfgang
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 06:32 AM

Little Hawk,

sorry I didn't mention you as one other master of this art form. I remember when I first opened a Shatner thread the name Shatner meant nothing to me at all. I then saw your name and smelled what would be coming. I closed the thread immediately and decided I never would want to know who Shatner was. I did never open any Shatner thread yas far as I know and for about 2 years I was successful. But then some people started talking about Shatner in innocuous threads with harmless titles and one time it happened: I realised who Shatner was. I guess I'll never forget that detail but I still don't open Shatner threads.

Wolfgang


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: The Shambles
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 07:11 AM

I can't see any reason why it should have been closed. The "close thread" link is in a location where a volunteer could click it accidentally and not notice, so it may have been closed inadvertantly. Whatever the case, I don't think it should have been closed. I reopened the thread.
-Joe Offer-


Please note that Joe Offer and I are in complete agreement on the above.

We both consider that there are no reasons or grounds for why any anonymous voulunteer fellow poster should have imposed closure upon the thread in question and we both consider that it should not have been closed. But the fact remains that despite our agreement - this thread was subject to imposed closure.

As the editing comment only suggest that this thread MAY have been closed by inadvertantly by someone - has it been finally established and can it be confirmed - if indeed it was closed by some accident? Or if it was wrongly but intentionally closed by some anonymous volunteer fellow poster and if so what action will be taken to ensure that this is not repeated?

I may be alone in this - but I do find there is considerable irony and humour in the case of a thread entitled (or currently entitled anyway) 'Closing threads' being subject itself to closure and subsequent re-opening and of no one knowing or admitting to why.....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: The Shambles
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 07:25 AM

Is there such a thing as STC or Spontaneous Thread Closure? Or STC -Spontaneous Thead Cumbustion?

Don't get too close when the turd threads spontaneously combust..


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: jacqui.c
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 08:02 AM

Wolfgang - not opening a Shatner thread is a very wise decision. You don't know how many hours I've agonised over the Shatner question since I first clicked into one of LH's little traps.

The flashes of bad acting and the nightmares where Bill was the leading actor in every TV production......... It's going to take years of therapy to where I can once again close my eyes without seeing that face with the little animal perched atop the balding pate.

Stay away from Shatner threads for your own sanity. It's clear that there are some on the forum who haven't and it's driven them stark staring bonkers.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: The Shambles
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 08:23 PM

Yes, Rog-o, as you can see it was redundant and covered by this thread. And no one was talking turds over there, so I exercised editorial control so that we can talk about turds. Stay on subject please. Mudelf

Does anyone wish to own up to being this Mudelf person?

I am sure it is just me - but I find it more than a little offensive that this anonymous volunteer fellow poster can insert personal comments in my posts - have a one-way conversation - issue instructions to me and their identity is witheld from me and our forum.

Whatever happened to the value of being accountable on our forum? It would appear now that the less accountable you are prepared to be - the more ability you are given to impose your judgement upon those who are always prepared to be accountable and stand by their views and actions.

Joe Offer is at least prepared to be known to our forum - when he inserts his editing comments and personal judgements into my posts. Is it really too much to ask - that those who feel themselves qualified to impose their judgement upon their fellow posters are not able to do this anonymously?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: SINSULL
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 08:45 PM

AAAARRRRGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: Bill D
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 08:53 PM

" if it was wrongly but intentionally closed by some anonymous volunteer fellow poster and if so what action will be taken to ensure that this is not repeated?"

oh, I have NO doubt (it) will be soundly thrashed (virtually, of course) and made to edit all j0hn for Hull threads for proper spelling before (it) is allowed to mess with any serious thread again!!!

(ensure??? ENSURE???...we can't even ensure that repetitious rhetorical questions are not repeated....)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: jacqui.c
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 09:49 PM

Definitely too much Shatner in his past.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: George Papavgeris
Date: 29 Aug 05 - 10:16 PM

In his present, more like... he shatner all over this thread


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 30 Aug 05 - 03:40 AM

In spite of the treatment difficulties, patients with a paranoid disorder may function quite well. Even though their paranoid views are apparently unshakable, various treatments appear effective in improving social functioning, so that they do not often require lengthy hospitalization. The symptoms are less bizarre than those associated with paranoid schizophrenia. Also, the paranoid disorders seem to cause less disorganization of the personality and disruptions in social and family life. Unlike schizophrenia, which can become progressively worse, paranoid disorder seems to reach a certain level of severity and stay there.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: The Shambles
Date: 31 Aug 05 - 02:18 AM

(ensure??? ENSURE???...we can't even ensure that repetitious rhetorical questions are not repeated....)

Or can we? Or should we?

Perhaps 'threads have now spoken'? And have ensured - by apparently deciding now to close themselves - to be the final judge of whether they stay to to be contrubuted to - or not?

Our anonymous volunteer posters may be under the impression that they are in control - but our forum seems to have developed a mind of its own.

HELLO DAVE.................


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: Le Scaramouche
Date: 31 Aug 05 - 05:05 AM

Aren't the Clones accountable to Max?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: jacqui.c
Date: 31 Aug 05 - 07:49 AM

Le Scaramouche - Yes they are, and this has been pointed out a number of times to Roger, but he is not prepared to accept this fact. (see Giok's post at 30 Aug 3.40am).


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: The Shambles
Date: 31 Aug 05 - 07:54 AM

Apparently not.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: The Shambles
Date: 31 Aug 05 - 08:29 AM

HAL has shot poor old Max off into obit somewhere around Jupiter.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: BaldEagle2
Date: 31 Aug 05 - 09:39 AM

Hey!

Who was it that said Sham had no sense of humor?

Well, smarty-pants, you sure as hell got that one wrong.

I think someone should cut and paste Sham's HAL joke and post it to one of our joke threads.

Humor like that deserves a much wide audience.

Well Done, Sham! (You show 'em, kid!)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: The Shambles
Date: 19 Sep 05 - 05:26 AM

I can't see any reason why it should have been closed. The "close thread" link is in a location where a volunteer could click it accidentally and not notice, so it may have been closed inadvertantly. Whatever the case, I don't think it should have been closed. I reopened the thread.
-Joe Offer-


Just for the sake of completness (and for those posters still with a sense of humour). The thread in question has now been closed by Joe Offer. Who now knows which anonymous volunteer fellow poster was responsible but after publicly speculating that the first closure may have ben a accident - is not at liberty to confirm to our forum - if this was in fact the case.

And Max would still appear to be orbiting Jupiter.....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 19 Sep 05 - 06:02 AM

Just for a millisecond I wondered who re-opened this boring old thread!
G


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: JennyO
Date: 19 Sep 05 - 07:19 AM

I didn't. I KNEW.

Oh yes, and $700 now.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: wysiwyg
Date: 19 Sep 05 - 08:55 AM

And Max would still appear to be orbiting Jupiter.....

On the contrary-- Max posted in other threads several times during the active periods of this thread... and apparently chose to ignore this.

~Susan


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: HI Max: What about Shambles requests?
From: GUEST,Yawn
Date: 19 Sep 05 - 10:28 AM

I would too if I was Max.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
  Share Thread:
More...


This Thread Is Closed.


Mudcat time: 3 June 8:41 PM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.