|
Subject: BS: Thermostats From: dianavan Date: 01 Oct 05 - 12:39 AM I need advice, quick! I recently replaced my old thermostat with a new one. The old one was old and ugly but it worked. The new one is a Honeywell and it looks nice but it doesn't work. I know, if it ain't broke, don't fix it but... The new Honeywell seems to have only two temperatures, hot and cold (off and on). The thermometer doesn't work and the temperature is not controlled automatically. I need a new thermostat very soon or I'm gonna freeze. I have a gas powered, hot water system that works just fine. Its just that I can't seem to regulate it. Someone said its because the thermostat is cheap junk from China. Is there anyone who makes a good thermostat? How much does it cost? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: Joe Offer Date: 01 Oct 05 - 02:33 AM Hi, Dianavan - Honeywell is one of the standards, and they're usually thought to be pretty good - there aren't all that many brands available. What model number is it? How many wires do you have to hook to the thermostat? Have you tried reversing them? How does the thermostat get power? - from the wires, or does it need a supplemental battery? Is there a timer on the thermostat? The basic test is to disconnect the thermostat from the furnace and connect a low-voltage light or meter to it. Then, rotate the dial and see when it goes off and on - test is just a bit different with digital thermostats, but works on the sam principle. Give us the model number of the thermostat, and I (or somebody) should be able to come up with advice for you. -Joe Maintenance- |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 01 Oct 05 - 05:18 AM Put the old one back if you still have it. What type of stat is it? A manual one with a knob? You can usualy get some clue as to whether the they are swiching as you probably would be able to gear a click as you rotate the dial. Joe Offers method is more reliable though - s simple continuity test. You could well find you have a faulty unit but I believe Honewell are OK. I've a feeling they are American but thier heating controls are widely used in the UK. Don't know what other makes you might get. Our own is one of these Danfoss-Randall ones. Works fine. I fitted the controls a year or more back as there was no room stat, no cylider stat, and no zone valve for the hot water side of the circuit, going radio conroled to avoid wiring tasks I didn't fancy. We have made significant savings in oil consumption since moving from the system that was just controlled by timer to this. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 01 Oct 05 - 05:21 AM Wrong page - We went for this type |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 01 Oct 05 - 07:33 AM And re the continuity test, I've a feeling you are Canada but N America anyway so might well have a "Radio Shack" near you. If you haven't got one, go out and get youself a cheap mulitmeter - I'd suggest a digital one as they are more robust. I think my own (UK) cost about £20 but you could easily 1/2 that. I do use mine for a bit more than this but they are handy to have around even if all you want to do is confirm whether a fuse is blown or to find if a battery really has some voltage, etc. My meter (and maybe most now do) has a continuity setting that gives a bleep but one with just ohms (which they all have) is fine. A switch like the thermostat should be showing close to infinate resistance when open/off and close to zero when closed/on. Joe mentioned the bulb one. You need a battery for that. You just make a circuit so that the swich is the thing you want to test. Your light shold come on when the thermostat is on. One big thing in all this though is make sure your thermostat is not connected to the mains in any way when you try to test it. Take it off the wall and have no mains connected. If it is a type relying on mains for a timer or programmer, I'd suggest you leave it alone or get a professional in unless you are fully sure of what you are doing I think even on your 110V (certainly is on our 240) a mistake could be fatal and at a minimum very unpleasant. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: kendall Date: 01 Oct 05 - 09:04 AM Remove the cover. You should see two tiny pointers. If they have not been calibrated, that would account for the thing not working. They must be on different ends of the scale to work right. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: kendall Date: 01 Oct 05 - 09:07 AM And, it must be perfectly level. If it is off just a bit, it wont work. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: JohnInKansas Date: 01 Oct 05 - 11:48 AM Common US thermostat manufacturers include Honeywell, Robertshaw/LUX, White-Rodgers, General Controls, Johnson Controls, and Jameson. There are several others. For most purposes they can be considered interchangeable, although various installers may have their favorites. Only the "brand names" are US. They'll most likely be made in Taiwan, Mexico, China, Indonesia etc., with instructions written by someone in India, Turkistan, or S. Africa by an ESL marketing specialist, and the "US" company probably belongs - directly or indirectly - to a British Holding Conglomerate (LLC). Nearly all thermostats work off a transformer, often located near the device being controlled. The standard voltage in the US is 24VAC, although 6, 12, and 30 volts have been used. The most common applications assume that the transformer voltage will be switched on and off to the device the thermostat is controlling; but many heat pump systems and electric (baseboard and under-floor) require a special device to switch "line voltage" (110/220 VAC in the US). These line voltage types will sometimes use an internal battery to power the temperature sensing circuit. Battery powered thermostats can generally be used on any system, but since you have to bring the switched voltage to the thermostat there's little practical reason to do so if it's a low-voltage control line. Many thermostats use a "mercury switch" on a bimetal coil to sense temperature, and these require - as kendall notes - that the thermostat be mounted with a specific orientation and be "perfectly level." If your new thermostat is of this kind it should have had a "permanent label" noting "CONTAINS MERCURY DISPOSE PROPERLY" (an OSHA/EPA mandated label). More "modern" digital thermostats frequently use thermister sensors that shouldn't be too sensitive to orientation, although a level mounting is probably a good idea. Thermostat wiring - what comes out of the wall - is commonly 2, 4, or 5 wires. Many "digital" thermostats require at least the 4-wire connection, since the sensing circuit must be powered independent of the controlled circuit (2 wires each). Thermostats with a battery to power the sensing circuit may be usable on a 2-wire system, but non-battery-powered digitals likely will not work. (There are exceptions.) If you've only got 2 wires, you're probably better off with a simple (ugly) mercury switch type thermostat. Most recently offered thermostats accommodate 4 or 5 wire connection. The 5th wire allows a single thermostat to control both heating and cooling. If you have a 4-wire installation and have inadvertently connected the "furnace hot" lead to the "A/C hot" terminal, you'll get the effect described that you can make it turn on, but it will never shut itself off and you can make it turn off but it will never turn itself on. John |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 01 Oct 05 - 11:59 AM Interesting John... I would have guessed most mechanical stats I've seen (UK) would be using a bimetal strip. I didn't know of the low voltage control system. I've not touched many or looked at many wiring diagrams but the ones I have have been 240V (UK of course). Our own is now effectively the Honeywell Y plan shown here. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 01 Oct 05 - 12:00 PM (but instead of a timer, like that programmable stats - Honewell do one too - can't find that diagram at the moment though) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: dianavan Date: 01 Oct 05 - 12:09 PM Thanks, so much for all of your guidance. I will get busy this afternoon. Hopefully I don't make a mistake! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 01 Oct 05 - 12:17 PM One other point of course is that I don't imagine air conditioning (as in the cooling side) being something you would find often in a UK house. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: dianavan Date: 01 Oct 05 - 01:56 PM Before I start monkeying with this, the thermostat is a model CT50A4775, Class 2, 30 V max. Two wires R and W. Do I have the right model for a gravity fed, hot water system with a gas-fired boiler? There are two wires. My old thermostat was a honeywell (round) with a thermometer to measure room temp. and a dial. The new Honeywell seems to have only on and off. Maybe I need a different thermostat. I want to know the room temperature and I want to be able to control it. Help, please, before I do something I might regret. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 01 Oct 05 - 04:09 PM Dunno dianavan, seem to be more variations on systems than I'd realised when I'd first posted and going by bits of UK experience... I think it's best left to someone who has dealt with your systems. