BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: catspaw49
Date: 22 May 10 - 05:02 AM

Hmmmmmm......Just as I suspected Don......That was a test and it shows your mirror is broken!

Spaw

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Little Hawk
Date: 22 May 10 - 12:51 PM

Poor man! If he was Canadian, he would understand millimeters and other metric units of measurement. Instead, he's been walking around for years with a grossly inflated estimate of his penile dimensions in his head, and that has no doubt led to a number of embarrassing situations.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Little Hawk
Date: 22 May 10 - 12:57 PM

Spaw, that is....not Obama. ;-D I think Obama probably does understand metric measurements.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Ebbie
Date: 22 May 10 - 02:36 PM

LH, I expect that Spaw, as a mechanic, does understand metric. I think he was questioning Don's ability. Or something. :)

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Little Hawk
Date: 22 May 10 - 02:39 PM

You may be right...

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Mrrzy
Date: 23 May 10 - 01:31 PM

I'm still giggling about fledging a whale...

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don Firth
Date: 23 May 10 - 01:58 PM

Did you hear about the guy who specialized in circumcising whales? He wrote a book about it. The opening line is,

"Call me Ishmoyel. . . ."

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: ichMael
Date: 23 May 10 - 11:29 PM

Ebbie said:

As for believing Larry Sinclair, get real. Do you really truly believe that anyone would trust or fall for that guy? To put it kindly: he is not the type who rides around in a limo. If you think he is attractive, dere is somesing rong mit you.

My response:

Homosexuality in the White House

Thanks, Ebbie.

Also, I updated the Eugenics page. The Ethanol stuff. Seems Obama wants to bump the number he kills to over a billion. What a guy. Goin' for the record:

Obama's genocide: Forced Starvation by Destroying Food -- Ethanol fuel requires 6 times the amount of energy to be produced than it actually contains. ... Malnutrition contributes to between 3.5 and 5 million annual deaths of children under 5 years of age. Meanwhile, in 2009, 107 million tons of grain were turned into fuel for American cars. This was enough to feed 330 million people for one year at average world consumption levels.

Obama wants to triple ethanol production -- "Obama noted funding for ethanol projects and research in last year's stimulus law, and also cited his interagency biofuels working group. The administration wants to see ethanol production tripled over the next 12 years..."

http://www2.moment.net/~michael/Eugenics.htm

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: mousethief
Date: 23 May 10 - 11:32 PM

Did you hear about the guy who specialized in circumcising whales? He wrote a book about it.

Moby's Dick?

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Ebbie
Date: 24 May 10 - 12:17 AM

Ichmael needs more empathy than censure, I think. A little voice tells me that he is housebound, has never held a job for longer than three days, dropped out of high school in his sophomore year "because of issues" and does not enjoy a 'normal' life expectancy. His only real pleasure is reading- but it has to be the right kind of reading because he gets bored so easily.

Sorry for outing you, Ichy.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: ichMael
Date: 24 May 10 - 12:31 AM

Don't you like being given credit for one of my pages, Ebbie? No need to lash out. But then, that's what LED to that page, isn't it? Seems you'd be mature enough not to cast aspersions on someones sexuality. You don't know me, yet you did that 1950's-60's pseudo psychological thing of questioning a man's sexuality. Was that the only way you gals could get laid back then? Pretty pathetic.

Anyway, Obama's a nancy boy, same as GW was. Now I guess I'll cobble together something about the Obama Jurgen. Obama's on track to become the king of the mass murderers with his ethanol and his support from the "green" people. You folks call me flaky but you call yourselves "green." lol Little green men. lol.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: mousethief
Date: 24 May 10 - 12:35 AM

Do you live downwind from a chemical plant, by any chance?

