 sj |
||
|
||
Any old ex-hacks out there?
|
|
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: olddude Date: 11 Sep 08 - 06:34 PM I got paid 10 dollars for an article once does that count. Wow I am right up there with the great ones. Such exciting works as "the implementation of cyclic redundancy checking in the C Language" or Brents Method a Recursive Example in Ada" or my best seller "Semantic Database Management Systems" buried in journals no one alive would ever read. Nope never got paid for such masterpieces only 10 dollars for writing about a local fair. A friend of mine told me they were not bad but his wife was bothered because she had to keep pulling the gun barrel out of his mouth as he struggled through any of them. :-) |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Peter K (Fionn) Date: 11 Sep 08 - 06:04 PM Hi Dan Mitchell! Sorry for the delay in responding. I was celebrating my 60th birthday in Republika Srpska the day you posted, and have only seen your message now. I'll send you a personal message - and don't worry, your dad's account with me was all square! |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: dick greenhaus Date: 20 Jul 08 - 05:42 PM A hack is, properly speaking, a writer who can produce usable copy on any subject he or she is asked for. See also "professional" |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Stringsinger Date: 20 Jul 08 - 01:25 PM As I understand it, one person's "hack" is another's "pundit" or "guru". Hacking out a living is an American dream. You have to hack it out because you are not going to be given it on its merits. Most writers for newspapers are there because their bosses are breathing over their shoulders and telling them what to write. This would include TV pundits on all the major networks and most of the American newspapers today including the New York Times. There are a few intelligent beings who are writing journalism today and making sense and a living but you can count them on your fingers. Journalism is a corrupted form of expression in the US today. Don't believe me? Ask Bill Moyers who knows something about it. Ask Amy Goodman or Olbermann (sometimes). The reason there are ex-hacks is that truth in journalism is not encouraged today. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Stilly River Sage Date: 19 Jul 08 - 07:37 PM Interesting that Mitchell would find this thread via Google. Too bad he mucked up a bunch of teribus stuff at the same time. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: dick greenhaus Date: 19 Jul 08 - 06:55 PM Well, I spent a whole lot of years in the ink-stained wretching business--mostly magazines, with a few books thrown in. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,Dan Mitchell Date: 19 Jul 08 - 05:22 PM Peter K (Fionn) Referring to your post of 24 Jan 01 - "did you ever meet an old hack called Les Mitchell? The Three Horseshoes was his local, I think" I'm his son. Stumbled across this while googling. Did he owe you a pint? |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Teribus Date: 23 May 08 - 01:01 AM Thanks for that Gervase, and you are correct in that my opinion of the "Press" in general is coloured by my experience of them at first hand. I would now not knowingly ever talk to reporter about anything other that the weather at that particular time irrespective of whatever circumstance or situation we both found ourselves in. "I can understand why Teribus, as a squaddie,....." - Peter K (Fionn) So I was a "squaddie", was I, Peter? After what has been stated in the following posts, for you to come out with that at 09:36 AM, 22 May 08, serves as an excellent indicator of how much your finger is on the pulse - hope you pay better attention to detail in your "reporting": Gervase - 19 May 08 - 03:48 AM Teribus - 20 May 08 - 09:56 AM Teribus - 20 May 08 - 03:35 PM |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Gervase Date: 22 May 08 - 05:05 PM Apologies, Teribus, for the personal remark - but I'm afraid I took your blanket attack on journalists personally. You accused me of being craven and dishonest, and I reacted. I'm sorry that you have clearly had some personal issues with the media which have coloured your outlook. I believe you are completely wrong, however - but that is unlikely to have the slightest effect. Some journalists are held in high regard by the services - take a look on ARRSE and see the massed ranks of the Audrey Gillan fan club - and she a Guardian hack at that! "Hack", by the way, means any journalist; be it the gentleman from the broadsheet or the keen young thing from the Bogshire Bugle. Not Navy, by the way - have only been on ships as cargo, and as a wardroom guest (where I was drunk under the table and through the keel by your brethren!). Though, for sheer tastelessness and amoral depravity, I'm afraid the Army probably has the Navy beaten. Even the Marines would blench at some of the grot-games that while away a dull hour in the bar. