Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Sort Descending - Printer Friendly - Home


BS: David Ray Griffin's 9/11 debunking book

Related threads:
Sept 11, 2001 - 10 yr anniversary thread (39)
BS: Remember 9/11 (123)
BS: Building What? 9/11 (68)
BS: Firefighters for 9/11 Truth: Press Conference (311)
BS: Did We Imagine 9/11??? (128)
BS: An Investent And Momento Of 9/11, Not! (12)
BS: The Legacy of 9/11 (25)
BS: Michael Moore - 9/11 could be inside job (715)
BS: Kerry acknowledges WTC7 demolition (167)
BS: 9/11 Solved-Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Confessed (121)
BS: 9/11 eyewitness in WTC sub-basement (23)
BS: Five years after 9/11 (88)
WTC survivor - virus (Hoax) (2)
BS: Did the FBI bomb the WTC in '93? (111) (closed)
BS: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories (24) (closed)
BS: why did the wtc fall down (62) (closed)
BS: Were the 9/11 Hijackers Gay? (161) (closed)
BS: Great Collection of 9/11 Related Stuff (2) (closed)
BS: WTC Attackers: An Alternative View (14) (closed)
Is this the WTC? (19)


GUEST,transient 11 May 07 - 07:00 PM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:





Subject: BS: David Ray Griffin's 9/11 debunking book
From: GUEST,transient
Date: 11 May 07 - 07:00 PM

Supporters of the US government's conspiracy theory about the events of September 11 have been pointing to an article which appeared in Popular Mechanics magazine. Most people have known all along this so-called "scientific" "debunking" piece is itself bunk, but now philosopher and theologian David Ray Griffin has written a book debunking the Popular Mechanics piece, the NIST report on 9/11, and a couple of other phony government pieces.

In an interview with Griffin I heard on the radio, he said the question he's usually asked first about 9/11 is "How could a government do that to its own citizens?" He said he responds by talking about the actions of the Environmental Protection Agency after 9/11. They declared Manhattan's air "safe," and as a result, 40,000 people who helped with the clean-up will die from asbestos and chemical poisoning. So, if a government would misuse its agencies to issue deadly reassurances that will cause 40,000 deaths, why would it not carry out an event that would result in 3,000 deaths?

A link to an article about the EPA and the White House is below:

EPA Misled Public on 9/11 Pollution

NEW YORK -- In the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the World Trade Center, the White House instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to give the public misleading information, telling New Yorkers it was safe to breathe when reliable information on air quality was not available....

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0823-03.htm

A description of Griffin's book and some reviews can be found at:

http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Mechanics-Defenders-Conspiracy/dp/156656686X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-5749621-0549756?ie=UTF8&s=bo

A good overview site about David Ray Griffin's work on 9/11 can be found at:

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050504davidraygriffin


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 17 May 2:04 AM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.