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Ebbie
Date: 24 May 10 - 12:46 AM

I agree that I went out of line, IchM, but I did not say a word about your sexuality.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Ebbie
Date: 24 May 10 - 01:06 AM

But if I had- doesn't it strike you odd that you make all kinds of assumptions about some one else's sexuality? Take a look in the mirror sometime.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don Firth
Date: 24 May 10 - 07:28 PM

Okay. Big secret from Michelle Obama. The reason she does get on Obama's case once in a while is that, although he was not really what could be called a heavy smoker (store-bought tobacco cigarettes, not the Mexican laughing-tobacco kind), she wanted to get him to quite smoking entirely, and thought he had. But, she says, he still sneaks a quick smoke from time to time.

Oh, horrors!!!

Source:   a television interview with Michelle and Barack Obama some time back.

####

Did you hear about the slightly dippy co-ed who thought Moby Dick was a venereal disease?

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: mousethief
Date: 24 May 10 - 08:30 PM

Co-ed? Veneral disease? Which decade are you from? :-D

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Bill D
Date: 24 May 10 - 08:43 PM

Is 'Moby Dick' worse than "Grape Nuts"?

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: ichMael
Date: 24 May 10 - 09:44 PM

Okay, I updated Homosexuality in the White House with some stuff at the bottom of the page. I hate those sites and pages that whine about problems but offer no solutions, so I decided to get pro-active. Hope you all take a moment to do as the page asks.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don Firth
Date: 24 May 10 - 10:00 PM

Yeah, mouse, I think I heard that one back in high school (late 1940s). I really should update it a bit. . . .

####

Ya know what, Michael? I don't think anyone can blackmail Obama about anything like that. First of all, it isn't true, second, even if it were true, there's no reason it should affect his ability to be a good president.

AND only terminally stupid homophobes would give a wall-eyed shit.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Little Hawk
Date: 25 May 10 - 10:32 AM

Ichmael appears to be criticizing Obama and G.W. Bush in much the same manner. Why is no one here upbraiding him for saying bad things about Bush? ;-)

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don Firth
Date: 25 May 10 - 03:37 PM

Bush was probably the biggest dork to ever hold national office (well, that can be disputed, I'm sure;   plenty of candidates for "biggest dork"), but there are no indications whatsoever (with the exception of obviously photo-shopped pictures) that Bush was (is) gay.

Michael is just playing with himself again.

####

Michael, you honk at Ebbie, saying, "Seems you'd be mature enough not to cast aspersions on someones sexuality. . . ."

Then, in the next paragraph, you say, "Anyway, Obama's a nancy boy, same as GW was."

O-o-o-o-okay. . . .

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don Firth
Date: 25 May 10 - 03:38 PM

Must hurt like hell to keep stepping on your own tongue like that.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: ichMael
Date: 25 May 10 - 10:16 PM

Yes, Little Hawk is right--I make pretty much the same observations about Bush as I do about Obama on the homosexual stuff.

But that may be about to change. It seems that Obama's about to be outed, by the national media. I've started tracking the story on a supplementary page, HERE.

In a way this is kind of a relief. I thought they might whack him for not attacking Iran, but it looks like they're just going to drag him through the muck. Hope so at least. I hope we get to see Rahm's blue dress in court.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Amos
Date: 25 May 10 - 10:28 PM

Jaysus, Ichy--are you aware that ALL you rinformation is slander by unsubstantiated, nebulous associations with absolutely no facts in them? You are so full of hot air and ungrounded conclusions and illogic it is amazing you can even keep your head on your shoulders, I swan.


A

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: ichMael
Date: 25 May 10 - 11:27 PM

CBS news ungrounded? Emanuel, naked, standing in front of a sitting man, poking him in the chest. And shaking his wang at him in the process.

This is going to be so good watching these two go down. So to speak. Hope we don't have to look at video of them literally going down on each other.

Obama and Emanuel are destroying the country. You may not care about that, but they're also destroying the Congressional Black Caucus. Your world revolves around skin color now, right? So where's the outrage?