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Peter K (Fionn) Date: 22 May 08 - 09:36 AM Hard to explain then why the Daily Mail was cleared of acting in contempt of court and why its action was subsequently credited with being instrumental in instigating the McPherson inquiry. Still, I can understand why Teribus, as a squaddie, you would prefer that our establishment institutions be left free from scrutiny. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Teribus Date: 20 May 08 - 06:05 PM But Peter K, having named them it meant that it was that much more difficult to bring them to book should further, more compelling evidence turned up, as any subsequent trial would have been compromised. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Peter K (Fionn) Date: 20 May 08 - 03:36 PM Oh, just a little detail Teribus, but the Daily Mail named Stephen Lawrence's killers only after the CPS decided, on the evidence of a racist and incompetent police inquiry (not my words), that they should not face a trial. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Teribus Date: 20 May 08 - 03:35 PM "There again I do not for one second think that you do believe that everyone who served in the Royal Navy is, or was, a sordid, amoral pygmy and a drunken disgrace to his country." - Teribus Now what was that again Peter K (Fionn): "He took the hypothesis at face value and assumed it to be Gervase's solemnly held conviction." - Peter K (Fionn) "I do not for one second think that you do believe.." = "He..assumed it to be Gervase's solemnly held conviction." Only a Squaddies brain eh? Fionn, seems to be a bit sharper on the uptake than the one you are, or more likely the one you are not using at the moment. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Peter K (Fionn) Date: 20 May 08 - 03:25 PM Alas poor Teribus, in possession of a brain fit only for soldiering, which he then fills with the voluminous output of four daily newspapers (all of them broadsheets, he proudly boasts). If he has time to wade through all that entertainment/lifestyle tonnage, generated purely and simply as wrapping for the adverts (and to judge from the sheer ennui of his penultimate post, he clearly has), he would do better to read the Economist from cover to cover each week. Its editorial line is far removed from my own political agenda but it is well written and packed with solid information, usually unspun. But perhaps a bit much for Teribus to absorb, on reflection. To illustrate the absurdity of Teribus's generalisations, Gervase postulated a similarly absurd generalisation about the navy. Unfortunately this was a bit too complicated for Teribus, who has only a squaddie's brain at his disposal. He took the hypothesis at face value and assumed it to be Gervase's solemnly held conviction. What schadenfreude to see Teribus wasting a good hour or two of his time rebutting an argument that was never made! |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Big Al Whittle Date: 20 May 08 - 01:04 PM well true enuff! some of the good stuff was a while back. still you could say the same about folk music, and Bob Dylan, and he's professonal. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Teribus Date: 20 May 08 - 11:43 AM "Some journalists do a bit better than their job." - WLD's examples 1. Ed Murrow (Radio Reporter)telling America about the London Blitz. 2. That guy who repoted the famine in Ethiopia (Michael Buerk - BBC Television Reporter - 1984) , and inspired Live Aid (Bob Geldof - 1985). 3. Brian Hanrahan (Television - 1982) in The Falklands. 4. Richard Dimbleby's (BBC Radio War Correspondent - 1945) report entering Belsen concentration camp. Example 1 - WLD has to go back nearly 70 years for this example - Ed Murrow had been reporting affairs in Europe for America since 1938 and had seen the threat and the evil posed by Nazi-Germany up close. FDR relied more on what he got by way of information and "feel for the situation" from Ed Murrow and Harry Hopkins than he did from US Ambassador Joe Kennedy. Murrow knew that the UK had to be kept in the war and reported accordingly. A "black-and-white" situation, very hard to do wrong in such a situation - Joe Kennedy suceeded in doing just that - advising Roosevelt, "England's finished" Example 2 - 24 years ago - Well reported cry for help - nearer to today who has bothered for Darfur? Who has bothered backing up the only Head of State to describe it as it is - Genocide - George W. Bush President of The United States of America. Example 3 - 26 years ago - Reported factually as directed by the RN. At the same time his colleagues in the UK Press alerted the Argentinians that they had fused their bombs incorrectly. Example 4 - 63 years ago - Again factual reporting of a complete and utter horror story. Two radio correspondents, two television reporters - No "hacks" no journalists. All from over a quarter of a century ago. That's encouraging. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Big Al Whittle Date: 20 May 08 - 10:13 AM Some journalists do a bit better than their job. Ed Murrow telling America about the London Blitz. That guy who repoted the famine in Ethiopia , and inspired Live Aid. Brian Hanrahan in The Falklands. Richard Dimbleby's report entering Belsen concentration camp. You can sneer and downgrade everything in life. But I think such people, and folks even doing humbler tasks are worthy of the title professional. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Teribus Date: 20 May 08 - 09:56 AM "I've always seen journalism as a trade - like carpentry, plastering or joinery. It's certainly not a profession in that there is no self-regulation." – Gervase Completely agree with that. "To tar every member of that trade with the same brush shows an extraordinary display of myopia, ignorance and plain pigheadedness." – Gervase Here we part company. Considering the amount of damage that "opinionated" and sometimes completely misinformed and sensationalized articles written by some Journalists can do, and have done, to people, lends me towards my opinion that Journalists, Radio & TV Reporters (The Mass Media) should ALL be treated with the highest degree of distrust and suspicion. Question for all – something inaccurate, or downright untrue, is sensationally blasted across the front page of some rag with a circulation of millions. It is pointed out to that rag or to the "Press Council" that the story is untrue and without foundation – Where does the "Rag" print the apology/retraction? Front Page? Given equal prominence? Don't be shy, Gervase tell us, but I suspect most readers who are familiar with the Press in the UK already know exactly what happens. "It's like me saying that everyone who has ever served in the Royal Navy is a sordid, amoral pygmy and a drunken disgrace to his country after witnessing matelots on the lash." – Gervase Let's see "a bit of an old hack for 20 years", puts us back to 1988. Ex-RN so for the period could possibly have served either 4, 6, 9, 12 or 22 years, if options were exercised, or were you D-by-P? Difference here Gervase is that you did actually serve, therefore you should be aware of exactly what happens when "matelots" go on the "lash". Another 'catter, Shanghaiceltic will know the "animals bar" up at HMS Neptune, he would also be able to tell you exactly what its function is. Historically the "Royal Navy" has always had a bit of an easy time as far as public approbation goes. The "British Army" on the other hand has not, and reasons for that are simple. One is the sovereign's and historically safeguarded the trade of the country, the other was raised by Parliament to keep the country in order (English Civil War). Historically, "Jack" when he came ashore en-mass brought with him lots of money, more important, he was more than willing to spend it, for which he was universally loved by Publicans and regarded as an amusing entertainment by the general population. If trouble broke out it was normally an "inter-mess-sort-out" Jack fighting Jack, very rarely did it involve the locals that was true in Nelson's time as it was during my time in the RN, which coincidentally would have been around about the same time as yourself Gervase. The Army on the other hand was universally disliked because they were forcibly "quartered" on generally unwilling civilians when out of their own garrisons, they had very little, or no money, they were drunk whenever possible and violence spread in all directions more often than not with robbery as a motive. While the Army got drunk in the public eye – brutal and licentious soldiery – Jack drank a hell of a lot more, just look up what his daily ration was, but he did the bulk of his drinking out of sight of the public and under the constraints of the Naval Discipline Act. So, having served in the RN, if you wish to consider yourself – how did you put it? – "a sordid, amoral pygmy and a drunken disgrace to his country" – that would be entirely up to you, you know best. I obviously saw the men I served with in a much more favourable light – Hurricane relief in the West Indies, Cyclone disaster humanitarian assistance in Bangladesh in 1970 (Far worse than the current disaster in Burma). There again I do not for one second think that you do believe that everyone who served in the Royal Navy is, or was, a sordid, amoral pygmy and