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: JohnInKansas Date: 01 Oct 05 - 04:43 PM Honeywell makes it hard to identify specific models on their website, but the CT50 has terminals marked "R" and "W" that should be used if your wall only has two wires running out of it. At least that's the answer the Honeywell Thermostat Wizard gave me. The only other thing that needs to be checked is that you don't have one of those "line voltage" systems mentioned above. If you have a voltmeter, the two wires - without the thermostat connected - should show something less than 30V AC (probably 24V or near that). If the voltage at the wires is less than 30V, hook them up to the R and W terminals and you should be working. IF THE VOLTAGE at the wires is more than 30V it will probably be line voltage, 110 VAC or more and you would probably have killed yourself by now, or at least melted some wire. If you don't have a voltmeter handy, you may be able to tell from the markings on the old thermostat whether it was a normal (30V) one or a special high voltage unit. If you're adventurous, you can see if the voltage at the wires will light an ordinary household light bulb. I'd expect it won't. The thermometers built in on thermostats seldom read the same as the markings on the dial/lever you use to adjust them, unless some care is taken in calibrating things. A small separate thermometer mounted nearby should work just as well as a built in one. The trick is to: 1. let the room temperature stabilize. 2. read the temperature on the thermometer. 3. set the thermostat knob/lever to the temperature on the thermometer. If the heat clicks on rotate the entire thermostat (usually ccw) so that it's off. 4. rotate the thermostat on the wall carefully (usually cw) until it just clicks on the heater. This adjusts the levelling of the switch so that it comes on at the temperature on the knob/lever. (A test lamp or voltmeter is handy to tell when the thing switches.) 5. tighten the thermostat mounting screws. The simpler option is to read the temp from your separate thermometer, and just nudge the thermostat knob/lever a little at a time in the direction you want the temp to go. John |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 01 Oct 05 - 07:26 PM Funny reading this thread BTW. And I'm guilty too here... At one extreme we have recogintiion that some of these devices (although it seems rarer in the US) could quite literaly kill you and at the other a seemingly casual just take the cover off. Perhaps that again higlights the dangers (and I stress I'm aware I contributed) of asking this type tech question on a primarily music forum. Between us all (and with very informative comments from John in K too) the reality to me (at least if it was common UK systems) is that we could have "killed some fucker" here and all with good intentions. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: dianavan Date: 01 Oct 05 - 08:35 PM I'm still alive and guess what? Its often the simplest of things that prove effective. The winner of the solution is - Kendall, "Remove the cover. You should see two tiny pointers. If they have not been calibrated, that would account for the thing not working. They must be on different ends of the scale to work right." Yes, it does help to calibrate the damn thing. Anyway, it seems to be working now. I'll give it a couple of days to prove itself. The next step will be to buy a room thermometer and follow your directions, JohninKansas. Thanks everybody, so much - and don't worry, as much monkeying as I have done, I still haven't received a shock. Maybe I'm just lucky. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 01 Oct 05 - 08:47 PM Yes but Daina, Kendalls coments (as often are the case - look at his computer messups for one) are often the most dangerous of all. Glad this worked out but really and honestly I would not trust that guy to change a fuse (I would on the other hand think KIK would follow the UK wiring diagrams I gave without being troubled - have more than a touch of belief in his tech ability and to be able to apply it in various areas if needed). Simple, maybe on this one,,, Thank God. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 01 Oct 05 - 09:34 PM I still haven't received a shock. Maybe I'm just lucky. Maybe you are stupid enough to not realise it is possible that you couuld have been dealinng with voltages that cold zap you. If it is intended as sarcasm, try tracing the volatge throough any of the examples I gave you from Honeywell and tell me the it is not likely that the voltage you hit might not be V230 at the stat. Please trace you route and publice it here if you think such reasoning of mine is BS, or admit these things CAN be dangerous - give me one or other rationalisation from the diagrams |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: JohnInKansas Date: 02 Oct 05 - 02:50 AM Jon - The diagram to which you referred may be common in the UK, but except in exceptional circumstances would not be legal under the building codes in most US municipalities, or in most of Canada, at least for residential use. (I haven't looked lately, but at my last casual browsing of Canadian codes, they appear to be much like the common US ones.) Any connection that carries line voltage must be enclosed in a "junction box." Any access to any metal part that carries line voltage must require the removal of one or more "permanent fasteners" such as metal screws or bolts. This pretty much precludes using a surface mount