Subject: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: GUEST,Skipy Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:00 PM How much longer can we keep this crap up? Skipy |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Lox Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:02 PM and another thing |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: John MacKenzie Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:02 PM Have you tried a laxative? G. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Lox Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:05 PM and furthermore |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Bill D Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:05 PM We can't keep it down, we HAVE to keep it up! |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Lox Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:14 PM I would categorically and explicitly like to make it absolutely clear |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: GUEST,FFGA Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:17 PM Perhaps... |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Lox Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:22 PM ... in no uncertain terms ... |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: John MacKenzie Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:22 PM But then again? |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Lox Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:28 PM and again! |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Bill D Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:29 PM to summarize.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Lox Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:30 PM or winterize ... |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Cluin Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:30 PM In winter, my eyes get cold. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Lox Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:36 PM That is a beautiful poem. I'm touched. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Bill D Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:44 PM ...or maybe 'tetched' |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Cluin Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:49 PM In summer, some are too hot. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Lox Date: 12 Dec 06 - 06:51 PM No ... bzzzt ... I'm just ... wibble ... touched ... ='p |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Big Mick Date: 13 Dec 06 - 12:02 AM et cetera, and so on, for..... |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: John MacKenzie Date: 13 Dec 06 - 04:11 AM What it's worth |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: skipy Date: 13 Dec 06 - 04:28 AM not a lot! Skipy |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: GUEST Date: 13 Dec 06 - 07:03 AM its not fare, joe is picking on me, this is our forum, blar, blar, blar.blar, blar ,blar etrc etc etc. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Cluin Date: 13 Dec 06 - 06:07 PM Hi jOhn! |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: catspaw49 Date: 13 Dec 06 - 06:50 PM I feel this thread needs a taste of Shamby-Pamby without the actual thing itself. So....in case you missed it.....Straight from the twisted mind of Bill D.: "But Shambles...don't you realize that posting reasoned responses to your recapitulative exhortations requires us not only to consider the contextual parameters of the indicated isssue, but also to analyze the temporal framework of the argument so as not to introduce irrelevant personal judgements which have already been judged by the majority of the respondents to not focus on the current situational aspects of all the NON-judgemental impositions which may have been earlier, or at least in different threads, already rendered valueless in the minds of those whose concerns regress to the former devalued impositions of judgement by not only anonymous volunteers, but also, rightfully, by other members (who, posting under their own names, might also BE one of the judgemental volunteers) who decide not to enter the debate without knowing whether the subject at hand has, in fact, been imposed, whether in the thread title or merely during non-judgemental editing which I am led to understand that you also disapprove of in most cases where previous permission has not been sought(from the original poster (or originator of the thread) prior to the perviously mentioned discussion, which, by virtue of its temporal priority, ought to supercede ANY subsequent discussion of judgements, whether anonymously imposed or merely parenthetically referred to , either by you, as 'chief inquisitor' of the investigation, or by newer members of the forum, many of whom have not had the experience of BEING improperly edited or their words censored, and thus who might, perhaps, be reluctant to join the majority whose previous experience has been inevitably affected by repetitious reduncancy relating to the incessant verbosity inundating the very foundations of the entire issues of whether, in consideration of the best interests of our forum, the anonymity of the volunteers (most of whom did not actually volunteer, but were, I am given to understand, recruited,)should be compromised due to the unmitigated Gall of one dissatisfied member who evidently has little other hobbies than to compose interminable and self-referential posts which intrinsically relate to one individual concept of discussion and the overriding value system thought to be, by our moderators, not essential to the more central core of the entire point of having an open forum where dissimilar viewpoints could BE discussed without being left vulnerable to extraneous digressions about imposition of personal taste by those who have no interest in the inveterate balderdash which usually accompanies such digressions and causes many entirely incomprehensible paragraphs to be perpetrated on an umwilling readership anyway? Wouldn't you agree?" Ain't that great? Spaw |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: jacqui.c Date: 14 Dec 06 - 08:02 AM BillD for president!!!!!!! |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: The Shambles Date: 14 Dec 06 - 11:51 AM Would we tell the difference? For it already looks as he is the one who writes all the current President's speeches and statements. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Bill D Date: 14 Dec 06 - 12:13 PM awww, don't be silly...Bush can't deal with a sentence longer than 7-8 words, and avoids words longer than 2 syllables. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Peace Date: 14 Dec 06 - 01:47 PM Sorry Bill, but I have become used to the writings of George W Bush and you have ceased to make sense. Learn from the following site, Bill, and I will vote for you. Real speeches. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Bill D Date: 14 Dec 06 - 04:59 PM Can't be Bush's system...it doesn't include "cut & run" or "stay the course"...but, as I said, it DOES use very few 3 syllable words! |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Peace Date: 14 Dec 06 - 05:11 PM LOL |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Little Hawk Date: 14 Dec 06 - 05:30 PM Hitler "stayed the course". He never allowed any of his troops to "cut and run"...and that is how he stupidly lost entire armies at places like Stalingrad, Tunisia, Normandy, East Prussia, etc... It's one of the best ways to court absolute disaster when you've made intially poor or unrealistic military decisions. Bush obviously does not grasp that simple truth. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Cluin Date: 19 Dec 06 - 06:57 AM And he still says "nucular" after all these years. Stupidly stubborn. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Lox Date: 19 Dec 06 - 09:25 AM nucul head! |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Little Hawk Date: 19 Dec 06 - 01:16 PM He's afraid that if he pronounced "nuclear" properly he'd lose the support of most of his constituency. It is my experience that very few Americans can pronounce the word "nuclear" properly...specially those who like it when the USA goes abroad and "kicks ass" in some small foreign country. Just as an aside, there are very few who can pronounce "February" properly too. I wonder how Mr Bush says it? |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Bill D Date: 19 Dec 06 - 01:28 PM "It is my experience..." How large is this database, Little Hawk? I know many who pronounce it just fine!....and why single out Americans? Do most Canadians say it better? (yeah, I'm still poking at attempts to generalize over a population of 300,000,000) |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: bobad Date: 19 Dec 06 - 01:33 PM "Do most Canadians say it better?" That's unclear. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Cluin Date: 19 Dec 06 - 03:29 PM I've heard a lot of Canadians pronounce it "nucular" as well. No country has a monopoly on ignorance. But the President of the United States HAS to have advisors who can point out his ongoing mistake, doesn't he? So he's obviously pronouncing it wrongly (and it IS wrong) on purpose. And that is stupid and stubborn. Just the qualities you want in a world leader. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: number 6 Date: 19 Dec 06 - 03:52 PM Does anyone really give a rat's ass on how to pronounce nukekleer. biLL |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Cluin Date: 19 Dec 06 - 03:55 PM Rat's Asses... the gift-of-choice for the discerning shopper this season. Get `em while their hot! |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: number 6 Date: 19 Dec 06 - 03:58 PM Rat's Asses .. I got mine .... didja get yours? Rat's Asses and they're red hot, yes she got em for sale. Rat's Asses and they're red hot, yes she got em for sale. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Cluin Date: 19 Dec 06 - 04:06 PM Rat's Asses... they go with everything. In six designer colours and twelve different poses. Collect the whole set. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Ebbie Date: 19 Dec 06 - 05:17 PM Thanks for the link, Peace. I wrote a very good speech for the president. Got lots of applause. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Little Hawk Date: 19 Dec 06 - 05:22 PM I have never been given a rat's ass by anyone. Not even once. This compells me to again ask the eternal question: Who gives a rat's ass? Bill, there are many, many Canadians who mispronounce both "nuclear" and "February"! It's a tragic situation. I blame it on American TV. ;-) |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: number 6 Date: 19 Dec 06 - 05:34 PM It is most tragic LH ... that's why I now have a Chinese TV. Now Feberwary, Febyouwary, ... that's a damned difficult word for anyone one from anywhere to pronounce. biLL |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Little Hawk Date: 19 Dec 06 - 06:52 PM You can master it, 6. Just do this... Say "Feb"...pause very briefly...then say..."Roo-ary". Child's play, really. Now imagine William Shatner doing it: "I intend...to take up this......matter in....FEB!.....ruary. Mr Scott, give us Warp 9!" |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Lox Date: 19 Dec 06 - 06:58 PM "Now imagine William Shatner doing it:" Ugh... |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Little Hawk Date: 19 Dec 06 - 07:25 PM Now think about your favorite kind of sexual situation, and imagine William Shatner doing THAT! |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: GUEST Date: 19 Dec 06 - 07:33 PM Shatner in PVC just don't do it for me. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: GUEST Date: 19 Dec 06 - 07:35 PM Shit it's all gone quiet. He is in the loft squuezing into the combats. He's going to regroup folks. Duck. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: GUEST Date: 19 Dec 06 - 07:36 PM Shucks dontcha just hate it when you post a thread directed at muckster in the wrong thread. |
Subject: RE: BS: Closed threads & deleted posts (936) From: Little Hawk Date: 19 Dec 06 - 08:36 PM How about Shatner, breathless and slightly disheveled, in a torn harvest gold T-shirt? That schtick used to work great on the old show... |