a drunken disgrace to his country – that you only came out with to have a personal "pop" at me. Which, in a way, illustrates my point with regard to "Journalists" perfectly. To have a go at me you blithely cast aspersions on those you served with – some of them must have been your friends Gervase – but that didn't rate as a consideration when you went into print, did it Gervase? Just to fill you in a bit with regard to suppositions Gervase: "I can only assume that the poster makes a point never to read newspapers, magazines or periodicals, and turns off the television and radio whenever anything that might loosely be construed as news or current affairs is broadcast for fear of tarnishing his simple sword of truth and trusty shield of British fair play." • I read, and I mean read, four "National" Newspapers everyday all broadsheets. • I read three local Newspapers every week. • News via TV I get and watch daily from local and National Broadcasters plus BBC; CNN and Al-Jazeera. Do I believe what they tell me all the time? – No I most certainly do not. Now for the Ad-Hominem part of your post: "As for asking a pompous, self-important arse like that to apologise - a complete waste of time." I can safely say Gervase that anyone who contributes to a thread in which one group of people get together to collectively clap themselves on the back and tell everybody what a great bunch they are has got no business telling anyone else about being pompous and your own feelings of self-importance require serious attention. "In my own experience, journalism is a broad church, and those who distort, twist and dissemble rarely prosper." – Gervase. Really – how well did Piers Morgan do with his book? – care to relate the "story" that brought him to notoriety, while at the same time put the lives of British servicemen at risk? I note that he wasn't among your list of examples Gervase. "Your ordinary reporter is merely that - someone paid to be the eyes and ears of the public and to interpret the events of the world for the viewer, listener or reader." – Gervase. Would that he was old chap, but those days have long since gone and the "world and his dog", including both you and I know it. Having long since ceased to being the eyes and ears of the world, 'the meedjah', as you refer to them are now more, and more increasingly becoming just "the mouth". I am pleased to hear that you agree with my opinion that "there are editors and proprietors on whom I wouldn't waste my piss if they were blazing." Except I go that little bit further to include the authors of the pieces that those editors and proprietors print. If there is "editorial" or "proprietorial" influence the "journalist", if he had any integrity, would withdraw the article. This by the bye, I thought was priceless: "In the UK you have the BBC which, though many knee-jerk rightwingers would argue otherwise, is a model of dispassionate, objective reporting, and the broadsheets, which offer a depth of coverage - particularly foreign - that puts most US papers to shame." Let's see Gervase was that the BBC that during the initial bombing campaign in March 2003 reported a stray cruise missile strike on a Baghdad Maternity Hospital in the early hours one morning. Four bulletins later their own reporter in Baghdad came on the TV and from the scene reported: • That No Maternity Hospital had been hit • That a missile had landed in an area near a Maternity Clinic • That there were NO casualties as the missile landed at around 3.30 in the morning and the Clinic was closed and the market area desserted. • Said reporter showed the hole made by the missile plus some fragments Subsequent BBC Reports on this incident throughout the remainder of the day Gervase said what? American Cruise Missile Hits Baghdad Maternity Hospital – Now what was that you said again? "the BBC ………. a model of dispassionate, objective reporting". The BBC, hmmm, the same BBC who has been dispassionately and objectively reporting all those phantom Taleban "Spring" and "Summer" Offensives in Afghanistan, that have never materialised. The same BBC, who find it impossible to say the word Taleban without stating the adjective "resurgent" before it. The same BBC who continuously reports on the increasing number of deaths in Afghanistan but omits, in the cause of objectivity, to report that most of those deaths are insurgents (Hint 2007, Deaths 4000 of which three quarters were Taleban, of the 1000 civilians killed, around 900 were Afghanis killed by the Taleban). The same BBC of Dykes and Gilligan that got slated in the Inquiry into the Death of David Kelly? The Inquiry that found the BBC to be far from impartial or objective, so much so that both Gilligan and Dykes found themselves out the door. "Much though it galls me to mention, it was the Daily Mail that first named the killers of Stephen Lawrence." – Gervase. And in doing so compromised subsequent legal proceedings IIRC. Interesting to get your take on the current treatment of Sarah Ferguson's daughter Beatrice by 'the meejah', Gervase? My take on it - absolutely despicable – now where is the condemnation from "The Press"? There won't be any will there Gervase? This sort of subjective personal attack made on someone who 'the meedjah' knows can't fight back sells Newspapers doesn't it Gervase? And THAT Gervase is the TRADE that you and your fellow hacks are in – "eyes and ears of the world" – my arse. PS: Don't stand near open fires or any other naked flames. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Gervase Date: 19 May 08 - 06:29 PM Mainstream US, UK, French, Australian or what? Generally, when I look around, I'm impressed by the diversity of the mainstream media. In the UK you have the BBC which, though many knee-jerk rightwingers would argue otherwise, is a model of dispassionate, objective reporting, and the broadsheets, which offer a depth of coverage - particularly foreign - that puts most US papers to shame. The Telegraph may be a 'Tory' paper, but its op-ed pages are distinctly anti-Cameron, while the Guardian may be a peacenik leftie rag, but the squaddies posting on the Army Rumour Service consistently rate the paper's Audrey Gillan as the most Army-friendly reporter on Fleet Street and Max Hastings has a weekly slot on the op-ed pages. And, before anyone counters, there is the Daily Express, but that hasn't been a real newspaper since it was bought by a sleazy pornographer. And the other tabloids? Yes, they have agendas, but it would be a dim person indeed who looked to them for a general world view. And even in that blinkered world view can lie some important truths. Much though it galls me to mention, it was the Daily Mail that first named the killers of Stephen Lawrence. But, sure, 'the meejah' is an easy target. No-one's going to shout you down if you blame society's ills on the journalists. It's an easy and cheap point - blame the media and win a teddy-bear. Just remember, though, who it was that uncovered the corruption and turpitude of Aitken, Archer, Levy and their ilk. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,Fantasma Date: 19 May 08 - 04:47 PM Look around at the mainstream media today, Gervase. And there, I'll rest my case. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: open mike Date: 19 May 08 - 04:41 PM http://www.cambridgema.gov/License/faq.html#Hackney |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Gervase Date: 19 May 08 - 03:48 AM I've always seen journalism as a trade - like carpentry, plastering or joinery. It's certainly not a profession in that there is no self-regulation. To tar every member of that trade with the same brush shows an extraordinary display of myopia, ignorance and plain pigheadedness. It's like me saying that everyone who has ever served in the Royal Navy is a sordid, amoral pygmy and a drunken disgrace to his country after witnessing matelots on the lash. I can only assume, given the splenetic eruption above, that the poster makes a point never to read newspapers, magazines or periodicals, and turns off the television and radio whenever anything that might loosely be construed as news or current affairs is broadcast for fear of tarnishing his simple sword of truth and trusty shield of British fair play. As for asking a pompous, self-important arse like that to apologise - a complete waste of time. In my own experience, journalism is a broad church, and those who distort, twist and dissemble rarely prosper. Your ordinary reporter is merely that - someone paid to be the eyes and ears of the public and to interpret the events of the world for the viewer, listener or reader. That said, there are editors and proprietors on whom I wouldn't waste my piss if they were blazing. Just as it's said that there are no bad troops, merely bad officers, so one could argue that there are no bad (staff) journalists, just bad editors. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Teribus Date: 19 May 08 - 01:07 AM No WLD all those you mention were doing their jobs. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Big Al Whittle Date: 18 May 08 - 05:46 PM Yeh and when Veronica Guerin was killed - she was killed for acting in a professional capacity. When Woodward and bernstein made America face up to facts that they had a crook for president - they were acting as professionals. we could do with a few more like them. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,Fantasma Date: 18 May 08 - 04:27 PM Oh sorry, I meant to include soldiers in my list. No one feeds off human misery more than they. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,Fantasma Date: 18 May 08 - 04:26 PM One of my dearest writer friends has a saying I wholeheartedly agree with: "journalists don't have friends, they have contacts". Rather explains it all right there as far as I'm concerned. Ditto the clergy, lawyers, and politicians. Of course there are always exceptions to the rule. But that just proves the rule. No problem in my world painting entire "professions" (or job classifications, if you prefer) as loathsome, particularly when it is their mission to feed off misery for personal gain. That is pretty much the job description for clergy, lawyers, politicians, and yes, journalists. I find it nearly impossible that I am in agreement with Teribus. But there you have it. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Teribus Date: 18 May 08 - 02:15 PM "The doctors who preside at executions are in a profession. The lawyers who spent years keeping Robert Maxwell away from his comeuppance were in a profession." - WLD Were those doctors in attendance at those executions there in their professional capacity? Yes they were. Was the presence of a qualified medical practioner required by law? Yes it was. Were those lawyers engaged to provide a defence for their client? Yes they were. Were those lawyers bound to provide the best possible defence for their client? Yes they were. Your comparison is rather badly skewed, both groups you come out with were practicing their professions as required by law. Writing is not a "profession", it may be honourable. However we are not talking about writers in this thread we are talking about Journalists - different kettle of fish entirely. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Big Al Whittle Date: 18 May 08 - 01:44 PM The doctors who preside at executions are in a profession. The lawyers who spent years keeping Robert Maxwell away from his comeuppance were in a profession. You cannot judge whether some is to be accorded professional status by what the shadier characters get up to. Writing is an honourable profession. I wish I were skilled enough to do it. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: pdq Date: 18 May 08 - 12:53 PM "I spent those few hack years trying to swim upstream against the steady flow of garbage that local politicians and self-proclaimed "experts" on this and that were dishing out" If that included time in LA in the last 30 years or so, may I say "I feel your pain". |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Teribus Date: 18 May 08 - 12:13 PM I have not the slightest intention of apologising Chicken Charlie. By the bye, Medicine is a "profession", the Law is a "profession" - as far as I am aware Journalism is a job Now until such time as your "profession" starts to police itself and roots out those who deliberately misrepresent every single member of that "profession" can and should be tarred with the same brush. If it is your job to report on something then restrict yourself to doing just that. Report factually, fairly and impartially we do not need your comments, we do not need your opinions. Example - Piers Morgan - complete and utter moral amputee |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,Chicken Charlie Date: 17 May 08 - 07:22 PM There is probably no point objecting, dear Teribus, that you not only never read anything I wrote, but you never knew the circumstances behind it. Far from having what I wrote dictated to me, I spent those few hack years trying to swim upstream against the steady flow of garbage that local politicians and self-proclaimed "experts" on this and that were dishing out. It is not ever justified for anyone to condemn an entire profession on the basis of some of its members. It is within the bounds of Mudcatness, unfortunately, but not of polite or rational behavior. You owe all of us an apology. Chicken Charlie |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: akenaton Date: 17 May 08 - 04:09 AM Well Teribus there are journalists and journalists. Pilger, Simon Jenkins, Parris are heros....most of the others are vermin. I think at last we may have some "common ground"...Ake |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Matt_R Date: 17 May 08 - 01:04 AM I'm a newspaper copy editor/page designer. Never did any reporter, just a plain old desk hack. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Ebbie Date: 16 May 08 - 03:41 PM Every one of them? |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Teribus Date: 16 May 08 - 03:43 AM Eh No Ebbie, neither but I do, however, know "Journalists" at first hand. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,.gargoyle Date: 16 May 08 - 12:55 AM Holy Molly!!
I PROMISE to try my best, to do my duty, to not venture (for six weeks) "Below the Line."