I haven't even started on the Obama gay stuff. His boy toys...some movie actor he brought into the white house...a list of them. The gay community knows about all this. Sad part is we get Biden after the mud settles.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: mousethief
Date: 25 May 10 - 11:37 PM

What makes you think we get Biden?

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Little Hawk
Date: 26 May 10 - 12:37 AM

Well, if a president is removed from office, for whatever reason, the vice president takes his position. That's obviously what Ichmael means.

Ichmael, you indicate that you were previously concerned that Obama might get "whacked" (by the powers that be) if he didn't attack Iran? Can you elaborate on that some? I'm curious what you might have to say about it.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: mousethief
Date: 26 May 10 - 02:51 AM

Ah.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 26 May 10 - 05:11 AM

""Can you elaborate on that some? I'm curious what you might have to say about it.""

Icky Sicky doesn't have anything to say about anything LH.

He simply re-hashes the hallucinatory babblings he finds on www.loonies-R-us.nut

If he ever had an original thought or comment, it got lost in the pile of steaming BS he dribbles all over multiple internet fora.

It's no use talking sense to him. The foil cap filters it out.

Don T.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: frogprince
Date: 26 May 10 - 11:43 AM

When are we (I didn't say you) going to get it through our heads that going around endlessly with someone who has serious mental issues serves no real purpose and contributes to getting the forum cluttered with garbage.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: mousethief
Date: 26 May 10 - 12:52 PM

It's fun, in a cruel sort of way.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Amos
Date: 26 May 10 - 01:22 PM

FP:

You are quite right. Thanks for calling it.


A

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Little Hawk
Date: 26 May 10 - 08:51 PM

You wouldn't post here if there weren't something in you saying "I want to post here now", would you?

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: ichMael
Date: 26 May 10 - 09:14 PM

Yes, Biden replaces Obama after the torches and pitchforks wave farewell to Obama on his jet back to Indonesia or wherever the hell he came from.

Let's see...DonT and frogprince...I think I can dust off Argument # 3 for you two filosofers.

And Little Hawk says: Ichmael, you indicate that you were previously concerned that Obama might get "whacked" (by the powers that be) if he didn't attack Iran? Can you elaborate on that some? I'm curious what you might have to say about it.

Always the gentleman. Sure, I'll elaborate.

Iran is 98% Muslim. Obama was educated in Muslim schools. There's a chance that Islam is his religion.

An aside here--did any of you folks see Obama's "swearing in" at the inauguration? The one he "flubbed." He had his hand on Lincoln's Bible and all that...what a show. The news reported later that he was sworn in again, but without the Bible. There is NO WAY a Muslim would swear to the Christian God:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5567187.ece

Anyway, the media has given Obama an absolute free pass on everything pertinent (same way they did the annointed G.W. Bush), so we don't know squat about him. For some reason he doesn't want to attack Iran. Maybe because he's Muslim. And this refusal to attack wasn't part of the plan. He was put into office to continue the destruction of America pushed so effectively by the Bush regime, and part of that process is more Treasury-depleting warfare. Iran is next on the list.

Obama's mentor is Z. Brzezinski. He was the one who worked with the Taliban and recruited CIA operatives out of Columbia University when Obama was supposed to have been attending class there. Brzezinski groomed him and helped get him into the white house and now Obama's dragging his feet on Iran.

Brzezinski's goal is to create a crescent of wars in the mid-east. Cut China off from the mid-east oil and also block them from getting natural resources out of Africa. Once that is done, China will have to turn on Russia as the nearest source of raw resources. Brzezinski's said forever that China and Russia need to be pitted against each other in order for America to become dominant.

But thing's aren't going well for Brzezinski. Just a few days ago he whined that people were becoming too politically aware and the global elite's infighting might destroy the opportunity for global dictatorship. Or words to that effect:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=brzezinski+infighting&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

Brzezinski is worried because he's getting on in years and he wants his world dictatorship, dammit. He got highly frustrated when Jimmy Carter was in office. Brzezinski was his National Security Advisor, but Carter was hamstrung early on by the Iranian Hostage Crisis. Of course it came out later that the crisis was staged by the Iranians and the CIA (Brzezinski's bane...the hated Yale-based CIA), so he KNOWS that the Bush people are still lurking, waiting for another chance to do another hamstringing. He wants Obama to attack Iran NOW.

