Subject: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Bobert Date: 14 Nov 03 - 07:34 PM Well, danged. Here we go again. Yet another plan. What happened to the last 3 or 4? Bush's PR folks are trying to get everyone to believe this is only their *second* plan... We, who have been following this story have it officially as the 3rd and, depending on ones interprstation of new plan, maybe the 7th or 8th or... But here's how it goes. Iraqitize Iraq! Yep, that's the latest. Screw democracy, Shoot, if it can't work in the US then why think it can work in Iraq? Right? Well, I gotta agree with them on that one. Democracy in Iraq is an impossible goal. Like I said, if it can't work in the US than it doesn't stand a chance in Iraq. Well, sure, I've got my ideas on what can be done in Iraq now and have suggested elements of the "Bobert Plan" in other threads but, Iz just gonna keep quiet (or try...) and let my fellow Catboxers comment... Bobert |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: akenaton Date: 14 Nov 03 - 07:59 PM Bobert..I dont believe for one minute that America has any intention of pulling out of Iraq.I think Bush and his masters are playing the "pressure" game to encourage other countries to assist in the subjugation of the Iraqi people .America has invested too heavily in the effort to control oil supplies to back off now. An extremely dangerous situation looms...Ake |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Ebbie Date: 14 Nov 03 - 08:24 PM Did ya see that the US is now 'planning' elections before next summer in Iraq? Planning is easy- but it would appear that conditions will have to be a LOT less volatile before that can be successfully pulled off. Not a good sign that conditions have been becoming MORE volatile, not less. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST,pdc Date: 14 Nov 03 - 08:46 PM I find it rather interesting that in many ways, Iraq is a replay of Viet Nam. The US went into Viet Nam with all the latest technology -- air strikes, napalm, huge numbers of huge bombs, etc. The Viet Cong used technology, yes, but also operated in small packs, with stealth, guerilla tactics, etc., nibbling away at Americans until they won the war. I believe the US went into Iraq with the same belief in high-tech bombs, etc., and Iraqis are doing much the same that the Vietnamese did, on their own turf, in their own culture. Interesting. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Ebbie Date: 14 Nov 03 - 11:04 PM Pdc, it also reminds me of the situation between Israel and Palestine. The eye for an eye thing. And we all know how well that has worked for them. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Donuel Date: 15 Nov 03 - 12:07 AM This is Molly Ivans take http://www.workingforchange.com/printitem.cfm?itemid=15990 Mr Ed: Stay the course reverse the course but say its the exact same course of course unless of course you feel remorse for the nameless GI's dead They say the glass is half full we know its a pile of bull the glass is cracked from all the attacks and walter reed hospital's full |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Metchosin Date: 15 Nov 03 - 02:39 AM Some de ja voodoo in response to Troll in my post from last March perhaps? |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Bobert Date: 15 Nov 03 - 09:36 AM Well said then, Metchosin, and it is still the case. Actually, they had *their man* but they just didn't keep him in the fold. It wasn't Saddam's choice to get left out of the loopm but the US's. He tought he had a wink from Bush One to take Kuwait only to find that he'd been lured into a trap... One from which he would no escape... Why? I don't have a clue... But he was very much *our* man... Bobert |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST Date: 15 Nov 03 - 10:09 AM Yes, it appears that the Bush administration is now preparing the ground to withdraw from Iraq by the spring, in order to save themselves from being booted in the '04 election. Ironic isn't it, that they purportedly invaded Iraq to free the country from a nasty dictator, and that instead of the promised land, we will leave them instead with martial law, chaos, and a shitload of petty dictators, warlords, and an out of control militia? Talk about making things better for the US in the Middle East! This is a stroke of fuckin' genius, ain't it? |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Alaska Mike Date: 15 Nov 03 - 11:20 AM Sha Boom, Sha Boom Yadada-Yadada-Yadada-Yadada Sha Boom, Sha Boom Yadada-Yadada-Yadada-Yadada Sha Boom, Sha Boom I wish this was a dream, Sweetheart. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 15 Nov 03 - 12:28 PM They kept Vietnamising things in Vietnam, didn't they? Didn't work. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Ebbie Date: 15 Nov 03 - 12:38 PM Molly Ivins: "I don't think the Bush administration lied to us about Iraq. I think it's worse than that. I think they fooled themselves. I think they were conned by Ahmad Chalabi. I think they indulged in wishful thinking to a point of near criminality. I think they decided anyone who didn't agree with them was an enemy, anti-American, disloyal. In other words, I think they're criminally stupid. " Bears repeating, I think. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Don Firth Date: 15 Nov 03 - 03:14 PM Methinks that Bush has a major problem with what might be called "Wile. E. Coyote moments." This is when Wile E. Coyote is concentrating so hard on the chase (motivated by his single-minded "I want! I want!") that he doesn't realize that he's run off the edge of the cliff and is standing in mid-air. He's fine until he suddenly realizes that something is not quite what he thought it was. The "moment" comes when he looks down. And then. . . . But you've got to hand it to him. As Bush hurtles toward the canyon floor, his (or somebody's) mind is working, and by the time he hits bottom with a resounding splat, he has managed to spin it into a policy statement, saying that this is what he planned all along. After all (he sees in retrospect), it is the fastest way to get down from the cliff. Don Firth |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Amergin Date: 15 Nov 03 - 03:52 PM i thought the war had to be over before they could implement a postwar plan.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Peace Date: 15 Nov 03 - 06:46 PM Is there gonna be a postal war in Iraq? Sorry, I know this is serious stuff, but ya know? I think about US 'policy' in Iraq and I want to wear my t-shirt that says, "I'm trying to see things from your point of view, but I can't stick my head that far up my ass." |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Amergin Date: 15 Nov 03 - 09:53 PM roflmao...i like that.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Bobert Date: 15 Nov 03 - 11:04 PM Danged, Don... I was thinkin' of some kinda "Acme Postwar Kit" thread when I started this... Yeah, it is a lot like Wilie-Coyote foriegn policy that we've got going with these folks... Bobert |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Donuel Date: 16 Nov 03 - 12:15 AM My next cartoon shows the transitional gov turning its power over to the provisional gov which then turns its power over to the hysterical gov turning power over to the recreational gov. etc. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Bobert Date: 16 Nov 03 - 08:32 PM Well, word on the streets 'round DC has it that Bush has hired a chimp to assist him with policy. Yeah, Bush sets up a big dart board of options for any given issue and lets the chimp throw the darts. This should certainly improve Bush's chances in '04..... Bobert |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Amergin Date: 16 Nov 03 - 08:35 PM but if a chimp was setting the policy....wouldn't things be going better? |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Peace Date: 16 Nov 03 - 09:18 PM Why has he hired a chump to do the policy stuff? |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Peace Date: 16 Nov 03 - 09:20 PM Sorry. Saw it just as I pushed the submit bar. I thought we were the chumps. In this context, chimp makes much more sense. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST,Frank Hamilton Date: 17 Nov 03 - 10:58 AM Pre-emption in Iraq is an old policy. It was inevitable. Oil corporations required it. Bush (Poppy) supported Saddam but when the Administration couldn't own him, it turned on him. Noriega too. The Administration only likes dictators they can own. The new Manifest Destiny has to do with the price of oil. US expansionism is nothing new but part of an ongoing policy. Our country is addicted to oil. The Cartels discourage alternative energy sources. They got a cash cow. They are the new "pushers". Do you think that Iraq will see much of it's oil money slotted for reconstruction? Don't count on it. Check Afghanistan. African Kuwait. Where next? Today, Iraq, tomorrow the world! Solution for the short term.....dump W. But watch these other guys that get in. Campaign Finance Reform? Don't count on it. The election can still be bought. The latest Postwar Plan is called "covering your ass". Frank Hamilton |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Little Hawk Date: 17 Nov 03 - 11:17 AM Accurate all the way, Frank. They only like dictators they can own. Saddam became an independent operator, and they don't tolerate that, any more than the Democrat-Republican political cartel tolerates political independents in American elections. The rule is: buy 'em out, slander 'em out, shoot 'em out or bomb 'em out...whatever works. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST Date: 17 Nov 03 - 11:24 AM GUEST 15 Nov 03 - 10:09 AM "Yes, it appears that the Bush administration is now preparing the ground to withdraw from Iraq by the spring, in order to save themselves from being booted in the '04 election." No sign of that whatsoever, in fact they have clearly stated the reverse. Frank Oil Corporations required what exactly?? "The new Manifest Destiny has to do with the price of oil." - Certainly does with regard to Russia (their reconstruction and future development relies on the price of oil not dropping below $21 per barrel), and to the Saudi's (they are relying on the price not dropping below $25 per barrel) Here's some other news for you the "Oil Corporations" are not exclusively American owned. USA addicted to oil - then you have no problem. Have a look at the figures for known Shale Oil reserves in the US of A. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Mickey191 Date: 17 Nov 03 - 04:56 PM Okay Folks, He gets us out of the quagmire, he is re- elected,and through some rouse he gets us reinvolved. Whether it is because of a Hussein sighting, civil unrest or some other "reason." Folks,don't forget this Biblical Mission our President believes in: "the calling of our time, the calling of our country to convert the world to democracy." In Little Rock, a week ago today,he said "This nation is freedom's home & Freedom's defender. We welcome this charge of history, and we are keeping it." I'm convinced he will get us back in. It's his imagined mandate. It's OIL & THE BIBLE folks! So our mission is clear. We must send G.W.Bush packing. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST,Frank Hamilton Date: 17 Nov 03 - 06:03 PM Hi Guest, >Oil Corporations required what exactly?? Exxon,Mobil,Shell et. al. require American domination of the market. >Here's some other news for you the "Oil Corporations" are not >exclusively American owned. Here's some news for you. Oil corps will soon by run by Americans. It's part of the master plan. Do you see France or German oil companies in Afghanistan or Iraq? >USA addicted to oil - then you have no problem. Have a look at the >figures for known Shale Oil reserves in the US of A. These figures if they are accurate which I doubt would make American oil corporations king of the hill. They also impact upon the environment in an unhealthy way. How 'bout another Alaska spill? Addicts have their pushers. The only way oil gets to flow is to the West (euphenism for US). Frank |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 17 Nov 03 - 06:24 PM Do you think these guys really worry about little things like "American" or "French" or "German"? Money is globalised. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Peace Date: 17 Nov 03 - 07:55 PM This is about much more than oil. This administration is doing the work of MJ 12. The intent is complete globalization. Won't matter a damn where the oil is. One big happy family. A work force of about 6,000,000,000, and ya can decide exactly what to pay each and every one of them. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Bobert Date: 17 Nov 03 - 08:02 PM Well, after getting blasted by just about everyone fir the *about face*, the Bush administration clarified their plan de jour... "Ahhhh, folks, we ain't going nowhere! We're in it fir the long haul. We just want for Iraqis to, ahhhh, hmmmmm? Like, ahhh, we'll have to get back to you on this....." Normal..... (clueless.....)........ Bobert |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST,Teribus Date: 18 Nov 03 - 12:55 AM Frank above mentions two oil corporations, one American based multinational Exxon/Mobil and Shell (Royal Dutch Shell) which is very much European. Now why the latter would the latter would want "American domination of the market" I cannot begin to imagine. Another he did not mention was BP/Amoco (British, BP having taken over the US Oil Company Amoco, BP already owned Standard Oil another American oil company). The French Oil Company Total-Petrofina-Elf are certainly involved in Iraq and have been for years, none of their licences have been revoked since Saddam departed. Oil, like any other commodity, gets sold to the highest bidder. What Kevin says about money is perfectly correct. The "Oil Corporations" do make money, they employ both directly and indirectly a vast number of people the world over, their owners are a vast number of shareholders, including Insurance and Financial institutions who manage pension funds for millions of people. The Oil & Gas industry is, and always has been, very much an "American game" in terms of technology - but they do not control it, and never have. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Hrothgar Date: 18 Nov 03 - 04:25 AM When is postwar? |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 18 Nov 03 - 06:30 AM And, which Teribus left out, it all gets creamed off by a much smaller bunch of people who are actually in control. But nationality isn't the bottom line, that's just a matter of what happens to be convenient. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Peace Date: 18 Nov 03 - 10:48 AM Hrothgar: When they have the wrap-up. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST Date: 18 Nov 03 - 11:19 AM RE: ".... it all gets creamed off by a much smaller bunch of people who are actually in control." Examples please Kevin |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: DougR Date: 18 Nov 03 - 06:30 PM Guest: your comments would be so much more meaningful, and would be taken more seriously if you would identify yourself. You make some good points but ... I can't understand why so many of you folks are so upset at Bush's postwar plan. You do want the U. S. to turn over leadership of the country to the Iraqis don't you? Bush has always said that was the plan! DougR |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST,pdc Date: 18 Nov 03 - 06:48 PM DougR, I believe your remark was a bit naive. 