There are true daemons (and I thought I was the best) down here. Mr. Duhgil is one thing...jOhn is another... but I have met my match with "Teribus." Reminds me of my conversations with Mr. Lewis regarding The Screwtape Letters....did I invite you here Mr. Teribus ?:?:? I feel a kindred spirit.
Sincerely, |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,.gargoyle Date: 16 May 08 - 12:44 AM Well done Teribus !!!!
RE: Journalists - one step slightly above child-molesters.
No problem with that positioning slightly above:
If there is a spill to make a thrill - a debauchery to make a mockery - a liar's song to pluck like a lyre...
The "Fifth Estate" is waiting... lean, hungry and mean... in the wings....waiting to feed upon the incorruptable Host.
Sincerely, |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Stilly River Sage Date: 16 May 08 - 12:09 AM You collectively have done more harm to western civilisation than Hitler, all in the name of the God of circulation. . . Utterly contemptible the lot of you. Thank god the fair and balanced voice of teribus is there to set the world straight. NOT. SRS |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Ebbie Date: 16 May 08 - 12:02 AM I gather from your post, T, that you are familiar with the brothel? I didn't know you play piano. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Teribus Date: 15 May 08 - 08:35 PM Well chaps just to piss a little on your parade "Any old ex-hacks out there?" Journalists - one step slightly above child-molesters Politically motivated shysters who had their stories dictated to them and written before you even left the office. I wouldn't even piss on you if you were on fire. You collectively have done more harm to western civilisation than Hitler, all in the name of the God of circulation. Many threads in this Forum attribute "spin" to politicians that in all honesty belongs fair and square at the door of the "popular press" or its cousin "Main Stream Media" - the name Ober-something-or-other springs to mind. Rather than patting each other on the back the lot of you need horse-whipping. Take a bloody good look at this country (The UK) this is where you and you alone have brought us. Utterly contemptible the lot of you. Best let on to family and friends that instead of being an "old ex-hack" you tell them that you were all piano players in a brothel - far more honourable profession IMHO. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Cool Beans Date: 15 May 08 - 06:42 PM It's seven years since my original post to this thread and I am proud to say I am now an ex-hack, having taken a buyout last November. I am now teaching at a university, training a new generation of future ex-hacks. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,.gargoyle Date: 15 May 08 - 05:52 PM WELCOME StangleChorder
Nice to see you the floor.
Newspaper Editor's Prayer
I pray, thee, God,
Or may there transpire some big new step towards greater global malice
Or may some admiral or general
Give us, I pray thee,
And then happily
Burke, Kenneth Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method, PARTII, Chapter Two - "The Thinking of the Body (Comments on the Imagery of Catharsis in Literature)," University of California Press, Berkeley, 1966, p 330-331.
Kenneth Burke (famous for "The Burkian Pentad" of rhetoricial analysis )
Sincerely, |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,Chicken Charlie Date: 14 May 08 - 08:07 PM Hello, Chordstrangler-- I wrote a local history column for an LA Times subsidiary for about three years before the bean-counters in Chicago closed the whole operation down. I am not conscious of that having any effect on my prose style. When I went to work, I said, "What do you want, style wise?" They said, "Read Fidleydee; we like her." Three years passed. I never read any of Fidleydee's stuff. As John Pryne once wrote, "Disgusted, Disgusted, you have no complaint; You are what you are, and you ain't what you ain't." As for an effect on writing music, well, I wrote a song once. Check that off. I'm happy to re-work traditional stuff, and actually I figure the odds are on my side. Singer-songwriters can knock themselves out for years and never get a real winner. I play stuff that's been around for a century and a half, I figure it must have something going for it or it wouldn't have lasted, and pretty much, the audience proves me right. The only effect I can readily see in myself is to become rabidly, excitably, lividly outraged at the MANY distortions of history laid upon us by newspapers and politicians. I'm trying to engage a local editor right now over a matter of historical accuracy. I say trying, because