But Mr. Bath-house Obama has other things on his mind, plus he's a Muslim, or is he? What a freakin soap opera.

Anyway, I thought that Brzezinski might kill Obama if he didn't do what he was appointed to do, so this bath house thing looks like good news for Mr. O. Maybe they're just going to trash him, rather than kill him.

But I could be wrong. Brzezinski isn't the only player in the game. There's Bill Ayers with his burning desire to start a race war in America, and he's been hobnobbing with the Brown Berets lately. Ayer's BEST chance of starting a race war would be to whack Obama and blame it on the KKK. The compassionate liberals would come clattering out of the woodwork screaming about redneck nation and all that paranoid crap to help round up...well, whoever the enemy of the moment is.

Obama's bright, but he doesn't seem to know how much trouble he's in. Damned if he does attack Iran (damned for eternity), and damned if he doesn't (bullet or bath house exposure).

Or so it seems. Maybe Obama's been dragging his feet because he's been afraid of having the gay thing exposed. Maybe Brzezinski himself is outing Obama so that everyone can get on with the matter at hand--WW3 leading to a global dictatorship.

Who knows? Brzezinski's sure getting pissy, though, and that's not a good sign.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: mousethief
Date: 26 May 10 - 09:38 PM

Somebody read that and recap it for me, wouldja?

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don Firth
Date: 26 May 10 - 09:44 PM

Sorry, Amos. I gave it a quick glance, but playing in the septic tank is not my thing.

I do know that we have one sick puppy there. Nothing really worth reading.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don Firth
Date: 26 May 10 - 11:10 PM

Sorry, mouse! Reading too fast. I thought that was from Amos.

Actually, though, there's nothing really wrong with ichMael.

Except, of course, for the botched lobotomy. . . .

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: mousethief
Date: 26 May 10 - 11:12 PM

I once had a lobe
Or should I say
It once had me?

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Little Hawk
Date: 26 May 10 - 11:19 PM

Hmmmm. Okay....you raise a whole bunch of interesting possibilities there, Ichmael.

Where do I start? ;-)

Personally, I really don't care whether or not Obama was educated in some Muslim schools in his youth, and I don't care whether or not he is a Muslim either.

But most Americans care intensely, don't they?!!

And I don't care whether or not he's secretly bisexual. (he has produced 2 daughters, so he obviously must be at least partly heterosexual...but perhaps he is also interested in men? If he is....I simply don't care.)

But most Americans care intensely, don't they?!!!

And I don't even care if he wasn't born in the USA. I simply don't give a damn. Hell, it might even help him be a more responsible politician if he'd been born somewhere else, because he'd have a more international perspective, and that would be good.

Bust most American's care intensely about it, don't they?!!! And it's unconstitutional (like a lot of other stuff that gets done all the time in the USA).

I find it funny...and sad...that people attach so much importance to such trivial stuff as whether Obama might be Muslim (I know all kinds of wonderful and reliable people who are Muslim), whether he might've been born in Africa (so what?), whether he might be half-gay, etc.....

Yadda, yadda, yadda. Theatre of the absurd if you ask me. I wouldn't care about any of this stupid stuff in regards to a Canadian politician either. What I do care about, though, is: what are his actual policies and intentions and how is he carrying them out while in office?

Your comments about Obama and his foot-dragging on launching a war against Iran are very interesting, though. I think you might be right about some of that, and about the forces in America who are thirsting for a war with Iran ASAP. Yes, Obama may be interfering with their plans, and if he is, I think they will find a way to destroy his presidency...any way that's feasible. There are several different ways to do it, some more ruthless than others. The easiest way would be by scandal of some sort.