1) Just because Bush says he's going to do something doesn't mean he will -- check his environment promises, his No Child Left Behind promises, and many others. 2) Turning Iraq over to the Iraqis means turning it over to the American Administration's Iraqis -- the ones they will own. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 18 Nov 03 - 07:01 PM And, if you go a few years back, it's worth remembering that the favourite Iraqi for a previous US Administration was Saddam Hussein. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Bobert Date: 18 Nov 03 - 07:04 PM Dougie, Plan? Hmmmmmm? Like what is it? Bobert |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST,guest from NW Date: 18 Nov 03 - 07:12 PM "I can't understand why so many of you folks are so upset at Bush's postwar plan. You do want the U. S. to turn over leadership of the country to the Iraqis don't you? Bush has always said that was the plan!" if that is the extent of the plan why aren't we packing up right now and proceeding to "turn over leadership to the Iraquis"? if there are any more details to the plan could you point out a few? |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Bobert Date: 18 Nov 03 - 09:17 PM Thank you, GUEST from NW. That's what I'm trying to get a handle on my own Wes Ginny self... "Ahhh, we're turning it over to the Iraqis *but* we ain't leaving..." Like what's wrong with this picturre... It's like the obnoxious drunk at yer party who announces that he's leaving and then preceeds to drag his drunk butt into yer bedroom where he lays in yer bed, watching yer TV and vomits on yer carpet... That's a plan? Beam me up... Bobert |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST,Boab Date: 18 Nov 03 - 10:07 PM The situation as it now stands in Iraq [it will get worse---] was a foregone [and forecast] scenario. The ringleaders, and their lapdogs, followed a path pre-ordained by greed and sheer ineptitude. And so it continues. Anybody who thinks that George W. and his savage pack don't envisage US miltary bases in the country of Iraq beyond forever are seriously deluding themselves---or are being naive enough to be seriously deluded. Boab |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: GUEST,pdc Date: 18 Nov 03 - 10:14 PM I no longer have the link, but can find it if nagged -- 5 months before the invasion of Iraq, Canadian intelligence findings were that the situation in Iraq would not work because it would deteriorate into -- exactly what it has. No exit plan, and a quagmire. That's one reason why Canada didn't go in with the US - plus, we found it repugnant, and the government would have had a hard time selling it to us. The question is, however: if our intelligence knew, why didn't US intelligence? |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Peace Date: 18 Nov 03 - 10:30 PM If our Intelligence knew, then their Intelligence knew, ya know? But the game has never been about the righting of the wrongs in Iraq, has it? An ya don't have to be an Intelligence Service to know that. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Thomas the Rhymer Date: 18 Nov 03 - 11:06 PM US intelligence?... head for the hoop Bobert, and and I'll set you up for a nice slam dunk! ;^) Most of us in the states are too busy to bother researching... PBS Shows pictures of each of the American War dead... in silence... How do you feel as they look back at you... those healthy young men... Makes me so sad... And then I get miffed... What ARE we doing? Maybe Rush Limbaugh will tell us... Have a heart guys... imagine how foolish George must feel these days... Let's start sending the pretzels... millions and millions of pretzels...ttr |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Mickey191 Date: 18 Nov 03 - 11:26 PM Over 8,000 Wounded. The beautiful young American soldier in his hospital bed with no arms. Blown off. Repeating the Big Lie: To bring peace, to find WMD. I wanted to shake him and for that, I'm heartly sorry. |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Little Hawk Date: 18 Nov 03 - 11:39 PM Japanese soldiers in World War II thought they were bringing freedom and liberation from foreign white domination to all Asians (except the Chinese?). "Asia for the Asiatics!" they cried. Sounded really idealistic, didn't it? They died in their hundreds of thousands, in the ruins of the lands they invaded, and finally in their own homeland in atomic fireballs and burning cities. This is what happens to the young and naive who believe an aggressor's propaganda and march off to make war on foreign soil. - LH |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Amos Date: 19 Nov 03 - 12:08 AM With a dead soldier's name on each of the return envelopes, contianing one pretzel.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Thomas the Rhymer Date: 19 Nov 03 - 01:40 AM Amos... return envelopes? |
Subject: RE: BS: Bush's Latest Postwar Plan From: Hrothgar Date: 19 Nov 03 - 04:13 AM Don't send pretzels to Dubya. One wrong swallow, and you get Cheney. Best of luck, fellers. |