the paper isn't dialoging with me at this point; I believe they are hoping I will just go away. Marx was wrong about a lot of stuff; he was right on with, "History is a pack of tricks we play on the dead." Chicken Charlie |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,Guest Gweltas1 Date: 14 May 08 - 12:36 AM Colin, I have copied your "Bylines" article and emailed it to Mickey MacConnell some hours ago and I have also responded to your article on your website. I will e-mail you Mickey's current e-mail address, if you wish to contact him. Best regards, Anne (Gweltas1) |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Colin Randall Date: 14 May 08 - 12:30 AM I have just re-read the thread and realised that I half outed Chordstrangler, author of the original song called Boys of the Byline Brigade, since nowhere else among these old messages was he identified. But there's no secret - Chordstrangler is, as Gervase (also up there somewhere) says at my site, Mickey MacConnell. I do not know how good a journalist Mickey was, but he's a mightily good songwriter. Tinkerman's Daughter, Only Our Rivers Run Free........Gervase would add Peter Pan and Me, which I have never heard So thanks to Gervase for alerting me to this, albeit seven years late, (and also for his beautifully written summing up of the highs and lows of daily journalism, and the life beyond it that I, too, hope to sample again) And finally, another singer, Anne Truscott Kennedy, has popped up at Salut! Live (link in previous message) to tell us that Mickey is still making great music over in Kerry. She has also added some YouTube links to Mickey live. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: GUEST,Colin Randall Date: 13 May 08 - 01:44 PM I love the way ancient Mudcat threads sometimes spring back into life. Mickey's excellent words quoted above - I have never heard them sung -are not the only ones to bear the same song title. My friend Geoff Lakeman, another newsman as well as being dad of the assorted Lakeman brothers, father-in-law of Cara Dillon etc etc, wrote one too. I have traced the background to this in an article at at Salut! Live but would be grateful if anyone could convey the link to Mickey, who I have so far been unable to contact. in an article at |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Peter K (Fionn) Date: 24 Jan 01 - 07:02 AM Kevin, just a long shot, but if you really aare of Harlow, did you ever meet an old hack called Les Mitchell? The Three Horseshoes was his local, I think. |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: wysiwyg Date: 23 Jan 01 - 03:46 PM CS-- Oh, THAT goddess is always flipping. She's just really bouncy, is all. Toujours Gae. Pull down the Quicklinks menu at the top of the page to find Aine's Mudcat Songbook. (Don't forget to come back out of there and talk with us once in awhile!) There will be some clues there on how to submit entries. She also keeps an eye on the threads, often, and finds posted songs like yours to invite into the songbook. Amos isn't at Mudcat as much as he used to be, so I will take this opportunity to speak about him behind his back. I don't know how he was christened Five Minutes Flat, but he is a really gifted songwriter and a few of his pieces are actually pretty good (just kidding, Big Guy!). A CD he made at home was played on one of the Mudcat radio episodes, I think in February of 2000. Why do you need to know this? Because if you will see the quality of his work, you will get embarrassingly puffed up about the fact that he complimented you. He's awful good. To have gotten his accolade... well it was a big one. Not that he ain't generous with them when due. He is. But what I am TRYING to say is that if I got a note from him like you did, I'd be doing a LOT MORE songwriting, and I hope you will. Your piece was THAT GOOD. Enjoy the songbook! ~Susan PS-- Also BOLO for Aine's "Song Challenge!" threads. Since they are based on funny news stories, they all start from hacks!!! LOL!!! ~LOL |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: chordstrangler Date: 23 Jan 01 - 03:15 PM Amos, as a newcomer to the Cat I'm unsure about the rituals involved in getting it to the Goddess.. Is this wise ? Does it require ritual purification or a deep knowledge of the blue clickey things ? Also, is it wise to be responsible either morally or ethically for a Flippin' Goddess? I was once mildly flipant to what I took to be a minor Goddess and lived to rue the day. Please advise? |
|
Subject: RE: Any old ex-hacks out there? From: Pinetop Slim Date: 23 Jan 01 - 10:22 AM Count me as an unreconstructed hack, in news business since 1967. |
| Share Thread: |
