Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: GUEST,Joe_F Date: 17 Jul 06 - 08:56 PM If wishes were horses, there would be an easy explanation for all this horseshit. However,-- Inasmuch as this forum has sucked all the juice out of rec.music.folk, I wish I could read & write to it the way I can to a newsgroup, that is, I wish it had a tree structure with postings attached to other postings and not just mixed in in chronological (or, in many old threads, random) order. Also, perhaps even less reasonably, I wish it would support w3m better. --- Joe Fineman joe_f@verizon.net ||: "There's a hint of fall in the air." "Don't talk with your mouth full." :|| |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Divis Sweeney Date: 17 Jul 06 - 08:11 PM Just thinking if we excluded guest from the forum, what would the member who supports his own thread do ? Or lacks the balls to put his name to his posts then do ? |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: SharonA Date: 17 Jul 06 - 02:10 PM I wish I may, I wish I might... ...be able to select the "trace a thread" link from within the thread, without having to close it and trace it via the Forum page. --------------------------------------------- But if I could wish BIG, I'd wish for a simplified, more concise, more comprehensive FAQ, so we don't have to have those little sidebar discussions (on music threads) with newer members about how to do this-or-that on Mudcat. For example, recently katlaughing and I answered Azizi's question about linking to specific Mudcat posts... on the Songs & Rhymes That Mention Snakes thread. Now, granted, we could have told her to go post her question ON the FAQ, but could the next person with that question find it in the FAQ? I didn't even bother to look to see if the answer was in there already, because the FAQ is so cumbersome to deal with. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Keith A of Hertford Date: 17 Jul 06 - 04:42 AM No need to exclude Guests from the music section, It is in the BS dept. that GUEST regularly abuses the hopitality of his host. It would serve him fairly if he was excluded. The level of debate could only improve. My wish. Keith. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Rapparee Date: 16 Jul 06 - 05:59 PM I wish I had a pony. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: gnu Date: 16 Jul 06 - 03:09 PM From kendall's origianl post in this thread : "If you could make one thing the rule here, what would you change?" Read the first post!!! |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Mooh Date: 16 Jul 06 - 03:00 PM I agree, the actual subject in the title line, and no guests. No dogs allowed either, like on the beaches around here. Peace, Mooh. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: John Hardly Date: 16 Jul 06 - 08:59 AM I wish that the name of the starter of a thread appeared with the title of the thread on the opening page. Also, similarly, that the name of the last poster appeared with the thread title on the opening page. As one whose posts are not often read or responded to, I understand that this would further limit my participation here. But the turnabout would be worth it -- not having to open threads to find out, yet again, that they are started or perpetuated by folks whose opinions I have heard enough of (and already know what they think -- which is very little). |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Divis Sweeney Date: 16 Jul 06 - 07:29 AM Members only, simple as that. No guest postings at all under any guest name and the profile/members page there to let you know who your talking to. It's a waste of time, sent details TWICE two months ago, never appeared. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 16 Jul 06 - 04:35 AM I wish those who post links to video, sound clips, Flash animation etc. would plainly indicate as much by saying something like VIDEO HERE instead of CLICK HERE. That way, those of us with slow dialup connections who don't want to wait fifteen minutes while a ten-second video clip downloads won't waste our time opening the link. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: ragdall Date: 16 Jul 06 - 01:00 AM BS section for registered members only, with a 3 day wait, after registering, before accepting the first post. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: GUEST,harpgirl Date: 16 Jul 06 - 12:35 AM I want to meet gargoyle.... |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Bert Date: 16 Jul 06 - 12:31 AM Mine's the same as Freda's. I'd like to meet ALL of you. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Mooh Date: 15 Jul 06 - 01:46 PM Rosie The Wonder Dog insists that you, "[lkkkkkm". Cosmo The Other Dog adds that "b b b b vxc nnnnnnnnnnn bv bn hggftrv" would be helpful. As for me, when I grow up I want to be a firetruck! Peace, Mooh. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Donuel Date: 15 Jul 06 - 01:16 PM To master the bass ukelele. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Little Hawk Date: 15 Jul 06 - 01:13 PM My wish is for Clinton Hammond to get married to Britney Spears so she can make his life a living hell. ;-) If not her, then Paris Hilton. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Amos Date: 15 Jul 06 - 01:08 PM Shambles, I think you might enjoy a vacation like the one shown here and it might brighten your outlook. A |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: freda underhill Date: 14 Jul 06 - 10:42 AM I would like to be able to meet more Mudcatters and hear their music live! |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: The Shambles Date: 14 Jul 06 - 10:10 AM My first one came true.......... |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: kendall Date: 14 Jul 06 - 07:38 AM I believe I asked for ONE wish. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: The Shambles Date: 14 Jul 06 - 05:27 AM Not to have any more threads closed. Mudcat's stated goals |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: rock chick Date: 13 Jul 06 - 06:57 PM To have that one wish come true rc x |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Donuel Date: 13 Jul 06 - 06:27 PM here? or there? We are the collective, the greatest here by far but if I had but one one wish here twould be to visit every star who shared their illuminated life right here. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: GUEST,Dani Date: 13 Jul 06 - 05:35 PM I'm with Liz. I wish you all lived in a much closer ; ) Also, I do wish there was a way to keep all the more stupid and foolish BS away, or at least to have it limited to members willing to stand by their foolishness. Dani (exceeding the wish limit MANY times over) |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Rman Date: 13 Jul 06 - 10:48 AM I wish you could stop Timmy (next doors tomcat) from eating Rosie's (my dog) food! bloomin Ceasar an' all that- costs a fortune blah moan blather!!!! 8o) |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Dave the Gnome Date: 13 Jul 06 - 10:41 AM Gosh, I never know that... :D (tG) |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Amos Date: 13 Jul 06 - 10:20 AM IT's not "Mud" plus "Cats", Dave. It's "the" "Mudcat"...which refers to the Mississippi delta regional catfish seen on the forum page, leaping from a banjo in the best Dadaesque tradition. A |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Dave the Gnome Date: 13 Jul 06 - 09:25 AM More mud and more cats. Or is that 2 wishes? There are none at all as far as I can see. False advertising is what I calls it... :D (tG) |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: GUEST,Russ Date: 13 Jul 06 - 08:38 AM I wish that mudcat won't change. I like it just as it is, warts and all. Russ (eternal GUEST) Is it time for another guest-bashing? |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: jacqui.c Date: 13 Jul 06 - 07:18 AM I would like to see mare from Sir jOhn. Nice to see you here mate! |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: GUEST,jOhn Date: 13 Jul 06 - 06:13 AM I wish The Shambels would stop waffling on about the same old shite, mudcat nearly 10 years old, i think most days shambles been moaning. a real nutcase. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: The Shambles Date: 13 Jul 06 - 05:49 AM Can you not see that we are all judgemental? Yourself included? Too much to ask huh? We may all indeed be judgemental but as long as an unknown number of posters (an some anonymously) can IMPOSE their judgement on the contributions of others - we are no longer posting on an equal basis are we? Too much to ask huh? |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: catspaw49 Date: 13 Jul 06 - 04:23 AM "That all posters could once again return to posting on a equal basis and some were not now able - or feel themselves to be qualified - to moan about, judge and impose their personal tastes upon the invited contributions of their fellow posters (and for some to do this anonymously)." Yes Roger, anonymously or otherwise, I too wish YOU were not now able - or feel yourself to be qualified - to moan about, judge and impose your personal tastes upon the invited contributions of your fellow posters. Can you not see that we are all judgemental? Yourself included? Too much to ask huh? Spaw |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: GUEST Date: 13 Jul 06 - 03:00 AM If wishes were fishes. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: The Shambles Date: 13 Jul 06 - 02:55 AM That all posters could once again return to posting on a equal basis and some were not now able - or feel themselves to be qualified - to moan about, judge and impose their personal tastes upon the invited contributions of their fellow posters (and for some to do this anonymously). |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Alba Date: 12 Jul 06 - 09:04 PM Good one PDQ that is a wish that may come true. Hold that thought. Now if only I had thought of that wish first! Good Wishes Folks. Not too sure about the Wackipedia thingy. After all the idea is to improve the DT! sorry Joe...:) My Wish. That every single Mudcatter who is fighting an illness makes a full recovery SOON! Love and Light to all, Jude |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: pdq Date: 12 Jul 06 - 08:33 PM I think we should have more criticism of George W. Bush. Afterall, we have a guy in the Whitehouse with an "R" after his name. He must have a "D". We can't allow this to happen! Yep, here on Mudcat, seldom a word against Bush is spoken. You guys are slackers. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: GUEST,Jon Date: 12 Jul 06 - 08:31 PM Definatly the dt. It's had known problems, the biggest of which I've felt for years (that artist's whose work has been "nicked" complete with errors and without attribution and then get's told to wait) is really the hight of arrogance as an attitude (even though I know most would change the situation) and contempt for an artist. But don't get me wrong, I like the dt, wish it well etc. and hope suggestions I amongs others at least this time round are seen as constructive and for benefit of dt and Mc. Just hope one day, MC will actually do something. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Bobert Date: 12 Jul 06 - 08:22 PM Hey, I've had my share of troubles with various GUEST's but, hey, I like and respect the idea of having GUEST's, however... ... I'd like to see GUEST's stuck with one handle... It's kind tough arguin' with GUEST,X who can come back as GUEST,Y and GUEST,Z all with in 5 minutes that makes it look as if one GUEST is 3 different people... Then it becomes a numbers game... GUEST,X says, "Bobert's wrong..." then GUEST,Y says, "Bobert's wrong..." then GUEST,Z say, "Bobert's wrong..." Problem is that if all three of these GUEST's are one person then it looks as if 3 people think "Bobert's wrong" when in fact, only one person thinks "Bobert's wrong"... This puts the registered and somewhat transparent member at a distinct disadvantage... Like, can't isp's be used to find where varuios single GUEST's post as mutiple GUEST's to end this??? That's my wish... Bobert |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: number 6 Date: 12 Jul 06 - 08:18 PM It would be good to see a lot more younger Mudcatters showing up here ... bringing with them new music, ideas. sIx |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Amos Date: 12 Jul 06 - 08:11 PM Actually I changed my mind. I'd like Rick Fielding back, please.... A |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Georgiansilver Date: 12 Jul 06 - 07:49 PM Even if each ones wish were granted for change...there would still be the moaners and groaners, they would find something or someone else to moan about. So I suggest we just get on with enjoying the bits of the Cat we like.... Best wishes, Mike. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: katlaughing Date: 12 Jul 06 - 07:48 PM Please NO, Joe! Nothing LIKE Wikipedia, please! The misinformation THERE is nothing to be envied or modelled HERE! Other than that, I totally agree with Kendall. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Bill D Date: 12 Jul 06 - 07:33 PM "I agree with guest." ....yet you...oh, never mind. Maybe I agree with Joe, that a MudWiki would be the most useful....but I assumed 'here' meant the forum... |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: GUEST Date: 12 Jul 06 - 07:07 PM I agree with guest. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: JenEllen Date: 12 Jul 06 - 06:59 PM Not specifically Mudcat, but just a general wish for more hours in the day so I could get out and 'Cat like I used ta... It's not so bad to wade through the venom when you have time to flip people the mental middle finger, but when you are rushed for time, it seems like a big waste. More time, and lots of it. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: GUEST Date: 12 Jul 06 - 06:55 PM I agree with Kendall. No guest posing to the BS section. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Amos Date: 12 Jul 06 - 06:53 PM I'd like to see some slight moderation in the BS section, such that venom, hatred, snide sniping and nounless negativity would just be bounced. Ain't gonna happen, because it would be labor-intensive, but it's a wish. I'd also like to see completely pointless and dullwitted threads be disallowed -- I mean things like "Guess What I am Thinking" and twsiting thread names to make meaningless idele fluff. Not _good_ BS. ;>) A |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Liz the Squeak Date: 12 Jul 06 - 06:49 PM I'd just wish you were all in my front room, or in my street, or in my local pub... it would be a lot more fun! LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Sorcha Date: 12 Jul 06 - 06:43 PM That too, Joe |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Joe Offer Date: 12 Jul 06 - 06:03 PM I'd like to see a way to make immediate changes to the Digital Tradition - a moderated Wikipedia, perhaps. Something that would allow changes to be submitted easily, but not to be included permanently in the Digital Tradition until accepted by an editor. -Joe- |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: rock chick Date: 12 Jul 06 - 05:31 PM I wish the cat would not go down so often and just when i want to log in always Grrrrr |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Sorcha Date: 12 Jul 06 - 05:10 PM I'm with Ken Doll on this. But I have more wishes too. Please, sor, could I have some more? |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: GUEST Date: 12 Jul 06 - 04:56 PM i wish the bs section was members only too. and i wish the moderators would take onboard the suggestion rather than acting like distant gods. i'm aware of the irony of posting as a guest. but hey, with a members section, you'd discourage idiots like me?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: dwditty Date: 12 Jul 06 - 04:52 PM I'm fine the way it is...hair and all. |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: number 6 Date: 12 Jul 06 - 04:39 PM My wish is ... well why waste it here ... the Mudcat is the Mudcat ... everyone has voiced there opinions (or wishes) so much regarding these issues in the past ... it only ignites the worst out of some people making it rather nasty for the rest of us. sIx |
Subject: RE: BS: If you had one wish here From: Bill D Date: 12 Jul 06 - 04:38 PM Well, I'd at least require a name to be entered....I don't like conversing with 27 folks all named 'guest'. (I have seen forums where you get a pop-up warning if you try to post with no name) ....but I have 6-7 other wishes too. Hey, maybe I'll log off and enter them under different 'guest' names...*grin* |
Subject: BS: If you had one wish here From: kendall Date: 12 Jul 06 - 04:29 PM If you could make one thing the rule here, what would you change? Mu own choice, Make the BS section for members only. |