device, like the thermostats described, at line voltage. Line voltage thermostats are used in the US, but usually only for electric baseboard/underfloor systems and some heat pump systems. Where line voltage is used, the thermostat itself usually is embedded into the wall in an electrical junction box. Even for these systems, current rules in most areas would require that the "thermostat" in your diagram be replaced by a "relay" or in some cases a "contactor" which would in turn be switched on/off by a low-volt thermostat hung in the occupied areas of the residence. By implementing these restrictions in building codes, it is apparently hoped, by some of our leaders, that eventually the US will have even more "surviving idiots" than the rest of the world. It seems to be working... You also asked about the use of bimetal thermostat sensors. The "sensing" in the simple mercury switch thermostats used here is usually done by a bimetal strip, usually a coil that looks like a clock spring, with a glass tube containing a slug of mercury hung at the outer end of the coil. As the temp falls the coil winds tighter and tilts the tube so that the mercury runs to one end and connects two embedded wire ends. A cute feature is that when the mercury runs to the turnon end it applies an additional torque to the coil, so that the temperature has to rise a bit past the original switch point before the blob runs back. Automatic snap-action. The two adjustment pointers mentioned by Kendall (01 Oct 05 - 09:04 AM) are called "anticipator" adjustments and are usually on a couple of small rheostats that apply a bit of extra heat near the bimetal coil. One heats the coil a little when the mercury switch is OFF (for the heat circuit) - making the switch turn on at a little lower room temp, and the other heats it a different bit when the switch is ON, also making it turn off at a different slightly lower than room temp. This lets you adjust the "gap" in temperature between when the furnace turns on and when it turns off, although it may shift the calibration between switch point temp and indicated room temp if used too agressively. Digital thermostats generally have similar adjustments, although they often work by applying a voltage bias to a thermister circuit. The "OFF Side" anticipator adjustment would normally be critical only if you're using the thermostat for heating and cooling. (Older 2-wire 'stats often only had a single anticipator.) In a heat-only setup, setting the Off-side one too high could get an "off below on" condition, but it's really unlikely. It does sound as if dianovan may have managed it. If one or both of these is set too far off, you'll often see fairly wide temperature excursions. If the heat comes on at 68F (20C?) and stays on until the room hits 75F (24C?) you're likely to feel like you're enjoying the benefits of menopause. Some twiddling may be in order. A swing of about 2F (1C) is generally considered acceptable, although some sensitive souls have trouble even with that. Simple flat leaf bimetals with "dry contacts" may be more common in line-voltage setups, but it's really difficult to get sensitive temperature adjustment with sufficient "snap" to prevent arcing of the contacts. They're commonly used here for water heaters and such, where adjustment in 10 or 20 degree F increments is sufficient, but seldom seen - so far as I'm aware - in room temp setups. I've been told that A/C is uncommon in the UK, but it's one of the easiest ways to get rid of that muggy humidity, and in moderate temperatures shouldn't be too expensive to run. I'd suspect it will become more common when more Brits have been exposed to it here... I've even seen A/C equipped houses in Seattle - proof positive that it's becoming more common in foreign places. John |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: dianavan Date: 02 Oct 05 - 03:32 AM Like I said, I'm still not sure the problem has been solved but I should know by tomorrow night if it is working. I still haven't heard it turn off and on automatically according to the room temperature. One of the problems is that the boiler is in the basement and I don't hear a thing. I am constantly running up and down the stairs to see if its on or off. Could it be that the bimetal coil is malfunctioning? The new thermostat is a 30vac and of course I threw away the old one and have no idea if it is the right voltage. It may have been a 24 to 27 Vac since it was Honeywell's round classic. My old one is not like the picture on the web because it only controls the heat, not a cooling system, too. How do I know how many volts are coming into the thermostat? Don't worry, Jon, I am so scared of electricity my kids make fun of me. The last thing I want is an electrical zap. I'm not playing with the wires, just checking them, adjusting the calibration and trying to make sure that the new thermostat is compatible with my heating system. Thanks for your help and for your consideration. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: JohnInKansas Date: 02 Oct 05 - 04:39 AM dianovan - The only thing very specific to your thermostat that I've found at Honeywell's website is an operator's manual that, unfortunately for me, appears to be available only in Spanish. If that's helpful, and you didn't get one with the thermostat, it's a 2.4MB .pdf download at CT50 Operating Manual. It focuses on the CT51, which appears to be a little fancier than the CT50, but it covers both; and it does look like it tells you how to check the nameplate(s) on the stuff in the basement to confirm that you have the right thermostat for your setup - if you can read the Español. Even without reading, you can tell quite a bit from the pictures. The 30V rating for the Honeywell CT50 is a maximum rating, and this thermostat shouldn't care if any lower voltage is used. It would, in fact, probably work for a while at significantly higher voltage, although staying within the ratings is recommended. All it does is open and close a single connection when it's connected in the two wire configuration you're using. If there aren't any sparks or smoke when it turns off, and it doesn't get too hot when it's on, it will work; although outside the ratings it may not work for very long. The "professional" way to tell if the thermostat is on or off would be to clip a voltmeter on the terminals where it's connected. Your voltmeter should show "thermostat line voltage" (probably about 24V) when the switch is open (furnace off) and near zero when the switch closes (furnace on). The cover on your new thermostat is a pull-off kind, and the thermostat will work just as well with the cover off as with it on. The CT50 is the common mercury switch type. If you can see the mercury switch, just look at which end of the glass tube the shiny blob is in. If it's in one end and the furnace is off, moving it to the other end (by setting a different temp) should turn the furnace on. You can probably run down, check, and get back upstairs to turn it back down before all the butter melts. As long as you can turn the furnace on/off by changing the setting on the thermostat, you can be pretty confident that it will do its own thing when you set it and forget it. I did get an indication elsewher at Honeywell that your "anticipator" screw for the heat turn-on should probably be set at about "8" for hot water systems. Setting the rheostats all the way to zero can let a lot of current through them, which can burn them up. No mention at that source about where the other one should be, but somewhere around "2" or "3" should be safe enough. John |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 02 Oct 05 - 11:53 AM Aye John but I do have difficulty with IF THE VOLTAGE at the wires is more than 30V it will probably be line voltage, 110 VAC or more and you would probably have killed yourself by now, or at least melted some wire. Meaning anything other than a recognition that it is possible to kill oneself. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 02 Oct 05 - 12:09 PM Dainavan, my worry is just that we can (maybe mostly me) dive into these questions so easily and even if what JIK says is (and I've no reason to dispute this) correct, some UK 'Catter could have read and finding rather more than a 24V control circuit. I can't help the feeling these matters are better dealt with more professional places. As you know we are in different countires but UK, I used this one for bits of help at times. Not sure what is like now but it did have some good working tradesmen in, |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: dianavan Date: 02 Oct 05 - 03:00 PM I finally found the model number of my old, Honeywell thermostat (T87F 3855) and it is 24V which is very helpful information. I realize now that I want to return to this very effecient, old standard type. The only numbers I could find on the transformer (also Honeywell) were A409B1X0) which did not prove to be very helpful. I couldn't find anything on the net. I think the problem may be that its such an old system that they probably don't even make the parts anymore. Jon - I don't see what's wrong with asking for help on the cat. I think that most people here are able to help with all kinds of questions. Members seem to have a wide variety of experience and knowledge. I certainly rcvd. the info. I needed and it has saved me a pile of money. I have no idea how a UK member would have interpreted the info but it was good enough for me. Since I'm a single mom with very little money to hire tradesman, I often have to do my own work. I make some mistakes but I haven't hurt myself yet. I'm pretty cautious and know when I am over my head. I think that its good to learn about the heating system in your home and not to rely on others to do the work. Same goes for plumbing. Sure, if its a big job, I hire somebody. Its my home and whenever possible, I take responsibility for minor repairs. Whenever I solve a problem (such as this one) my self confidence soars and I enjoy my home even more. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: JohnInKansas Date: 02 Oct 05 - 03:09 PM Jon: From one of my previous: By implementing these restrictions in building codes, it is apparently hoped, by some of our leaders, that eventually the US will have even more "surviving idiots" than the rest of the world. It seems to be working... Just trying to improve the Brit gene pool.... (joking of course) John |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: dianavan Date: 02 Oct 05 - 03:27 PM Jon - As you can see by this page, http://yourhome.honeywell.com/Consumer/Cultures/en-US/Products/Thermostats/Non-Programmable/Non-Digital/Default.htm Thermostats are broken into two categories: 1. professional 2. do-it-yourself I think what you are saying is that in Britain, only professionals should attempt this. In North America, they seem to think that we have enough know-how to do it ourselves, if it is low-voltage. I don't think Honeywell would risk a law suit. BTW - I am impressed with the wide range of products that Honeywell manufactures and no longer believe that my thermostat is cheap junk. Seems to me that they are a very reputable company. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 02 Oct 05 - 03:42 PM Fair enoough Dianavan - no point in my repeating a concern. John, in the UK, they have tried to make us safer! There is these days a little thing called "Part P" floating around" making life more difficult for an odd jobber (at home) like me - some stuff needs testing by an electrician now (or maybe yoou risk house insurance), Whether it will improve the Brit gene pool or not , I'm, uncertain but I think you will find cowboys (hey aint that an American term - used in the UK a lot - slipshod builders, etc. poss con men...- though and in this way in terms of me using it as a joking response to your joking) will still get through. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 02 Oct 05 - 03:44 PM Opps, dianvan. see we cross posted. Maybe finding that page before asking here.... Whatever, I'm out of this one. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: kendall Date: 02 Oct 05 - 05:07 PM When the heating company installed my thermostat, a Honeywell T87F, it did not work properly. I called them and they couldn't get to me right away so they suggested I make sure the thermostat was level. It wasn't, so I made it level. I also touched the tiny wires that activate the thing, and as you can see, I'm still alive. There is no way that such small wires could carry enough voltage to harm you. Now I'm curious, what other dangerous advice have I given, Jon? Now, I admit I'm not much on computers, but how does that carry over to thermostats? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 02 Oct 05 - 05:44 PM OK Kendall I will come back just for this: There is no way that such small wires could carry enough voltage to harm you. Are you aware that the current may be more important when thinking of the wires and if you have a higher voltage you may use thinner wire to carry the same wattage? Would W=I^2R mean anything to you? They don't (at least in the UK) have such high voltages on the distribution like pylons because a high voltage needs a thicker wire you know. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 02 Oct 05 - 06:13 PM Seem to have missed some of my intended post... Try this page for example. You will find quite clearly that for the same watts, I'd need thinner, not thicker wire for if I used higher voltage.. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: Joe Offer Date: 02 Oct 05 - 07:45 PM Dianavan - it sounds like you have your problem solved. Remember that a thermostat is basically an on-off switch. If you have a very simple thermostat, it may not use power at all (it just serves as a switch for the relay that turns the heater off and on). Simple thermostats turn on at a certain temperature, and turn off when a certain temperature is reached. Usually, the range is set at one or two degrees so it's not a constant on-off-on cycle. -Joe Offer- |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: kendall Date: 02 Oct 05 - 09:39 PM Like I said, what other dangerous advice have I given? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: The Fooles Troupe Date: 02 Oct 05 - 09:46 PM Enjoy yourself? ;-) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: dianavan Date: 02 Oct 05 - 09:49 PM Hey, Jon, relax - I did check out the Honeywell site before I asked for help. Neither my old model or my new model thermostat appeared on that site. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: kendall Date: 03 Oct 05 - 11:26 AM I've been challenged. I expect an answer. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: Richard Bridge Date: 03 Oct 05 - 11:37 AM It's the volts that jolts, but the mills (milliamps) that kills. 