You said "For some reason he doesn't want to attack Iran."

Well, yeah!!! What sane and responsible person would want to attack Iran? That's the first question I would ask. ;-) I regard Iran as the next most likely victim of a series of imperial wars of outright aggression launched by America and the UK and their proxy, Israel, and yes, those wars are precisely for the purposes you suggested:

"to create a crescent of wars in the mid-east. Cut China off from the mid-east oil and also block them from getting natural resources out of Africa. Once that is done, China will have to turn on Russia as the nearest source of raw resources. Brzezinski's said forever that China and Russia need to be pitted against each other in order for America to become dominant."

Bingo.   That pretty well has to be the main Anglo-American plan in the present Great Game that is being waged in the world. In that game countries like Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon, the Koreas...they're just minor pieces that get beaten up and gobbled up by the big players while the big players jockey for strategic position. Excuses are found to gobble them.

Obama doesn't need to be a secret Muslim to want to prevent a war with Iran. He just needs to be a reasonably rational, sane, and moral human being to want to prevent that.

But if he is trying to prevent it, he will be in very great danger, in my opinion, because the people who want to pursue that policy will seek the destruction of his presidency.

I think they picked him because:

1. they felt he was quite electable, and would appeal very powerfully to many people's hopes for change.
2. they felt he was controllable once elected.

If he proves not to be so controllable, well, then the shit will hit the fan...and Obama's presidency will suffer accordingly.


*****

No one else here is likely to talk with you seriously, Ichmael, because they're already having WAY too much fun just throwing verbal stones and ridicule at the village heretic. Every village needs one, right? You get to occupy that role here for a bit, and don't think it isn't enjoyed hugely by those who gather daily in response to your presence. You satisfy a powerful emotional need in certain people.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: mousethief
Date: 26 May 10 - 11:54 PM

Village heretic? or village idiot?

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Little Hawk
Date: 27 May 10 - 12:05 AM

Yeah, I could have said that too, mousethief. Either expression will serve in this case: village heretic or village idiot.

Look, it works this way in the medieval village. Most of the "respectable" citizens are gossipy and competitive by nature, capable of being quite mean given a good excuse, and nothing really makes them (subliminally) happier than the presence of an utterly despised individual in their midst, someone at whom to toss their garbage without experiencing guilt, someone whom even the little children can torture and harass, someone who can hopefully be eventually dragged like Quasimodo into the central square, there to be hectored, laughed at, abused, and picked upon by the most sadistically passive-aggressive people in the community as well as the superficially righteous. It's good clean fun for the decent folks! ;-D A crowd is guaranteed to gather and much spectacle is guaranteed to unfold. Every village needs its idiot, its Quasimodo...a truly symbiotic relationship.

And it can only be better if the village's Quasimodo will not crawl quietly off to lick his wounds, but will return again and again to take on the respectable mob and fight back, as it were, providing them with yet more opportunities to righteously attack him. Anthony Quinn gets to play the part of the idiot if it's made into a movie.

Villages love that sort of thing. It helps compensate for a lot of other frustrating stuff in life that isn't nearly so easy to define or to formulate a satisfying response to.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: mousethief
Date: 27 May 10 - 12:09 AM

Smug aren't you?

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Ebbie
Date: 27 May 10 - 12:17 AM

For some reason, LH, I suspect you did not listen to Brezinski's speech. The speech, incidentally, was cut to get as close as they can to saying the things they say he said.

He did not.

I think that sometimes you go just about as far off the beam as the various village phenomena.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: ichMael
Date: 27 May 10 - 12:35 AM

Problem here with the village idiot analogy is that THIS idiot is putting the village on display. The pages I upload are all linked to an index that mentions mudcat.org. No telling how much more traffic this place gets now because of those pages. Haven't checked in a while, but type in 'The Mudcat Pages' on google. I bet it's up pretty high.

