|
Subject: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 27 Nov 07 - 01:35 PM Turns out he was back between the wall and the sofa...just like the old potato chips...a bit dusty and disheveled, but still not spoiled. So now he is definitely found, he has been recovered, no question about it whatsoever. His whereabouts are now crystal clear. His location is known. His coordinates are in the log book. He is no longer lost. This means we can put that other fecking thread to rest, okay? Thank you very much. ;-) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: jacqui.c Date: 27 Nov 07 - 01:36 PM No. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Liz the Squeak Date: 27 Nov 07 - 01:43 PM PLeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese???? Pretty please with sugar on???????? LTS |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: MMario Date: 27 Nov 07 - 01:55 PM Micca was Lost? I thought he wuz at Tinker's , then in Maine, then home?? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 27 Nov 07 - 02:13 PM Whatever. The point is, he is now found! The search has ended. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 27 Nov 07 - 02:16 PM LH: How does it come to pass, do you think, that by postulating an imaginary event you can thus decree a whole conversation of enjoyment to others be ended? If you wish no more exposure to the Miccas Lost thread, I urge you to do as I have done, and direct your attention elsewhere. To instead resort to using your energy to try and nullify the activity is quite beneath you, sirrah. A |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 27 Nov 07 - 02:25 PM Are you getting all serious on me again, Amos? If so, I must remind you that the public embarrassment...or may I even say consternation...that is being caused daily by your dogged insistence on clinging to outdated methods of dress, coiffure, dialogue, and general personal deportment is creating distress throughout the entire municipality you live in, and it is time for a change! For God's sake, get a lifestyle coach and put matters right. Heed my advice on this one. That's what friends are for...they're there to make you aware of these things when others will not. ;-) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 27 Nov 07 - 05:27 PM I hoped the little scrote would stay lost :) G |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 27 Nov 07 - 07:09 PM LH: I hadn't realized that's what friends were for, so thanks for putting me straight on that. How do you differentiate between friends, then, and the goofballs who carp and criticize in a desperate effort to gain some imaginary personal advantage? Of course, I may be asking thew wrong person. Perhaps Micca would know. Where is he, anyway? A |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: SINSULL Date: 27 Nov 07 - 08:30 PM He once was lost but now am found. Too good for the likes of you! Harumph! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: SINSULL Date: 27 Nov 07 - 08:32 PM heh heh |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Leadfingers Date: 27 Nov 07 - 08:51 PM Bloody Hell !! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 27 Nov 07 - 09:33 PM Where is he???? I told you, Amos! He's behind the damn couch! Well, at least he was there until we discovered him. He's now in the ready room being dusted off, steam-cleaned, de-loused, immunized, and debriefed. In that order. We should be able to wrap this thing up by tomorrow morning, I think, if the eyebrow repairs hold up. Seems there were some moths back there... "How do you differentiate between friends, then, and the goofballs who carp and criticize in a desperate effort to gain some imaginary personal advantage?" Huh? I don't find it hard to do that at all. Do you? Look, man, I just consult the official program, whaddya think??? It's a snap. Goofballs are on the left side of the page, friends on the right, goofballs are in paisley italicised font, friends are in rich royal blue bolded script. Geez, I think those longrunning political threads you spawned have gotten to your brain, old buddy, or you wouldn't ask me such bloody obvious questions. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: manitas_at_work Date: 28 Nov 07 - 07:55 AM I looked. He's not behind the couch. In any case, if he was behind the couch we'd be sitting with our feet in the fireplace. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: SINSULL Date: 28 Nov 07 - 09:23 AM I no longer own a couch so he's not back there. That makes no sense at all... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: MMario Date: 28 Nov 07 - 09:29 AM He's not behind my couch either - I checked behind them all. LH - are you pulling our legs? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Nov 07 - 09:52 AM Did you mean coach? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 28 Nov 07 - 10:11 AM The debriefing has been completed. The eyebrow repairs appear to be holding. All is well. ;-) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Bill D Date: 28 Nov 07 - 10:22 AM Last I heard the complaint was that he appeared from the shower sans briefs. Why would you intentionally deprive him of them? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 28 Nov 07 - 10:38 AM WHAT???? That's a pretty serious allegation, Bill! I hope you can document it exhaustively. I want a fully documented response in triplicate with every piece of evidence hotlinked to an unimpeachable source on the Internet. I want at least 800 factual words on the matter, along with stats and photos! Substantive and undeniable evidence, Bill, that's what I must have from you if I am to place any credence in anything you say from this point on!!! Where are your facts?!! Ha! You don't have any, do you? Ha! Face turning a bit red now, Bill? Ha! Got you squirming now, don't I? (Teribus and Don Firth would ask no less than this of you, right?) ;-) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Stilly River Sage Date: 28 Nov 07 - 10:54 AM Poor guy. Next they'll be sending in Shane to collect some sort of evidence. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Nov 07 - 11:07 AM Send him to the forensic laboratory to be forensiced! G |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: SINSULL Date: 28 Nov 07 - 11:51 AM That was at the Getaway years ago. He now understands the American squeamishness about naked bodies and appears "cum briefs". Now if we could only convince him to add more. A definite Brit thing - I have had a number of them wandering around in mixed company wearing only a towel. They will drop it upon request - as Jeri discovered. So...whose couch is Micca behind? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Nov 07 - 12:16 PM "cum briefs" ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 28 Nov 07 - 12:21 PM More power to them, so to speak, I say. It's not as if there's a huge mystery about what's going on behind those towels. A |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 28 Nov 07 - 12:27 PM That was an unfortunate choice of words, wasn't it? I too have been puzzled for years by the penchant of many British men for wandering casually into the den, the front hallway, the kitchen, the front sidewalk, or the local smoke shop around the corner from their residence, dressed only in a pair of tatty old briefs. They seem to feel that it's quite normal to do that if one is off work at the time and merely engaged in running a brief errand...not planning to stay long, in other words. They can't see the point of throwing a bunch of outer clothing on if one is not actually formally "visiting" someone or intending to stay for more than a minute or two, as it just uses up valuable time and energy to do so, and what would be the point of it all, really? ;-) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: MMario Date: 28 Nov 07 - 12:34 PM What else would one wear while "engaged in running a "brief" errand..." *snicker* |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 28 Nov 07 - 01:12 PM Let's be glad the wife didn't send him off to the butcher for a carnal errand! A |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: katlaughing Date: 28 Nov 07 - 01:56 PM Oh, jaysus, Amos, that's tacky..."the wife!" Perhaps he is tired of you all taking the piss... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: SINSULL Date: 28 Nov 07 - 02:04 PM "cum" is Latin for "with" |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 28 Nov 07 - 02:24 PM Excuse while I bristle for just a mo' here: /BRISTLE ON Excuse me ladies, and Micca, but the subject of the thread was "many British men", not Micca. I am no stomper of buttons, me. But generalized icons of British mankind, of course, have no buttons. I appreciate the delicate sensitivities demonstrated by the Mudcat Ladies Improvement Society, but sometimes it gets just a tad misplaced. \BRISTLE OFF ;>) Peace and goodwill to all, A |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Nov 07 - 02:39 PM Summa cum loud? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: katlaughing Date: 28 Nov 07 - 02:42 PM Perhaps, Amos, but knowing what we all do, I still contend it was a tacky thing to say. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 28 Nov 07 - 02:52 PM Contend away, lass. Contentiousness is your sovereign right and privelege. I contend that if the remark were understood, it was tacky anyway, but for the right reasons. A |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 28 Nov 07 - 03:51 PM The real measure of something's tackiness is this: do things tend to stick to it? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Liz the Squeak Date: 28 Nov 07 - 04:52 PM Personally, I find it very offensive to be referred to as 'the wife', as if I were the table, the chair, the bit of mud on the carpet... The only time I heard Manitas introduce me as 'the wife' it earned him a slap upside the head. I didn't introduce him as 'the old man' so I should be afforded the same respect. I know I refer to Limpit as 'the child' but I never introduce her that way. Besides, she likes it. She's weird. LTS |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Nov 07 - 04:56 PM You could try introducing him as your future ex-husband! G |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 28 Nov 07 - 05:03 PM Got to agree about "the wife". It's an unpleasant expression. I don't like "the old man" or "the hubby" any better. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Liz the Squeak Date: 28 Nov 07 - 05:30 PM And in this present case, it's just downright bloody tactless, insensitive and boorish... or perhaps someone should acquaint Amos with what's happened in the last 18 months? LTS |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 28 Nov 07 - 05:36 PM There ya go again, switching contexts on me. Please read the thread as written, ladies, not some other imaginary thread. If I have trod on Micca's sensibilities, I offer profound apologies, but I would prefer for him to beard me on the issue his own self. I have made it clear the context I addressed with my stupid joke, which I heartily withdraw herewith. Call off your Sisterhood, and let me move on toward Dunsinane. A |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Nov 07 - 05:55 PM Who me; Thain? What a gas. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 28 Nov 07 - 06:44 PM Sounds like Jock the Ripper, mister MacKenzie. A |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 28 Nov 07 - 07:00 PM Great line there about moving on toward Dunsinane, Amos. ;-) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 28 Nov 07 - 07:00 PM That's me Mr J. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 28 Nov 07 - 08:24 PM Germane, in case the Mudcat Ladies Improvement Association ever gets a Lear Jet... >We've all heard about people having guts or balls. But do you really >know the difference between them? In an effort to keep you informed, >the definition for each is listed below... > >GUTS - is arriving home late after a night out with the guys, being met >by your wife with a broom, and having the guts to ask: "Are you still >cleaning, or are you flying somewhere?" > >BALLS - is coming home late after a night out with the guys, smelling >of perfume and beer, lipstick on your collar, slapping your wife on the butt >and having the balls to say: "You're next." > >I hope this clears up any confusion on the definitions. > >Medically speaking, there is no difference in the outcome since both >ultimately result in death. ... Ya think? :D A (The author disavows all agreement with the tacit sentiments of above joke, the opinions of which are entirely those of the anonymous emailer who sent it me.) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 29 Nov 07 - 11:40 AM LOL! Now, THAT's tacky! Sounds like what Shane would do if he ever got married, which is not likely. He would go for number 2 (BALLS). |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: katlaughing Date: 29 Nov 07 - 11:53 AM I find both examples stupid and sexist. Be Forewarned: If you persist with such AND with the barely hidden sarcasm of "Mudcat Ladies Improvement Association" there will be no more Golden Globes for YOU! You will 86'd from the Temple. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: katlaughing Date: 29 Nov 07 - 11:57 AM **bg** |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 29 Nov 07 - 12:19 PM Oh, pull in your feathers, kat!! Sheeshe!! When I set the Temple up, I ensured that I controlled well over 55% of the voting shares; and several (if not all) of the Board Members are in my pocket. ;>) A |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 29 Nov 07 - 12:43 PM How is the Temple holding up these days anyway? Any renovations or structural supports needed? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 29 Nov 07 - 12:45 PM Sometimes global warming sounds like it might be OK. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Micca found!!!! From: Amos Date: 29 Nov 07 - 01:04 PM We find that we usually get in under the wire on issues of support, Little Hawk. A |