240v mains won't usually kill you so long as you don't manage to create a situation in which you can't let go or turn it off. If you have a weak heart it might. If you hold one wire with your left hand and one with your right, then it can be dangerous because the current crosses the chest (and therefore the heart). 240v can give you a nasty burn that if deep will take a long time to heal. Been there, done that. If you fiddle with electrical stuff enough, sooner or later you will make a mistake and get a good belt, but you usually survive and learn. Let's not get paranoid here. What you really do need to worry about is 3-phase and if you get two bits of equipment on different phases you can get 415 volts between them. And the maths of it is a whole different ball game so a mistake becomes likelier. Unless you are a professional, do not do 3-phase! Take extra care with even 240v in kitchens - you are surrounded by good conductors, and good earths. I once bought a house where the previous owner had succeeded in wiring up a spur to feed the ignition circuit in the gas cooker with phase and neutral reversed (and no earth at all). And it was next to the sink. The really really worrying thing was that he was a nuclear engineer, and if his standards were as high at work, the consequences did not bear thinking about. Over here 110v is used as a safety level voltage for site work (big step down transformers) on the basic theory that 110v is not (all that) likely to kill, even among muddy puddles. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: kendall Date: 03 Oct 05 - 02:27 PM Jon, don't you think it unlikely that the furnace company would suggest I mess with the wiring if they thought I could get burned? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: Richard Bridge Date: 03 Oct 05 - 02:54 PM Kendall, have you upset tehm lately? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: kendall Date: 03 Oct 05 - 03:56 PM No, but Jon has upset me some. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 03 Oct 05 - 04:46 PM Kendall I'm going from a UK background but I can assure you I could go out and buy any buy any number of things that could burn you. If you got it wrong. I could for examle go out and buy this honeywell and have the 230- 240V. I think the sense comes in in the knowing what might be behind it - simple rule, you isolate things from the mains before messing. And a job such as changing 2 wires on a thrermostat (to fit a new one) should be safe for anyone as long as it isn't live when doing the job. Replacing a socket or light switch isn't hard either but personally I'd rather ensure it is switched of at the mains first. Can't go out and buy a gun though. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 03 Oct 05 - 04:48 PM misssed my linkk |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: Jeri Date: 03 Oct 05 - 05:28 PM I suppose levelling a thermostat or calibrating it (attached to wall, with its cover off) would put you in danger of electrocution too? That's what started all of this. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 03 Oct 05 - 05:38 PM Jeri, I have re-read and see no indication that leveling one (never seen a mercury one BTW) was being asked for, idea or country or anything. Perhaps you can find for me that in the first post. I just find someone with problems with a Honeywell. Hints? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 03 Oct 05 - 05:48 PM I do think though Jeri (poss as indicated by Richard Bridge - ie. 110 is a sort of safety voltage for site work, etc) that Americans might be generally more casual about taking covers of things than UK people. That could be a cultural one, coming from we do have that higher voltage. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: kendall Date: 03 Oct 05 - 06:46 PM Ok, time to put it to rest. I knew exactly what I was doing. ok? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 03 Oct 05 - 06:59 PM Kendall, I'm rolling on the floor laughing at that but OK, no point in keeping up an unhappy forum - I can go along with that. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: Jeri Date: 03 Oct 05 - 07:13 PM Jon, I don't think it's the voltage. I think that calibration is something that shouldn't cause you to worry about dying. And no, dianavin didn't ask how to level a thermostat, but kendall said, "And, it must be perfectly level. If it is off just a bit, it wont work." That right there should have made me think there was a leg or several being pulled. Good one, Sparky. The companies who deliver the gas have installation and repair guys. I'd ask somebody professional. Or you can invite kendall over. You know CPR? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Thermostats From: GUEST,Jon Date: 03 Oct 05 - 07:58 PM I don't think it is the voltage either jeri,, but I do think you can take the cover off a UK Honeywell stat and find 230-240 of them behind you. If such matters should not be of concern, I will apologise. |