And that means a LOT of people will click on the "Spaw" link by the butt-crack smiley and read the truth about Spaw's beloved Morris Dees. I've been looking for a way for YEARS to get word out about the Dees operation, and there it is.

So have your fun, folks, it's just grist for the mill. I expect my Eugenics page will become a standard reference after I've added fifty or so links. Nestle foods drying up breast milk in third world countries, Baxter shipping 72 kilos of live avian flu throughout Europe, Obama murdering 330 million people with his 2009 ethanol program.

Laugh away. I ought to put a "comments" section on The Mudcat Pages so you can see what others have to say, but I don't have the heart.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Little Hawk
Date: 27 May 10 - 12:41 AM

I'm observing the usual human behaviour in any small village, and commenting on it, mousethief. No, I'm not smug necessarily, but I'm philosophical about the common foibles of man when he gathers in groups. I've seen this kind of thing happening ever since I was in first grade.

The village idiot may indeed be a genuine idiot. Or he may just be unusual in some way. Or both. Nevertheless, the dynamic that typically ensues confers little glory on any of the participants.

Ebbie - I don't really know all that much about Mr Brezinski and I did not listen to his speech, no...but I do think that there are major imperial plans behind American and British foreign policy, and that among those plans are plans to eventually have a war with Iran and to conquer and occupy Iran. Heck, it's plainly obvious that such plans have been in the works for years now. As always, though, the general public has to be prepared for that somehow so that a modicum of popular support can be raised for it, specially in the USA. There has to be one hell of a lot of scare-mongering done first, lots of false rumours and unanswerable accusations, and possibly a false flag attack or two of some kind...or perhaps the Iranians can be conveniently maneuvered into commiting some rash act which will serve just as well to seal their fate. All those kinds of things have worked in the past to get the public onside for a foreign war, so they will also work in the future.

There's nothing the least bit unusual about any of this. Competing empires have been doing this sort of thing all through history in order to get what they want...and what do they want? They want control of strategic resources and they want military/political/financial supremacy in their chosen spheres of influence, that's what. If they're really megalomaniacal, then they see their sphere of influence as encompassing the entire world (as they know it). The Romans saw it that way. The Greeks did too (for awhile). The Germans under Hitler did. Stalin did. The USA and the UK do also. They will do whatever they want to to achieve those ends.

Obama is merely temporary in that picture, as are ALL presidents of the USA. He's an interesting case, a very bright man, and I wonder to what extent he will cooperate with the imperial agenda, and to what extent he will not.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don Firth
Date: 27 May 10 - 01:08 AM

Thanks for setting us all straight once again, O Great Lama.

Doesn't it get lonely all alone up there on that mountaintop?

Dante.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: akenaton
Date: 27 May 10 - 02:47 AM

You folks need LH more than you need the the Dem Party or Mr Obama.

Do you never look at yourselves in the mirror that he often provides?

Little Hawk gives you the opportunity to develop depth and a degree of understanding of yourselves, yet all you can do is sneer from beneath your stones.
Well said Hawk.....rationality for ever!

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 27 May 10 - 05:51 AM

""someone at whom to toss their garbage without experiencing guilt,""

Reality check LH.

Who is tossing garbage here?

I think you'll find the biggest pile has Icky sitting on top.

Don T.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: GUEST,TIA
Date: 27 May 10 - 08:23 AM

How did that earth-shattering trial work out?
I thought Obama was supposed to be completelye exposed by now.
Heads of state were going to testify in Harlem.
As suggested, I was holding my breath.
I suppose I can breath now.

Subject: RE: BS: Eugenics -- evidence all around you
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 27 May 10 - 10:31 AM

""No, I'm not smug necessarily, but I'm philosophical about the common foibles of man when he gathers in groups. I've seen this kind of thing happening ever since I was in first grade.""

So tell us LH, as a self confessed outsider, what do you really think of the human race, and have you any aspirations to come down off that pedestal and join it?

Don T.